-
Disability and Rehabilitation Sep 2022Urinary incontinence is one of the most clinically relevant side effects in the treatment of prostate cancer patients. The aim of this systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Supervised pelvic floor muscle exercise is more effective than unsupervised pelvic floor muscle exercise at improving urinary incontinence in prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Urinary incontinence is one of the most clinically relevant side effects in the treatment of prostate cancer patients. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the specific exercise effects of supervised versus unsupervised pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) and exercise volume on urinary incontinence status after radical prostatectomy.
METHODS
A systematic data search was performed for studies published from January 2000 to December 2020 using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, SciSearch, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Database of Abstracts of Reviews and Effects. The review was undertaken according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A random-effects meta-analysis of urinary incontinence remission was performed. The relation between time since surgery and urinary incontinence remission was analyzed using a non-linear dose-response meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 20 randomized controlled trials involving 2188 men ( = 1105 in intervention groups; = 1083 in control groups). PFME versus no PFME had a beneficial effect on urinary incontinence remission at 3 months, 3-6 months, and more than 6 months post-surgery, with risk differences ranging from 12 to 25%. These effects were particularly evident for higher volume, supervised PFME in the first 6 months post-surgery. Additional biofeedback therapy appeared to be beneficial but only during the first 3 months post-surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
There is good evidence that the supervised PFME causes a decrease in short-term urinary incontinence rates. Unsupervised PFME has similar effects as no PFME in postoperative urinary incontinence. PFME programs should be implemented as an early rehabilitative measure to improve postoperative short-term urinary incontinence in patients with prostate cancer.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONProstate cancer, surgery, and urinary incontinenceThe surgical treatment of prostate cancer often leads to urinary incontinence.Pelvic floor training leads to a significant improvement of this situation.Exercise therapy support is very important in this context and is even more effective than unsupported training.
Topics: Exercise Therapy; Humans; Male; Pelvic Floor; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Incontinence
PubMed: 34550846
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1937717 -
Annals of Internal Medicine Aug 2021Use of robot-assisted surgery has increased dramatically since its advent in the 1980s, and nearly all surgical subspecialties have adopted it. However, whether it has...
BACKGROUND
Use of robot-assisted surgery has increased dramatically since its advent in the 1980s, and nearly all surgical subspecialties have adopted it. However, whether it has advantages compared with laparoscopy or open surgery is unknown.
PURPOSE
To assess the quality of evidence and outcomes of robot-assisted surgery compared with laparoscopy and open surgery in adults.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to April 2021.
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized controlled trials that compared robot-assisted abdominopelvic surgery with laparoscopy, open surgery, or both.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two reviewers independently extracted study data and risk of bias.
DATA SYNTHESIS
A total of 50 studies with 4898 patients were included. Of the 39 studies that reported incidence of Clavien-Dindo complications, 4 (10%) showed fewer complications with robot-assisted surgery. The majority of studies showed no difference in intraoperative complications, conversion rates, and long-term outcomes. Overall, robot-assisted surgery had longer operative duration than laparoscopy, but no obvious difference was seen versus open surgery.
LIMITATIONS
Heterogeneity was present among and within the included surgical subspecialties, which precluded meta-analysis. Several trials may not have been powered to assess relevant differences in outcomes.
CONCLUSION
There is currently no clear advantage with existing robotic platforms, which are costly and increase operative duration. With refinement, competition, and cost reduction, future versions have the potential to improve clinical outcomes without the existing disadvantages.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
None. (PROSPERO: CRD42020182027).
Topics: Abdomen; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Pelvis; Postoperative Complications; Robotic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 34181448
DOI: 10.7326/M20-7006 -
International Journal of Sports Medicine Jun 2023Urinary incontinence (UI) in female athletes can impair their quality-of-life (QoL) and reduce their participation in sports. This review aims to evaluate the effect of...
Urinary incontinence (UI) in female athletes can impair their quality-of-life (QoL) and reduce their participation in sports. This review aims to evaluate the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in treating UI in women participating in high-impact sports. Furthermore, to assess the influence of PFMT on pelvic floor muscles (PFM) function and the UI impact on their QoL. For this purpose, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs was performed. An electronic search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, SciELO, and Scopus. The quality of evidence was assessed using the PEDro and ROBINS-I scales. The Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) was used to assess the quality of PFMT protocols. All studies were available in full-text including incontinent female participants who are practitioners of high-impact sports, investigating PFMT vs control groups(inactive) or undergoing other treatments. Three RCTs and two non-RCTs (104 participants) were analyzed. PFMT provided a significant improvement in UI symptoms with a reduction in the frequency (n=3) and the amount of UI (n=5). PFM function was assessed in three studies, and two found improvement in maximal contraction and one in vaginal resting pressure in favor of PFMT. None of the two studies that assessed QoL found a difference after PFMT intervention.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pelvic Floor; Exercise Therapy; Urinary Incontinence; Sports; Exercise; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Incontinence, Stress
PubMed: 36075371
DOI: 10.1055/a-1939-4798 -
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics &... Nov 2019There are a weakness and laxity in pubourethral and external urethral ligaments during postpartum which has an important role in the females' sexual function and quality... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
There are a weakness and laxity in pubourethral and external urethral ligaments during postpartum which has an important role in the females' sexual function and quality of life. Some evidences showed that pelvic floor muscle training can strength pelvic muscles and prevent sexual dysfunction. Therefore, current study aimed to review the effect of pelvic floor exercise on female sexual function and quality of life in the postpartum period. PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, Scopus, Google scholar citations, Persian databases including SID and Iran Medex were searched using MeSH-based keywords to find published articles. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies in Persian and English were included. Data extracted was done in pre-defined checklist by two independent researchers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-Analysis of the data was carried out by "Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2" (CAM). The search resulted in 347 titles and abstracts, which were narrowed down to 12 potentially eligible articles. Pooled standardized differences in means (SMD) of sexual function in both pelvic floor exercise and control group were 0.462 [0.117 to 0.806], p = 0.009. The pooled SMD was 1.294 [0.926 to 1.663], p < 0001 for sexual quality of life. The pooled SMD was 0.232 [0.038-0.426], p = 0.019 for general quality of life. Evidences showed that pelvic floor muscle training in primi or multi-parous women can boost sexual function and quality of life in postpartum. Although the majority of studies and the result of meta-analysis reported positive results, more high-quality RCTs are needed in this area. One limitation of our study is significant heterogeneity because of different intervention method.
Topics: Exercise Therapy; Female; Humans; Pelvic Floor; Postpartum Period; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Quality of Life
PubMed: 31759521
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.09.003 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2020Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem in women. About 40% of women will experience prolapse in their lifetime, with the proportion expected to rise in line with an...
BACKGROUND
Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem in women. About 40% of women will experience prolapse in their lifetime, with the proportion expected to rise in line with an ageing population. Women experience a variety of troublesome symptoms as a consequence of prolapse, including a feeling of 'something coming down' into the vagina, pain, urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms and sexual difficulties. Treatment for prolapse includes surgery, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and vaginal pessaries. Vaginal pessaries are passive mechanical devices designed to support the vagina and hold the prolapsed organs back in the anatomically correct position. The most commonly used pessaries are made from polyvinyl-chloride, polythene, silicone or latex. Pessaries are frequently used by clinicians with high numbers of clinicians offering a pessary as first-line treatment for prolapse. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2003 and last published in 2013.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women; and summarise the principal findings of relevant economic evaluations of this intervention.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings (searched 28 January 2020). We searched the reference lists of relevant articles and contacted the authors of included studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials which included a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse in at least one arm of the study.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed abstracts, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and carried out GRADE assessments with arbitration from a third review author if necessary.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four studies involving a total of 478 women with various stages of prolapse, all of which took place in high-income countries. In one trial, only six of the 113 recruited women consented to random assignment to an intervention and no data are available for those six women. We could not perform any meta-analysis because each of the trials addressed a different comparison. None of the trials reported data about perceived resolution of prolapse symptoms or about psychological outcome measures. All studies reported data about perceived improvement of prolapse symptoms. Generally, the trials were at high risk of performance bias, due to lack of blinding, and low risk of selection bias. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for imprecision resulting from the low numbers of women participating in the trials. Pessary versus no treatment: at 12 months' follow-up, we are uncertain about the effect of pessaries compared with no treatment on perceived improvement of prolapse symptoms (mean difference (MD) in questionnaire scores -0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.61 to 0.55; 27 women; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence), and cure or improvement of sexual problems (MD -0.29, 95% CI -1.67 to 1.09; 27 women; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). In this comparison we did not find any evidence relating to prolapse-specific quality of life or to the number of women experiencing adverse events (abnormal vaginal bleeding or de novo voiding difficulty). Pessary versus pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT): at 12 months' follow-up, we are uncertain if there is a difference between pessaries and PFMT in terms of women's perceived improvement in prolapse symptoms (MD -9.60, 95% CI -22.53 to 3.33; 137 women; low-certainty evidence), prolapse-specific quality of life (MD -3.30, 95% CI -8.70 to 15.30; 1 study; 116 women; low-certainty evidence), or cure or improvement of sexual problems (MD -2.30, 95% -5.20 to 0.60; 1 study; 48 women; low-certainty evidence). Pessaries may result in a large increase in risk of adverse events compared with PFMT (RR 75.25, 95% CI 4.70 to 1205.45; 1 study; 97 women; low-certainty evidence). Adverse events included increased vaginal discharge, and/or increased urinary incontinence and/or erosion or irritation of the vaginal walls. Pessary plus PFMT versus PFMT alone: at 12 months' follow-up, pessary plus PFMT probably leads to more women perceiving improvement in their prolapse symptoms compared with PFMT alone (RR 2.15, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.94; 1 study; 260 women; moderate-certainty evidence). At 12 months' follow-up, pessary plus PFMT probably improves women's prolapse-specific quality of life compared with PFMT alone (median (interquartile range (IQR)) POPIQ score: pessary plus PFMT 0.3 (0 to 22.2); 132 women; PFMT only 8.9 (0 to 64.9); 128 women; P = 0.02; moderate-certainty evidence). Pessary plus PFMT may slightly increase the risk of abnormal vaginal bleeding compared with PFMT alone (RR 2.18, 95% CI 0.69 to 6.91; 1 study; 260 women; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is uncertain if pessary plus PFMT has any effect on the risk of de novo voiding difficulty compared with PFMT alone (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.19; 1 study; 189 women; low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We are uncertain if pessaries improve pelvic organ prolapse symptoms for women compared with no treatment or PFMT but pessaries in addition to PFMT probably improve women's pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and prolapse-specific quality of life. However, there may be an increased risk of adverse events with pessaries compared to PFMT. Future trials should recruit adequate numbers of women and measure clinically important outcomes such as prolapse specific quality of life and resolution of prolapse symptoms. The review found two relevant economic evaluations. Of these, one assessed the cost-effectiveness of pessary treatment, expectant management and surgical procedures, and the other compared pessary treatment to PFMT.
Topics: Bias; Female; Humans; Muscle Strength; Pelvic Floor; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Pessaries; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rectal Prolapse; Urethral Diseases; Urinary Bladder Diseases; Uterine Prolapse
PubMed: 33207004
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub4 -
BMC Women's Health Nov 2023Childbirth is one of the biggest risk factors for incontinence. Urinary and anal incontinence can cause pain and social limitations that affect social life,...
BACKGROUND
Childbirth is one of the biggest risk factors for incontinence. Urinary and anal incontinence can cause pain and social limitations that affect social life, cohabitation, and work. There is currently no up-to-date literature study on the effect of pelvic floor muscle training with feedback from a physiotherapist, which involves verbal instructions based on vaginal and anal digital palpation, compared to treatment without feedback (e.g., recommendations for pelvic floor muscle training).
AIM
The objective of this systematic review was to examine the scientific evidence regarding the impact of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with feedback from a physiotherapist and/or biofeedback on urinary and anal incontinence in women during the first six months following vaginal delivery, compared to treatment without feedback.
METHODS
The literature search was conducted in the databases PubMed, Cochrane, and CINAHL. In addition, a manual search was conducted. The search terms consisted of MeSH terms and synonyms in the respective search block including population, intervention, and study design, as well as the terms pelvic floor and postpartum. An evaluation of each included study was conducted for methodological quality, evidence value, and clinical relevance.
RESULTS
Eight studies were included, three of which showed a significant difference between groups, in favor of the intervention group that received pelvic floor muscle training with feedback from a physiotherapist and/or biofeedback. Due to the varying results and insufficient quality for the majority of the studies, the scientific basis was considered insufficient.
CONCLUSION
The scientific evidence for pelvic floor muscle training with feedback from a physiotherapist or biofeedback on postpartum urinary and anal incontinence compared to treatment without feedback is considered insufficient. Further research on the subject is needed. The study is registered in PROSPERO CRD42022361296.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Pelvic Floor; Feedback; Physical Therapists; Exercise Therapy; Biofeedback, Psychology; Delivery, Obstetric; Fecal Incontinence; Urinary Incontinence, Stress; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37980530
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02765-7 -
Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) Apr 2020Treadmills are often used in research, clinical practice, and training. Biomechanical investigations comparing treadmill and overground running report inconsistent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Treadmills are often used in research, clinical practice, and training. Biomechanical investigations comparing treadmill and overground running report inconsistent findings.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed at comparing biomechanical outcomes between motorized treadmill and overground running.
METHODS
Four databases were searched until June 2019. Crossover design studies comparing lower limb biomechanics during non-inclined, non-cushioned, quasi-constant-velocity motorized treadmill running with overground running in healthy humans (18-65 years) and written in English were included. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed where possible.
RESULTS
33 studies (n = 494 participants) were included. Most outcomes did not differ between running conditions. However, during treadmill running, sagittal foot-ground angle at footstrike (mean difference (MD) - 9.8° [95% confidence interval: - 13.1 to - 6.6]; low GRADE evidence), knee flexion range of motion from footstrike to peak during stance (MD 6.3° [4.5 to 8.2]; low), vertical displacement center of mass/pelvis (MD - 1.5 cm [- 2.7 to - 0.8]; low), and peak propulsive force (MD - 0.04 body weights [- 0.06 to - 0.02]; very low) were lower, while contact time (MD 5.0 ms [0.5 to 9.5]; low), knee flexion at footstrike (MD - 2.3° [- 3.6 to - 1.1]; low), and ankle sagittal plane internal joint moment (MD - 0.4 Nm/kg [- 0.7 to - 0.2]; low) were longer/higher, when pooled across overground surfaces. Conflicting findings were reported for amplitude of muscle activity.
CONCLUSIONS
Spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic, muscle activity, and muscle-tendon outcome measures are largely comparable between motorized treadmill and overground running. Considerations should, however, particularly be given to sagittal plane kinematic differences at footstrike when extrapolating treadmill running biomechanics to overground running. Protocol registration CRD42018083906 (PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews).
Topics: Adolescent; Ankle Joint; Biomechanical Phenomena; Cross-Over Studies; Exercise Test; Female; Humans; Male; Range of Motion, Articular; Running
PubMed: 31802395
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-019-01237-z -
Journal of Physiotherapy Apr 2021What is the most cost-effective way of providing pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) to prevent or treat postpartum incontinence? (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Group-based pelvic floor muscle training for all women during pregnancy is more cost-effective than postnatal training for women with urinary incontinence: cost-effectiveness analysis of a systematic review.
QUESTION
What is the most cost-effective way of providing pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) to prevent or treat postpartum incontinence?
DESIGN
Meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis of models of care included in a recent Cochrane systematic review.
PARTICIPANTS
Pregnant and postnatal women.
INTERVENTION
Supervised PFMT for preventing or treating urinary and/or faecal incontinence.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Postpartum urinary or faecal incontinence.
ANALYSIS
We examined the comparative incremental cost effectiveness of different approaches to successfully prevent or cure one case of incontinence. Costs were valued in Australian dollars using publicly available market rates and enterprise agreements as of 2019. Comparisons involving group-based treatment approaches were subject to sensitivity analyses where the numbers of patients attending each group were varied to identify thresholds where recommendations change.
RESULTS
Seventeen trials were included for meta-analysis. Three models of care were clinically effective: individually supervised PFMT during pregnancy to prevent urinary incontinence (Model 1), group-based PFMT during pregnancy to prevent or treat urinary incontinence (Model 2) and individually supervised postnatal PFMT to treat urinary incontinence and prevent or treat faecal incontinence (Model 3). The health service costs per urinary incontinence case prevented or cured were $768 for Model 1, and $1,970 for Model 3. However, Model 2 generated a cost saving of $14 if there were eight participants per session, with greater savings if more participants attend. The health service cost per faecal incontinence case prevented or cured was $2,784 (Model 3).
CONCLUSION
Providing group-based PFMT for all women during pregnancy is likely more efficient than individual PFMT for incontinent women postnatally; however, providing PFMT for postnatal women with urinary incontinence should not be discounted because of the added known benefit for preventing and treating faecal incontinence.
Topics: Australia; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Exercise Therapy; Female; Humans; Pelvic Floor; Pregnancy; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Incontinence; Urinary Incontinence, Stress
PubMed: 33771484
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.03.001 -
Clinical Interventions in Aging 2019The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in the treatment of urinary incontinence (UI) in men after radical...
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in the treatment of urinary incontinence (UI) in men after radical prostatectomy (RP).
METHODS
PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published in years 2000-2019. We included randomized controlled trials in English which compare clinic-based vs home-based PFMT, preoperative and postoperative PFMT, supervised vs unsupervised PFMT, and PFMT alone vs no treatment at all.
RESULTS
Eight articles were included in the final review. There was a total of 1078 patients aged 45-75 in all study groups. The study participants received radical retropubic prostatectomy or radical prostatectomy. Included studies assessed the following interventions: preoperative and postoperative PFMT, supervised vs home-based PFMT, unsupervised PFMT vs no treatment at all, and PFMT combined with resistance and flexibility exercises vs PFMT alone.
CONCLUSION
PFMT is an effective treatment for urinary incontinence in men after radical prostatectomy. PFMT improves not only physical parameters but also the quality of life of men after RP.
Topics: Aged; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pelvic Floor; Postoperative Period; Prostatectomy; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Incontinence
PubMed: 31814714
DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S228222 -
International Journal of Oral and... Jan 2022Maxillomandibular deformity (MMD) and body posture appear to be correlated. However, no systematic literature review of the available evidence to support this... (Review)
Review
Maxillomandibular deformity (MMD) and body posture appear to be correlated. However, no systematic literature review of the available evidence to support this correlation has been performed to date. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review on posture and MMD. This systematic literature review was registered in the PROSPERO database. Systematic searches of the MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were performed. In total, 13 clinical studies were included. Nine found a significant association between MMD and body posture or body balance: two studies showed a correlation between increased cervical lordosis and skeletal class III MMD, two studies showed an interaction between mandibular deviation and scoliosis, four studies demonstrated a significant association between lumbar column and pelvis anatomy and MMD, and one study found a correlation between displacement of the centre of mass and MMD. However, the level of evidence is low; the methods used to evaluate body posture and MMD were inconsistent. Orthognathic surgery could modify body posture. Although there seems to be an interaction between body posture and facial deformity, the number of studies is too small and the level of evidence too low to strongly support this association.
Topics: Humans; Orthognathic Surgery; Orthognathic Surgical Procedures; Posture
PubMed: 34120792
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.05.003