-
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aug 2020Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase (Rpi, EC 5.3.1.6) is widespread in microorganisms, animals, and plants. It has a pivotal role in the pentose phosphate pathway and...
Ribose-5-phosphate isomerase (Rpi, EC 5.3.1.6) is widespread in microorganisms, animals, and plants. It has a pivotal role in the pentose phosphate pathway and responsible for catalyzing the isomerization between D-ribulose 5-phosphate and D-ribose 5-phosphate. In recent years, Rpi has received considerable attention as a multipurpose biocatalyst for production of rare sugars, including D-allose, L-rhamnulose, L-lyxose, and L-tagatose. Besides, it has been thought of as a potential drug target in the treatment of trypanosomatid-caused diseases such as Chagas' disease, leishmaniasis, and human African trypanosomiasis. Despite increased research activities, up to now, no systematic review of Rpi has been published. To fill this gap, this paper provides detailed information about the enzymatic properties of various Rpis. Furthermore, structural features, catalytic mechanism, and molecular modifications of Rpis are summarized based on extensive crystal structure research. Additionally, the applications of Rpi in rare sugar production and the role of Rpi in trypanocidal drug design are reviewed. Key points • Fundamental properties of various ribose-5-phosphate isomerases (Rpis). • Differences in crystal structure and catalytic mechanism between RpiA and RpiB. • Application of Rpi as a rare sugar producer and a potential drug target.
Topics: Aldose-Ketose Isomerases; Animals; Binding Sites; Biocatalysis; Crystallography, X-Ray; Humans; Isomerism; Kinetics; Models, Molecular; Parasitic Diseases; Plants; Ribosemonophosphates
PubMed: 32533303
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10735-4 -
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy 2024Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) are ever-changing. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) as maintenance therapy for newly-diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with mutational status: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) are ever-changing. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and overall safety of available PARPi as maintenance therapy for BRCA mutation status in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum-sensitive recurrent (PSR) OC patients.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Relevant RCTs were systematically retrieved from PubMed and Embase until 31 May 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on mutation status and adverse events (AEs) regardless of mutation were efficacy and safety endpoints.
RESULTS
In newly diagnosed BRCAm-OC patients, olaparib (HR: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 0.43) and other PARPis [niraparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.55), rucaparib (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.76) and veliparib (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.69)] had a statistically significant effect on PFS versus placebo. In BRCAm-PSROC patients, Olaparib exhibited significant benefit (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.88) for OS compared to other PARPis. In BRCAwt-PSR OC patients, Olaparib showed a favorable OS benefit than other PARPis (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.57,1.22). Overall, safety profile of all PARPis was acceptable.
CONCLUSION
All PARPis showed significant benefit, with olaparib showing greater benefit in newly diagnosed and PSR OC women.
REGISTRATION
CRD42021288932.
Topics: Female; Humans; Adenosine Diphosphate; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Network Meta-Analysis; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases; Ribose
PubMed: 38174379
DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2298832 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aug 2021To investigate the efficacy and safety of poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (including their different types) as maintenance therapy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors as maintenance therapy in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
To investigate the efficacy and safety of poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (including their different types) as maintenance therapy in women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, and to explore whether this therapy produces a survival benefit in a subgroup population with specific clinical characteristics.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and relevant clinical research registry platforms on October 1, 2019, and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PARP inhibitors with placebo in women (aged ≥ 18 years) with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer.
RESULTS
We identified four RCTs with 3,070 participants. Compared with placebo, PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy showed a clinically significant benefit on progression free survival (PFS) in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) positive population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.53). In contrast, no clear differences were identified between the groups in the HRD negative population (HR, 0.83; 95% CI 0.67-1.03). Further, there was no clear difference between the groups in terms of other outcomes (overall survival, health-related quality of life, and adverse events).
CONCLUSIONS
PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy significantly prolongs the PFS of patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, especially in HRD positive patients. The diagnostic test used to determine HRD status plays an important role in guiding PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy. Compared with placebo, the effect of PARP inhibitors on ovarian cancer was probably not affected by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage status, response to first-line chemotherapy, and residual macroscopic disease after debulking surgery.
Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Ribose; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34021367
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06070-2 -
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and... Apr 2022This meta-analysis evaluated the correlation between poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) expression and prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This meta-analysis evaluated the correlation between poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) expression and prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer.
METHODS
Eligible studies were extracted from the electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE until 1 August 2019. The included studies investigated the correlation between PARP expression and clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer. Clinical outcomes are overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). The clinical data of patients, such as clinicopathologic characteristics and survival, were analyzed. The language was limited to English, and studies conducted at the cellular level, animal studies, and non-original research were excluded. The odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for this meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 9 eligible studies involving 1230 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Based on the analysis, higher PARP expression was correlated with worse overall survival [OS] (HR,1.64; 95% CI, 1.08-2.49; P = 0.020) in the univariate analysis, whereas results from multivariate analysis indicated that PARP overexpression wasn't statistically associated with worse OS (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.98-1.90; P = 0.069). Moreover, the pooled results revealed that patients with PARP overexpression were not associated with worse histologic grade (OR,2.22; 95% CI, 0.98-5.02; P = 0.06).
CONCLUSION
PARP overexpression maybe associated with poor prognosis and survival in patients with ovarian cancer. The patients with PARP over expression were not tended to have a worse histologic grade. Findings require further validation.
Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Prognosis; Ribose
PubMed: 35218983
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102344 -
Frontiers in Genetics 2022infects millions and kills thousands of people annually the world over. With the emergence of artemisinin and/or multidrug resistant strains of the pathogen, it has...
infects millions and kills thousands of people annually the world over. With the emergence of artemisinin and/or multidrug resistant strains of the pathogen, it has become even more challenging to control and eliminate the disease. Multiomics studies of the parasite have started to provide a glimpse into the confounding genetics and mechanisms of artemisinin resistance and identified mutations in Kelch13 (K13) as a molecular marker of resistance. Over the years, thousands of genomes and transcriptomes of artemisinin-resistant/sensitive isolates have been documented, supplementing the search for new genes/pathways to target artemisinin-resistant isolates. This meta-analysis seeks to recap the genetic landscape and the transcriptional deregulation that demarcate artemisinin resistance in the field. To explore the genetic territory of artemisinin resistance, we use genomic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) datasets from 2,517 isolates from 15 countries from the MalariaGEN Network (The Pf3K project, pilot data release 4, 2015) to dissect the prevalence, geographical distribution, and co-existing patterns of genetic markers associated with/enabling artemisinin resistance. We have identified several mutations which co-exist with the established markers of artemisinin resistance. Interestingly, K13-resistant parasites harbor α-ß hydrolase and putative HECT domain-containing protein genes with the maximum number of SNPs. We have also explored the multiple, publicly available transcriptomic datasets to identify genes from key biological pathways whose consistent deregulation may be contributing to the biology of resistant parasites. Surprisingly, glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathways were consistently downregulated in artemisinin-resistant parasites. Thus, this meta-analysis highlights the genetic and transcriptomic features of resistant parasites to propel further exploratory studies in the community to tackle artemisinin resistance.
PubMed: 35464842
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.824483 -
Journal of Cancer Research and... Dec 2021To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and potential advantages of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in treating BRCA-mutated breast cancer, we performed a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and potential advantages of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in treating BRCA-mutated breast cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of published studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. Data analysis was conducted in Review Manager 5.4.
RESULTS
The progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with triple-negative (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.88; P < 0.00001) or hormone receptor-positive (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.91; P < 0.0001) BRCA-mutated breast cancer was significantly extended in the containing PARPi therapy arm versus the chemotherapy arm. PFS of the patients who did not receive platinum-based therapy (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.70-0.86; P < 0.0001) was significantly extended in the PARPi monotherapy arm versus the chemotherapy arm. The objective response rate of patients treated by PARPi monotherapy (risk ratio [RR] 2.51; 95% CI 1.81-3.47; P < 0.00001) was significantly higher than that of patients treated by chemotherapy. The incidence of thrombocytopenia in patients received PARPi combined therapy was obviously increased compared with chemotherapy group (RR 1.36; 95% CI 1.07-1.72; P = 0.01). PARPi monotherapy markedly increased the incidence of anemia (RR 5.83; 95% CI 2.64-12.88; P < 0.0001) versus chemotherapy. However, the risk of neutropenia (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29-0.81; P = 0.006) was reduced in the PARPi monotherapy arm. There were no statistical differences in other adverse events among these three groups.
CONCLUSIONS
PARPi combined therapy and monotherapy improved PFS of patients with BRCA-mutated breast cancer compared with standard chemotherapy, which was unrelated to type of BRCA mutation and status of hormone receptor. PARPi therapy has slightly higher hematological toxicity and better overall safety and tolerance.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020204385.
Topics: Adenosine Diphosphate; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Progression-Free Survival; Ribose
PubMed: 35381738
DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2085_21 -
Asian Journal of Surgery Dec 2023
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Female; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Ribose; Ovarian Neoplasms; Mutation
PubMed: 37541880
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.07.118 -
International Journal of Gynecological... Aug 2023To evaluate the risk of interstitial lung disease associated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and characterize its clinical features.
Interstitial lung disease in patients treated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi): analysis of results from clinical trials and the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System database.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the risk of interstitial lung disease associated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and characterize its clinical features.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed phase III randomized clinical trials of interstitial lung disease related to PARPi and calculated Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pharmacovigilance studies were conducted by collecting cases of PARPi-related interstitial lung disease from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System and assessing disproportionalities by reporting ORs and information components.
RESULTS
A total of five randomized clinical trials involving 2980 patients were included. Although PARPi showed a tendency to increase the risk of interstitial lung disease compared with controls, this difference was not significant (Peto OR: 4.92; 95% CI: 0.92 to 26.35). A total of 170 cases of interstitial lung disease related to PARPi were included, with a median latency of 99 days. PARPi had a significantly increased reporting of interstitial lung disease (reporting OR: 2.86; 95% CI: 2.46 to 3.33; information component (IC): 1.49; 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.74). Our sensitivity analyses showed strong robustness of the disproportionalities between PARPi as a class, olaparib, and interstitial lung disease. Some 91.9% of patients experienced discontinuation, 51.6% achieved remission, and no deaths were reported.
CONCLUSION
Our pharmacovigilance study suggested increased reporting of interstitial lung disease related to PARPi particularly olaparib.
Topics: Humans; Female; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Ribose; Ovarian Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37164363
DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004042