-
Hernia : the Journal of Hernias and... Aug 2023A perineal hernia is a subtype of pelvic floor hernias, and especially primary perineal hernias are rare. No guideline exists on how to handle this type of hernia.... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
A perineal hernia is a subtype of pelvic floor hernias, and especially primary perineal hernias are rare. No guideline exists on how to handle this type of hernia. Therefore, the primary aim of this scoping review was to investigate the surgical treatment options in adults for primary perineal hernias.
METHODS
This systematic scoping review included studies with original data on at least one adult operated for a primary perineal hernia. Studies from 1990 and forward were included to cover contemporary surgical techniques. Three databases were systematically searched: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Furthermore, a snowball search was performed. The primary outcome was to narratively present details about the surgical techniques. The secondary outcomes were to give an overview of symptoms, diagnostics, intraoperative complications, and postoperative course.
RESULTS
Twenty-two case studies reported repairs on 22 patients suffering from primary perineal hernia. Common symptoms were pain and discomfort, and a bulge was often found during physical examination. Different diagnostic methods were used, and MRI-scans most often found an abnormality. Different surgical procedures can repair the condition, however, laparotomy and the use of a permanent mesh was the most common option. Far from all studies reported on outcomes, but no severe intraoperative event was reported, and the postoperative course was overall uneventful.
CONCLUSION
Primary perineal hernia is a very rare condition presenting with pain/discomfort and bulging and it can be visualized with different imaging modalities. Laparotomy with a permanent mesh was often used for repair, and the postoperative course was mostly uneventful.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Herniorrhaphy; Surgical Mesh; Hernia; Hernia, Abdominal; Laparotomy; Pain; Perineum
PubMed: 36840829
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02760-9 -
International Urogynecology Journal Dec 2023Perineal wound dehiscence is associated with complications, such as infections, perineal pain, dyspareunia, and altered sexual function, that severely affects women's... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
Perineal wound dehiscence is associated with complications, such as infections, perineal pain, dyspareunia, and altered sexual function, that severely affects women's health. Currently, few studies have examined secondary repair of first- and second-degree perineal wound dehiscence and episiotomies, and there is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment option for dehisced perineal wounds. The objective was to evaluate whether resuturing or conservative treatment of first- and second-degree dehisced perineal wounds and episiotomies is the optimal treatment modality in terms of postoperative healing time and other secondary outcomes.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was carried out using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. All included studies were evaluated using the SIGN methodology checklist, with the purpose of assessing the study quality.
RESULTS
Three randomized controlled trials were included. Only two small sample-sized studies presented data regarding healing time for both the resuturing and the conservative treatment groups. However, no significant difference was found between the two groups at 4-6 weeks' healing time (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.53-2.52). One study found that women being resutured experienced a significantly reduced healing time and higher satisfaction with the appearance of the wound healing at 3 months compared with the conservative treatment group.
CONCLUSION
We found no significant differences in the healing time between the resuturing group and the conservative treatment group. However, the sample sizes of the studies were small. A well-designed, large, and prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate the optimal treatment modality for dehisced perineal wounds.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Conservative Treatment; Delivery, Obstetric; Episiotomy; Perineum; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 37740731
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05642-x -
International Urogynecology Journal Jul 2021In evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in perineal trauma research, outcomes reported by patients should have a prominent focus. There is no international... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
In evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in perineal trauma research, outcomes reported by patients should have a prominent focus. There is no international consensus regarding the use of either patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or tools used to determine these outcomes (patient-reported outcome measures, PROMs). The objective was to evaluate the selection, reporting and geographical variations of PROs and PROMs in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on perineal trauma.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of RCTs in perineal trauma research evaluating outcome and outcome measure reporting. We identified PROs and PROMs and grouped PROs into domains and themes, a classification system based on a medical outcome taxonomy.
RESULTS
Of 48 included RCTs, 47 reported PROs. In total, we identified 51 PROs. Outcome reporting consistency was low, with 27 PROs reported only once. Nine PROs were reported more than five times, the most frequent being perineal pain, with no geographical variation in reporting. Four themes encompassing 12 domains were identified. The most frequently reported theme was "Clinical", with 25 PROs grouped within four domains. "Resource use" and "Adverse events" themes were rarely reported, with only five PROs. PROMs also exhibited variation. Most common were visual analogue scale (VAS; 100 mm), Cleveland Clinic Continence Score, The Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale, VAS (0-10) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire.
CONCLUSIONS
Significant heterogeneity in PROs and PROMs was observed among RCTs. Despite inconsistency, PROs are the most prevalent outcome in perineal trauma research. Patient-reported adverse events are underreported. Their use in determining the effectiveness and safety of interventions makes their integration important in perineal trauma core outcome sets. Identification and grouping of outcomes will assist future core outcome consensus studies.
Topics: Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Parturition; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Perineum; Pregnancy
PubMed: 34143238
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04820-z -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Jan 2022Empty pelvis syndrome is a major contributor to morbidity following pelvic exenteration. Several techniques for filling the pelvis have been proposed; however, there is... (Review)
Review
AIM
Empty pelvis syndrome is a major contributor to morbidity following pelvic exenteration. Several techniques for filling the pelvis have been proposed; however, there is no consensus on the best approach. We evaluated and compared the complications associated with each reconstruction technique with the aim of determining which is associated with the lowest incidence of complications related to the empty pelvis.
METHOD
The systematic review protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021239307). PRISMA-P guidelines were used to present the literature. PubMed and MEDLINE were systematically searched up to 1 February 2021. A dataset containing predetermined primary and secondary outcomes was extracted.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies fulfilled our criteria; these included 375 patients with mainly rectal and gynaecological cancer. Only three studies had a follow-up greater than 2 years. Six surgical interventions were identified. Mesh reconstruction and breast prosthesis were associated with low rates of small bowel obstruction (SBO), entero-cutaneous fistulas and perineal hernia. Findings for myocutaneous flaps were similar; however, they were associated with high rates of perineal wound complications. Omentoplasty was found to have a high perineal wound infection rate (40%). Obstetric balloons were found to have the highest rates of perineal wound dehiscence and SBO. Silicone expanders effectively kept small bowel out of the pelvis, although rates of pelvic collections remained high (20%).
CONCLUSION
The morbidity associated with an empty pelvis remains considerable. Given the low quality of the evidence with small patient numbers, strong conclusions in favour of a certain technique and comparison of these interventions remains challenging.
Topics: Female; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pelvic Exenteration; Pelvis; Perineum; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Rectal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34653292
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15956 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Jun 2023Rectal prolapse is considered rare in men but the prevalence can be high in certain populations. It is unclear which surgical approach offers lower recurrence rates and... (Review)
Review
AIM
Rectal prolapse is considered rare in men but the prevalence can be high in certain populations. It is unclear which surgical approach offers lower recurrence rates and better functional outcomes in men. The aim of this work was to determine the recurrence rates, complications and functional outcomes after prolapse surgery in men.
METHOD
The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus databases were systematically searched to identify studies on outcomes following surgical management of full-thickness rectal prolapse in men (over 18 years of age) published between 1951 and September 2022. Outcomes of interest included recurrence rate after surgery, bowel function, urinary function, sexual function and postoperative complications.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight studies involving 1751 men were included. Two papers focused exclusively on men. Twelve studies employed a mixture of abdominal approaches, ten employed perineal approaches and six compared both. The recurrence rate varied across studies, ranging from 0% to 34%. Sexual and urinary function were poorly reported, but the incidence of dysfunction appears low.
CONCLUSION
The outcomes of rectal prolapse surgery in men are poorly studied with small sample sizes and variable outcomes reported. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific repair approach based on the recurrence rate and functional outcomes. Further studies are required to identify the optimal surgical approach for rectal prolapse in men.
Topics: Male; Humans; Adolescent; Adult; Rectal Prolapse; Defecation; Postoperative Complications; Recurrence; Perineum; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36847704
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16534 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Aug 2022We aimed to systematically determine the incidences of wound infection and dehiscence after primary obstetric anal sphincter injury repair. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to systematically determine the incidences of wound infection and dehiscence after primary obstetric anal sphincter injury repair.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, EmCare, the Cochrane Library, and Trip Pro databases were searched from inception to February 2021.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We included observational clinical studies reporting the incidences of wound infection and dehiscence after primary obstetric anal sphincter injury repair. Case series and reports were excluded. Conference articles and observational study abstracts were included if they contained enough information regarding study design and outcome data.
METHODS
Data were analyzed as incidence (percentage) with 95% confidence intervals. Moreover, the prediction intervals were calculated to provide a predicted range for the potential incidence of wound complications when applied to an individual study setting. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the relevant tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute.
RESULTS
Of 956 studies found, 39 were selected for full-text review. Moreover, 10 studies (n=4767 women) were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. All 10 studies were conducted in high-income countries (Denmark [n=1], the United Kingdom [n=3], and the United States [n=6]). The incidences of wound infection (n=4593 women) and wound dehiscence (n=3866 women) after primary obstetric anal sphincter injury repair ranged between 0.1% to 19.8% and 1.9% to 24.6%, respectively. The overall incidences were 4.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.4-8.4) for wound infection and 6.9% (95% confidence interval, 1.6-12.2) for wound dehiscence. The prediction intervals were wide and suggested that the true incidences of wound infection and dehiscence in future studies could lie between 0.0% to 11.7% and 0.0% to 16.4%, respectively. Overall, 8 studies had a high or unclear risk of bias across ≥1 assessed element. None of the studies used the same set of clinical parameters to define wound infection or dehiscence. Furthermore, microbiological confirmation with wound swabs was never used as a diagnostic measure.
CONCLUSION
This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of wound infection and dehiscence incidences after primary obstetric anal sphincter injury repair. The incidence estimates from this review will be useful for clinicians when counseling women with obstetric anal sphincter injury and when consenting them for primary surgical repair.
Topics: Anal Canal; Delivery, Obstetric; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Incidence; Observational Studies as Topic; Obstetric Labor Complications; Perineum; Pregnancy; United Kingdom; Wound Infection
PubMed: 35550375
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.012 -
Journal of Clinical Nursing Apr 2023To summarize the evidence on the effects of different techniques during the second stage of labour on reducing perineal laceration depending on available systematic...
AIM AND OBJECTIVE
To summarize the evidence on the effects of different techniques during the second stage of labour on reducing perineal laceration depending on available systematic reviews to provide optimal evidence for decision-making.
BACKGROUND
Preventing perineal laceration has been considered an important part of improving women's health. Various techniques have been used to prevent perineal laceration during the second stage of labour. However, systematic reviews evaluating the effects of different techniques on reducing perineal laceration show inconsistent results.
DESIGN
Overview of systematic reviews.
METHODS
Five English and four Chinese databases were systematically searched for relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 1 January 2016 and 31 August 2021. The quality of the included reviews was assessed by the AMSTAR 2 tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted to report the results of moderate-to-high quality systematic reviews. The overview was reported according to the PRISMA statement.
RESULTS
Eighteen reviews were included, of which four reviews had moderate-to-high methodological quality. Perineal massage and warm compresses significantly decreased the incidence of third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration (moderate-quality evidence). Hands-off technique had no impact on perineal laceration (low-to-moderate quality evidence). Ritgen's manoeuvre could reduce the incidence of first-degree perineal laceration but increase the incidence of second-degree perineal laceration (very low-quality evidence). Spontaneous pushing (low-quality evidence) and delayed pushing (moderate-quality evidence) had no impact on the incidence of third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration. Upright positions did not increase the risk of third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration (very low- to low-quality evidence) but increased the risk of second-degree perineal laceration for women without epidural analgesia (low-quality evidence).
CONCLUSIONS
Perineal massage and warm compresses could be the better choice for preventing perineal laceration in the second stage of labour.
RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE
Midwives and obstetricians could use perineal massage and warm compresses to prevent perineal laceration and should consider women's preferences and experience with perineal techniques.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Databases, Factual; Labor Stage, Second; Lacerations; Massage; Perineum
PubMed: 35253295
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16276 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Apr 2023To investigate the effectiveness of interventions to prevent the occurrence of perineal trauma in parturients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To investigate the effectiveness of interventions to prevent the occurrence of perineal trauma in parturients.
METHODS
A bibliographic search was carried out in Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via PUBMED, LILACS via Virtual Health Library (VHL), Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Scielo, Web of Science, and PEDro databases. Randomized clinical trials evaluating the effects of any intervention to prevent perineal trauma during pregnancy and/or childbirth were included. There were no temporal or language restrictions. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-bias Tool for Randomized Trials.
RESULTS
Fifty studies, with a total of 17,221 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. No intervention during childbirth was effective for the prevention of perineal trauma (RR = 1.07, 95% CI [0.98.1.18], p < 0.01, I = 83%) when compared to no intervention. However, a lower risk of perineal laceration was verified with techniques performed during pregnancy, when compared to no intervention (RR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.71, 0.93], p = 0.05, I = 47%). Among them, highlight the effects of perineal massage in preventing lacerations (RR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.54, 0.87], p < 0.01) when compared to no intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
The techniques performed during pregnancy, especially perineal massage, are associated with a lower risk of perineal laceration.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Lacerations; Obstetric Labor Complications; Delivery, Obstetric; Parturition; Risk; Perineum; Episiotomy
PubMed: 36827751
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.02.008 -
Journal of Robotic Surgery Jun 2024This study aims to compare the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of perineal hydrodissection (HD) with standard treatment (ST) in patients undergoing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of perineal hydrodissection in perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
This study aims to compare the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of perineal hydrodissection (HD) with standard treatment (ST) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. We performed an exhaustive search in databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, seeking English-language studies relevant to our research question, with a cutoff date of April 2024. The pooled results were assessed using the weighted mean differences (WMDs), standardized mean differences (SMDs), and odds ratios (ORs) metrics. We also performed a sensitivity analysis. The meta-analysis was conducted utilizing Stata/MP version 18 software. The study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD 42024536400). We included a total of five studies (three RCTs and two retrospective studies). According to the data from the Meta-analysis, the HD group showed positive effects in promoting urinary continence (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.36, 5.12; p = 0.004 < 0.05) and erectile function (SMD 0.92, 95%CI 0.56, 1.27; p < 0.05) within 3 months after surgery. However, no notable disparities were observed in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss, bilateral nerve-sparing rate, or the rate of positive surgical margin. Perineal hydrodissection can be safely applied in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), offering a distinct advantage in functional outcomes compared to those who undergo standard robot-assisted prostatectomy alone.
Topics: Humans; Prostatectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Male; Perineum; Prostatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Incontinence; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38904929
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02028-z -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Dec 2021Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a rare potentially lethal necrotising infection of the perineum. While the gold standard management is early and aggressive surgical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a rare potentially lethal necrotising infection of the perineum. While the gold standard management is early and aggressive surgical debridement, the evidence in the literature is unclear as to the role and outcomes of diversional stoma.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted to identify studies investigating the relationship between stoma formation and FG. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven studies (n=1482) were included. There was no significant difference in disease severity scores between the stoma and no stoma groups. Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who required diversional stoma (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.13-2.59, p=0.01). Significantly more surgical procedures were performed on patients who underwent stoma formation, and the total hospital cost was also higher in this group. This study may have been limited by bias in patients with more fulminant course or sphincter damage requiring stoma as a medical necessity.
CONCLUSION
These findings suggest that the use of diversional stoma in FG is a predictor of poor outcomes. This study demonstrated that mortality rate remained high and a diversional stoma did not reduce risk of mortality as suggested by smaller case series. Its use should therefore be individualised based on disease severity and sphincter damage.
Topics: Debridement; Fournier Gangrene; Humans; Perineum; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 33864128
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02175-z