-
European Spine Journal : Official... Jul 2022Low back pain (LBP) individuals with high levels of fear of pain might display changes in motor behavior, which leads to disability. This study aimed to systematically... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Low back pain (LBP) individuals with high levels of fear of pain might display changes in motor behavior, which leads to disability. This study aimed to systematically review the influence of pain-related threat beliefs or disability on trunk kinematic or postural control in LBP.
METHOD
Eight electronic databases were searched from January 1990 to July 1, 2020. Meta-analysis using random-effect model was performed for 18 studies on the association between pain-related threat beliefs or disability and lumbar range of motion. Pearson r correlations were used as the effect size.
RESULT
Negative correlations were observed between lumbar range of motion (ROM) and pain-related threat beliefs (r = - 0.31, p < 0.01, 95% CI: - 0.39, - 0.24) and disability (r = - 0.24, p < 0.01, 95% CI: - 0.40, - 0.21). Nonsignificant correlations were reported between pain-related threat beliefs and center of pressure parameters during static standing in 75% of the studies. In 33% of the studies, moderate negative correlations between disability and postural control were observed.
CONCLUSION
Motor behaviors are influenced by several factors, and therefore, the relatively weak associations observed between reduced lumbar ROM with higher pain-related threat beliefs and perceived disability, and postural control with disability are to be expected. This could aid clinicians in the assessment and planning rehabilitation interventions.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I
Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Disabled Persons; Humans; Low Back Pain; Postural Balance; Torso
PubMed: 35583666
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07261-4 -
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice Dec 2023Living with a diabetes-related foot ulcer has significant lifestyle impacts. Whilst often considered a last resort, amputation can overcome the burden of ulcer... (Review)
Review
Living with a diabetes-related foot ulcer has significant lifestyle impacts. Whilst often considered a last resort, amputation can overcome the burden of ulcer management, for an improved quality of life. However, limited research has been conducted to understand how the decision to amputate is made for people with a chronic ulcer when amputation is not required as a medical emergency. Therefore, the aim was to identify and map key concepts in the literature which describe the decision-making for diabetes-related amputations. This review followed Arksey and O'Malley's PRISMA scoping review framework. Five electronic databases and grey literature were searched for papers which described clinical reasoning and/or decision-making processes for diabetes-related amputation. Data were extracted and mapped to corresponding domains of the World Health Organisation's International Classification of functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Ninety-four papers were included. Personal factors including emotional wellbeing, quality of life, and treatment goals are key considerations for an elective amputation. It is important to consider an individual's lifestyle and personal circumstances, as well as the pathology when deciding between amputation or conservative management. This highlights the importance of a holistic and shared decision-making process for amputation which includes assessment of a person's lifestyle and function.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Ulcer; Amputation, Surgical; Diabetic Foot; Lower Extremity; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37981124
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.111015 -
Public Health Sep 2023To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the relative risk of COVID-19-related mortality among people with disabilities compared to people without... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the relative risk of COVID-19-related mortality among people with disabilities compared to people without disabilities.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We systematically searched four databases from March 1, 2020, to August 15, 2022. We included prospective studies with a baseline assessment of disability and a longitudinal assessment of the COVID-19-related mortality. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We undertook random-effects meta-analyses to calculate pooled adjusted hazard ratios for COVID-19-related mortality for people with disabilities, also disaggregated by disability type and study setting.
RESULTS
We identified 2596 articles throughout the electronic data search, and 56 studies were included in the review. Most (73%) had a moderate risk of bias. The pooled adjusted effect estimate for COVID-19-related mortality in people with disabilities compared to those without was 2.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-3.2). Heterogeneity between the studies was high (τ = 0.28, I = 97%). Effect estimates were highest for population-based samples (3.3, 95% CI: 2.7-3.9), compared to hospital settings (2.1, 95% CI: 1.7-2.7). Risk was not elevated among people with disabilities in care home settings (1.6, 95% CI: 0.7-3.5). Disaggregation by disability type showed that people with intellectual disabilities were at the highest relative risk of COVID-19 mortality.
DISCUSSION
Risk of COVID-19 mortality is elevated among people with disabilities, especially people with intellectual disabilities. Efforts are needed to collect better routine data on disability and to include people with disabilities in the pandemic response for COVID-19.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; Intellectual Disability; Prospective Studies; Disabled Persons; Bias
PubMed: 37541064
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.06.032 -
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 2022This umbrella systematic review examined the effectiveness, facilitators, and barriers of interventions for social, community and civic participation for adults on the... (Review)
Review
Interventions for social and community participation for adults with intellectual disability, psychosocial disability or on the autism spectrum: An umbrella systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
This umbrella systematic review examined the effectiveness, facilitators, and barriers of interventions for social, community and civic participation for adults on the autism spectrum, or with intellectual or psychosocial disability.
DATA SOURCES
Eight databases were searched to identify eligible reviews defined by the: Sample (≥50% adults on the autism spectrum or with intellectual or psychosocial disability), Phenomena of Interest (interventions in community settings that aimed to improve social, community or civic participation, or capacity to participate), Design (any), Evaluation (any method that evaluated impacts on participation or capacity to participate), and Research type (reviews as journal articles, dissertations or in grey literature, in English, published 2010-2020).
REVIEW METHODS
Rapid review methods were used. One researcher screened 27,890 records and 788 potentially eligible full texts. A second reviewer independently screened 20% of records, and ambiguous full text publications. Study quality was extracted, and review quality was assessed with the Assessing Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) checklist. Data from 522 studies in 57 eligible systematic reviews were extracted for narrative synthesis. The Corrected Covered Area (CCA) was calculated to indicate overlap between reviews.
RESULTS
There was a pooled sample of 28,154 study participants, predominantly from studies in North America, the UK and Europe. There was very low overlap between reviews (CCA = 0.3%). Reviews were predominantly low quality: 77.2% of reviews met <50% of AMSTAR criteria. Most studies were low (45.4%) or moderate (38.3%) quality. Three broad intervention categories improved participation, inclusion and belonging outcomes: (1) interventions to help people identify and connect with participation opportunities (e.g., person centred planning); (2) participation opportunities or activities (e.g., joining a community group, sports or outdoor activities, or arts-based activities); and (3) supports to build skills and capacity to participate socially and in the community.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence highlighted that improved social and community participation requires purposeful strategies that identify meaningful participation preferences (e.g., where, when, how, and with whom) and provide support to build capacity or enable ongoing participation. Community capacity building, peer support and advocacy may also be needed to make the community more accessible, and to enable people to exercise genuine choice.
PubMed: 36189003
DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.935473 -
International Journal of Environmental... Nov 2021To systematically review interventions aimed at improving employment participation of people with psychosocial disability, autism, and intellectual disability. We... (Review)
Review
To systematically review interventions aimed at improving employment participation of people with psychosocial disability, autism, and intellectual disability. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, ERIC, and ERC for studies published from 2010 to July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions aimed at increasing participation in open/competitive or non-competitive employment were eligible for inclusion. We included studies with adults with psychosocial disability autism and/or intellectual disability. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias II Tool. Data were qualitatively synthesized. Our review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020219192). We included 26 RCTs: 23 targeted people with psychosocial disabilities ( = 2465), 3 included people with autism ( = 214), and none included people with intellectual disability. Risk of bias was high in 8 studies, moderate for 18, and low for none. There was evidence for a beneficial effect of Individual Placement and Support compared to control conditions in 10/11 studies. Among young adults with autism, there was some evidence for the benefit of Project SEARCH and ASD supports on open employment. Gaps in the availability of high-quality evidence remain, undermining comparability and investment decisions in vocational interventions. Future studies should focus on improving quality and consistent measurement, especially for interventions targeting people with autism and/or intellectual disability.
Topics: Autistic Disorder; Disabled Persons; Employment; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Young Adult
PubMed: 34831840
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212083 -
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal... 2023Low back pain is one of the leading causes of disability globally, with a high economic and social burden. A decrease or imbalance in trunk strength has been associated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Low back pain is one of the leading causes of disability globally, with a high economic and social burden. A decrease or imbalance in trunk strength has been associated with the occurrence of low back pain and its severity. Trunk strength training is helpful in the treatment of Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) patients. However, we do not know the effects of trunk isokinetic training (IKT) on pain intensity, disability, and trunk strength.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of trunk IKT in NSLBP patients on pain intensity, disability, and trunk flexor and extensor isokinetic strength.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, and PEDro, from January 2001 until March 2021 and updated to November 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effect of IKT in adult participants with NSLBP on pain intensity, disability, or isokinetic trunk strength were included. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for pain. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool and evidence certainty via Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
RESULTS
Among 1750 retrieved articles, eight were included in this review. Meta-analysis comparing IKT (trunk isokinetic training, n= 134) with control groups (conventional exercises, n= 133) revealed that IKT decreases pain intensity (MD -1.50 (95% CI: -2.60; -0.39)) immediately post-intervention, and one month (MD -1.97 (95% CI: -2.92; -1.03)) and at six months follow-up (MD -2.48 (95% CI: -2.77; -2.19)), although with a very low to low quality according to the GRADE rating. Besides, IKT decreases disability and increases isokinetic trunk strength, but with scant evidence.
CONCLUSIONS
Trunk IKT could be a novel clinical tool for pain management in patients with NSLBP, although evidence is scarce. In addition, few RCTs exist for IKT on disability or trunk isokinetic strength in patients with NSLBP. Therefore, further research on this topic is needed.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Low Back Pain; Exercise Therapy; Resistance Training; Disabled Persons; Pain Measurement
PubMed: 37458013
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-220301 -
Archives of Physical Medicine and... Aug 2022To systematically review and synthesize evidence of determinants associated with hospital-based health service utilization among individuals with cerebral palsy (CP). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and synthesize evidence of determinants associated with hospital-based health service utilization among individuals with cerebral palsy (CP).
DATA SOURCES
Electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, APA Psycinfo were searched from January 2000 to April 2020.
STUDY SELECTION
Observational studies were included that described people with CP, reported quantitative measures of hospital-based health service utilization (inpatient, outpatient, emergency department), and based in high-income countries. We excluded studies that included only subsets of people with CP, or those that only reported therapy service utilization.
DATA EXTRACTION
After initial screen, 2 reviewers reviewed full texts for inclusion and performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Determinants of health service utilization were identified and categorized using the Andersen behavioral model.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Study quality was high. Twenty-six determinants were reported across 8 Andersen model characteristics. Individual predisposing factors such as sex showed no difference in health service utilization; inpatient admissions decreased with increasing age during childhood and was lower in adults. Increased health service utilization was associated with "individual need" including severe gross motor disability, epilepsy, developmental/ intellectual disability and gastrostomy-use across inpatient, outpatient and emergency department settings. There was little information reported on socio-demographic and health system contextual determinants.
CONCLUSIONS
CP health service utilization is associated with age, severity and comorbidities. Improved understanding of determinants of health service utilization can support health service access for people with CP.
Topics: Adult; Cerebral Palsy; Disabled Persons; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Humans; Motor Disorders
PubMed: 34968439
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.12.003 -
Midwifery Apr 2022Women with physical disabilities face multiple barriers in accessing safe, respectful and acceptable healthcare. As the number of women with physical disabilities... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Women with physical disabilities face multiple barriers in accessing safe, respectful and acceptable healthcare. As the number of women with physical disabilities becoming pregnant rises, ensuring their access to acceptable and high-quality maternity care becomes increasingly important. This review aimed to explore the most recent evidence regarding access to, and experiences of, maternity care for women with physical disabilities in high-income countries.
DESIGN
A scoping review was undertaken as guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A systematic search of five online databases identified relevant articles published in English from 2000 to 2020. Reference lists of included studies were also screened, and quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklists. A thematic synthesis was undertaken to develop descriptive and analytical themes.
FINDINGS
After screening, 27 articles from eight high-income countries were included. All articles were identified as having moderate or high methodological rigour in the quality appraisal. Women with physical disabilities reported numerous barriers in accessing maternity care and described predominantly mixed and negative experiences of care. These findings were grouped under three major themes: women with physical disabilities want a "normal" pregnancy experience; the need to strengthen maternity provider's disability knowledge and skills; and promoting enabling environments for improved access to, and experiences of, maternity care.
KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
This review found that for women with physical disabilities access to, and experiences of, maternity care is suboptimal. Improving maternity providers disability knowledge and awareness, increasing the availability of support services for women, and increasing person-centred care through organisational policies and provider training may help to address the inequities women with disabilities face in accessing high-quality maternity care.
Topics: Disabled Persons; Female; Health Services Accessibility; Humans; Maternal Health Services; Obstetrics; Pregnancy; Quality of Health Care
PubMed: 35158123
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103273 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2023Very preterm infants often require respiratory support and are therefore exposed to an increased risk of chronic lung disease and later neurodevelopmental disability.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Very preterm infants often require respiratory support and are therefore exposed to an increased risk of chronic lung disease and later neurodevelopmental disability. Although methylxanthines are widely used to prevent and treat apnea associated with prematurity and to facilitate extubation, there is uncertainty about the benefits and harms of different types of methylxanthines.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of methylxanthines on the incidence of apnea, death, neurodevelopmental disability, and other longer-term outcomes in preterm infants (1) at risk for or with apnea, or (2) undergoing extubation.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and three trial registers (November 2022).
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized trials in preterm infants, in which methylxanthines (aminophylline, caffeine, or theophylline) were compared to placebo or no treatment for any indication (i.e. prevention of apnea, treatment of apnea, or prevention of re-intubation).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods and GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 18 studies (2705 infants), evaluating the use of methylxanthine in preterm infants for: any indication (one study); prevention of apnea (six studies); treatment of apnea (five studies); and to prevent re-intubation (six studies). Death or major neurodevelopmental disability (DMND) at 18 to 24 months. Only the Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity (CAP) study (enrolling 2006 infants) reported on this outcome. Overall, caffeine probably reduced the risk of DMND in preterm infants treated with caffeine for any indication (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 0.97; risk difference (RD) -0.06, 95% CI -0.10 to -0.02; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 16, 95% CI 10 to 50; 1 study, 1869 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). No other trials reported DMND. Results from the CAP trial regarding DMND at 18 to 24 months are less precise when analyzed based on treatment indication. Caffeine probably results in little or no difference in DMND in infants treated for prevention of apnea (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.24; RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.09; 1 study, 423 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) and probably results in a slight reduction in DMND in infants treated for apnea of prematurity (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01; RD -0.06, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.00; NNTB 16, 95% CI 7 to > 1000; 1 study, 767 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) or to prevent re-intubation (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99; RD -0.08, 95% CI -0.15 to -0.00; NNTB 12, 95% CI 6 to >1000; 1 study, 676 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Death. In the overall analysis of any methylxanthine treatment for any indication, methylxanthine used for any indication probably results in little or no difference in death at hospital discharge (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.37; I = 0%; RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02; I = 5%; 7 studies, 2289 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Major neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. In the CAP trial, caffeine probably reduced the risk of major neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.96; RD -0.06, 95% CI -0.10 to -0.02; NNTB 16, 95% CI 10 to 50; 1 study, 1869 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), including a reduction in the risk of cerebral palsy or gross motor disability (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88; RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.01; NNTB 33, 95% CI 20 to 100; 1 study, 1810 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) and a marginal reduction in the risk of developmental delay (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00; RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.09 to -0.00; NNTB 20, 95% CI 11 to > 1000; 1 study, 1725 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Any apneic episodes, failed apnea reduction after two to seven days (< 50% reduction in apnea) (for infants treated with apnea), and need for positive-pressure ventilation after institution of treatment. Methylxanthine used for any indication probably reduces the occurrence of any apneic episodes (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.52; I = 47%; RD -0.38, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.25; I = 49%; NNTB 3, 95% CI 2 to 4; 4 studies, 167 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), failed apnea reduction after two to seven days (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.70; I = 0%; RD -0.31, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.17; I = 53%; NNTB 3, 95% CI 2 to 6; 4 studies, 174 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may reduce receipt of positive-pressure ventilation after institution of treatment (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.96; I = 0%; RD -0.06, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.01; I = 49%; NNTB 16, 95% CI 9 to 100; 9 studies, 373 infants; low-certainty evidence). Chronic lung disease. Methylxanthine used for any indication reduces chronic lung disease (defined as the use of supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age) (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.85; I = 0%; RD -0.10, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.06; I = 18%; NNTB 10, 95% CI 7 to 16; 4 studies, 2142 infants; high-certainty evidence). Failure to extubate or the need for re-intubation within one week after initiation of therapy. Methylxanthine used for the prevention of re-intubation probably results in a large reduction in failed extubation compared with no treatment (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.71; I = 0%; RD -0.27, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.15; I = 69%; NNTB 4, 95% CI 2 to 6; 6 studies, 197 infants; moderate-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Caffeine probably reduces the risk of death, major neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months, and the composite outcome DMND at 18 to 24 months. Administration of any methylxanthine to preterm infants for any indication probably leads to a reduction in the risk of any apneic episodes, failed apnea reduction after two to seven days, cerebral palsy, developmental delay, and may reduce receipt of positive-pressure ventilation after institution of treatment. Methylxanthine used for any indication reduces chronic lung disease (defined as the use of supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age).
Topics: Infant; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Infant, Premature; Caffeine; Apnea; Cerebral Palsy; Disabled Persons; Motor Disorders; Lung Diseases; Oxygen
PubMed: 37905735
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013830.pub2 -
Research in Developmental Disabilities May 2023Psychological flexibility, a popular concept in clinical psychology, is still evolving in the context of studying parents of children with disabilities. This study... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Psychological flexibility, a popular concept in clinical psychology, is still evolving in the context of studying parents of children with disabilities. This study systematically reviewed the literature on the psychological flexibility of parents of children with disabilities to identify contributions of the literature and make recommendations for practice and future study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and identified studies on the psychological flexibility of parents of children with disabilities using five electronic databases: PsychNet, PubMed, ERIC, Social Services Abstracts, and EBSCO. Twenty-six articles met the criteria and were included. A thematic analysis was conducted to extract major themes.
RESULTS
Three major themes emerged from the data: (1) psychological flexibility is associated with various aspects of mental health; (2) psychological flexibility is associated with parental functioning in caring for children with a disability; (3) acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) based interventions effectively enhance the psychological flexibility of parents of children with disabilities.
CONCLUSIONS
The study concludes that psychological flexibility is extremely relevant to disability studies and should be further explored in relation to different parental well-being and functioning aspects. Professionals are encouraged to incorporate principles of acceptance and commitment therapy into their work with parents of children with disabilities.
Topics: Child; Humans; Disabled Children; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy; Parents; Mental Health; Stress, Psychological
PubMed: 36966545
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104490