-
Disability and Rehabilitation Mar 2022The aim of this study is to systematically review and critically assess the methodological quality of literature regarding prevalence, characteristics and factors... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The aim of this study is to systematically review and critically assess the methodological quality of literature regarding prevalence, characteristics and factors influencing pain, other than phantom limb pain (PLP) in persons with lower limb amputation (LLA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review was performed (PROSPERO CRD42019138018). Literature was searched using PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and PEDro. Studies were included if describing pain other than PLP at least three months after amputation. For residual limb pain (RLP) and back pain, a meta-regression was performed.
RESULTS
Fifty-one studies were included in which predominantly young males with a unilateral traumatic amputation using a prosthesis were investigated. Pooled prevalence of RLP was 0.51 (95% CI 0.40-0.62) with a positive association with presence of back pain ( = 0.044) in the univariate meta-regression. Pooled prevalence of back pain was 0.55 (95% CI 0.45-0.64), with a positive association of time since amputation ( < 0.001) and co-occurrence of RLP ( = 0.050).
CONCLUSIONS
Back pain and RLP are common after LLA. The prevalence of back pain was positively associated with the presence of RLP, and vice versa. Future studies should give more attention to other chronic pain types, to persons with a diabetic or vascular cause of amputation, and to pain-related interference.Implications for RehabilitationBoth back pain and residual limb pain occur in more than 50% of persons with lower limb amputation (LLA), and both pain types are positively associated.Clinicians should be aware that chronic pain is common after LLA and can have a significant impact on the functioning of persons with LLA.Future research on this topic should give more attention to other chronic pain types, to persons with a diabetic or vascular cause of amputation, and to pain-related interference.
Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Back Pain; Chronic Pain; Humans; Lower Extremity; Male; Phantom Limb
PubMed: 32603198
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1783377 -
Journal of Neural Engineering Sep 2022Electrical stimulation can induce sensation in the phantom limb of individuals with amputation. It is difficult to generalize existing findings as there are many... (Review)
Review
Electrical stimulation can induce sensation in the phantom limb of individuals with amputation. It is difficult to generalize existing findings as there are many approaches to delivering stimulation and to assessing the characteristics and benefits of sensation. Therefore, the goal of this systematic review was to explore the stimulation parameters that effectively elicited referred sensation, the qualities of elicited sensation, and how the utility of referred sensation was assessed.We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Engineering Village through January of 2022 to identify relevant papers. We included papers which electrically induced referred sensation in individuals with limb loss and excluded papers that did not contain stimulation parameters or outcome measures pertaining to stimulation. We extracted information on participant demographics, stimulation approaches, and participant outcomes.After applying exclusion criteria, 49 papers were included covering nine stimulation methods. Amplitude was the most commonly adjusted parameter (= 25), followed by frequency (= 22), and pulse width (= 15). Of the 63 reports of sensation quality, most reported feelings of pressure (= 52), paresthesia (= 48), or vibration (= 40) while less than half (= 29) reported a sense of position or movement. Most papers evaluated the functional benefits of sensation (= 33) using force matching or object identification tasks, while fewer papers quantified subjective measures (= 16) such as pain or embodiment. Only 15 studies (36%) observed percept intensity, quality, or location over multiple sessions.Most studies that measured functional performance demonstrated some benefit to providing participants with sensory feedback. However, few studies could experimentally manipulate sensation location or quality. Direct comparisons between studies were limited by variability in methodologies and outcome measures. As such, we offer recommendations to aid in more standardized reporting for future research.
Topics: Amputees; Artificial Limbs; Feedback, Sensory; Humans; Phantom Limb; Sensation
PubMed: 36001115
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac8c38 -
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Mar 2023Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is growing in popularity; however, literature evaluating patient characteristics and outcomes is limited.
BACKGROUND
Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is growing in popularity; however, literature evaluating patient characteristics and outcomes is limited.
METHODS
The EMBASE database was queried with the search terms "targeted muscle reinnervation" OR "TMR" AND "outcomes" OR "patient outcomes." Clinical human studies in English were eligible for inclusion, yielding 89 articles. After rigorous exclusion criteria, a total of 13 articles were included in this review. Study data including geographic location, patient demographics, TMR indication, amputation level, number of nerve transfers performed, length of follow-up, and reported outcomes were extracted and analyzed.
RESULTS
The included articles represent 338 patients (341 limbs). Average patient age was 47.4 years. Indication for amputation included trauma ( = 125), infection ( = 76) cancer/tumor resection ( = 71), ischemia ( = 18), failed Charcot reconstruction ( = 15), failed hardware ( = 9), burn ( = 4), and CRPS ( = 4). Five studies included upper extremity TMR only, two included lower extremity TMR only, and six included both upper and lower extremity TMR. TMR was performed in an immediate or delayed fashion, with an average of 2.2 nerve transfers performed per limb overall. Average length of follow-up was 22.3 months. In three studies, patients with phantom limb pain undergoing delayed TMR were found to have significant or trending toward significant reduction in pain after TMR using numeric rating scale and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scales. One article reported 9/10 patients with improved or complete resolution of phantom limb pain after delayed TMR. Three studies found that patients undergoing immediate TMR had lower pain scores compared with non-TMR controls.
CONCLUSION
While there is evidence that TMR reduces neuroma-related pain and improves the quality of life for amputees, further outcomes studies are needed to study the patient experience with TMR on a larger scale. Establishing standardized, validated patient-reported outcomes assessment tools is critical to future investigation in this field.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Phantom Limb; Quality of Life; Muscle, Skeletal; Amputation, Surgical; Neoplasms; Upper Extremity
PubMed: 35988579
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755262 -
Neurosurgery Feb 2020Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been considered for patients with intractable pain syndromes since the 1950s. Although there is substantial experience reported in the...
BACKGROUND
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been considered for patients with intractable pain syndromes since the 1950s. Although there is substantial experience reported in the literature, the indications are contested, especially in the United States where it remains off-label. Historically, the sensory-discriminative pain pathways were targeted. More recently, modulation of the affective sphere of pain has emerged as a plausible alternative.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the literature from studies that used contemporary DBS technology. Our aim is to summarize the current evidence of this therapy.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries through July 2017 to review all studies using the current DBS technology primarily for pain treatment. Study characteristics including patient demographics, surgical technique, outcomes, and complications were collected.
RESULTS
Twenty-two articles were included in this review. In total, 228 patients were implanted with a definitive DBS system for pain. The most common targets used were periaqueductal/periventricular gray matter region, ventral posterior lateral/posterior medial thalamus, or both. Poststroke pain, phantom limb pain, and brachial plexus injury were the most common specific indications for DBS. Outcomes varied between studies and across chronic pain diagnoses. Two different groups of investigators targeting the affective sphere of pain have demonstrated improvements in quality of life measures without significant reductions in pain scores.
CONCLUSION
DBS outcomes for chronic pain are heterogeneous thus far. Future studies may focus on specific pain diagnosis rather than multiple syndromes and consider randomized placebo-controlled designs. DBS targeting the affective sphere of pain seems promising and deserves further investigation.
Topics: Chronic Pain; Deep Brain Stimulation; Female; Humans; Implantable Neurostimulators; Male; Pain Management; Pain, Intractable; Phantom Limb; Quality of Life; Thalamus
PubMed: 30799493
DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy552 -
Pain Reports Dec 2023Limb trauma remains the most prevalent survivable major combat injury. In the First World War, more than 700,000 British soldiers received limb wounds and more than... (Review)
Review
Limb trauma remains the most prevalent survivable major combat injury. In the First World War, more than 700,000 British soldiers received limb wounds and more than 41,000 underwent an amputation, creating one of the largest amputee cohorts in history. Postamputation pain affects up to 85% of military amputees, suggesting that up to 33,000 British First World War veterans potentially reported postamputation pain. This qualitative systematic review explores the professional medical conversation around clinical management of chronic postamputation pain in this patient cohort, its development over the 20th century, and how this information was disseminated among medical professionals. We searched and archives (1914-1985) for reports referring to postamputation pain, its prevalence, mechanisms, descriptors, or clinical management. Participants were First World War veterans with a limb amputation, excluding civilians and veterans of all other conflicts. The search identified 9809 potentially relevant texts, of which 101 met the inclusion criteria. Reports emerged as early as 1914 and the discussion continued over the next 4 decades. Unexpected findings included early advocacy of multidisciplinary pain management, concerns over addiction, and the effect of chronic pain on mental health emerging decades earlier than previously thought. Chronic postamputation pain is still a significant issue for military rehabilitation. Similarities between injury patterns in the First World War and recent Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts mean that these historical aspects remain relevant to today's military personnel, clinicians, researchers, and policymakers.
PubMed: 37860786
DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001094 -
Pain Apr 2024Combat trauma can lead to widespread tissue damage and limb loss. This may result in chronic neuropathic and post amputation pain, including phantom limb pain (PLP) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Combat trauma can lead to widespread tissue damage and limb loss. This may result in chronic neuropathic and post amputation pain, including phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP). The military population is distinct with respect to demographic, injury, and social characteristics compared with other amputation and trauma cohorts. We undertook a systematic review of studies of military personnel, with a history of combat injury, that reported a prevalence of any type of postamputation pain or chronic neuropathic pain, identified from Embase and MEDLINE databases.Using the inverse variance method with a random-effects model, we undertook a meta-analysis to determine an overall prevalence and performed exploratory analyses to identify the effect of the type of pain, conflict, and time since injury on prevalence. Pain definitions and types of pain measurement tools used in studies were recorded. Thirty-one studies (14,738 participants) were included. The pooled prevalence of PLP, RLP, and chronic neuropathic pain were 57% (95% CI: 46-68), 61% (95% CI: 50-71), and 26% (95% CI: 10-54), respectively. Between-study heterogeneity was high (I 2 : 94%-98%). Characterisation of duration, frequency, and impact of pain was limited. Factors reported by included studies as being associated with PLP included the presence of RLP and psychological comorbidity. The prevalence of postamputation pain and chronic neuropathic pain after combat trauma is high. We highlight inconsistency of case definitions and terminology for pain and the need for consensus in future research of traumatic injury.
Topics: Humans; Military Personnel; Prevalence; Pain Measurement; Neuralgia; Phantom Limb
PubMed: 38112578
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003094 -
Disability and Rehabilitation Oct 2023Life after any amputation can be significantly altered and can have a significant impact on quality of life (QoL). However, most of the evidence base involves older aged... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Life after any amputation can be significantly altered and can have a significant impact on quality of life (QoL). However, most of the evidence base involves older aged amputees, therefore there is a lack of understanding about the impact of amputation on QoL and the factors that predict QoL in younger amputees. The aim of this review is to identify the factors that predict QoL in young amputees.
METHODS
MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science were searched to identify articles that measured QoL in young amputees. Articles were independently assessed by two assessors. Data was extracted from the selected articles and a narrative synthesis performed.
RESULTS
18 articles were included in this review. QoL outcome measures varied between studies. The quality of evidence was generally low. This review identified, gender, age, cause of amputation, level of amputation, phantom pain, ability to use a prosthesis, physical function, depression, anxiety, body image, type of prosthesis as predictors of QoL.
CONCLUSION
This review identified modifiable and non-modifiable predictors of QoL in young amputees. Future research needs to focus on exploring the modifiable predictors of QoL as these are the aspects that can be improved to enhance QoL.
PubMed: 37865851
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2270908 -
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Sep 2022Sensory discrimination training (SDT) is a form of feedback guided sensory training used in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP).
BACKGROUND
Sensory discrimination training (SDT) is a form of feedback guided sensory training used in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP).
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of SDT for CMP.
METHODS
MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, AMED, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, OT Seeker, PEDro, ETHOS, Web of Science, and Open Grey were searched for appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Included papers were assessed for risk of bias, and evidence was graded using the GRADE approach. The protocol was published on PROSPERO (anonymized).
RESULTS
Ten RCTs met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. There was conflicting evidence from seven RCTs for the efficacy of SDT for chronic low back pain (CLBP). There was very low-quality evidence from two studies supporting the efficacy of SDT for phantom limb pain (PLP). There was very low-quality evidence from one RCT for the efficacy of SDT for Fibromyalgia. No adverse effects of SDT were identified.
CONCLUSIONS
SDT has been delivered in multiple forms in the literature. SDT does not appear to be associated with any adverse effects and shows potential regarding its clinical efficacy. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence upon which to make any firm clinical recommendations.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Chronic Pain; Fibromyalgia; Low Back Pain; Musculoskeletal Pain
PubMed: 33078667
DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1830455 -
Arquivos de Neuro-psiquiatria Jan 2024Phantom limb pain (PLP) occurs after amputations and can persist in a chronic and debilitating way. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a...
BACKGROUND
Phantom limb pain (PLP) occurs after amputations and can persist in a chronic and debilitating way. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation method capable of influencing brain function and modulating cortical excitability. Its effectiveness in treating chronic pain is promising.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the evidence on the efficacy and safety of using rTMS in the treatment of PLP, observing the stimulation parameters used, side effects, and benefits of the therapy.
METHODS
This is a systematic review of scientific articles published in national and international literature using electronic platforms.
RESULTS
Two hundred and fifty two articles were identified. Two hundred and forty six publications were removed because they were duplicated or met the exclusion criteria. After selection, six studies were reviewed, those being two randomized clinical trials and four case reports. All evaluated studies indicated some degree of benefit of rTMS to relieve painful symptoms, even temporarily. Pain perception was lower at the end of treatment when compared to the period prior to the sessions and remained during patient follow-up. There was no standardization of the stimulation parameters used. There were no reports of serious adverse events. The effects of long-term therapy have not been evaluated.
CONCLUSION
There are some benefits, even if temporary, in the use of rTMS to relieve painful symptoms in PLP. High-frequency stimulation at M1 demonstrated a significant analgesic effect. Given the potential that has been demonstrated, but limited by the paucity of high-quality studies, further controlled studies are needed to establish and standardize the clinical use of the method.
Topics: Humans; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Phantom Limb; Chronic Pain
PubMed: 38286434
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779051 -
Current Pain and Headache Reports Sep 2020The purpose of the present systematic review is to provide a current understanding of the mechanism of action and the evidence available to support clinical...
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The purpose of the present systematic review is to provide a current understanding of the mechanism of action and the evidence available to support clinical decision-making. The focus is to summarize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized or observational studies of spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain to understand clinical effectiveness and the mechanism of action.
RECENT FINDINGS
Several recent studies have demonstrated the benefit of spinal cord stimulation in managing chronic pain. Until recently, the mechanism of action was founded on a central paradigm derived from gate control theory, which is the need to stimulate the dorsal column of the spinal cord to generate paresthesia. The recent development of new therapies that do not rely on paresthesia has left the field without a clear mechanism of action that could serve as a strong foundation to further improve clinical outcomes. Consequently, multiple theories have emerged to explain how electrical pulse applied to the spinal cord could alleviate pain, including activation of specific supraspinal pathways, and segmental modulation of the neurological interaction. Recent systematic reviews also have shown the clinical effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in managing chronic spinal pain, phantom limb pain, complex regional pain syndrome, and other chronic painful conditions. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain is rapidly evolving with technology at its forefront. This comprehensive focused review evaluated 11 RCTs and 7 nonrandomized/observational studies which provided levels of evidence ranging from I to II.
Topics: Chronic Pain; Humans; Low Back Pain; Lower Extremity; Spinal Cord Stimulation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32997170
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-020-00907-2