-
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Nov 2019The diagnosis of neck pain is challenging. Many visceral disorders are known to cause it, and clinical practice guidelines recommend to rule them out during neck pain... (Review)
Review
The diagnosis of neck pain is challenging. Many visceral disorders are known to cause it, and clinical practice guidelines recommend to rule them out during neck pain diagnosis. However, the absence of suspicion of any cause impedes one from establishing that specific aetiology as the final diagnosis. To investigate the degree of consideration given to visceral aetiology, a systematic search of trials about neck pain was carried out to evaluate their selection criteria. The search yielded 309 eligible articles, which were screened by two independent reviewers. The PEDro scale score was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. The following information was retrieved: number of authors affiliated to a clinical or non-clinical institution, number of citations in the Web of Science, study aims, characteristics of participants, and eligibility criteria. The top 15 most cited trials, and the 15 most recent studies about treatment efficacy in neck pain, published in first quartile journals of the Journal Citation Reports, were selected. Females represented 67.5% of participants. A single study was of poor methodological quality (4/10). Based on the eligibility criteria of the articles that were systematically reviewed, it would appear that visceral aetiology was not considered in eighty percent of the trials on neck pain, showing a low level of suspicion both in research and clinical settings.
PubMed: 31726685
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics9040186 -
Cureus Nov 2023The interscalene block (ISB) is the standard regional anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopy. However, the superior trunk block (STB) is an alternative with a potentially... (Review)
Review
The interscalene block (ISB) is the standard regional anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopy. However, the superior trunk block (STB) is an alternative with a potentially safer profile. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the incidence and degree of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis and block efficacy of these techniques. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The main outcome was total hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. We used the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess the certainty of evidence. Four RCTs and 359 patients were included. The STB group showed lower total hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (RR 0.07; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.14; <0.0001). The incidence of subjective dyspnea ( = 0.002) and Horner's syndrome (<0.001) was significantly lower with STB relative to ISB. There was no significant difference between groups in block duration (p = 0.67). There was a high certainty of evidence in the main outcome as per the GRADE framework. Our findings suggest that STB has a better safety profile than ISB, resulting in lower rates of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis and dyspnea while providing a similar block. Therefore, STB could be preferred to ISB, especially in patients susceptible to phrenic nerve paralysis complications.
PubMed: 38050517
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48217 -
International Journal of Cardiology.... Oct 2022Initial experience suggests that the POLARx cryoballoon system (Boston Scientific) has a similar procedural efficacy and safety as Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro,... (Review)
Review
Initial experience suggests that the POLARx cryoballoon system (Boston Scientific) has a similar procedural efficacy and safety as Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro, Medtronic). We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis comparing POLARx and AFA-Pro. Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched until 12/01/2022 for studies comparing POLARx versus AFA-Pro in patients undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for AF. A total of 8 studies, involving 1146 patients from 11 European centers were included (POLARx n = 317; AFA-Pro n = 819). There were no differences in acute PV isolation, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, ablation time, minimal esophageal temperature, and risk of phrenic nerve palsy or thromboembolic events. Balloon nadir temperatures were lower for POLARx in all PVs. Compared with AFA-Pro, POLARx had a higher rate of first freeze isolation in the left inferior PV (LIPV) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.60; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.06 to 6.43; P = 0.04), higher likelihood of time-to-isolation (TTI) recording in LIPV (OR: 2.91; 95 % CI: 1.54 to 5.49; P = 0.001) and right inferior PV (OR: 3.23; 95 % CI: 1.35 to 7.74; P = 0.008). In contrast, the TTI in LIPV was longer with POLARx in comparison to AFA-Pro (mean difference: 7.61 ; 95 % CI 2.43 to 12.8 ; P = 0.004). In conclusion, POLARx and AFA-Pro have a similar acute outcome. Interestingly, there was a higher rate of TTI recording in the inferior PVs with POLARx. This updated -analysis provides new safety data on esophageal temperature and thromboembolic events.
PubMed: 36097550
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101115 -
Journal of Cardiovascular... Oct 2020Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the preferred modalities for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Technological advances have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing second-generation cryoballoon and contact force radiofrequency ablation for initial ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.
INTRODUCTION
Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the preferred modalities for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Technological advances have improved procedural outcomes, warranting an updated comparison. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBA-2nd generation (CBA-2G) in comparison to RFA-contact force (RFA-CF) in patients with AF.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched until 03/01/2020 for relevant studies comparing CBA-2G versus RFA-CF in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for AF.
RESULTS
A total of 17 studies, involving 11 793 patients were included. There was no difference between the two groups in the outcomes of freedom from atrial arrhythmia (p = .67) and total procedural complications (p = .65). There was a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy in CBA-2G (odds ratio: 10.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.85 to 19.55; p < .001). Procedure duration was shorter (mean difference: -31.32 min; 95% CI: -40.73 to -21.92; p < .001) and fluoroscopy duration was longer (+3.21 min; 95% CI: 1.09 to 5.33; p = .003) in CBA-2G compared to RFA-CF. In the subgroup analyses of patients with persistent AF and >1 freeze lesion delivered per vein, there was no difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia.
CONCLUSIONS
In AF patients undergoing initial ablation, CBA-2G and RFA-CF were equally efficacious. The procedure duration was shorter, but with a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy in CBA-2G. In patients with persistent AF, there was no difference in the efficacy between CBA-2G or RFA-CF techniques.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Cryosurgery; Humans; Pulmonary Veins; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32671920
DOI: 10.1111/jce.14676 -
Journal of Interventional Cardiac... Apr 2023There is limited data comparing radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), which tends to have higher recurrence rates... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
There is limited data comparing radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), which tends to have higher recurrence rates following ablation compared to paroxysmal AF.
METHODS
A systematic search of the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane database was performed for studies comparing RF vs CB ablation for persistent AF. An inverse-variance random-effects model was used to calculate the composite effects.
RESULTS
One randomized and 9 observational studies were identified, with 1650 patients receiving CB and 1706 patients receiving RF ablation. Mean follow-up time ranged from 12 to 48 months. Freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia was similar with the two modalities (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.08, I 0%). Total complications were similar in both groups (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.53, I 0%) although rates of phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) were greater with CB (RR 4.13, 95% CI 1.49 to 11.46, I 0%). Shorter procedure times were observed with CB (mean reduction 43.77 min, 95% CI 66.45 to 21.09 min, I 96%) with no difference in fluoroscopy time (mean difference 0.82 min, 95% CI - 11.92 to 13.55 min, I 100%).
CONCLUSIONS
In persistent AF patients, CB ablation has similar efficacy and overall safety as compared to RF ablation. While CB is associated with significantly shorter procedure times, the improved procedural efficiency with CB is offset by increased rates of PNP and the potential need for touch-up RF ablation.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Treatment Outcome; Catheter Ablation; Cryosurgery; Radiofrequency Ablation; Pulmonary Veins; Recurrence
PubMed: 36089635
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01369-9 -
Journal of Cardiovascular... Sep 2021In May 2020, a novel cryoballoon system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) became available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The design of the cryoballoon is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
In May 2020, a novel cryoballoon system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) became available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The design of the cryoballoon is comparable to the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro; Medtronic), but it is more compliant during freezing. We compared the procedural efficacy, biophysical parameters, and risk of phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) between the two cryoballoons.
METHODS
Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched until June 1, 2021 for relevant studies comparing POLARx versus AFA-Pro in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for AF.
RESULTS
A total of four studies, involving 310 patients were included. There was no difference between the two groups for outcomes regarding procedural efficacy: acute PVI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06 to 3.03; p = .40), procedure time (mean difference [MD]: 8.15 min; 95% CI: -8.09 to 24.39; p = .33), fluoroscopy time (MD: 1.32 min; 95% CI: -1.61 to 4.25; p = .38) and ablation time (MD: 1.00 min; 95% CI: -0.20 to 2.20; p = .10). The balloon nadir temperature was lower for all individual pulmonary veins (PV) in POLARx compared with AFA-Pro (MD: -9.74°C, -9.98°C, -6.72°C, -7.76°C, for left superior PV, left inferior PV, right superior PV, and right inferior PV, respectively; all p < .001). The incidence of PNP was similar between groups (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.85; p = .72).
CONCLUSION
In AF patients undergoing PVI, POLARx and AFA-Pro had a similar procedural efficacy. Balloon nadir temperatures were lower with POLARx, however, the incidence of PNP was similar.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Cryosurgery; Humans; Incidence; Paralysis; Phrenic Nerve; Pulmonary Veins; Temperature; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34289198
DOI: 10.1111/jce.15182 -
Journal of Cardiovascular... Dec 2022We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies with a control group to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a time to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies with a control group to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a time to isolation (TTI)-based strategy of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS
Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase) without language restrictions were searched. The intervention assessed was a TTI-based strategy of CBA in the treatment of AF. TTI was defined as the time from the start of freezing to the last recorded pulmonary veins' potential. The comparison of interest was intended conventional protocol of CBA. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia.
RESULTS
Nine studies were deemed eligible (N = 2289 patients). Eight studies reported freedom from atrial arrhythmia and pooled results showed a marginally similar success rate between the two protocols (odds ratio [OR]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-1.56). A prespecified subgroup analysis verified that a high dose TTI strategy (with >120 s duration of cryotherapy post-TTI) compared to the conventional protocol could significantly increase the patients without atrial arrhythmia during follow-up (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.05-1.83). TTI strategy could also significantly decrease total procedure time (SMD: -26.24 min; 95% CI: -36.90 to -15.57) and phrenic nerve palsy incidence (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29-0.84).
CONCLUSION
Moderate confidence evidence suggests that an individualized CBA dosing strategy based on TTI and extended (>2 min post-TTI) duration of CBA is accompanied by fewer recurrences post-AF ablation.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Cryosurgery; Catheter Ablation; Treatment Outcome; Pulmonary Veins; Recurrence
PubMed: 36177697
DOI: 10.1111/jce.15697 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is the most common form of thoracic venous abnormality. Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be complicated...
INTRODUCTION
Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is the most common form of thoracic venous abnormality. Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be complicated by the existence of PLSVC, which could act as an important arrhythmogenic mechanism in AF.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We reported a case series of patients with PLSVC who underwent CA for AF at our center between 2018 and 2021. A systematic search was also performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for research reporting CA for AF in patients with PLSVC. Sixteen patients with PLSVC were identified at our center. Ablation targeting PLSVC was performed in 5 patients in the index procedures and in four patients receiving redo procedures. One patient experienced acute procedure failure. After a median follow-up period of 15 months, only 6 (37.5%) patients remained free from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) after a single procedure. In the systematic review, 11 studies with 167 patients were identified. Based on the included studies, the estimated prevalence of PLSVC in patients undergoing CA for AF was 0.7%. Ablation targeting PLSVC was performed in 121 (74.7%) patients. Major complications in patients with PLSVC receiving AF ablation procedure included four cases of cardiac tamponades (2%), three cases of cardiac effusion (1.5%), one case of ischemic stroke, and three cases of phrenic nerve injury (1.5%) (one left phrenic nerve and two right phrenic nerve). Pooled analysis revealed that after a median follow-up period of 15.6 months (IQR 12.0-74.0 months), the long-term AF/AT-free rate was 70.6% (95% CI 62.8-78.4%, = 0.0%) (Central illustration). Different ablation strategies for PLSVC were summarized and discussed in the systematic review.
CONCLUSION
In patients with PLSVC, recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after CA for AF is relatively common. Ablation aiming for PLSVC isolation is necessitated in most patients. The overall risk of procedural complications was within an acceptable range.
PubMed: 36337869
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1015540 -
Journal of Interventional Cardiac... Nov 2021Cryoballoon (CB) has been widely utilized in the treatment of drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF), but the balance point between efficacy and safety has been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison for the efficacy and safety of time-to-isolation protocol and conventional protocol of cryoballoon in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
BACKGROUND
Cryoballoon (CB) has been widely utilized in the treatment of drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF), but the balance point between efficacy and safety has been unclear. The protocol based on the time-to-isolation (TTI) was expected to provide patients with individualized ablation strategies.
METHODS
All studies up to June 2020 comparing the CB of TTI-based protocol (TTIP) and conventional protocol (ConP) in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The pooled OR or SMD with 95% CIs for each outcome were calculated with inverse-variance random effect model. The Egger method was used to evaluate the publication bias and the subgroup analysis was conducted according to the type of atrial fibrillation.
RESULTS
Six studies enrolling a total of 1770 patients with drug-refractory AF were included. The pool real-time recording of pulmonary veins potential was 71% (95% CI: 61 ~ 81%, I = 97.9%) and a similar incidence of freedom from ATs after 1 year (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.86 ~ 1.46, I = 0.0%, P = 0.481) was observed between two protocols. No difference was observed in complications (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.43 ~ 1.04, I = 0.0%, P = 0.717) and phrenic nerve palsy (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.37 ~ 1.35, I = 0.0%, P = 0.807). TTIP could significantly decrease the CB freezes per patient (SMD: - 2.44; 95% CI: - 4.46 to approximately - 0.41; I = 99.5%, P = 0.00) and shorten the cryotherapy application time (SMD: - 3.04; 95% CI: - 4.18 to approximately - 1.89; I = 97.4%, P = 0.00), procedure time (SMD: - 1.51; 95% CI: - 2.08 to approximately - 0.94; I = 95.4%, P = 0.00), and fluorescence time (SMD: - 0.70; 95% CI: - 1.25 to approximately - 0.15; I = 95.7%, P = 0.00).
CONCLUSION
TTIP is safe and effective and it opens a new chapter in the field of individualized protocol of CB for patients with AF.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Clinical Protocols; Cryosurgery; Pulmonary Veins; Recurrence; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33033904
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-020-00890-z -
Microsurgery Feb 2020Restoration of elbow flexion is the priority in traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Surgical approaches commonly include nerve transfers and nerve grafting. Our... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
UNLABELLED
Restoration of elbow flexion is the priority in traumatic brachial plexus injuries. Surgical approaches commonly include nerve transfers and nerve grafting. Our objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of nerve transfers versus grafting for traumatic nonobstetric brachial plexus injuries.
METHODS
This systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and the I-square was used to assess heterogeneity. The Medical Research Scale (MRC) score was used to assess the efficacy of the procedures.
RESULTS
Nine studies comprising 490 patients overall were identified. In the pooled analysis, functional recovery of elbow flexion defined as MRC ≥ M3, was superior in the transfer (N = 272/350, 77.7%) compared to the graft group (N = 99/140, 70.7%); however statistical significance was not reached (OR: 1.95; 95%CI: 0.79-4.83; I : 58.8%). However, the odds for successful restoration of elbow flexion (MRC≥M3) were significantly higher when the ulnar (OR:12.20; 95%CI:3.05-48.80; I :0%) or pectoral nerves (OR: 9.69; 95% CI: 1.83-51.25; I : 0%) were used as healthy donors for the transfer compared to the graft procedures. Results between the two groups were similar when the intercostal, spinal accessory, thoracodorsal, contralateral C7 and phrenic nerves were used as donors for the transfer procedures.
CONCLUSIONS
The ulnar or pectoral nerve transfer to musculocutaneous is associated with statistically significant superior rates of elbow flexion recovery as compared to graft. No differences were identified in the pooled analysis or the subgroups of other donors used in nerve transfers. Future randomized studies or prospective cohorts are needed to validate our results.
Topics: Brachial Plexus; Brachial Plexus Neuropathies; Elbow; Humans; Nerve Transfer; Prospective Studies; Range of Motion, Articular
PubMed: 31486132
DOI: 10.1002/micr.30510