-
Neurourology and Urodynamics Jun 2024Although antibiotic prophylaxis (AB) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in bacteriuria after invasive urodynamics (UDS), no significant decrease in the...
INTRODUCTION
Although antibiotic prophylaxis (AB) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in bacteriuria after invasive urodynamics (UDS), no significant decrease in the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI) has been confirmed. No absolute recommendations on the use of AB in case of relevant potential risk of UTI have been reported, though some categories of patients at increased infective probability after UDS have been recognized. The aim of this study is to report the experts' consensus on the best practice for the use of AB before UDS in the main categories of patients at potential risk of developing UTI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed on AB before UDS in males and females. A panel of experts from the Italian Society of Urodynamics, Continence, Neuro-Urology, and Pelvic Floor (SIUD) assessed the review data and decided by a modified Delphi method on 16 statements proposed and discussed by the panel. The cut-off percentage for the consensus was a ≥70% of positive responses to the survey. The study was a Delphi consensus with experts' opinions, not a clinical trial involving directly patients.
RESULTS
The panel group was composed of 57 experts in functional urology and UDS, mainly urologists, likewise gynaecologists, physiatrists, infectivologists, pediatric urologists, and nurses. A positive consensus was achieved on 9/16 (56.25%) of the statements, especially on the need for performing AB before UD in patients with neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression. Urine analysis and urine culture before UDS are mandatory, and in the event of their positivity, UDS should be postponed. A consensus was reached on avoiding AB in menopausal status, diabetes, age, gender, bladder outlet obstruction, high postvoid residual, chronic catheterization, previous urological surgery, lack of urological abnormalities, pelvic organ prolapse, and negative urine analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for patients without notable risk factors and with a negative urine test due to the potential morbidities that may result from antibiotic administration. However, AB can be used for risk categories such as neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression. The evaluation of urine analysis and urine culture and postponing UDS in cases of positive tests were considered good practices, as well as performing AB in the neurogenic bladder and immunosuppression.
Topics: Humans; Delphi Technique; Urodynamics; Urinary Tract Infections; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Consensus; Female; Male; Italy; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Risk Factors; Urology
PubMed: 38587242
DOI: 10.1002/nau.25463 -
American Journal of Physical Medicine &... Jul 2022The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on spasticity after upper motor neuron injury. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on spasticity after upper motor neuron injury.
DESIGN
Eight electronic databases were searched systematically from their inception to August 3, 2021, to provide robust evidence for the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for spasticity and range of motion after upper motor neuron injury. Study screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and evaluation of the certainty of evidence were performed independently by two independent reviewers. Data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3.5 and R 3.6.1 software.
RESULTS
Forty-two studies with 1973 patients who met the eligibility criteria were selected from articles published from 2010 to 2021, of which 34 were included in the meta-analysis. A comparison intervention revealed that extracorporeal shock wave therapy significantly decreased the Modified Ashworth Scale score and increased the passive range of motion of a joint. Regarding the safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy, slightly adverse effects, such as skin injury, bone distortion, muscle numbness, pain, petechiae, and weakness, were reported in five studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy may be an effective and safe treatment for spasticity after upper motor neuron injury. However, because of poor methodological qualities of the included studies and high heterogeneity, this conclusion warrants further investigation.
TO CLAIM CME CREDITS
Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.
CME OBJECTIVES
Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Determine the impact of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on spasticity after upper motor neuron injury; (2) Describe the factors that affect the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on spasticity; and (3) Discuss the mechanism of action of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on spasticity.
LEVEL
Advanced.
ACCREDITATION
The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Topics: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy; Humans; Motor Neurons; Muscle Spasticity; Pain
PubMed: 35152251
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001977 -
American Journal of Physical Medicine &... Oct 2022The aims of the study were to assess the effectiveness of long-term exercise therapy (≥12 wks) for patients with Parkinson disease and to derive specific suggestions... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The aims of the study were to assess the effectiveness of long-term exercise therapy (≥12 wks) for patients with Parkinson disease and to derive specific suggestions on how the motor symptom improvements can be optimized by exercise type and exercise dose.
DESIGN
The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register, Embase, Scopus, and CNKI databases were searched up to January 2021 for randomized controlled trials focusing on the effects of long-term exercise for Parkinson disease. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of papers using the PEDro scale. Twenty-six studies with a total of 1243 participants were included.
RESULTS
Tai Chi, resistance training, and dance provide significant improvements in physical function and functional mobility. Furthermore, Tai Chi and dance result in balance benefits. However, walking capacity outcomes did not improve after Tai Chi and resistance training but did improve after dance. With an increase in the intervention duration or length of each session, the effect sizes of exercise on these outcomes increased; higher benefits of exercise on these outcomes were observed at a frequency of 2 times/wk.
CONCLUSIONS
Long-term exercise therapy is an effective treatment for improving motor symptoms, with dance being an ideal exercise choice.
TO CLAIM CME CREDITS
Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME.
CME OBJECTIVES
Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Recognize that long-term exercise slows clinical progression of motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson disease; (2) Acquire knowledge regarding the effectiveness of long-term exercise therapy on motor symptoms in Parkinson disease; and (3) Incorporate specific suggestions on dose-response relationships of different exercise therapy on motor symptoms in Parkinson disease.
LEVEL
Advanced.
ACCREDITATION
The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Topics: Exercise Therapy; Humans; Parkinson Disease; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tai Ji
PubMed: 35695530
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002052 -
American Journal of Physical Medicine &... Aug 2020The goal of this systematic review was to provide guidelines for treatment parameters regarding electrical stimulation by investigating its efficacy in improving muscle...
OBJECTIVE
The goal of this systematic review was to provide guidelines for treatment parameters regarding electrical stimulation by investigating its efficacy in improving muscle strength and decreasing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
DESIGN
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standard, three electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, and PEDro) and gray literature were used. Randomized control trials comparing electrical stimulation and conservative physical therapy were critically appraised using the 2005 University of Oxford standard.
RESULTS
Nine randomized control trials were included in our review. First, our review confirmed that neuromuscular electrical stimulation is the most effective electrical stimulation treatment in the management of knee OA, and its efficiency is higher when combined with a strengthening program. Second, frequency of at least 50 Hz and no more than 75 Hz with a pulse duration between 200 and 400 μs and a treatment duration of 20 mins is necessary for successful treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
For the first time, our review provides standardized clinical treatment parameters for neuromuscular electrical stimulation to be included in a strengthening program for the adult patient with knee OA.
TO CLAIM CME CREDITS
Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME CME OBJECTIVES: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Recall the impact of quadriceps femoris weakness on joint stability; (2) Summarize the mechanism of action of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on reducing pain and increasing muscle strength; and (3) Plan the clinical treatment parameters of NMES to be included in a strengthening program for an adult patient with knee osteoarthritis.
LEVEL
Advanced.
ACCREDITATION
The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Topics: Electric Stimulation Therapy; Humans; Muscle Strength; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32167955
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001409