-
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Mar 2023: Vancomycin combined with piperacillin/tazobactam (vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam) has a higher risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) than vancomycin combined with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Evaluating the Nephrotoxicity of Area-under-the-Curve-Based Dosing of Vancomycin with Concomitant Antipseudomonal Beta-Lactam Antibiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
: Vancomycin combined with piperacillin/tazobactam (vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam) has a higher risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) than vancomycin combined with cefepime or meropenem. However, it is uncertain if applying area under the curve (AUC)-based vancomycin dosing has less nephrotoxicity than trough-based dosing in these combinations. : We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to December 2022. We examined the odds ratio (OR) of AKI between vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam and the control group. The control group was defined as vancomycin combined with antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics, except for piperacillin-tazobactam. : The OR for AKI is significantly higher in vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam compared with the control group (3 studies, 866 patients, OR of 3.861, 95% confidence interval of 2.165 to 6.887, < 0.05). In the sample population of patients who received vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam (2 studies, 536 patients), the risk of AKI (OR of 0.715, 95% CI of 0.439 to 1.163, = 0.177) and daily vancomycin dose (standard mean difference-0.139, 95% CI-0.458 to 0.179; = 0.392) are lower by AUC-based dosing than trough-based dosing, although it is not statistically significant. : Nephrotoxicity is higher when combined with piperacillin/tazobactam than other antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics (cefepime or meropenem) using the AUC-based dosing. However, applying the AUC-based dosing did not eliminate the risk of AKI or significantly reduce thedaily vancomycin dose compared with the trough-based dosing in the available literature.
Topics: Humans; Vancomycin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Meropenem; Drug Therapy, Combination; Retrospective Studies; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Monobactams; Acute Kidney Injury
PubMed: 37109649
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59040691 -
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 2019A systematic review was performed in order to integrate and synthesize available information on mcr genes dissemination in Latin America. Four databases were searched... (Review)
Review
A systematic review was performed in order to integrate and synthesize available information on mcr genes dissemination in Latin America. Four databases were searched for articles reporting plasmid-mediated colistin resistance between bacteria isolated from countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. Abstract books of scientific events realized in each region were also examined. After search and selection, 48 studies that included 18,705 isolates recovered between 2000 and 2018 were evaluated. The overall frequency of mcr genes in Latin America was 2.9% (550/18,705), with IncX4 plasmids shown to be the key vectors responsible for the dissemination of genes within the continent. Brazil, Bolivia and Argentina were the countries with the highest number of mcr-positive isolates, and only Colombia (mcr-5) and Brazil (mcr-3) presented mcr genes other than type 1. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium were mainly found to carry the gene within the continent and these microorganisms showed high susceptibility to ertapenem, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, fosfomycin and tigecycline. This review showed that the mcr gene is circulating in several countries of Latin America. Thus, it is important to encourage microbiological and molecular surveillance programs to avoid the spread of these genes within and outside the continent.
Topics: Bacteria; Caribbean Region; Colistin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Genes, Bacterial; Latin America; Plasmids
PubMed: 31336179
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2019.07.015 -
Pharmacotherapy Nov 2023Prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) is gaining popularity as a renal replacement modality in intensive care units, but there is a relative lack of... (Review)
Review
Prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) is gaining popularity as a renal replacement modality in intensive care units, but there is a relative lack of guidance regarding antimicrobial clearance and dosing when compared with other modalities. The objectives of this systematic review were to: (1) identify and describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of relevant antimicrobials used in critically ill adults receiving PIRRT, (2) evaluate the quality of evidence supporting these data, and (3) propose dosing recommendations based on the synthesis of these data. A search strategy for multiple databases was designed and executed to identify relevant published evidence describing the PK of antimicrobials used in critically ill adults receiving PIRRT. Quality assessment, evaluation of reporting, and relevant data extraction were conducted in duplicate. Synthesis of PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) outcomes, dosing recommendations from study authors, and physicochemical properties of included antibiotics were assessed by investigators in addition to the quality of evidence to develop dosing recommendations. Thirty-nine studies enrolling 452 patients met criteria for inclusion and provided PK and/or PD data for 20 antimicrobials in critically ill adults receiving PIRRT. Nineteen studies describe both PK and PD outcomes. Vancomycin (12 studies, 171 patients), meropenem (7 studies, 84 patients), and piperacillin/tazobactam (5 studies, 56 patients) were the most frequent antimicrobials encountered. The quality of evidence was deemed strong for 7/20 antimicrobials, and strong dosing recommendations were determined for 9/20 antimicrobials. This systematic review updates and addresses issues of quality in previous systematic reviews on this topic. Despite an overall low quality of evidence, strong recommendations were able to be made for almost half of the identified antimicrobials. Knowledge gaps persist for many antimicrobials, and higher quality studies (i.e., population PK studies with assessment of PD target attainment) are needed to address these gaps.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy; Critical Illness; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Vancomycin; Renal Replacement Therapy
PubMed: 37596844
DOI: 10.1002/phar.2861 -
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Aug 2023Piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem are often used to treat patients with severe bacterial infections. We aimed to compare the desirable and undesirable effects of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem are often used to treat patients with severe bacterial infections. We aimed to compare the desirable and undesirable effects of empirical and/or definitive piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems in patients with severe bacterial infections.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Epistemonikos, and trial registers for randomised clinical trials of empirical and/or definitive piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems in adult patients with severe bacterial infection (i.e., any bacterial infection requiring hospitalisation). The primary outcome was all-cause short-term mortality within 90 days. Secondary outcomes were all-cause long-term mortality, adverse events, quality of life, days alive without or duration of life support, secondary infections, selection of fungi or resistant bacteria, and days alive and out of hospital or hospital length of stay. We calculated relative risks (RRs) using random effects and fixed effect meta-analyses along with trial sequential analyses.
RESULTS
We included 31 trials (n = 8790 patients) with overall high risk of bias. The RR for all-cause short-term mortality was 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.43, low certainty evidence), for adverse events 1.00 (98% CI: 0.96-1.04, moderate certainty evidence), for secondary infections 1.13 (98% CI: 0.76-1.68, very low certainty evidence), and for selection of fungi or resistant bacteria 1.61 (98% CI: 0.89-2.89, very low certainty evidence). There were no or limited data for the remaining outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on very low or low certainty evidence, piperacillin/tazobactam may be associated with less favourable outcomes in patients with severe bacterial infections as compared with carbapenems, but the information size for a robust conclusion has not been reached.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Carbapenems; Coinfection; Quality of Life; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Bacterial Infections; Bacteria
PubMed: 36919866
DOI: 10.1111/aas.14239 -
Emerging infections in vulnerable hosts: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Elizabethkingia anophelis.Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases Dec 2023This systematic review aimed to explore the recent trends in the epidemiology, risk factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility of two emerging opportunistic pathogens,...
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
This systematic review aimed to explore the recent trends in the epidemiology, risk factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility of two emerging opportunistic pathogens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Elizabethkingia anophelis .
RECENT FINDINGS
Since 2020, numerous outbreaks of S. maltophilia and E. anophelis have been reported worldwide. Most of these outbreaks have been associated with healthcare facilities, although one outbreak caused by E. anophelis in France was considered a community-associated infection. In terms of antimicrobial susceptibility, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), levofloxacin, and minocycline have exhibited good efficacy against S. maltophilia . Additionally, cefiderocol and a combination of aztreonam and avibactam have shown promising results in in vitro susceptibility testing. For E. anophelis , there is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment. Although some studies have reported good efficacy with rifampin, TMP-SMZ, piperacillin/tazobactam, and cefoperazone/sulbactam, minocycline had the most favourable in vitro susceptibility rates. Cefiderocol may serve as an alternative due to its low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against E. anophelis . The role of vancomycin in treatment is still uncertain, although several successful cases with vancomycin treatment, even with high MIC values, have been reported.
SUMMARY
Immunocompromised patients are particularly vulnerable to infections caused by S. maltophilia and E. anophelis , but the optimal treatment strategy remains inconclusive. Further research is necessary to determine the most effective use of conventional and novel antimicrobial agents in combatting these multidrug-resistant pathogens.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Minocycline; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Vancomycin; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Anti-Infective Agents; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Cefiderocol
PubMed: 37548375
DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000953 -
Journal of Clinical and Experimental... Oct 2022Patients with odontogenic infections are commonly prescribed antimicrobials on an experiential base without knowing the precise microorganisms implicated. The aim of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Patients with odontogenic infections are commonly prescribed antimicrobials on an experiential base without knowing the precise microorganisms implicated. The aim of this systematic scoping review is to evaluate the prevalence and proportions of antimicrobial-resistant species in patients with odontogenic infections.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic scoping review of scientific evidence was accomplished involving different databases.
RESULTS
Eight randomized clinical trials and 13 prospective observational studies were included. These investigations analyzed 1506 patients. The species that showed higher levels of resistance included aerobic and facultative anaerobe such as , and . In obligate anaerobes sampled were Peptostreptococcos spp., Bacteroides spp., and Prevotella spp. Staphylococcus showed resistance to ampicillin, piperacillin, clindamycin, amoxicillin, metronidazole, and penicillin. Streptococcus had resistance to metronidazole, clindamycin, doxycycline, penicillin, and amoxicillin. Peptostreptococcus spp. presented resistance to penicillin, amoxicillin, erythromycin, and cefalexin. Gram-negative microorganisms had resistance to tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, amoxicillin, erythromycin, and penicillin. Bacteroides spp. exhibited resistance to penicillin, erythromycin, and gentamicin. Prevotella spp. showed resistance to penicillin, amoxicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, levofloxacin, and imipenem. Finally, Klebsiella spp. displayed resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin, moxifloxacin, and cefalexin. Interestingly, one clinical trial showed that after therapy there was a reduction in sensitivity of 18% for azithromycin and 26% for spiramycin.
CONCLUSIONS
Most of the microorganisms had resistance to diverse groups of antimicrobials. Suitable antimicrobials must be prescribed founded on the microbial samples, culture susceptibility, and clinical progression of the odontogenic infection. Furthermore, it was observed high levels of resistance to antimicrobials that have been used in local and systemic therapy of oral cavity infections. A preponderance of anaerobic microorganisms over aerobic ones was observed. Antibiotic resistance, odontogenic infections, efficacy, microorganisms, scoping review.
PubMed: 36320675
DOI: 10.4317/jced.59830 -
Journal of Chemotherapy (Florence,... Feb 2022species are Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, facultative anaerobes typically motile due to the presence of peritrichous flagella. the species responsible for the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
species are Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, facultative anaerobes typically motile due to the presence of peritrichous flagella. the species responsible for the majority of infections in humans, is part of the intestinal microbiota and may cause infection in patients that have previously received antimicrobial therapy or who have been admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. may cause several infections, such as pneumonia, urinary tract, skin and soft tissue and intravascular infections. Infective Endocarditis (IE) is a rare disease with notable morbidity and mortality. Even though IE is rarely caused by , these infections can be problematic due to the relative lack of experience in their management. The purpose of this study was to systematically review all published cases of IE by in the literature. A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane library (through 14 November 2020) for studies providing epidemiological, clinical, microbiological as well as treatment data and outcomes of IE by was performed. A total of 20 studies, containing data of 20 patients, were included. A prosthetic valve was present in 27.8%. Mitral valve was the commonest infected site, followed by aortic valve. Diagnosis was facilitated by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in 38.5% each, while the diagnosis was set at autopsy in 10%. Fever, sepsis, shock and immunologic phenomena were the most common clinical presentations, followed by heart failure. Aminoglycosides, cephalosporins and carbapenems were the most common antimicrobials used. Clinical cure was noted in 75%, while overall mortality was 30%. Development of shock and treatment with the combination of piperacillin with tazobactam were associated with overall mortality.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aortic Valve; Echocardiography; Endocarditis, Bacterial; Enterobacter cloacae; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Humans; Mitral Valve
PubMed: 34369324
DOI: 10.1080/1120009X.2021.1959786 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022β-lactams remain the cornerstone of the empirical therapy to treat various bacterial infections. This systematic review aimed to analyze the data describing the dosing...
β-lactams remain the cornerstone of the empirical therapy to treat various bacterial infections. This systematic review aimed to analyze the data describing the dosing regimen of β-lactams. Systematic scientific and grey literature was performed in accordance with Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The studies were retrieved and screened on the basis of pre-defined exclusion and inclusion criteria. The cohort studies, randomized controlled trials (RCT) and case reports that reported the dosing schedule of β-lactams are included in this study. A total of 52 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 40 were cohort studies, 2 were case reports and 10 were RCTs. The majority of the studies (34/52) studied the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a drug. A total of 20 studies proposed dosing schedule in pediatrics while 32 studies proposed dosing regimen among adults. Piperacillin (12/52) and Meropenem (11/52) were the most commonly used β-lactams used in hospitalized patients. As per available evidence, continuous infusion is considered as the most appropriate mode of administration to optimize the safety and efficacy of the treatment and improve the clinical outcomes. Appropriate antibiotic therapy is challenging due to pathophysiological changes among different age groups. The optimization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters is useful to support alternative dosing regimens such as an increase in dosing interval, continuous infusion, and increased bolus doses.
PubMed: 36210807
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.964005 -
Medicine Dec 2021Antipseudomonal β-lactams have been used for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN); however, the efficacy and safety of antipseudomonal β-lactams in pediatric...
BACKGROUND
Antipseudomonal β-lactams have been used for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN); however, the efficacy and safety of antipseudomonal β-lactams in pediatric patients remain unclear. The aim of this study was to comprehensively compare the efficacy and side effects of optional antipseudomonal β-lactams for pediatric FN.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from their inception to December 18, 2020. Eligible randomized controlled trials in which pediatric FN patients were treated with an empiric monotherapy of antipseudomonal β-lactams were selected. Data synthesis was performed using WinBUGS 14.0 software and meta packages implemented in R 3.6.2. Random-effects network meta-analysis was performed, and dichotomous data were pooled as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The primary outcome was treatment success without modification; the secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs), all-cause mortality, and new infections. The GRADE tool was used to assess the quality of the evidence. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO ID CRD42021226763.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies with 2517 patients were included. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the optional antipseudomonal β-lactams in the outcomes of treatment success without modification, all AEs, all-cause mortality, and new infections for pediatric FN. Based on the results of Bayesian rank probability, meropenem was ranked highest among all the treatment options with regard to treatment success without modification benefit; ceftazidime and meropenem were associated with a lower risk of AEs; cefoperazone/sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam were associated with a lower risk of mortality, and piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem were associated with a lower risk of new infections. The quality of evidence was moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam were found to be better with regard to treatment success without modification, with a comparable safety profile. Therefore, our findings support the use of meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam as a treatment option for pediatric FN patients.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Imipenem; Male; Meropenem; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pseudomonas Infections; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; beta-Lactams
PubMed: 34918626
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027266 -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Feb 2023Pharmacokinetics (PK) are severely altered in pregnant women due to changes in volume of distribution (Vd) and/or drug clearance (CL), affecting target attainment of...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Pharmacokinetics (PK) are severely altered in pregnant women due to changes in volume of distribution (Vd) and/or drug clearance (CL), affecting target attainment of antibiotics in pregnant women. This review is part of a series that reviews literature on the description of PK and target attainment of antibiotics in pregnant women with specific focus on penicillins.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed. Articles were labelled as relevant when information on PK of penicillins in pregnant women was available.
RESULTS
Thirty-two relevant articles were included, 8 of which discussed amoxicillin (with and without clavulanic acid), 15 ampicillin, 4 benzylpenicillin, 1 phenoxymethylpenicillin, and 4 piperacillin (with and without tazobactam). No studies were found on pheneticillin and flucloxacillin in pregnant women. Ten out of 32 articles included information on both Vd and CL. During the second and third trimester of pregnancy, a higher CL and larger Vd was reported than in non-pregnant women and in pregnant women during first trimester. Reduced target attainment was described in second and third trimester pregnant women. Only 7 studies reported dosing advice, 4 of which were for amoxicillin.
CONCLUSION
The larger Vd and higher CL in second and third trimester pregnant women might warrant a higher dosage or shortening of the dosing interval of penicillins to increase target attainment. Studies frequently fail to provide dosing advice for pregnant women, even if the necessary PK information was available.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Penicillins; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Amoxicillin; Ampicillin; Piperacillin
PubMed: 36662480
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01211-z