-
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Aug 2020To systematically review published literature and calculate the prevalence of vasa previa and its known risk factors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review published literature and calculate the prevalence of vasa previa and its known risk factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed (non-MEDLINE and in process), and www.clinicaltrials.gov were searched from inception to March 2018 using indexing terms "vasa previa," "placenta previa," "low lying placenta," "succenturiate lobe," "bilobate placenta," "bilobed placenta," and "velamentous insertion." All original research studies reporting on 5 or more pregnancies with vasa previa were included. The search was limited to studies on human data and those published in the English language. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, completed data extraction, and assessed reporting quality using the Study Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Disagreements were discussed and resolved at each step of the process.
RESULTS
We included 21 studies that reported 428 pregnancies with vasa previa of 1,027,918 deliveries (0.46 cases of vasa previa per 1000 deliveries). These studies fared well on risk of bias assessment using the Study Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The prevalence and 95% confidence intervals of known risk factors for vasa previa included a low-lying placenta (61.5%, 53.0%-70.0%), velamentous cord insertion (52.2%, 39.6%-64.7%), bilobed or succenturiate lobed placenta (33.3%, 20.9%-45.7%), use of in vitro fertilization (26.4%, 16.0%-36.8%), and multiple gestation (8.92%, 5.33%-12.5%).
CONCLUSION
Vasa previa affects 0.46 cases per 1000 pregnancies. Given the high prevalence of prenatally detectable risk factors in affected pregnancies, the cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for vasa previa either in isolation, using a risk factor-based approach, or universally, in tandem with cervical-length screening using transvaginal ultrasound, should be revisited.
Topics: Female; Humans; Placenta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Risk Factors; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Vasa Previa
PubMed: 33345868
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100117 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... May 2024Cesarean hysterectomy is generally presumed to decrease maternal morbidity and mortality secondary to placenta accreta spectrum disorder. Recently, uterine-sparing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Cesarean hysterectomy is generally presumed to decrease maternal morbidity and mortality secondary to placenta accreta spectrum disorder. Recently, uterine-sparing techniques have been introduced in conservative management of placenta accreta spectrum disorder to preserve fertility and potentially reduce surgical complications. However, despite patients often expressing the intention for future conception, few data are available regarding the subsequent pregnancy outcomes after conservative management of placenta accreta spectrum disorder. Thus, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess these outcomes.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to September 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We included all studies, with the exception of case studies, that reported the first subsequent pregnancy outcomes in individuals with a history of placenta accreta spectrum disorder who underwent any type of conservative management.
METHODS
The R programming language with the "meta" package was used. The random-effects model and inverse variance method were used to pool the proportion of pregnancy outcomes.
RESULTS
We identified 5 studies involving 1458 participants that were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The type of conservative management included placenta left in situ (n=1) and resection surgery (n=1), and was not reported in 3 studies. The rate of placenta accreta spectrum disorder recurrence in the subsequent pregnancy was 11.8% (95% confidence interval, 1.1-60.3; I=86.4%), and 1.9% (95% confidence interval, 0.0-34.1; I=82.4%) of participants underwent cesarean hysterectomy. Postpartum hemorrhage occurred in 10.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.3-81.4; I=96.7%). A composite adverse maternal outcome was reported in 22.7% of participants (95% confidence interval, 0.0-99.4; I=56.3%).
CONCLUSION
Favorable pregnancy outcome is possible following successful conservation of the uterus in a placenta accreta spectrum disorder pregnancy. Approximately 1 out of 4 subsequent pregnancies following conservative management of placenta accreta spectrum disorder had considerable adverse maternal outcomes. Given such high incidence of adverse outcomes and morbidity, patient and provider preparation is vital when managing this population.
Topics: Humans; Placenta Accreta; Female; Pregnancy; Conservative Treatment; Hysterectomy; Cesarean Section; Pregnancy Outcome; Organ Sparing Treatments; Recurrence
PubMed: 37918506
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.047 -
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology :... Dec 2024Vaginal bleeding during pregnancy has been recognised as a significant risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Vaginal bleeding during pregnancy has been recognised as a significant risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between vaginal bleeding during the first trimester of pregnancy and clinical adverse effects using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Databases of Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed (including Medline), Cochrane Library and Science Direct were searched until June of 2023. Data analysis using statistical test fixed- and random-effects models in the meta-analysis, Cochran and meta-regression. The quality of the eligible studies was assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale checklist (NOS). A total of 46 relevant studies, with a sample size of 1,554,141 were entered into the meta-analysis. Vaginal bleeding during the first trimester of pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth (OR: 1.8, CI 95%: 1.6-2.0), low birth weight (LBW; OR: 2.0, CI 95%: 1.5-2.6), premature rupture of membranes (PROMs; OR: 2.3, CI 95%: 1.8-3.0), abortion (OR: 4.3, CI 95%: 2.0-9.0), stillbirth (OR: 2.5, CI 95%: 1.2-5.0), placental abruption (OR: 2.2, CI 95%: 1.4-3.3) and placenta previa (OR: 1.9, CI 95%: 1.5-2.4). Vaginal bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with preterm birth, LBW, PROMs, miscarriage, stillbirth, placental abruption and placenta previa. Therefore, physicians or midwives need to be aware of the possibility of these consequences and manage them when they occur.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Stillbirth; Premature Birth; Abruptio Placentae; Placenta Previa; Placenta; Pregnancy Outcome; Abortion, Spontaneous; Uterine Hemorrhage
PubMed: 38305047
DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2023.2288224 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Nov 2023To report on the occurrence of urological complications in women undergoing Cesarean section for placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To report on the occurrence of urological complications in women undergoing Cesarean section for placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS).
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane databases were searched electronically up to 1 November 2022. Studies reporting on the urological outcome of women undergoing Cesarean section for PAS were included. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction using a predefined protocol and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies, with disagreements resolved by consensus.The primary outcome was the overall occurrence of urological complications. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of any cystotomy, intentional cystotomy, unintentional cystotomy, ureteral damage, ureteral fistula and vesicovaginal fistula. All outcomes were explored in the overall population of women undergoing surgery for PAS. In addition, we performed subgroup analyses according to the type of surgery (Cesarean hysterectomy, or conservative surgery or management), severity of PAS at histopathology (placenta accreta/increta and placenta percreta), type of intervention (planned vs emergency) and number of cases per year. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS
There were 62 studies included in the systematic review and 56 were included in the meta-analysis. Urological complications occurred in 15.2% (95% CI, 12.9-17.7%) of cases. Cystotomy complicated 13.5% (95% CI, 9.7-17.9%) of surgical operations. Intentional cystotomy was required in 7.7% (95% CI, 6.5-9.1%) of cases, while unintentional cystotomy occurred in 7.2% (95% CI, 6.0-8.5%) of cases. Urological complications occurred in 19.4% (95% CI, 16.3-22.7%) of cases undergoing hysterectomy and 12.2% (95% CI, 7.5-17.8%) of those undergoing conservative treatment. In the subgroup analyses, urological complications occurred in 9.4% (95% CI, 5.4-14.4%) of women with placenta accreta/increta and 38.5% (95% CI, 21.6-57.0%) of those described as having placenta percreta, and included mainly cystotomy (5.5% (95% CI, 0.6-15.1%) and 22.0% (95% CI, 5.4-45.5%), respectively). Urological complications occurred in 15.4% (95% CI, 8.1-24.6%) of cases undergoing a planned procedure and 24.6% (95% CI, 13.0-38.5%) of those undergoing an emergency intervention. In subanalysis of studies reporting on ≥ 12 cases per year, the incidence of urological complication was similar to that reported in the primary analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Women undergoing surgery for PAS are at high risk of urological complication, mainly cystotomy. The incidence of these complications was particularly high in women described as having placenta percreta at birth and in those undergoing emergency surgical intervention. The high heterogeneity between the included studies highlights the need for a standardized protocol for the diagnosis of PAS to identify prenatal imaging signs associated with the increased risk of urological morbidity at delivery. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Cesarean Section; Placenta Accreta; Obstetrics; Ureter; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Retrospective Studies; Hysterectomy; Placenta
PubMed: 37401769
DOI: 10.1002/uog.26299 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Sep 2021This study aimed to review the effect of endometriosis on the prevalence of placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant patients and the surgical outcomes of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to review the effect of endometriosis on the prevalence of placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant patients and the surgical outcomes of pregnant patients with endometriosis developing placenta previa.
DATA SOURCES
In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was conducted on December 31, 2020, using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Comparative studies between pregnant women with and without endometriosis and studies that investigated the surgical outcomes of patients with and without endometriosis developing placenta previa were included.
METHODS
Here, 2 reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts, completed data extraction, and assessed the reporting quality using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool.
RESULTS
Overall, 19 studies (from 2010 to 2020) met the inclusion criteria (98,463 pregnancies with endometriosis and 7,184,313 pregnancies without endometriosis). In the adjusted pooled analysis, endometriosis was associated with a higher rate of placenta previa (adjusted odds ratio, 3.17; 95% confidence interval, 2.58-3.89), whereas the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was similar between pregnant women with and without endometriosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.34). When the analysis was restricted to histologically confirmed endometriosis cases, the relationship of endometriosis with placenta previa (adjusted odds ratio, 4.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.74-10.30) and postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-3.34) was consistent with results from the nonrestricted analysis. There was no study that examined the surgical outcomes of patients with endometriosis developing placenta previa patients. However, there are 3 studies that examined the effect of endometriosis on surgical outcomes during cesarean delivery: 1 study showing that endometriosis was associated with increased intraoperative bleeding during emergent cesarean delivery; the other study showing that endometriosis was associated with an increased incidence of postpartum hemorrhage during cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.2), especially in primiparous women with singleton pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.0); and another study suggesting a significantly higher rate of hysterectomy (7.1%) and bladder injury (7.1%) in patients with endometriosis than in those without endometriosis.
CONCLUSION
Endometriosis can potentially be associated with adverse surgical outcomes during cesarean delivery. Although there is a correlation between endometriosis and increased rate of placenta previa, the surgical outcomes of patients with endometriosis developing placenta previa remain understudied.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Endometriosis; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Placenta Previa; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy
PubMed: 34098177
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100417 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Dec 2023This study aimed to compare maternal outcomes of prenatally and nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare maternal outcomes of prenatally and nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane database, and Web of Science until November 28, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies comparing the clinical presentation of prenatally and nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum were included. The primary outcomes were emergent cesarean delivery, hysterectomy, blood loss volume, number of transfused blood product units, urological injury, coagulopathy, reoperation, intensive care unit admission, and maternal death. In addition, the pooled mean values for blood loss volume and the number of transfused blood product units were calculated. The secondary outcomes included maternal age, gestational age at birth, nulliparity, previous cesarean delivery, previous uterine procedure, assisted reproductive technology, placenta increta and percreta, and placenta previa.
METHODS
Study screening was performed after duplicates were identified and removed. The quality of each study and the publication bias were assessed. Forest plots and I statistics were calculated for each study outcome for each group. The main analysis was a random-effects analysis.
RESULTS
Overall, 415 abstracts and 157 full-text studies were evaluated. Moreover, 31 studies were analyzed. Prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum was associated with a significantly lower rate of emergency cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.67), higher hysterectomy rate (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.83), lower blood loss volume (mean difference, -0.65; 95% confidence interval, -1.17 to -0.13), and lower number of transfused red blood cell units (mean difference, -1.96; 95% confidence interval, -3.25 to -0.68) compared with nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum. The pooled mean values for blood loss volume and the number of transfused blood product units tended to be lower in the prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum groups than in the nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum groups. Nulliparity (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.20), previous cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 6.81; 95% confidence interval, 4.12-11.25), assisted reproductive technology (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.61), placenta increta and percreta (odds ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 2.24-7.03), and placenta previa (odds ratio, 6.81; 95% confidence interval, 4.12-11.25) showed statistical significance. No significant difference was found for the other outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Despite its severity, the positive effect of prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum on outcomes underscores the necessity of a prenatal diagnosis. In addition, the pooled mean values provide a preoperative preparation guideline.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Cesarean Section; Intensive Care Units; Maternal Mortality
PubMed: 37865220
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101197 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Jun 2022Placenta percreta is described as the most severe grade of placenta accreta spectrum and accounts for a quarter of all cases of placenta accreta spectrum reported in the...
BACKGROUND
Placenta percreta is described as the most severe grade of placenta accreta spectrum and accounts for a quarter of all cases of placenta accreta spectrum reported in the literature.
OBJECTIVE
We investigated the hypothesis that placenta percreta, which has been described clinically as placental tissue invading through the full thickness of the uterus, is a heterogeneous category with most cases owing to primary or secondary uterine abnormality rather than an abnormally invasive form of placentation.
STUDY DESIGN
We have evaluated the agreement between the intraoperative findings using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification with the postoperative histopathology diagnosis in a prospective cohort of 101 consecutive singleton pregnancies presenting with a low-lying placenta or placenta previa, a history of at least 1 prior cesarean delivery and ultrasound signs suggestive of placenta accreta spectrum. Furthermore, a systematic literature review of case reports of placenta percreta, which included histopathologic findings and gross images, was performed.
RESULTS
Samples for histologic examination were available in 80 of 101 cases of the cohort, which were managed by hysterectomy or partial myometrial resection. Microscopic examination showed evidence of placenta accreta spectrum in 65 cases (creta, 9; increta, 56). Of 101 cases included in the cohort, 44 (43.5%) and 54 (53.5%) were graded as percreta by observer A and observer B, respectively. There was a moderate agreement between observers. Of note, 11 of 36 cases that showed no evidence of abnormal placental attachment at delivery and/or microscopic examination were classified as percreta by both observers. The systematic literature review identified 41 case reports of placenta percreta with microscopic images and presenting symptomatology, suggesting that most cases were the consequence of a uterine rupture. The microscopic descriptions were heterogeneous, and all descriptions demonstrated histology of placenta creta rather than percreta.
CONCLUSION
Our study supported the concept that placenta accreta is not an invasive disorder of placentation but the consequence of postoperative surgical remodeling or a preexisting uterine pathology and found no histologic evidence supporting the existence of a condition where the villous tissue penetrates the entire uterine wall, including the serosa and beyond.
Topics: Female; Humans; Placenta; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 34973177
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.030 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth May 2023To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and in the diagnosis of Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and in the diagnosis of Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
DATA SOURCES
Screening of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, other bases from inception to February 2022 using the keywords related to placenta accreta, increta, percreta, morbidly adherent placenta, and preoperative ultrasound diagnosis.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
All available studies- whether were prospective or retrospective- including cohort, case control and cross sectional that involved prenatal diagnosis of PAS using 2D or 3D ultrasound with subsequent pathological confirmation postnatal were included. Fifty-four studies included 5307 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria, PAS was confirmed in 2025 of them.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Extracted data included settings of the study, study type, sample size, participants characteristics and their inclusion and exclusion criteria, Type and site of placenta previa, Type and timing of imaging technique (2D, and 3D), severity of PAS, sensitivity and specificity of individual ultrasound criteria and overall sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS
The overall sensitivity was 0.8703, specificity was 0.8634 with -0.2348 negative correlation between them. The estimate of Odd ratio, negative likelihood ratio and positive likelihood ratio were 34.225, 0.155 and 4.990 respectively. The overall estimates of loss of retroplacental clear zone sensitivity and specificity were 0.820 and 0.898 respectively with 0.129 negative correlation. The overall estimates of myometrial thinning, loss of retroplacental clear zone, the presence of bridging vessels, placental lacunae, bladder wall interruption, exophytic mass, and uterovesical hypervascularity sensitivities were 0.763, 0.780, 0.659, 0.785, 0.455, 0.218 and 0.513 while specificities were 0.890, 0.884, 0.928, 0.809, 0.975, 0.865 and 0.994 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of PAS among women with low lying or placenta previa with previous cesarean section scars is high and recommended in all suspected cases.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Number CRD42021267501.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta; Placenta Previa; Cesarean Section; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 37189095
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05675-6 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Nov 2022Intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) are one of the main reproductive system diseases in women worldwide. Fusion between the injured opposing walls leads to partial-to-complete...
BACKGROUND
Intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) are one of the main reproductive system diseases in women worldwide. Fusion between the injured opposing walls leads to partial-to-complete obliteration of the cavity and/or cervical canal. The main clinical manifestations in case of IUAs are menstrual disturbances, cyclic pain and reproductive disorders. The reproductive outcomes of women with IUAs remain limited and inefficient compared to women without IUAs, even after adhesiolysis. An exact understanding of the underlying mechanisms and processes to explain the compromised reproductive performance and outcomes in case of IUAs are lacking.
METHODS
A systematic literature review of MEDLINE-PubMed (1966 to January 2022) and EMBASE (1974 to January 2022) was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they reported underlying causes, related mechanisms and processes to explain the association between IUAs and impaired reproductive performance, pregnancy and obstetric complications.
RESULTS
After an extensive review of the literature, 58 articles were identified reporting underlying mechanisms to explain the association between IUAs and impaired fertility. Intrauterine scarring influences the process of fertilization, reproductive performance and ultimately reproductive outcome. IUAs can disturb the cervico-utero-tubal sperm transport and result in an avascular and unresponsive endometrium with decreased receptivity and thickness. Abnormal decidualization and abnormal trophoblastic infiltration leads to placental attachment disorders. Moreover, the risk for premature delivery, intrauterine fetal growth restriction and fetal anomalies is increased in case of IUAs.
CONCLUSION
The impact of IUAs on reproductive performance, even after adhesiolysis, is becoming more apparent. The postulated mechanisms to explain the association are related to sperm transport, embryo implantation and placentation. Prevention, by preserving the basal layer of the endometrium is essential. Effective and evidence-based strategies for the prevention of endometrial injury and formation of IUAs, are urgently needed.
Topics: Male; Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Hysteroscopy; Placenta; Semen; Uterine Diseases; Tissue Adhesions
PubMed: 36376829
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05164-2 -
Archivos Argentinos de Pediatria Oct 2023Mercury is a toxic metal which can cross the placenta and the blood-brain barrier and cause the disruption of various cellular processes. Studies have investigated...
Mercury is a toxic metal which can cross the placenta and the blood-brain barrier and cause the disruption of various cellular processes. Studies have investigated mercury exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders; therefore, a critical and rigorous analysis of this evidence is required. The objective of this review was to evaluate the available scientific evidence on the effects of mercury exposure during the prenatal and postnatal periods and its relationship with the development of neurobehavioral disorders. A systematic search of the MEDLINE and ScienceDirect databases was conducted; the results were presented in tables and narrative synthesis. Only 31 studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, the evidence on the effects of mercury exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders in children is limited. Learning disabilities, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were some of the reported potential effects.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Child; Humans; Mercury; Neurodevelopmental Disorders; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Autistic Disorder
PubMed: 37145892
DOI: 10.5546/aap.2022-02838.eng