-
Biomedicines Feb 2022This study aimed to assess the relationship between placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PASD) and endometriosis. The relationships among pregnancy, assisted reproductive... (Review)
Review
This study aimed to assess the relationship between placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PASD) and endometriosis. The relationships among pregnancy, assisted reproductive technology (ART), placenta previa, ART-conceived pregnancy and PASD were also determined. A systematic literature review was conducted using multiple computerized databases. Forty-eight studies (1990-2021) met the inclusion criteria. According to the adjusted pooled analysis ( = 3), endometriosis was associated with an increased prevalence of PASD (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.96-5.87). In the included studies, the ART rate ranged from 18.2% to 37.2% for women with endometriosis. According to the adjusted pooled analysis, women who used ART were more likely to have placenta previa ( = 13: adjusted OR 2.96, 95%CI, 2.43-3.60) and PASD ( = 4: adjusted OR 3.54, 95%CI 1.86-6.76) than those who did not use ART. According to the sensitivity analysis using an unadjusted analysis accounting for the type of ART, frozen embryo transfer (ET) was associated with an increased risk of PASD ( = 4: OR 2.79, 95%CI, 1.22-6.37) compared to fresh ET. Endometriosis may be associated with an increased rate of PASD. Women with placenta previa complicated with endometriosis who conceived using frozen ET may be a high risk for PASD.
PubMed: 35203599
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020390 -
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Nov 2023To report on the occurrence of urological complications in women undergoing Cesarean section for placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To report on the occurrence of urological complications in women undergoing Cesarean section for placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS).
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane databases were searched electronically up to 1 November 2022. Studies reporting on the urological outcome of women undergoing Cesarean section for PAS were included. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction using a predefined protocol and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies, with disagreements resolved by consensus.The primary outcome was the overall occurrence of urological complications. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of any cystotomy, intentional cystotomy, unintentional cystotomy, ureteral damage, ureteral fistula and vesicovaginal fistula. All outcomes were explored in the overall population of women undergoing surgery for PAS. In addition, we performed subgroup analyses according to the type of surgery (Cesarean hysterectomy, or conservative surgery or management), severity of PAS at histopathology (placenta accreta/increta and placenta percreta), type of intervention (planned vs emergency) and number of cases per year. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS
There were 62 studies included in the systematic review and 56 were included in the meta-analysis. Urological complications occurred in 15.2% (95% CI, 12.9-17.7%) of cases. Cystotomy complicated 13.5% (95% CI, 9.7-17.9%) of surgical operations. Intentional cystotomy was required in 7.7% (95% CI, 6.5-9.1%) of cases, while unintentional cystotomy occurred in 7.2% (95% CI, 6.0-8.5%) of cases. Urological complications occurred in 19.4% (95% CI, 16.3-22.7%) of cases undergoing hysterectomy and 12.2% (95% CI, 7.5-17.8%) of those undergoing conservative treatment. In the subgroup analyses, urological complications occurred in 9.4% (95% CI, 5.4-14.4%) of women with placenta accreta/increta and 38.5% (95% CI, 21.6-57.0%) of those described as having placenta percreta, and included mainly cystotomy (5.5% (95% CI, 0.6-15.1%) and 22.0% (95% CI, 5.4-45.5%), respectively). Urological complications occurred in 15.4% (95% CI, 8.1-24.6%) of cases undergoing a planned procedure and 24.6% (95% CI, 13.0-38.5%) of those undergoing an emergency intervention. In subanalysis of studies reporting on ≥ 12 cases per year, the incidence of urological complication was similar to that reported in the primary analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Women undergoing surgery for PAS are at high risk of urological complication, mainly cystotomy. The incidence of these complications was particularly high in women described as having placenta percreta at birth and in those undergoing emergency surgical intervention. The high heterogeneity between the included studies highlights the need for a standardized protocol for the diagnosis of PAS to identify prenatal imaging signs associated with the increased risk of urological morbidity at delivery. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Cesarean Section; Placenta Accreta; Obstetrics; Ureter; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Retrospective Studies; Hysterectomy; Placenta
PubMed: 37401769
DOI: 10.1002/uog.26299 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth May 2023To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and in the diagnosis of Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and in the diagnosis of Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
DATA SOURCES
Screening of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, other bases from inception to February 2022 using the keywords related to placenta accreta, increta, percreta, morbidly adherent placenta, and preoperative ultrasound diagnosis.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
All available studies- whether were prospective or retrospective- including cohort, case control and cross sectional that involved prenatal diagnosis of PAS using 2D or 3D ultrasound with subsequent pathological confirmation postnatal were included. Fifty-four studies included 5307 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria, PAS was confirmed in 2025 of them.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Extracted data included settings of the study, study type, sample size, participants characteristics and their inclusion and exclusion criteria, Type and site of placenta previa, Type and timing of imaging technique (2D, and 3D), severity of PAS, sensitivity and specificity of individual ultrasound criteria and overall sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS
The overall sensitivity was 0.8703, specificity was 0.8634 with -0.2348 negative correlation between them. The estimate of Odd ratio, negative likelihood ratio and positive likelihood ratio were 34.225, 0.155 and 4.990 respectively. The overall estimates of loss of retroplacental clear zone sensitivity and specificity were 0.820 and 0.898 respectively with 0.129 negative correlation. The overall estimates of myometrial thinning, loss of retroplacental clear zone, the presence of bridging vessels, placental lacunae, bladder wall interruption, exophytic mass, and uterovesical hypervascularity sensitivities were 0.763, 0.780, 0.659, 0.785, 0.455, 0.218 and 0.513 while specificities were 0.890, 0.884, 0.928, 0.809, 0.975, 0.865 and 0.994 respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of PAS among women with low lying or placenta previa with previous cesarean section scars is high and recommended in all suspected cases.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Number CRD42021267501.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta; Placenta Previa; Cesarean Section; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 37189095
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05675-6 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Jun 2022Placenta percreta is described as the most severe grade of placenta accreta spectrum and accounts for a quarter of all cases of placenta accreta spectrum reported in the...
BACKGROUND
Placenta percreta is described as the most severe grade of placenta accreta spectrum and accounts for a quarter of all cases of placenta accreta spectrum reported in the literature.
OBJECTIVE
We investigated the hypothesis that placenta percreta, which has been described clinically as placental tissue invading through the full thickness of the uterus, is a heterogeneous category with most cases owing to primary or secondary uterine abnormality rather than an abnormally invasive form of placentation.
STUDY DESIGN
We have evaluated the agreement between the intraoperative findings using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification with the postoperative histopathology diagnosis in a prospective cohort of 101 consecutive singleton pregnancies presenting with a low-lying placenta or placenta previa, a history of at least 1 prior cesarean delivery and ultrasound signs suggestive of placenta accreta spectrum. Furthermore, a systematic literature review of case reports of placenta percreta, which included histopathologic findings and gross images, was performed.
RESULTS
Samples for histologic examination were available in 80 of 101 cases of the cohort, which were managed by hysterectomy or partial myometrial resection. Microscopic examination showed evidence of placenta accreta spectrum in 65 cases (creta, 9; increta, 56). Of 101 cases included in the cohort, 44 (43.5%) and 54 (53.5%) were graded as percreta by observer A and observer B, respectively. There was a moderate agreement between observers. Of note, 11 of 36 cases that showed no evidence of abnormal placental attachment at delivery and/or microscopic examination were classified as percreta by both observers. The systematic literature review identified 41 case reports of placenta percreta with microscopic images and presenting symptomatology, suggesting that most cases were the consequence of a uterine rupture. The microscopic descriptions were heterogeneous, and all descriptions demonstrated histology of placenta creta rather than percreta.
CONCLUSION
Our study supported the concept that placenta accreta is not an invasive disorder of placentation but the consequence of postoperative surgical remodeling or a preexisting uterine pathology and found no histologic evidence supporting the existence of a condition where the villous tissue penetrates the entire uterine wall, including the serosa and beyond.
Topics: Female; Humans; Placenta; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 34973177
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.030 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Dec 2023This study aimed to compare maternal outcomes of prenatally and nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare maternal outcomes of prenatally and nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, the Cochrane database, and Web of Science until November 28, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies comparing the clinical presentation of prenatally and nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum were included. The primary outcomes were emergent cesarean delivery, hysterectomy, blood loss volume, number of transfused blood product units, urological injury, coagulopathy, reoperation, intensive care unit admission, and maternal death. In addition, the pooled mean values for blood loss volume and the number of transfused blood product units were calculated. The secondary outcomes included maternal age, gestational age at birth, nulliparity, previous cesarean delivery, previous uterine procedure, assisted reproductive technology, placenta increta and percreta, and placenta previa.
METHODS
Study screening was performed after duplicates were identified and removed. The quality of each study and the publication bias were assessed. Forest plots and I statistics were calculated for each study outcome for each group. The main analysis was a random-effects analysis.
RESULTS
Overall, 415 abstracts and 157 full-text studies were evaluated. Moreover, 31 studies were analyzed. Prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum was associated with a significantly lower rate of emergency cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.67), higher hysterectomy rate (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.83), lower blood loss volume (mean difference, -0.65; 95% confidence interval, -1.17 to -0.13), and lower number of transfused red blood cell units (mean difference, -1.96; 95% confidence interval, -3.25 to -0.68) compared with nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum. The pooled mean values for blood loss volume and the number of transfused blood product units tended to be lower in the prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum groups than in the nonprenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum groups. Nulliparity (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.20), previous cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 6.81; 95% confidence interval, 4.12-11.25), assisted reproductive technology (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.61), placenta increta and percreta (odds ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 2.24-7.03), and placenta previa (odds ratio, 6.81; 95% confidence interval, 4.12-11.25) showed statistical significance. No significant difference was found for the other outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Despite its severity, the positive effect of prenatally diagnosed placenta accreta spectrum on outcomes underscores the necessity of a prenatal diagnosis. In addition, the pooled mean values provide a preoperative preparation guideline.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Cesarean Section; Intensive Care Units; Maternal Mortality
PubMed: 37865220
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101197 -
Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology Feb 2023The occurrence of PAS has been recently associated with the presence of twin pregnancy. Aim of this review is to report the risk factors, histopathological correlation,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The occurrence of PAS has been recently associated with the presence of twin pregnancy. Aim of this review is to report the risk factors, histopathological correlation, diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound and clinical outcome of twin pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, Clinical Trial.Gov and Google Scholar databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were studies on twin pregnancies complicated by PAS. The outcomes explored were risk factors for PAS (including placenta previa, prior uterine surgery or assisted reproductive technology, ART), histopathology (placenta accreta and increta/percreta), detection rate of prenatal ultrasound and clinical outcome, including need for blood transfusion, hysterectomy, emergency or scheduled Cesarean delivery (CD), and maternal death. Random effect meta-analyses of proportions were sued to combine the data.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Two studies considering 103 pregnancies were included in this systematic review: 41.86% (95% CI 27.0-57.9) of twin pregnancies complicated by PAS disorders had a prior CD, 28.22% (95% CI 13.4-46.0) presented placenta previa and 58.14% (95% CI 42.1-73.0) of twin pregnancies were conceived by ART. 74.49% (95% CI 41.6-96.5) of PAS in twin pregnancies were placenta accreta, while 25.51% (95% CI 3.5-58.4) were placenta increta or percreta. Prenatal diagnosis of PAS in twin pregnancies was accomplished only in 27.91% (95% CI 15.3-43.7) of cases. Finally, only one study consistently reported the clinical outcome of PAS in twins. 31.67% (95% CI 20.3-45.0) of women required blood transfusion, 26.67% (95% CI 16.1-39.7) had hysterectomy, while there was no case of maternal death. 44.19% of women had an emergency CD.
CONCLUSIONS
There is still limited evidence on the clinical course of PAS disorders in twin pregnancies. Placenta previa, prior uterine surgery (mainly CD), and ART are the most commonly risk factors for PAS disorders in twins. Prenatal diagnosis of PAS in twins is lower compared to what reported in singleton. Finally, about 30% of women with a twin pregnancy complicated by PAS required blood transfusion and hysterectomy.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Pregnancy, Twin; Placenta Previa; Maternal Death; Risk Factors
PubMed: 34328297
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.21.04886-7 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Feb 2020To explore the strength of association between different maternal and pregnancy characteristics and the occurrence of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Pubmed,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To explore the strength of association between different maternal and pregnancy characteristics and the occurrence of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL databases were searched. The risk factors for AIP explored were: obesity, age >35 years, smoking before or during pregnancy, placenta previa, prior cesarean section (CS), placenta previa and prior CS, prior uterine surgery, abortion and uterine curettage, fertilization (IVF) pregnancy and interval between a previous CS, and a subsequent pregnancy. Random-effect head-to-head meta-analyses were used to analyze the data. Forty-six were included in the systematic review. Maternal obesity (Odd ratio, OR: 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.8), advanced maternal age (OR: 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-7.0) and parity (OR: 2.5, 95% CI 1.7-3.6), but not smoking were associated with a higher risk of AIP. The presence of placenta previa in women with at least a prior CS was associated with a higher risk of AIP compared to controls, with an OR of 12.0, 95% CI 1.6-88.0. Furthermore, the risk of AIP increased with the number of prior CS (OR of 2.6, 95% CI 1.6-4.4 and 5.4, 95% CI 1.7-17.4 for two and three prior CS respectively). Finally, IVF pregnancies were associated with a high risk of AIP, with an OR of 2.8 (95% CI 1.2-6.8). A prior CS and placenta previa are among the strongest risk factors for the occurrence of AIP.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Humans; Placenta Accreta; Placenta Previa; Pregnancy; Risk Factors
PubMed: 29938551
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1493453 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Oct 2023This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic ureteral stent placement for the prevention of genitourinary tract injury at the time of cesarean... (Review)
Review
Prophylactic ureteral stent placement for the prevention of genitourinary tract injury during hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum: systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic ureteral stent placement for the prevention of genitourinary tract injury at the time of cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum. The secondary objectives were to assess mean blood loss, operative time, number of packed red blood cells transfused, and rates of urinary tract infection among patients undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum with and without prophylactic ureteral stent placement.
DATA SOURCES
The search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to February 2022 to December 2022. The protocol for this review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews before data collection (registration number: CRD42022372817).
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
All studies that examined differences in the rate of genitourinary tract injury among women undergoing cesarean hysterectomy for prenatally suspected placenta accreta spectrum with and without placement of prophylactic ureteral stents were included. Genitourinary injury was defined as cystotomy, ureteral injury, and/or bladder fistula. Cases of both intentional and unintentional genitourinary injuries were included in the analysis.
METHODS
For all studies meeting the inclusion criteria, the following data were extracted: number of included patients, maternal demographic information, obstetrical history, type of invasive placentation, placement of stents (yes or no), type of stent placed, blood loss, operative time, genitourinary tract injury, and urinary tract infection. Pooled data analysis was completed using the Review Manager (version 5.3; Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). The summary measures were reported as summary relative risk or as summary mean difference. The quality and risk of biases of the included studies were assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS
Overall, 9 studies, including 848 patients, fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. Moreover, 523 patients (61.7%) had prophylactic ureteral stents placed, and 325 patients (38.3%) did not. Genitourinary injury occurred in 138 of 523 patients (26.4%) in the ureteral stent group vs 83 of 325 patients (25.5%) in the no ureteral stent group (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.20). The mean number of packed red blood cells transfused did not differ between the 2 groups. The pooled analysis demonstrated decreased blood loss among patients who received prophylactic ureteral stents, with a mean difference of 392 mL (95% confidence interval, 52.74-738.13).
CONCLUSION
Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in the rates of genitourinary tract injury with the use of prophylactic ureteral stent placement among cases of prenatally suspected placenta accreta spectrum undergoing cesarean hysterectomy.
PubMed: 37549736
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101120 -
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine :... Jun 2024Our systematic review highlights that multiparametric PAI score assessment is a consistent tool with high sensitivity and specificity for prenatal prediction for... (Review)
Review
Our systematic review highlights that multiparametric PAI score assessment is a consistent tool with high sensitivity and specificity for prenatal prediction for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in high-risk population with anterior placenta previa or low-lying placenta and prior cesarean deliveries. A systematic search was conducted on November 1, 2022, of MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies (PROSPERO ID # CRD42022368211). A total of 11 articles met our inclusion criteria, representing the data of a total of 1,044 cases. Women with PAS had an increased mean PAI total score, compared to those without PAS. Limitations of the PAI are most studies were conducted in developing countries in high-risk population which limit the global generalizability of findings. Heterogeneity of reported data did not allow to perform meta-analysis.
PubMed: 38888042
DOI: 10.1002/jum.16509 -
Reproductive Sciences (Thousand Oaks,... Aug 2022A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the potential relationship between hypertensive disease during pregnancy and placenta accreta. A systematic literature search... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the potential relationship between hypertensive disease during pregnancy and placenta accreta. A systematic literature search in OVID, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google scholar up to May 2021 was done, and 4 studies were found including 47,353 pregnant women at the start of the study; 4283 of them had hypertensive disease during pregnancy and 493 had placenta accreta. They were reporting relationships between hypertensive disease during pregnancy and placenta accreta. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated to assess the potential relationship between hypertensive disease during pregnancy and placenta accreta using the dichotomous with a random or fixed-effect model. Hypertensive disease during pregnancy was significantly related to lower prevalence of placenta accreta (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, .38-.94, p = 0.03) compared with control (no hypertensive disease during pregnancy). When looking at the result comparing the prevalence of hypertensive disease during pregnancy in women with placenta accreta compared with control (no placenta accreta), we found that the placenta accreta was significantly related to lower prevalence of hypertensive disease during pregnancy (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94, p = 0.03) compared with control. Hypertensive disease during pregnancy may have a lower prevalence of placenta accreta. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Topics: Female; Humans; Hypertension; Network Meta-Analysis; Placenta Accreta; Pregnancy; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35471550
DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-00938-7