-
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Nov 2022Thromboelastography (TEG) and Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) analyze hemostatic function in patients with coagulopathy. We sought to quantify the impact of TEG... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Thromboelastography (TEG) and Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) analyze hemostatic function in patients with coagulopathy. We sought to quantify the impact of TEG and ROTEM-guided transfusion algorithms on blood product utilization in patients with cirrhosis undergoing non-surgical procedures.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the utility of viscoelastic testing prior to non-surgical procedures to determine their impact on pre-procedural blood product use and post-procedural bleeding events. Studies comparing TEG or ROTEM-guided transfusions with standard-of-care (SOC) prior to non-surgical procedures in adult patients with cirrhosis were included. Primary outcomes were fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet transfusion and secondary outcomes of post-procedure bleeding, transfusion-related complications, and mortality; and were reported as standardized mean differences (SMD) and risk ratios (RR).
RESULTS
Six studies (five randomized controlled trials and one cohort study) involving 367 patients met inclusion criteria. Compared with SOC, TEG/ROTEM-guided transfusions led to an overall decreased number of patients who received FFP transfusions (SMD = -0.93, 95% CI [-1.54, -0.33], p < 0.001) and platelets transfusions (SMD = -1.50, CI [-1.85, -1.15], p < 0.001). Total amount of FFP (SMD-0.86, p < 0.001) and platelet (SMD = -0.99, p < 0.001) transfused in the TEG/ROTEM group were also lower. Decreased pre-procedure transfusion in the TEG/ROTEM group did not result in increased post-procedure bleeding (RR = 0.61, p = 0.09) or in mortality (RR = 0.91, p = 0.93).
CONCLUSION
In patients with cirrhosis, TEG or ROTEM significantly reduces blood product utilization prior to non-surgical procedures, with no increase in post-procedure bleeding or mortality. TEG and ROTEM utilization can promote high-value care and improve transfusion stewardship in this population.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cohort Studies; Thrombelastography; Blood Coagulation Disorders; Hemorrhage; Liver Cirrhosis; Transfusion Reaction; Hemostatics
PubMed: 35122595
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07376-6 -
Transfusion Medicine Reviews Jul 2021Septic reactions from platelet transfusions are one of the leading causes of transfusion-associated mortality. The FDA guidance for platelet bacterial risk control... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Septic reactions from platelet transfusions are one of the leading causes of transfusion-associated mortality. The FDA guidance for platelet bacterial risk control includes bacterial culture using both aerobic and anaerobic bottles. Several studies have reported false positive rates (FPR) of culture, but these data have not been summarized or influencing factors analyzed. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to published guidelines to assess the false positive rate and influencing factors. Eighteen studies were included for analysis. The combined aerobic/anaerobic FPR was 2.4 events per thousand (EPT) with a prediction interval of 0.5 to 5.7, while the aerobic FPR rate was 1.0 EPT (prediction interval: 0.2-2.2) and the anaerobic rate was 1.8 EPT. Estimates were based on a total of almost 5 million units tested. The rate of false positives due to instrument error was between 0.5-1.7 EPT, while it was between 0.3-1.0 EPT for sampling contamination based on whether only aerobic, anaerobic, or aerobic/anaerobic cultures were performed. The FPR is approximately 2 to 5 times higher than the literature reported true positive rate of 0.5 EPT.
Topics: Anaerobiosis; Bacteria; Blood Platelets; Humans; Platelet Transfusion; Quality Control
PubMed: 34158212
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.05.001 -
Transfusion Medicine Reviews Jan 2021Treatment guidelines recommend the routine use of point-of-care diagnostic tests for coagulopathy in the management of cardiac surgery patients at risk of severe... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Treatment guidelines recommend the routine use of point-of-care diagnostic tests for coagulopathy in the management of cardiac surgery patients at risk of severe bleeding despite uncertainty as to their diagnostic accuracy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of viscoelastometry, platelet function tests, and modified thromboelastography (TEG) tests, for coagulopathy in cardiac surgery patients. The reference standard included resternotomy for bleeding, transfusion of non-red cell components, or massive transfusion. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Clinical Trials.gov, from inception to June 2019. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Bivariate models were used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity with (95% confidence intervals). All 29 studies (7440 participants) included in the data synthesis evaluated the tests as predictors of bleeding. No study evaluated their role in the management of bleeding. None was at low risk of bias. Four were judged as low concern regarding applicability. Pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy were; Viscoelastic tests, 12 studies, sensitivity 0.61 (0.44, 0.76), specificity 0.83 (0.70, 0.91) with significant heterogeneity. Platelet function tests, 12 studies, sensitivity 0.63 (0.53, 0.72), specificity 0.75 (0.64, 0.84) with significant heterogeneity. TEG modification tests, 3 studies, sensitivity 0.80 (0.67, 0.89), specificity 0.76 (0.69, 0.82) with no evidence of heterogeneity. Studies reporting the highest values for sensitivity and specificity had important methodological limitations. In conclusion, we did not demonstrate predictive accuracy for commonly used point-of-care devices for coagulopathic bleeding in cardiac surgery. However, the certainty of the evidence was low.
Topics: Blood Coagulation Disorders; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Humans; Point-of-Care Testing; Thrombelastography
PubMed: 33187808
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2020.09.012 -
Transfusion May 2020Platelets have the highest bacterial contamination risk of all blood components, and septic transfusion reactions remain a problem. A good estimate of contamination... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Platelets have the highest bacterial contamination risk of all blood components, and septic transfusion reactions remain a problem. A good estimate of contamination rates could provide information about residual risk and inform optimal testing strategies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of platelet contamination rates by primary culture.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
A literature search in December 2019 identified articles on platelet contamination rates using primary culture. We used meta-analysis to estimate the overall rate of contamination and meta-regression to identify heterogeneity. We studied the following sources of heterogeneity: collection method, sample volume, positivity criteria, and study date. Contamination rate estimates were obtained for apheresis (AP), platelet rich plasma (PRP), and buffy coat (BC) collection methods.
RESULTS
The search identified 6102 studies, and 22 were included for meta-analysis. Among these 22 studies, there were 21 AP cohorts (4,072,022 components), 4 PRP cohorts (138,869 components), and 15 BC cohorts (1,474,679 components). The overall mean contamination rate per 1000 components was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.38-0.67) including AP (0.23, 95% CI: 0.18-0.28), PRP, (0.38, 95% CI: 0.15-0.70), and BC (1.12, 95% CI: 0.51-1.96). There was considerable variability within each collection method. Sample volume, positivity criteria, and publication year were significant sources of heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION
The bacterial contamination rate of platelets by primary culture is 1 in 1961. AP and PRP components showed a lower contamination rate than BC components. There is clinically significant between-study variability for each method. Larger sample volumes increased sensitivity, and bacterial contamination rates have decreased over time.
Topics: Bacterial Infections; Bacteriological Techniques; Blood Component Removal; Blood Component Transfusion; Blood Platelets; Cells, Cultured; Drug Contamination; Humans; Platelet Transfusion; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Primary Cell Culture; Transfusion Reaction
PubMed: 32181889
DOI: 10.1111/trf.15762 -
Digestive and Liver Disease : Official... Nov 2021Severe thrombocytopenia in cirrhosis can preclude invasive procedures. Platelet transfusion is recommended if platelet count pre-procedure is potential alternative to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Severe thrombocytopenia in cirrhosis can preclude invasive procedures. Platelet transfusion is recommended if platelet count pre-procedure is potential alternative to platelet transfusion is thrombopoietin-receptor (TPO) agonists.
AIM
Evaluate TPO-agonist efficacy and safety in cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia undergoing invasive procedures.
METHODS
Randomized control trials (RCT) from electronic reference databases were searched from inception till December 2019. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Primary outcome was platelet transfusion avoidance. Secondary outcomes were weighted mean difference (WMD) in platelet count from baseline to pre-procedure and rates of major adverse events (AE). Pooled Odds Ratio (OR) were estimated using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Six RCTs with 1,229 patients were included. All studies had low risk of bias. Compared with placebo, those treated with TPO-agonists had a pooled OR of 0.12(0.08-0.17), P<0.01 for platelet transfusion avoidance, and WMD in platelet count (x10 3 /µL) of 35.6(28.6-42.7), P<0.01. Major AE did not differ between groups [Pooled OR: 0.87(0.47-1.62), P=0.66].
CONCLUSION
Compared to placebo, TPO-agonists used in cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia prior to elective invasive procedures had 88% reduced odds of requiring peri-procedural platelet transfusion and increased platelet count pre-procedure, with no difference in AE rates.
Topics: Elective Surgical Procedures; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Platelet Count; Preoperative Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Thrombopoietin; Thrombocytopenia
PubMed: 34373229
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.07.015 -
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine : a... Jan 2022To present the recommendations and consensus statements with supporting literature for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill neonates and children...
Plasma and Platelet Transfusions Strategies in Neonates and Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass or Neonates and Children Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.
OBJECTIVES
To present the recommendations and consensus statements with supporting literature for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill neonates and children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass or supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation from the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.
DESIGN
Systematic review and consensus conference of international, multidisciplinary experts in platelet and plasma transfusion management of critically ill children.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PATIENTS
Critically ill neonates and children following cardiopulmonary bypass or supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
INTERVENTIONS
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
A panel of nine experts developed evidence-based and, when evidence was insufficient, expert-based statements for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill neonates and children following cardiopulmonary bypass or supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. These statements were reviewed and ratified by the 29 Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding experts. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, from inception to December 2020. Consensus was obtained using the Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. Results were summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. We developed one good practice statement, two recommendations, and three expert consensus statements.
CONCLUSIONS
Whereas viscoelastic testing and transfusion algorithms may be considered, in general, evidence informing indications for plasma and platelet transfusions in neonatal and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass or those requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support is lacking.
Topics: Anemia; Blood Component Transfusion; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Child; Critical Care; Critical Illness; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Evidence-Based Medicine; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Plasma; Platelet Transfusion
PubMed: 34989703
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002856 -
World Journal of Emergency Surgery :... Mar 2023The occurrence of massive haemorrhages in various emergency situations increases the need for blood transfusions and increases the risk of mortality. Fibrinogen... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The occurrence of massive haemorrhages in various emergency situations increases the need for blood transfusions and increases the risk of mortality. Fibrinogen concentrate (FC) use may increase plasma fibrinogen levels more rapidly than fresh-frozen product or cryoprecipitate use. Previous several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have not effectively demonstrated FC efficacy in significantly improving the risk of mortality and reducing transfusion requirements. In this study, we investigated the use of FC for haemorrhages in emergency situations.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included controlled trials, but excluded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in elective surgeries. The study population consisted of patients with haemorrhages in emergency situations, and the intervention was emergency supplementation of FC. The control group was administered with ordinal transfusion or placebo. The primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the amount of transfusion and thrombotic events, respectively. The electronic databases searched included MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
RESULTS
Nine RCTs in the qualitative synthesis with a total of 701 patients were included. Results showed a slight increase in in-hospital mortality with FC treatment (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.64-2.39, p = 0.52) with very low certainty of the evidence. There was no reduction in the use of red blood cells (RBC) transfusion in the first 24 h after admission with FC treatment (mean difference [MD] 0.0 Unit in the FC group, 95% CI - 0.99-0.98, p = 0.99) with very low certainty of the evidence. However, the use of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion significantly increased in the first 24 h after admission with FC treatment (MD 2.61 Unit higher in the FC group, 95% CI 0.07-5.16, p = 0.04). The occurrence of thrombotic events did not significantly differ with FC treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study indicates that the use of FC may result in a slight increase in in-hospital mortality. While FC did not appear to reduce the use of RBC transfusion, it likely increased the use of FFP transfusion and may result in a large increase in platelet concentrate transfusion. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the unbalanced severity in the patient population, high heterogeneity, and risk of bias.
Topics: Humans; Fibrinogen; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Blood Transfusion; Elective Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 36998084
DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00497-5 -
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine : a... Jan 2022To present consensus statements and supporting literature for plasma and platelet product variables and related laboratory testing for transfusions in general critically...
What Laboratory Tests and Physiologic Triggers Should Guide the Decision to Administer a Platelet or Plasma Transfusion in Critically Ill Children and What Product Attributes Are Optimal to Guide Specific Product Selection? From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of...
OBJECTIVES
To present consensus statements and supporting literature for plasma and platelet product variables and related laboratory testing for transfusions in general critically ill children from the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.
DESIGN
Systematic review and consensus conference of international, multidisciplinary experts in platelet and plasma transfusion management of critically ill children.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PATIENTS
Critically ill pediatric patients at risk of bleeding and receiving plasma and/or platelet transfusions.
INTERVENTIONS
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
A panel of 10 experts developed evidence-based and, when evidence was insufficient, expert-based statements for laboratory testing and blood product attributes for platelet and plasma transfusions. These statements were reviewed and ratified by the 29 Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative - Control/Avoidance of Bleeding experts. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, from inception to December 2020. Consensus was obtained using the Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. Results were summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. We developed five expert consensus statements and two recommendations in answer to two questions: what laboratory tests and physiologic triggers should guide the decision to administer a platelet or plasma transfusion in critically ill children; and what product attributes are optimal to guide specific product selection?
CONCLUSIONS
The Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding program provides some guidance and expert consensus for the laboratory and blood product attributes used for decision-making for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill pediatric patients.
Topics: Anemia; Blood Component Transfusion; Child; Critical Care; Critical Illness; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Plasma; Platelet Transfusion
PubMed: 34989701
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002854 -
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine : a... Jan 2022To present consensus statements and supporting literature for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill children following noncardiac surgery and critically ill...
Plasma and Platelet Transfusion Strategies in Critically Ill Children Following Noncardiac Surgery and Critically Ill Children Undergoing Invasive Procedures Outside the Operating Room: From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.
OBJECTIVES
To present consensus statements and supporting literature for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill children following noncardiac surgery and critically ill children undergoing invasive procedures outside the operating room from the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative - Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.
DESIGN
Systematic review and consensus conference of international, multidisciplinary experts in platelet and plasma transfusion management of critically ill children.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PATIENTS
Critically ill children undergoing invasive procedures outside of the operating room or noncardiac surgery.
INTERVENTIONS
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
A panel of 10 experts developed evidence-based and, when evidence was insufficient, expert-based statements for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill children following noncardiac surgery or undergoing invasive procedures outside of the operating room. These statements were reviewed and ratified by the 29 Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding experts. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, from inception to December 2020. Consensus was obtained using the Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. Results were summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. We developed eight expert consensus statements focused on the critically ill child following noncardiac surgery and 10 expert consensus statements on the critically ill child undergoing invasive procedures outside the operating room.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence regarding plasma and platelet transfusion in critically ill children in this area is very limited. The Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding Consensus Conference developed 18 pediatric specific consensus statements regarding plasma and platelet transfusion management in these critically ill pediatric populations.
Topics: Anemia; Blood Component Transfusion; Child; Critical Care; Critical Illness; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Operating Rooms; Plasma; Platelet Transfusion
PubMed: 34989705
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002858 -
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine : a... Jan 2022To present the consensus statements with supporting literature for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill neonates and children with malignancy, acute liver...
Plasma and Platelet Transfusion Strategies in Critically Ill Children With Malignancy, Acute Liver Failure and/or Liver Transplantation, or Sepsis: From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.
OBJECTIVES
To present the consensus statements with supporting literature for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill neonates and children with malignancy, acute liver disease and/or following liver transplantation, and sepsis and/or disseminated intravascular coagulation from the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding.
DESIGN
Systematic review and consensus conference of international, multidisciplinary experts in platelet and plasma transfusion management of critically ill children.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PATIENTS
Critically ill neonates and children with malignancy, acute liver disease and/or following liver transplantation, and sepsis and/or disseminated intravascular coagulation.
INTERVENTIONS
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
A panel of 13 experts developed evidence-based and, when evidence was insufficient, expert-based statements for plasma and platelet transfusions in critically ill neonates and children with malignancy, acute liver disease and/or following liver transplantation, and sepsis and/or disseminated intravascular coagulation. These statements were reviewed and ratified by the 29 Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding experts. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, from inception to December 2020. Consensus was obtained using the Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. Results were summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. We developed 12 expert consensus statements.
CONCLUSIONS
In the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding program, the current absence of evidence for use of plasma and/or platelet transfusion in critically ill children with malignancy, acute liver disease and/or following liver transplantation, and sepsis means that only expert consensus statements are possible for these areas of practice.
Topics: Anemia; Blood Component Transfusion; Child; Critical Care; Critical Illness; Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Evidence-Based Medicine; Hemorrhage; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Liver Failure, Acute; Liver Transplantation; Neoplasms; Plasma; Platelet Transfusion; Sepsis
PubMed: 34989704
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002857