-
European Journal of Radiology Mar 2022To identify the defining lung ultrasound (LUS) findings of COVID-19, and establish its association to the initial severity of the disease and prognostic outcomes. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To identify the defining lung ultrasound (LUS) findings of COVID-19, and establish its association to the initial severity of the disease and prognostic outcomes.
METHOD
Systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We queried PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database and Scopus using the terms ((coronavirus) OR (covid-19) OR (sars AND cov AND 2) OR (2019-nCoV)) AND (("lung ultrasound") OR (LUS)), from 31st of December 2019 to 31st of January 2021. PCR-confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, obtained from original studies with at least 10 participants 18 years old or older, were included. Risk of bias and applicability was evaluated with QUADAS-2.
RESULTS
We found 1333 articles, from which 66 articles were included, with a pooled population of 4687 patients. The most examined findings were at least 3 B-lines, confluent B-lines, subpleural consolidation, pleural effusion and bilateral or unilateral distribution. B-lines, its confluent presentation and pleural abnormalities are the most frequent findings. LUS score was higher in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and emergency department (ED), and it was associated with a higher risk of developing unfavorable outcomes (death, ICU admission or need for mechanical ventilation). LUS findings and/or the LUS score had a good negative predictive value in the diagnosis of COVID-19 compared to RT-PCR.
CONCLUSIONS
The most frequent ultrasound findings of COVID-19 are B-lines and pleural abnormalities. High LUS score is associated with developing unfavorable outcomes. The inclusion of pleural effusion in the LUS score and the standardisation of the imaging protocol in COVID-19 LUS remains to be defined.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; COVID-19; Humans; Lung; Pleura; SARS-CoV-2; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 35078136
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110156 -
Chest Nov 2023The optimal treatment for community-acquired childhood pneumonia complicated by empyema remains unclear.
BACKGROUND
The optimal treatment for community-acquired childhood pneumonia complicated by empyema remains unclear.
RESEARCH QUESTION
In children with parapneumonic effusion or empyema, do hospital length of stay and other key clinical outcomes differ according to the treatment modality used?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
A living systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Eligible RCTs included patients aged < 18 years and compared two of the following treatment modalities: antibiotics alone, chest tube insertion with or without fibrinolytics, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and decortication via thoracotomy. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate treatment effects on hospital length of stay (LOS), the primary outcome.
RESULTS
Eleven trials including a total of 590 patients were selected for the network meta-analysis. Compared with a chest tube alone, a chest tube with fibrinolytics, thoracotomy, and VATS were all associated with shorter LOS, with a mean difference of 5.05 days (95% CI, 2.46-7.64), 6.33 days (95% CI, 3.17-9.50), and 5.86 days (95% CI, 3.38-8.35), respectively. No substantial differences in LOS were observed between the latter three interventions. None of the 11 RCTs compared antibiotics alone vs other types of treatment. Most trials reported peri-procedural complications and the need for reintervention, but the descriptions differed significantly between trials, preventing meta-analysis. In trials reporting health care-associated costs, fibrinolytics had cost advantages compared with VATS. Short- and long-term morbidity and mortality were very low, regardless of the treatment modality.
INTERPRETATION
The results of this network meta-analysis showed that a chest tube alone was associated with a longer LOS compared with other treatment modalities. The lower cost associated with a chest tube plus fibrinolytics warrants consideration when choosing between treatment options, given similar LOS and clinical outcomes compared with the other modalities.
Topics: Child; Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Chest Tubes; Community-Acquired Infections; Drainage; Empyema, Pleural; Network Meta-Analysis; Pleural Effusion; Pneumonia; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
PubMed: 37463660
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.06.010 -
Respiration; International Review of... 2023Pleural infection represents a significant clinical challenge worldwide. Although prompt drainage of pleural fluid is thought to play a key role in pleural infection... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Pleural infection represents a significant clinical challenge worldwide. Although prompt drainage of pleural fluid is thought to play a key role in pleural infection management, the optimal size of intrapleural catheter has yet to be defined.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize data on efficacy and complications of small-bore drain (SBD), defined as ≤14F, in comparison to large-bore drain (LBD) in patients with pleural infection.
METHOD
We searched MEDLINE and Embase for all studies reporting outcomes of interest published up to October 2021. Two authors reviewed selected full text to identify studies according to predefined eligibility criteria. Summary estimates were derived using the random-effects model.
RESULTS
Twelve original studies were included for qualitative analysis and 7 of these for quantitative analysis. The surgical referral rate of SBD and LBD were, respectively, 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.21) and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.10-0.32), the pooled mortality were 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05-0.21) and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.10-0.32), and the length of hospital stay was 24 days in both groups. Data on complications suggest similar proportions of tube dislodgement. Intensity of pain was evaluated in one study only, reporting higher scores for LBD.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis provide the first synthesis of data on performance of SBD and LBD in management of pleural infection, and, overall, clinical outcomes and complications did not substantially differ, although the limited number of studies and the absence of dedicated randomized trials does limit the reliability of results.
Topics: Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Pleural Diseases; Empyema, Pleural; Chest Tubes; Drainage
PubMed: 36693327
DOI: 10.1159/000529027 -
Polish Journal of Radiology 2022Computed tomography (CT) scan is a commonly used tool for the diagnosis of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), similarly to reverse transcription-polymerase... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Computed tomography (CT) scan is a commonly used tool for the diagnosis of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), similarly to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Because of the limitations of RT-PCR, there is growing interest in the usability of the CT scan. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize the available data on the CT scan features of COVID-19.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic search in electronic databases to find eligible studies published between 1 December 2019 and 4 April 2020, which investigated the computed tomographic features of patients with COVID-19. All preprint and peer-reviewed articles were included. No language limitation was applied. For proportional data, pooled prevalence was calculated using a Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation, with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Eighty-six studies were eligible to be included in the meta-analysis. For 7956 patients, the most common CT findings were bilateral pattern of involvement (78%; 95% CI: 0.73-0.82; < 0.001), involvement of more than 1 lobe (75%; 95% CI: 0.68-0.82; < 0.001), ground-glass opacities (GGO) (73%; 95% CI: 0.67-0.78; < 0.001), and peripheral distribution of signs (69%; 95% CI: 0.61-0.76; < 0.001). Only 5% of patients had a normal CT scan (95% CI:0.03-0.07; < 0.001). The proportion of paediatric patients (age < 18 years) with unremarkable CT findings was higher (40%; 95% CI: 0.27-0.55; < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with the severe or critical type of COVID-19 were more likely to have pleural effusion (RR 7.77; 95% CI: 3.97-15.18; < 0.001) and consolidation (RR 3.13; 95% CI: 1.57-6.23; < 0.001). CT results in patients with COVID-19 were comparable with those of people having pneumonia from other causes, except for the lower incidence of consolidation (RR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.71-0.91; < 0.001) and higher risk of showing GGO (RR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.13-1.86; < 0.001). The mortality rate was slightly higher in patients with bilateral involvement (RR 3.19; 95% CI: 1.07-9.49; = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study results show that COVID-19 shares some features with other viral types of pneumonia, despite some differences. They commonly present as GGO along with vascular thickening, air bronchogram and consolidations. Normal CT images, lymphadenopathies, and pleural effusions are not common. Consolidations and pleural effusions correlate with more severe disease. CT features are different between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia. Also, they differ by age, disease severity, and outcomes within COVID-19 patients.
PubMed: 35140824
DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2022.112613 -
Cytokine Nov 2022The diagnostic performance of pleural fluid interleukins as potential biomarkers for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) remains unclear. We assessed the diagnostic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The diagnostic performance of pleural fluid interleukins as potential biomarkers for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) remains unclear. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of various interleukins in the pleural fluid for TPE and evaluated their ability to differentiate TPE from other effusions.
METHODS
We queried the PubMed and Embase databases for studies indexed till October 2021. We included studies that (a) provided information regarding sensitivity and specificity of pleural fluid interleukins for diagnosing TPE, or (b) compared pleural fluid interleukin levels between TPE and malignant or parapneumonic effusions. We used hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic plots to model summary sensitivity and specificity. Random effects modeling was employed to pool standardized mean differences (SMD) across descriptive studies comparing TPE and other effusions.
RESULTS
We included 80 publications in our review; most were small and of poor quality. All interleukins except interleukin-27 (interleukins 1-beta, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 12p40, 13, 18, 33) showed poor diagnostic accuracy and inconsistent discrimination of TPE from other effusions. The summary estimates for sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.94 (95 % CI 0.85-0.98), 0.97 (95 % CI 0.93-0.99), and 507.13 (95 % CI 130.66-1968.34) respectively for pleural fluid interleukin-27. Mean pleural fluid interleukin-27 levels in TPE were significantly higher than malignant (summary SMD 3.72, 95 % CI 2.81-4.63) or parapneumonic (summary SMD 2.45, 95 % CI -1.80-3.09) effusions.
CONCLUSION
Pleural fluid interleukins are poor diagnostic biomarkers for TPE. Only pleural fluid interleukin-27 exhibited good accuracy in diagnosing TPE and needs further evaluation.
Topics: Biomarkers; Humans; Interleukin-27; Interleukins; Pleural Effusion; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Pleural
PubMed: 36054961
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2022.156019 -
BMC Infectious Diseases May 2023Identification of pleural effusion (PE) in dengue infection is an objective measure of plasma leakage and may predict disease progression. However, no studies have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Identification of pleural effusion (PE) in dengue infection is an objective measure of plasma leakage and may predict disease progression. However, no studies have systematically assessed the frequency of PE in patients with dengue, and whether this differs across age and imaging modality.
METHODS
We searched Pubmed, Embase Web of Science and Lilacs (period 1900-2021) for studies reporting on PE in dengue patients (hospitalized and outpatient). We defined PE as fluid in the thoracic cavity detected by any imaging test. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021228862). Complicated dengue was defined as hemorrhagic fever, dengue shock syndrome or severe dengue.
RESULTS
The search identified 2,157 studies of which 85 studies were eligible for inclusion. The studies (n = 31 children, n = 10 adults, n = 44 mixed age) involved 12,800 patients (30% complicated dengue). The overall frequency of PE was 33% [95%CI: 29 to 37%] and the rate of PE increased significantly with disease severity (P = 0.001) such that in complicated vs. uncomplicated dengue the frequencies were 48% and 17% (P < 0.001). When assessing all studies, PE occurred significantly more often in children compared to adults (43% vs. 13%, P = 0.002) and lung ultrasound more frequently detected PE than conventional chest X-ray (P = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS
We found that 1/3 of dengue patients presented with PE and the frequency increased with severity and younger age. Importantly, lung ultrasound demonstrated the highest rate of detection. Our findings suggest that PE is a relatively common finding in dengue and that bedside imaging tools, such as lung ultrasound, potentially may enhance detection.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Severe Dengue; Exudates and Transudates; Pleural Effusion; Plasma; Ultrasonography; Dengue
PubMed: 37189054
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08311-y -
Forensic Science, Medicine, and... Dec 2022Clinical features of COVID-19 range from mild respiratory symptoms to fatal outcomes. Autopsy findings are important for understanding COVID-19-related pathophysiology... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Clinical features of COVID-19 range from mild respiratory symptoms to fatal outcomes. Autopsy findings are important for understanding COVID-19-related pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. This systematic study aims to evaluate autopsy findings in paediatric cases. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database Reviews. We included studies that reported autopsy findings in children with COVID-19. A total of 11 studies (24 subjects) were included. The mean age of patients was 5.9 ± 5.7 years. Grossly, there was pericardial and pleural effusion, hepatosplenomegaly, cardiomegaly, heavy soft lung, enlarged kidney, and enlarged brain. The autopsy findings of the lungs were diffuse alveolar damage (78.3%), fibrin thrombi (43.5%), haemorrhage (30.4%), pneumonia (26%), congestion and oedema (26%), angiomatoid pattern (17.4%), and alveolar megakaryocytes (17.4%). The heart showed interstitial oedema (80%), myocardial foci of band necrosis (60%), fibrin microthrombi (60%), interstitial and perivascular inflammation (40%), and pancarditis (30%). The liver showed centrilobular congestion (60%), micro/macrovesicular steatosis (30%), and arterial/venous thrombi (20%). The kidney showed acute tubular necrosis (75%), congestion (62.5%), fibrin thrombi in glomerular capillaries (37.5%), and nephrocalcinosis, mesangial cell hyperplasia, tubular hyaline/granular casts (25% each). The spleen showed splenitis (71.4%), haemorrhage (71.4%), lymphoid hypoplasia (57.1%), and haemophagocytosis (28.6%). The brain revealed oedema (87.5%), congestion (75%), reactive microglia (62.5%), neuronal ischaemic necrosis (62.5%), meningoencephalitis (37.5%), and fibrin thrombi (25%). SARS-CoV-2 and CD68 were positive by immunohistochemistry in 85.7% and 33.3% cases, respectively. Autopsy findings of COVID-19 in children are variable in all important organs. It may help in better understanding the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2.
Topics: Humans; Child; Infant; Child, Preschool; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Autopsy; Lung; Thrombosis; Fibrin; Necrosis
PubMed: 36048325
DOI: 10.1007/s12024-022-00502-4 -
Academic Radiology Dec 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the radiological predictors of post-coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pulmonary fibrosis and incomplete... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the radiological predictors of post-coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pulmonary fibrosis and incomplete absorption of pulmonary lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies reporting the predictive value of radiological findings in patients with post-COVID-19 lung residuals published through November 11, 2022. The pooled odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were assessed. The random-effects model was used due to the heterogeneity of the true effect sizes.
RESULTS
We included 11 studies. There were 1777 COVID-19-positive patients, and 1014 (57%) were male. All studies used chest computed tomography (CT) as a radiologic tool. Moreover, chest X-ray (CXR) and lung ultrasound were used in two studies, along with a CT scan. CT severity score (CTSS), Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema score (RALE), interstitial score, lung ultrasound score (LUS), patchy opacities, abnormal CXR, pleural traction, and subpleural abnormalities were found to be predictors of post-COVID-19 sequels. CTSS and consolidations were the most common predictors among included studies. Pooled analysis revealed that pulmonary residuals in patients with initial consolidation are about four times more likely than in patients without this finding (odds ratio: 3.830; 95% CI: 1.811-8.102, I2: 4.640).
CONCLUSION
Radiological findings can predict the long-term pulmonary sequelae of COVID-19 patients. CTSS is an important predictor of lung fibrosis and COVID-19 mortality. Lung fibrosis can be diagnosed and tracked using the LUS. Changes in RALE score during hospitalization can be used as an independent predictor of mortality.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Pulmonary Fibrosis; Respiratory Sounds; Lung; Disease Progression
PubMed: 37491177
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.06.002 -
Journal of Medical Virology Jan 2022Observational studies indicate that pleural effusion has an association with risk and the clinical prognosis of COVID-19 disease; however, the available literature on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Observational studies indicate that pleural effusion has an association with risk and the clinical prognosis of COVID-19 disease; however, the available literature on this area is inconsistent. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the correlation between COVID-19 disease and pleural effusion. A rigorous literature search was conducted using multiple databases. All eligible observational studies were included from around the globe. The pooled prevalence and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random effect model. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios were produced to report overall effect size using random effect models for severity and mortality outcomes. Funnel plots, Egger regression tests, and Begg-Mazumdar's rank correlation test were used to appraise publication bias. Data from 23 studies including 6234 COVID-19 patients was obtained. The overall prevalence of pleural effusion in COVID-19 patients was 9.55% (95% CI, I = 92%). Our findings also indicated that the presence of pleural effusions associated with increased risk of severity of disease(OR = 5.08, 95% CI 3.14-8.22, I = 77.4%) and mortality due to illness(OR = 4.53, 95% CI 2.16-9.49, I = 66%) compared with patients without pleural effusion. Sensitivity analyses illustrated a similar effect size while decreasing the heterogeneity. No significant publication bias was evident in the meta-analysis. The presence of pleural effusion can assist as a prognostic factor to evaluate the risk of worse outcomes in COVID-19 patients hence, it is recommended that hospitalized COVID-19 patients with pleural effusion should be managed on an early basis.
Topics: COVID-19; Female; Humans; Male; Pleural Effusion; Prevalence; Prognosis; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 34449896
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27301 -
Journal of the American College of... Jun 2020To date, considerable knowledge gaps remain regarding the chest CT imaging features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To date, considerable knowledge gaps remain regarding the chest CT imaging features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of results from published studies to date to provide a summary of evidence on detection of COVID-19 by chest CT and the expected CT imaging manifestations.
METHODS
Studies were identified by searching PubMed database for articles published between December 2019 and February 2020. Pooled CT positive rate of COVID-19 and pooled incidence of CT imaging findings were estimated using a random-effect model.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled positive rate of the CT imaging was 89.76% and 90.35% when only including thin-section chest CT. Typical CT signs were ground glass opacities (83.31%), ground glass opacities with mixed consolidation (58.42%), adjacent pleura thickening (52.46%), interlobular septal thickening (48.46%), and air bronchograms (46.46%). Other CT signs included crazy paving pattern (14.81%), pleural effusion (5.88%), bronchiectasis (5.42%), pericardial effusion (4.55%), and lymphadenopathy (3.38%). The most anatomic distributions were bilateral lung infection (78.2%) and peripheral distribution (76.95%). The incidences were highest in the right lower lobe (87.21%), left lower lobe (81.41%), and bilateral lower lobes (65.22%). The right upper lobe (65.22%), right middle lobe (54.95%), and left upper lobe (69.43%) were also commonly involved. The incidence of bilateral upper lobes was 60.87%. A considerable proportion of patients had three or more lobes involved (70.81%).
CONCLUSIONS
The detection of COVID-19 chest CT imaging is very high among symptomatic individuals at high risk, especially using thin-section chest CT. The most common CT features in patients affected by COVID-19 included ground glass opacities and consolidation involving the bilateral lungs in a peripheral distribution.
Topics: Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; Coronavirus Infections; Female; Humans; Male; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Radiography, Thoracic; SARS-CoV-2; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 32283052
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.03.006