-
Clinical Imaging Dec 2021Chest radiography (CXR) is most likely to be the utilized modality for diagnosing COVID-19 and following up on any lung-associated abnormalities. This review provides a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Chest radiography (CXR) is most likely to be the utilized modality for diagnosing COVID-19 and following up on any lung-associated abnormalities. This review provides a meta-analysis of the current literature on CXR imaging findings to determine the most common appearances of lung abnormalities in COVID-19 patients in order to equip medical researchers and healthcare professionals in their efforts to combat this pandemic. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The inclusion criteria consisted of: (1) published in English literature; (2) original research study; (3) sample size of at least 5 patients; (4) reporting clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients as well as CXR imaging features; and (5) noting the number of patients with each corresponding imaging feature. A total of 1948 patients were included in this study. To perform the meta-analysis, a random-effects model calculated the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals of abnormal CXR imaging findings. Seventy-four percent (74%) (95% CI: 51-92%) of patients with COVID-19 had an abnormal CXR at the initial time of diagnosis or sometime during the disease course. While there was no single feature on CXR that was diagnostic of COVID-19 viral pneumonia, a characteristic set of findings were obvious. The most common abnormalities were consolidation (28%, 95% CI: 8-54%) and ground-glass opacities (29%, 95% CI: 10-53%). The distribution was most frequently bilateral (43%, 95% CI: 27-60%), peripheral (51%, 95% CI: 36-66%), and basal zone (56%, 95% CI: 37-74%) predominant. Contrary to parenchymal abnormalities, pneumothorax (1%, 95% CI: 0-3%) and pleural effusions (6%, 95% CI: 1-16%) were rare.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Pandemics; Radiography; Radiography, Thoracic; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34364071
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.039 -
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection... 2022Efficient detection tools for determining staphylococcal pleural infection are critical for its eradication. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Efficient detection tools for determining staphylococcal pleural infection are critical for its eradication. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic utility of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) in suspected empyema cases to identify staphylococcal strains and avoid unnecessary empiric methicillin-resistant (MRSA) therapy.
METHODS
From inception to July 24, 2021, relevant records were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The quality of studies was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve for NAAT's diagnostic performance were evaluated using an HSROC model.
RESULTS
Eight studies comprising 424 samples evaluated NAAT accuracy for (SA) identification, while four studies comprising 317 samples evaluated methicillin-resistant (MRSA) identification. The pooled NAAT summary estimates for detection of both SA (sensitivity: 0.35 (95% CI 0.19-0.55), specificity: 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97), PLR: 7.92 (95% CI 4.98-12.59), NLR: 0.44 (95% CI 0.14-1.46), and DOR: 24.0 (95% CI 6.59-87.61) ) and MRSA (sensitivity: 0.45 (95% CI 0.15-0.78), specificity: 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.95), PLR: 10.06 (95% CI 1.49-67.69), NLR: 0.69 (95% CI 0.41-1.15), and DOR: 27.18 (95% CI 2.97-248.6) ) were comparable. The statistical scores for MRSA and SA identification sensitivity were 13.7% and 74.9%, respectively, indicating mild to substantial heterogeneity. PCR was frequently used among NAA tests, and its diagnostic accuracy coincided well with the overall summary estimates. A meta-regression and subgroup analysis of country, setting, study design, patient selection, and sample condition could not explain the heterogeneity (meta-regression = 0.66, = 0.46, = 0.98, = 0.68, and = 0.79, respectively) in diagnostic effectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study suggested that the diagnostic accuracy of NAA tests is currently inadequate to substitute culture as a principal screening test. NAAT could be used in conjunction with microbiological culture due to the advantage of faster results and in situations where culture tests are not doable.
Topics: Empyema; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques; ROC Curve; Staphylococcus
PubMed: 35967859
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.758833 -
Cureus Mar 2023Persistent air leaks (PALs) are associated with prolonged hospital stays, contamination and sustained infection of the pleural space, and significant morbidity. A... (Review)
Review
Persistent air leaks (PALs) are associated with prolonged hospital stays, contamination and sustained infection of the pleural space, and significant morbidity. A fistulous tract between the alveoli and the pleural space is referred to as an alveolar-pleural fistula (APF), whereas a fistulous tract between the bronchiole and the pleural space is referred to as a bronchopleural fistula (BPF). There is no consensus on the treatment, and multiple modalities exist for the management of persistent air leak (PAL). Autologous blood patch (ABP) is a relatively safe and inexpensive method that has been used for many years for the treatment of PALs. We conducted an electronic database search between 08/24/2022 and 08/27/2022 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane using keywords. The following keywords were used: "Blood patch" OR "Autologous blood patch" AND "pleurodesis." Our study included all original studies with the prime focus on the etiology of PALs, clinical characteristics, procedural details of ABP, and outcomes of the proposed treatment. The primary outcomes that were the focus of our study were the time to seal the air leak, the time to remove the chest tube after air leak cessation, and the time to discharge from the hospital. To determine the safety of ABP, we also evaluated the procedural outcomes. Our findings suggest a statistically significant decrease in the time to air leak cessation when compared to the control group (mean difference of -3.75 {95% CI: -5.65 to -1.85; P=0.001}) with considerable heterogeneity of I=85% and P=0.001. However, the difference was not statistically significant when a lower dose of ABP (50 mL) was compared to a higher dose (100 mL) (mean difference of 1.48 {95% CI: -0.07 to 3.02; P=0.06}) and considerable heterogeneity of I=80% and P=0.03. There was no statistically significant difference in the time to discharge when compared to the control group (mean difference of -2.12 {95% CI: -4.83 to 0.59; P=0.13}) and considerable heterogeneity (I=95% and P<0.001). When compared to the control group, ABP did not provide any statistically significant difference in the risk ratio for infection (1.18 {95% CI: 0.52 to 2.65; P=0.70} and moderate heterogeneity {I=33% and P=0.20}), pain (1.18 {95% CI: 0.52 to 2.65; P=0.70} and moderate heterogeneity {I=33% and P=0.20}), and fever (0.54 {95% CI: 0.27 to 1.10; P=0.09} and no heterogeneity {I=0% and P=0.50}). Our study concludes that using ABP caused a statistically significant decrease in the time to air leak cessation when compared to the control group. However, the procedure does not provide a statistically significant difference in the time to discharge from the hospital when compared to conservative treatment. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk ratio for complications such as infection, pain, and fever when compared to conservative management. More studies need to be conducted to fully understand the efficacy and safety of ABP in the management of PALs.
PubMed: 37090364
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36466 -
International Immunopharmacology Oct 2022Neopterin (NEO) is a marker of immune stimulation. Increased NEO levels have been associated with autoimmune diseases, infections, and malignancies. Studies of NEO... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Neopterin (NEO) is a marker of immune stimulation. Increased NEO levels have been associated with autoimmune diseases, infections, and malignancies. Studies of NEO alterations in tuberculosis (TB) with or without HIV co-infection show inconsistent results. Moreover, challenges exist regarding TB diagnosis in people with HIV.
METHODS
We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing urinary, pleural, and blood NEO levels between patients with TB or HIV-TB co-infection as the case group and subjects without TB and HIV or subjects with HIV without TB as the control group, respectively.
RESULTS
Blood NEO levels in patients with active TB were higher than healthy controls, with a large effect size of 1.99. Patients with TB had higher blood NEO levels before anti-tuberculosis therapy (ATT) than after ATT for months or when treatment ended with moderate effect sizes (1.13-1.46). meta-analysis of studies of patients with HIV-TB co-infection yielded similar results, with higher blood NEO levels in patients than controls that remained significant in subgroups of studies on pulmonary TB (PTB) patients and serum NEO and higher blood NEO levels in patients before than after ATT.
CONCLUSION
Meta-analyses reveal alteration in NEO levels in different specimens, e.g., blood, urine, and pleural fluid, in patients with TB with or HIV-TB co-infection compared to the control groups. Future studies need to investigate the utility of NEO as a diagnostic/prognostic biomarker for TB. Also, cellular and molecular mechanisms linking NEO and TB remain to be addressed.
Topics: Coinfection; HIV Infections; Humans; Neopterin; Tuberculosis; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 35973370
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109147 -
Urolithiasis Oct 2022We aimed to perform a systematic review of randomized trials to summarize the evidence on the safety and stone-free rate after Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We aimed to perform a systematic review of randomized trials to summarize the evidence on the safety and stone-free rate after Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (ureteral stent/catheter, no nephrostomy) compared to Standard PCNL (nephrostomy, with/without ureteral stent/catheter) to evaluate if the tubeless approach is better. The inverse variance of the mean difference with a random effect, 95% Confidence Interval (CI), and p values was used for continuous variables. Categorical variables were assessed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method with the random effect model, and reported as Risk Ratio (RR), 95% CI, and p values. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and a 95% CI. 26 studies were included. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Tubeless group (MD-5.18 min, 95% CI - 6.56, - 3.80, p < 0.00001). Mean postoperative length of stay was also significantly shorter in the Tubeless group (MD-1.10 day, 95% CI - 1.48, - 0.71, p < 0.00001). Incidence of blood transfusion, angioembolization for bleeding control, pain score at the first postoperative day, the number of patients requiring postoperative pain medication, fever, urinary infections, sepsis, perirenal fluid collection, pleural breach, hospital readmission, and SFR did not differ between the two groups. Incidence of postoperative urinary fistula was significantly lower in the Tubeless group (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07, 0.47, p = 0.0005). This systematic review shows that tubeless PCNL can be safely performed and the standout benefits are shorter operative time and hospital stay, and a lower rate of postoperative urinary fistula.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Calculi; Length of Stay; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous; Nephrostomy, Percutaneous; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Fistula
PubMed: 35674819
DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01337-y -
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and... Apr 2023The optimization of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) according to respiratory mechanics [driving pressure or respiratory system compliance (Crs)] is a simple and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure guided by respiratory mechanics during anesthesia for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The optimization of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) according to respiratory mechanics [driving pressure or respiratory system compliance (Crs)] is a simple and straightforward strategy. However, its validity to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remains unclear. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess such efficacy. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared personalized PEEP based on respiratory mechanics and constant PEEP to prevent PPCs in adults. The primary outcome was PPCs. Fourteen studies with 1105 patients were included. Compared with those who received constant PEEP, patients who received optimized PEEP exhibited a significant reduction in the incidence of PPCs (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.69). The results of commonly happened PPCs (pulmonary infections, hypoxemia, and atelectasis but not pleural effusion) also supported individualized PEEP group. Moreover, the application of PEEP based on respiratory mechanics improved intraoperative respiratory mechanics (driving pressure and Crs) and oxygenation. The PEEP titration method based on respiratory mechanics seems to work positively for lung protection in surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Lung; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Anesthesia, General; Postoperative Complications; Respiratory Mechanics
PubMed: 36607532
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00960-9 -
Emerging Microbes & Infections Dec 2021The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the new dengue classification in 2009. We aimed to assess the association of clinical signs and symptoms with WHO severe... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the new dengue classification in 2009. We aimed to assess the association of clinical signs and symptoms with WHO severe dengue classification in clinical practice. A systematic literature search was performed using the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus between 2009 and 2018 according to PRISMA guideline. Meta-analysis was performed with the RevMan software. A random or fixed-effect model was applied to pool odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of important signs and symptoms across studies. Thirty nine articles from 1790 records were included in this review. In our meta-analysis, signs and symptoms associated with higher risk of severe dengue were comorbidity, vomiting, persistent vomiting, abdominal pain or tenderness, pleural effusion, ascites, epistaxis, gum bleeding, GI bleeding, skin bleeding, lethargy or restlessness, hepatomegaly (>2 cm), increased HCT with decreased platelets, shock, dyspnea, impaired consciousness, thrombocytopenia, elevated AST and ALT, gall bladder wall thickening and secondary infection. This review shows new factors comorbidity, epistaxis, GI and skin bleeding, dyspnea, gall bladder wall thickening and secondary infection may be useful to refine the 2009 classification to triage severe dengue patients.
Topics: Comorbidity; Female; Humans; Male; Odds Ratio; Risk Factors; Severe Dengue; World Health Organization
PubMed: 34036893
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1935327 -
Cureus Feb 2023Pectus excavatum is a congenital chest wall deformity, commonly identified in early childhood, creating a "sunken chest" appearance. Over time, the deformity can worsen,... (Review)
Review
Pectus excavatum is a congenital chest wall deformity, commonly identified in early childhood, creating a "sunken chest" appearance. Over time, the deformity can worsen, thus impacting cardiopulmonary function and creating significant body image disturbance in patients. The Nuss procedure is a minimally invasive technique in which a curved steel bar is introduced underneath the sternum through small bilateral thoracic incisions to correct the deformity. Most studies regarding the procedure to date focus on outcomes and complications in pediatric patients, however, few studies discuss these results in adult patients. This systematic review aims to analyze common complications and outcomes in patients over the age of 18 who have not undergone any prior intervention for pectus excavatum. The most common complications experienced in adult patients were displacement of the implanted steel bar, infection of the surgical site, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and chronic postoperative pain. Reoperation was common in patients with a displacement of the bar, chronic pain, and bleeding. Additionally, adult patients routinely required a higher number of steel bars to be placed to correct the deformity. Despite evidence that the rate of complications increases with age, the majority of adult patients in our included studies were satisfied with the outcome of the procedure with indications of improved self-image and reduced preoperative symptoms such as dyspnea on exertion, palpitations, chest pain, and depression.
PubMed: 36960268
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35204 -
Journal of Bronchology & Interventional... Jul 2022Hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is described as pleural effusion secondary to liver cirrhosis after ruling out other etiologies. We aim to assess the efficacy of an indwelling... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is described as pleural effusion secondary to liver cirrhosis after ruling out other etiologies. We aim to assess the efficacy of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) placement in refractory HH in this systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of literature was performed from inception to December 2020. The authors reviewed, selected, and abstracted the data from eligible studies into Covidence, a systematic review software. Cochrane criteria was used to rate each study for the risk of bias. The data abstracted were described using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 test.
RESULTS
Ten studies involving a total of 269 patients were included. The studies were analyzed for the proportion of pleurodesis achieved, the average time to pleurodesis, total complication rate, pleural infection rate, and mortality. A proportion of 47% of the total subjects included achieved spontaneous pleurodesis in an average duration of 104.3 days. The frequency of total complication rate was noted to be 30.36%. The incidence of pleural cavity infection was described to be 12.4% and death resulting from complications of IPC was 3.35%.
CONCLUSION
The current management options for the refractory pleural effusion in HH include repeated thoracenteses, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, surgical repair of defects in the diaphragm, and liver transplantation. However, the cost, eligibility, and availability can be some of the major concerns with these treatment modalities. With this meta-analysis, we conclude that IPCs can provide an alternative therapeutic option for spontaneous pleurodesis.
Topics: Catheterization; Catheters, Indwelling; Humans; Hydrothorax; Pleural Effusion; Pleurodesis
PubMed: 34753862
DOI: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000823 -
Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and... 2022Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a large B-cell lymphoma growing within body-cavities caused by the Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)/human herpesvirus-8... (Review)
Review
Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a large B-cell lymphoma growing within body-cavities caused by the Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)/human herpesvirus-8 (KSHV/HHV-8). It is mainly reported in HIV-infected patients. The uncommon occurrence in the elderly supports a form paralleling classic Kaposi sarcoma (KS), i.e. classic PEL, whose characteristics are relatively underexplored. To better understand the diagnostic modalities and clinical-epidemiological features of classic PEL, articles reporting cases of PEL were identified through MEDLINE/EMBASE databases (January 1998-July 2020) and screened according to PRISMA guidelines to extract individual-level data. A comparison was also performed between classic PEL and classic KS to evaluate similarities and differences. We identified 105 subjects (median age 77 years; 86% males), mainly from Mediterranean countries (52%, first Italy) and Eastern Europe (7%). Common comorbidities were heart failure (32%), cirrhosis (16%), and malignancy (20%) including lymphoid neoplasms. Pleural cavity was the commonest site (67%). PEL diagnosis was based on cytomorphology (89%), evidence of KSHV/HHV-8 infection (94%), EBV co-infection (28%) and clonality of IGH (59%), IGK (14%), TRG (9%) alone or in multiple combinations. Compared to KS, age (P<.001), gender-ratio (P=.08) and mortality (P<.001) were significantly higher in PEL, whereas the frequency of PEL as a second primary was similar (P=.44). This is the first systematic review of classic PEL case reports highlighting heterogeneity and lack of a uniform multidisciplinary approach at diagnosis, in the absence of specific guidelines as it happens for rare cancers. It is conceivable that classic PEL is still underdiagnosed in Mediterranean countries wherein KSHV/HHV-8 is endemic.
PubMed: 35444770
DOI: 10.4084/MJHID.2022.020