-
Saudi Medical Journal Dec 2022To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and management of meningitis in cochlear implant (CI)users.
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and management of meningitis in cochlear implant (CI)users.
METHODS
A systematic review was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register. Articles were considered relevant if reported any data on incidence, clinical presentations, the role of vaccination, management, and outcomes of meningitis after CI.
RESULTS
A total of 32 studies including 27358 patients were included, and meningitis was reported in only 202 cases. Meningitis occurred in the period ranging from 1 day to 72 months after CI. A total of 55 patients received the pneumococcal vaccine, while 20 patients received the type B vaccine. A large number of participants (n=47) had associated anatomical malformations, while 62 had otitis media before meningitis. A total of 24 cases required revision surgery along with medical treatment. Full recovery was the outcome reported by the included studies in 19 patients.
CONCLUSION
Cochlear implant users seem to be at possible risk of bacterial meningitis at any time after implantation, especially in the presence of risk factors, such as otitis media and anatomical malformations of the cochlea.
Topics: Humans; Cochlear Implants; Cochlear Implantation; Meningitis, Bacterial; Otitis Media; Vaccination
PubMed: 36517062
DOI: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.12.20220426 -
Vaccine Mar 2020The purpose of this systematic review was to explore pharmacists' impact on older adults' access to vaccines in terms of realized accessibility, financial accessibility,... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this systematic review was to explore pharmacists' impact on older adults' access to vaccines in terms of realized accessibility, financial accessibility, and vaccine availability.
METHODS
Five databases were searched using a search strategy developed in PubMed and translated to other databases. Included studies were English-language, United States-based primary literature published between 1994 to present day. Studies were excluded if they were incomplete studies or did not focus on at least one of three dimensions of access to immunizations: realized accessibility, availability, and financial accessibility. The following data were gathered: title, authors, year published, sub-dimension of accessibility, health care setting, intervention or data source, pharmacist role, type of immunization, duration of study, sample size, and main outcome measures.
RESULTS
Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Of those, the majority evaluated realized accessibility (n = 22, 88%). Eleven studies evaluated vaccine availability, and one study addressed financial accessibility. Pharmacists had a variety of roles in the immunization process, including screener, educator, immunizer, or documenter, and often played more than one role (n = 10, 40%). Pharmacists participated in the vaccination process across multiple health care settings, including in community pharmacies (n = 8, 32%) and hospitals (n = 7, 28%). In the majority (n = 21, 84%) of studies, pharmacists positively impacted older adults' access to vaccines. The most common vaccinations studied were pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations (n = 20, 80%).
CONCLUSION
Vaccinations are important in protecting and maintaining the health of older adults. Pharmacists improved access to vaccinations and served many roles in the vaccination process. Future research should explore how pharmacists impact access to vaccines beyond vaccination rates, especially regarding the financial impact on patients.
Topics: Aged; Health Services Accessibility; Humans; Immunization Programs; Influenza Vaccines; Pharmacists; Professional Role; United States; Vaccination
PubMed: 32046889
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.061 -
Digestive and Liver Disease : Official... Sep 2021Patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) are at risk of infections, many of which are preventable with vaccinations. We performed a systematic review on various...
INTRODUCTION
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) are at risk of infections, many of which are preventable with vaccinations. We performed a systematic review on various aspects of vaccination in IBD.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, and EMBASE databases, through 31 January 2021. Primary outcomes included vaccination rates, predictors of vaccination, reasons of vaccination hesitancy and acceptance, and outcomes of intervention. Findings were presented with medians, ranges, and narrative synthesis.
RESULTS
We included 33 observational studies comprising 146,918 patients and 681 physicians. The median vaccination rates of influenza, pneumococcal pneumonia, and hepatitis B vaccines were 42%(IQR, 28%-61.5%), 20%(IQR, 9%-38.5%), and 48%(IQR, 29%-53%), respectively. Uses of immunosuppressant, older age and physician recommendations have positive influence on vaccination rate. Lack of vaccine-related knowledge and awareness of need for vaccination are main reasons of vaccine hesitancy among patients and physicians. There was disagreement between gastroenterologists and primary-care physicians on whose responsibility to offer vaccination. Education was the sole intervention identified, with variable success.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review demonstrates that the vaccination rates of IBD patients, similar to other chronic diseases, are suboptimal. Lack of vaccine-related knowledge and awareness of the need for vaccination are main reasons of vaccine hesitancy amongst patients and physicians. Education, though effective, was the only available intervention identified. Gastroenterologist could take the lead in educating, and initiating vaccination among IBD patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Immunocompetence; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Physician's Role; Vaccination; Vaccination Hesitancy; Young Adult
PubMed: 33994128
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.015 -
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Dec 2021Streptococcus pneumoniae remains an important bacterial pathogen, particularly for young children in low- and middle-income countries. A systematic review was conducted... (Review)
Review
Streptococcus pneumoniae remains an important bacterial pathogen, particularly for young children in low- and middle-income countries. A systematic review was conducted of peer-reviewed literature from PubMed published as of May 13, 2020, to identify articles relevant to invasive pneumococcal disease, pneumonia, otitis media (OM), nasopharyngeal carriage (NPC), antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and vaccination coverage in Egypt, with particular focus on children ≤ 18 years of age. A total of 16 relevant articles spanning three decades were included in this review. Among studies reviewed, S. pneumoniae was the causative agent of meningitis in 21-30% of cases among hospitalized children between 1983 and 2003. One study showed that serotypes 6A and 6B predominated among meningitis cases of pediatric patients aged < 5 years. This review also revealed that S. pneumoniae was the most commonly identified bacterial pathogen of acute mastoiditis, a severe complication of acute OM, among children aged 9 months to 11 years. NPC studies showed that approximately 30% of Egyptian children were carriers of S. pneumoniae. AMR, especially to penicillin, continues to be a growing concern in low- and middle-income countries, including among Egyptian children. Several predominant serotypes were identified to be associated with penicillin resistance, such as 6B, 1, 19A, 23F, and 6A. Currently available pneumococcal vaccines (PCVs) such as PCV10 and PCV13 may provide coverage against the most prevalent circulating serotypes among Egyptian children. Comprehensive disease surveillance and immunization programs are needed to ensure that this vulnerable population is sufficiently protected against pneumococcal disease.
PubMed: 34468962
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00523-6 -
Clinical Infectious Diseases : An... Aug 2022Pneumococcal serotypes differ in antimicrobial susceptibility. However, patterns and causes of this variation are not comprehensively understood. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Pneumococcal serotypes differ in antimicrobial susceptibility. However, patterns and causes of this variation are not comprehensively understood.
METHODS
We undertook a systematic review of epidemiologic studies of pneumococci isolated from carriage or invasive disease among children globally from 2000-2019. We evaluated associations of each serotype with nonsusceptibility to penicillin, macrolides, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. We evaluated differences in the prevalence of nonsusceptibility to major antibiotic classes across serotypes using random-effects meta-regression models and assessed changes in prevalence of nonsusceptibility after implementation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs). We also evaluated associations between biological characteristics of serotypes and their likelihood of nonsusceptibility to each drug.
RESULTS
We included data from 129 studies representing 32 187 isolates across 52 countries. Within serotypes, the proportion of nonsusceptible isolates varied geographically and over time, in settings using and those not using PCVs. Factors predicting enhanced fitness of serotypes in colonization as well as enhanced pathogenicity were each associated with higher likelihood of nonsusceptibility to penicillin, macrolides, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Increases in prevalence of nonsusceptibility following PCV implementation were evident among non-PCV serotypes, including 6A, 6C, 15A, 15B/C, 19A, and 35B; however, this pattern was not universally evident among non-PCV serotypes. Postvaccination increases in nonsusceptibility for serotypes 6A and 19A were attenuated in settings that implemented PCV13.
CONCLUSIONS
In pneumococci, nonsusceptibility to penicillin, macrolides, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is associated with more frequent opportunities for antibiotic exposure during both prolonged carriage episodes and when serotypes cause disease. These findings suggest multiple pathways leading to resistance selection in pneumococci.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Humans; Infant; Macrolides; Nasopharynx; Penicillins; Pneumococcal Infections; Pneumococcal Vaccines; Serogroup; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Vaccines, Conjugate
PubMed: 34599811
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab852 -
Expert Review of Vaccines May 2022is the most frequent cause of overwhelming post-splenectomy infections. Pneumococcal vaccination is generally recommended for splenectomized individuals. However, most...
INTRODUCTION
is the most frequent cause of overwhelming post-splenectomy infections. Pneumococcal vaccination is generally recommended for splenectomized individuals. However, most of our knowledge comes from a few observational studies or small randomized clinical trials. We conducted this systematic review to assess the evidence of efficacy, antibody response, and the best timing for pneumococcal vaccination in splenectomized individuals.
AREAS COVERED
The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We screened 489 articles, included 21 articles, and assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. We summarized the findings narratively due to the heterogeneity of the studies.
EXPERT OPINION
Splenectomized individuals seem to have adequate antibody responses to pneumococcal vaccines. No differences in antibody responses were observed compared to healthy controls, except in one study. The studies were heterogeneous, and the majority had moderate to high degree of bias. There is a lack of clinical evidence for efficacy and best timing of pneumococcal vaccination in splenectomized individuals. Randomized clinical trials addressing these issues are needed.
Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Bacterial; Humans; Pneumococcal Infections; Pneumococcal Vaccines; Splenectomy; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Vaccination
PubMed: 35236233
DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2049250 -
Vaccine Nov 2020A lower conversion vaccination rate and a more rapid decline in antibody titers over time in dialysis patients raise concerns about the effectiveness of pneumococcal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
A lower conversion vaccination rate and a more rapid decline in antibody titers over time in dialysis patients raise concerns about the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination (PV) in this population, which has not been systematically reviewed.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and three Chinese databases from inception until February 29th, 2020 for interventional, cohort and case-control studies evaluating PV alone or combined with influenza vaccination (IV) on outcomes (all-cause mortality, pneumonia, cardiovascular events, antibody response and safety). Independent reviewers completed citation screening, data extraction, risk assessment, meta-analysis, and GRADE rating of the quality of evidence.
RESULTS
Five cohort studies and one quasirandomized control trial enrolling 394,299 dialysis patients with high to moderate quality were included. Compared with unvaccinated individuals, those receiving PV had lower risk of all-cause mortality [Adjusted relative risk (RR) 0.73, 95% CI 0.67-0.79, I = 31.1%, GRADE low certainty] and cardiovascular events (adjusted RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93, I = 47.2%, GRADE low certainty) without serious adverse effect reported. Compared with no vaccination, lower all-cause mortality was observed in those receiving PV combined with IV (Adjusted RR 0.71, 95%CI 0.67-0.75, I = 63.3%), PV alone (Adjusted RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.94,I = 0%], and IV alone (Adjusted RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.73-0.79, I = 0%]. There was no difference between pneumococcal vaccinated patients vs non-vaccinated patients with respect to pneumonia. Immune response to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine-13 was weaker in polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine-23-pre-vaccinated compared with vaccine-naive patients.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of pneumococcal vaccine especially combined with influenza vaccination is associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality but may be affected by residual confounding/healthy vaccinee bias.
Topics: Humans; Influenza Vaccines; Influenza, Human; Pneumococcal Vaccines; Renal Dialysis; Vaccination; Vaccines, Conjugate
PubMed: 33059969
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.080 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Mar 2023To review the literature on pneumococcal vaccination compliance rates among cochlear implant (CI) patients and to examine the utility of intervention programs on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To review the literature on pneumococcal vaccination compliance rates among cochlear implant (CI) patients and to examine the utility of intervention programs on increasing vaccination rates.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Studies of pneumococcal vaccination rates at baseline and before and after the implementation of a quality improvement (QI) intervention were included. A total of 641 studies were screened, and 13 studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses of pneumococcal vaccination rates pre- and post-QI intervention in CI patients were performed.
RESULTS
A total of 12,973 children and adults were included. The baseline PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccination rates were 53.45% (95% CI, 37.02%-69.51%) and 42.53% (95% CI, 31.94%-53.48%), respectively. Comparing children and adults, PCV13 and PPSV23 baseline vaccination rates were not statistically significant. The PPSV23 vaccine rate after QI initiatives was significantly higher than the baseline rate at 83.52% (95% CI, 57.36%-98.46%). After these interventions, patients had a 15.71 (95% CI, 4.32-57.20, P < .001) increased odds of receiving PPSV23 vaccination compared to before QI implementation.
CONCLUSIONS
The baseline rates of PCV13 and PPSV23 are highly variable and lower than expected, given current vaccination recommendations for CI patients. QI programs appear successful in increasing compliance rates with the PPSV23 vaccination; however, they are still far from full compliance. Further intervention programs with stricter surveillance, monitoring, and follow-up systems are needed to achieve improved compliance with the PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccination in CI recipients.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Cochlear Implants; Vaccines, Conjugate; Vaccination; Cochlear Implantation; Pneumococcal Vaccines; Quality Improvement; Pneumococcal Infections
PubMed: 35852861
DOI: 10.1177/01945998221113310 -
International Journal of Environmental... Oct 2020Prison inmates are highly susceptible for several infectious diseases, including vaccine-preventable diseases. We conducted a systematic international literature review...
Prison inmates are highly susceptible for several infectious diseases, including vaccine-preventable diseases. We conducted a systematic international literature review on vaccination coverage against hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis A virus (HAV), combined HAV/HBV, tetanus-diphtheria, influenza, pneumococcal, and combined measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) in prison inmates, according to the PRISMA guidelines. The electronic databases were used Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cinhal. No language or time limit were applied to the search. We defined vaccination coverage as the proportion of vaccinated prisoners. There were no limitations in the search strategy regarding time period or language. Of 1079 identified studies, 28 studies were included in the review. In total, 21 reported on HBV vaccine coverage (range between 16-82%); three on HAV (range between 91-96%); two studies on combined HAV/HBV (77% in the second dose and 58% in the third); three studies on influenza vaccine (range between 36-46%), one of pneumococcal vaccine coverage (12%), and one on MMR coverage (74%). We found that data on vaccination coverage in prison inmates are scarce, heterogeneous, and do not include all relevant vaccines for this group. Current published literature indicate that prison inmates are under-immunized, particularly against HBV, influenza, MMR, and pneumococci. Strengthen immunization programs specifically for this population at risk and improvement of data record systems may contribute to better health care in prisoners.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype; Influenza Vaccines; Male; Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine; Prisoners; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Vaccination; Vaccination Coverage; Viral Hepatitis Vaccines
PubMed: 33086513
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207589 -
Pediatrics Apr 2020Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) (pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine [PCV-13] and pneumococcal 10-valent conjugate vaccine [PCV-10]) are available for...
CONTEXT
Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) (pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine [PCV-13] and pneumococcal 10-valent conjugate vaccine [PCV-10]) are available for prevention of pneumococcal infections in children.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of PCV-13 and PCV-10 in preventing invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and acute otitis media (AOM) in children <5 years.
DATA SOURCES
Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, and Cochrane.
STUDY SELECTION
Eligible studies examined the direct effectiveness and/or efficacy of PCV-10 and PCV-13 in reducing the incidence of disease in healthy children <5 years.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction and methodologic quality assessment.
RESULTS
Significant effectiveness against vaccine-type IPD in children ≤5 years was reported for ≥1 dose of PCV-13 in the 3 + 1 (86%-96%) and 2 + 1 schedule (67.2%-86%) and for PCV-10 for the 3 + 1 (72.8%-100%) and 2 + 1 schedules (92%-97%). In children <12 months of age, PCV-13 VE against serotype 19A post-primary series was significant for the 3 + 1 but not the 2 + 1 schedule. PCV-10 crossprotection against 19A was significant in children ≤5 years with ≥1 dose (82.2% and 71%). Neither PCVs were found effective against serotype 3. PCV-13 was effective against AOM (86%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 61 to 94). PCV-10 was effective against clinically defined (26.9%; 95% CI: 5.9 to 43.3) and bacteriologically confirmed AOM (43.3%; 95% CI: 1.7 to 67.3).
LIMITATIONS
Because of the large heterogeneity in studies, a meta-analysis for pooled estimates was not done.
CONCLUSIONS
Both PCVs afford protection against pneumococcal infections, with PCV-10 protecting against 19A IPD, but this VE has not been verified in the youngest age groups.
Topics: Acute Disease; Child, Preschool; Confidence Intervals; Humans; Immunization Schedule; Infant; Otitis Media; Pneumococcal Infections; Pneumococcal Vaccines; Serotyping; Streptococcus; Vaccines, Conjugate
PubMed: 32156773
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-0377