-
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) May 2022Although combination therapy using trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) plus echinocandins has been reported to reduce the mortality of patients with pneumocystis...
Efficacy of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in Combination with an Echinocandin as a First-Line Treatment Option for Pneumocystis Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Although combination therapy using trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) plus echinocandins has been reported to reduce the mortality of patients with pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP), it remains unclear whether it is more effective than TMP-SMX monotherapy, the current first-line treatment for this disease. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacies of these treatment options for PCP. The Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and Ichushi databases were searched for studies (up to January 2022) reporting the mortality and positive response rates (fewer clinical symptoms, improved partial pressure of arterial oxygen, and resolution of pneumonitis on chest imaging) of PCP patients receiving monotherapy or combination therapy. Four studies met the inclusion criteria. All four presented mortality data and one had positive response rates. Compared with the monotherapy, the combination therapy resulted in significantly lower mortality and higher positive response rates (mortality: odds ratio (OR) 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-3.31; positive response rate: OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.41-3.23), suggesting it to be an effective and promising first-line therapy for PCP. However, further safety evaluations are needed to establish this as a fact.
PubMed: 35740126
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11060719 -
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Apr 2024The performance of chest x-ray (CXR) features for pneumonia (PCP) diagnosis has been evaluated in small studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to...
BACKGROUND
The performance of chest x-ray (CXR) features for pneumonia (PCP) diagnosis has been evaluated in small studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe CXR changes in adults with HIV-associated laboratory-confirmed PCP, comparing these with non-PCP respiratory disease.
METHODS
We searched databases for studies reporting CXR changes in people >15 years old with HIV and laboratory-confirmed PCP and those with non-PCP respiratory disease. CXR features were grouped using consensus terms. Proportions were pooled and odds ratios (ORs) generated using random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analyses by CD4 count, study period, radiology review method, and study region.
RESULTS
Fifty-one studies (with 1821 PCP and 1052 non-PCP cases) were included. Interstitial infiltrate (59%; 95% CI, 52%-66%; 36 studies, n = 1380; = 85%) and ground-glass opacification (48%; 95% CI, 15%-83%; 4 studies, n = 57; = 86%) were common in PCP. Cystic lesions, central lymphadenopathy, and pneumothorax were infrequent. Pleural effusion was rare in PCP (0%; 95% CI, 0%-2%). Interstitial infiltrate (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.9; = 60%), interstitial-alveolar infiltrate (OR, 10.2; 95% CI, 3.2-32.4; = 0%), and diffuse CXR changes (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 2.7-20.2; = 87%) were associated with PCP diagnosis. There was loss of association with alveolar infiltrate in African studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Diffuse CXR changes and interstitial-alveolar infiltrates indicate a higher likelihood of PCP. Pleural effusion, lymphadenopathy, and focal alveolar infiltrates suggest alternative causes. These findings could be incorporated into clinical algorithms to improve diagnosis of HIV-associated PCP.
PubMed: 38628951
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae146 -
Clinical Transplantation Oct 2022Antimicrobial prophylaxis is well-accepted in the liver transplant (LT) setting. Nevertheless, optimal regimens to prevent bacterial, viral, and fungal infections are...
What is the optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent postoperative infectious complications after liver transplantation? A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations.
BACKGROUND
Antimicrobial prophylaxis is well-accepted in the liver transplant (LT) setting. Nevertheless, optimal regimens to prevent bacterial, viral, and fungal infections are not defined.
OBJECTIVES
To identify the optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent post-LT bacterial, fungal, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, to improve short-term outcomes, and to provide international expert panel recommendations.
DATA SOURCES
Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.
METHODS
Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel.
PROSPERO ID
CRD42021244976.
RESULTS
Of 1853 studies screened, 34 were included for this review. Bacterial, CMV, and fungal antimicrobial prophylaxis were evaluated separately. Pneumocystis jiroveccii pneumonia (PJP) antimicrobial prophylaxis was analyzed separately from other fungal infections. Overall, eight randomized controlled trials, 21 comparative studies, and five observational noncomparative studies were included.
CONCLUSIONS
Antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended to prevent bacterial, CMV, and fungal infection to improve outcomes after LT. Universal antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended to prevent postoperative bacterial infections. The choice of antibiotics should be individualized and length of therapy should not exceed 24 hours (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Both universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are strongly recommended for CMV prevention following LT. The choice of one or the other strategy will depend on individual program resources and experiences, as well as donor and recipient serostatus. (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Antifungal prophylaxis is strongly recommended for LT recipients at high risk of developing invasive fungal infections. The drug of choice remains controversial. (Quality of Evidence; High | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). PJP prophylaxis is strongly recommended. Length of prophylaxis remains controversial. (Quality of Evidence; Very Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong).
Topics: Humans; Liver Transplantation; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Anti-Infective Agents; Postoperative Complications; Communicable Diseases; Mycoses; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Anti-Bacterial Agents
PubMed: 35257411
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14631 -
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Jun 2024Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes intrauterine infections in 0.67% of neonates, with 12.7% displaying symptoms at birth. CMV can lead to severe multiorgan involvement, and...
BACKGROUND
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes intrauterine infections in 0.67% of neonates, with 12.7% displaying symptoms at birth. CMV can lead to severe multiorgan involvement, and mortality in symptomatic cases is around 30%. Pulmonary complications are rare in infants with CMV. This review assesses pulmonary complications and outcomes in infants with CMV infection.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS and Ovid SP to retrieve case reports on pulmonary complications in infants with congenital or perinatal CMV infection. Descriptive analysis and pooled analysis were conducted for the case reports.
RESULTS
A total of 28 articles with 38 patients were included in this systematic review. The reported pulmonary complications in the case reports were CMV pneumonitis (34.2%), persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (18.4%), emphysema and chronic lung disease (15.8%), diaphragmatic dysfunction (13.2%), lung cysts and calcifications (10.5%), Pneumocystis jirovecii infection (7.9%), pulmonary hypoplasia (5.3%) and bronchial atresia (2.6%). Seven (18.4%) of 38 patients passed away because of the pulmonary complications of CMV infection. Congenital transmission ( P = 0.0108), maternal CMV ( P = 0.0396) and presence of neonatal comorbidities ( P = 0.0398) were independent risk factors for mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review demonstrated infrequent occurrence of severe pulmonary involvement in CMV infection but should be considered in infants with persistent or severe respiratory symptoms.
Topics: Humans; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Infant, Newborn; Infant; Lung Diseases; Female; Cytomegalovirus; Male
PubMed: 38380928
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000004297 -
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and... Dec 2020Pneumocystis jiroveci (P jiroveci) is an important opportunistic fungus and causes pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). By using...
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE
Pneumocystis jiroveci (P jiroveci) is an important opportunistic fungus and causes pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). By using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, the objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of PJP prophylaxis clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), and to help develop, update or improve guideline.
METHODS
A search was conducted for PJP prophylaxis CPGs using PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), WanFang data, VIP Database, Google and guideline websites (until 18 January 2020). Data extraction and quality assessment were independently assessed by two appraisers, and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess interrater reliability. The specific recommendations were evaluated based on the quality results.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 6 CPGs were included. The highest median scores were in the clarity of presentation domain (92%), and the lowest median scores were in the applicability domain (25%). The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) and Renal Association (RA)/British Transplantation Society (BTS) CPGs were strongly recommended. The specific recommendations were inconsistent, such as the dose, frequency and duration.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION
The KDIGO and RA/BTS CPGs were strongly recommended. Not only the quality of the PJP prophylaxis CPGs needs to be improved during the development progress, but also the specific recommendations should be further refined.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Observer Variation; Opportunistic Infections; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 32710453
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13213 -
Medical Mycology Jun 2024This systematic review evaluates the current global impact of invasive infections caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii (principally pneumonia: PJP), and was carried out to...
Features and global impact of invasive fungal infections caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii: A systematic review to inform the World Health Organization fungal priority pathogens list.
This systematic review evaluates the current global impact of invasive infections caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii (principally pneumonia: PJP), and was carried out to inform the World Health Organization Fungal Priority Pathogens List. PubMed and Web of Science were used to find studies reporting mortality, inpatient care, complications/sequelae, antifungal susceptibility/resistance, preventability, annual incidence, global distribution, and emergence in the past 10 years, published from January 2011 to February 2021. Reported mortality is highly variable, depending on the patient population: In studies of persons with HIV, mortality was reported at 5%-30%, while in studies of persons without HIV, mortality ranged from 4% to 76%. Risk factors for disease principally include immunosuppression from HIV, but other types of immunosuppression are increasingly recognised, including solid organ and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, autoimmune and inflammatory disease, and chemotherapy for cancer. Although prophylaxis is available and generally effective, burdensome side effects may lead to discontinuation. After a period of decline associated with improvement in access to HIV treatment, new risk groups of immunosuppressed patients with PJP are increasingly identified, including solid organ transplant patients.
Topics: Humans; Pneumocystis carinii; Invasive Fungal Infections; World Health Organization; Immunocompromised Host; Risk Factors; Global Health; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Antifungal Agents; Incidence
PubMed: 38935910
DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myae038 -
The British Journal of Radiology Feb 2021Chest imaging is often used as a complementary tool in the evaluation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, helping physicians to augment their clinical...
Chest imaging is often used as a complementary tool in the evaluation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, helping physicians to augment their clinical suspicion. Despite not being diagnostic for COVID-19, chest CT may help clinicians to isolate high suspicion patients with suggestive imaging findings. However, COVID-19 findings on CT are also common to other pulmonary infections and non-infectious diseases, and radiologists and point-of-care physicians should be aware of possible mimickers. This state-of-the-art review goal is to summarize and illustrate possible etiologies that may have a similar pattern on chest CT as COVID-19. The review encompasses both infectious etiologies, such as non-COVID viral pneumonia, , , and pulmonary granulomatous infectious, and non-infectious disorders, such as pulmonary embolism, fat embolism, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, non-specific interstitial pneumonia, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, and acute and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia.
Topics: Adult; Aged; COVID-19; Community-Acquired Infections; Diagnosis, Differential; Embolism, Fat; Female; Granulomatous Disease, Chronic; Humans; Lung Diseases; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia, Mycoplasma; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Pneumonia, Viral; Pulmonary Embolism; Pulmonary Eosinophilia; Radiography, Thoracic; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 33296607
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200703 -
Systematic Reviews Mar 2021Even when resting pulse oximetry is normal in the patient with acute Covid-19, hypoxia can manifest on exertion. We summarise the literature on the performance of...
BACKGROUND
Even when resting pulse oximetry is normal in the patient with acute Covid-19, hypoxia can manifest on exertion. We summarise the literature on the performance of different rapid tests for exertional desaturation and draw on this evidence base to provide guidance in the context of acute Covid-19.
MAIN RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1. What exercise tests have been used to assess exertional hypoxia at home or in an ambulatory setting in the context of Covid-19 and to what extent have they been validated? 2. What exercise tests have been used to assess exertional hypoxia in other lung conditions, to what extent have they been validated and what is the applicability of these studies to acute Covid-19?
METHOD
AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE MEDLINE, Cochrane and PubMed using LitCovid, Scholar and Google databases were searched to September 2020. Studies where participants had Covid-19 or another lung disease and underwent any form of exercise test which was compared to a reference standard were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS 2. A protocol for the review was published on the Medrxiv database.
RESULTS
Of 47 relevant papers, 15 were empirical studies, of which 11 described an attempt to validate one or more exercise desaturation tests in lung diseases other than Covid-19. In all but one of these, methodological quality was poor or impossible to fully assess. None had been designed as a formal validation study (most used simple tests of correlation). Only one validation study (comparing a 1-min sit-to-stand test [1MSTST] with reference to the 6-min walk test [6MWT] in 107 patients with interstitial lung disease) contained sufficient raw data for us to calculate the sensitivity (88%), specificity (81%) and positive and negative predictive value (79% and 89% respectively) of the 1MSTST. The other 4 empirical studies included two predictive studies on patients with Covid-19, and two on HIV-positive patients with suspected pneumocystis pneumonia. We found no studies on the 40-step walk test (a less demanding test that is widely used in clinical practice to assess Covid-19 patients). Heterogeneity of study design precluded meta-analysis.
DISCUSSION
Exertional desaturation tests have not yet been validated in patients with (or suspected of having) Covid-19. A stronger evidence base exists for the diagnostic accuracy of the 1MSTST in chronic long-term pulmonary disease; the relative intensity of this test may raise safety concerns in remote consultations or unstable patients. The less strenuous 40-step walk test should be urgently evaluated.
Topics: COVID-19; Dyspnea; Exercise; Exercise Test; Humans; Hypoxia; Lung Diseases; Oxygen; Physical Exertion; Predictive Value of Tests; SARS-CoV-2; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 33726854
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01620-w -
PloS One 2024The epidemiology of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-associated pneumocystosis (HAP) is poorly described on a worldwide scale. We searched related databases between... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The epidemiology of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-associated pneumocystosis (HAP) is poorly described on a worldwide scale. We searched related databases between January 2000 and December 2022 for studies reporting HAP. Meta-analysis was performed using StatsDirect (version 2.7.9) and STATA (version 17) according to the random-effects model for DerSimonian and Laird method and metan and metaprop commands, respectively. Twenty-nine studies with 38554 HIV-positive, 79893 HIV-negative, and 4044 HAP populations were included. The pooled prevalence of HAP was 35.4% (95% CI 23.8 to 47.9). In contrast, the pooled prevalence of PCP among HIV-negative patients was 10.16% (95% CI 2 to 25.3). HIV-positive patients are almost 12 times more susceptible to PCP than the HIV-negative population (OR: 11.710; 95% CI: 5.420 to 25.297). The mortality among HAP patients was 52% higher than non-PCP patients (OR 1.522; 95% CI 0.959 to 2.416). HIV-positive men had a 7% higher chance rate for PCP than women (OR 1.073; 95% CI 0.674 to 1.706). Prophylactic (OR: 6.191; 95% CI: 0.945 to 40.545) and antiretroviral therapy (OR 3.356; 95% CI 0.785 to 14.349) were used in HAP patients six and three times more than HIV-positive PCP-negatives, respectively. The control and management strategies should revise and updated by health policy-makers on a worldwide scale. Finally, for better management and understanding of the epidemiology and characteristics of this coinfection, designing further studies is recommended.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; HIV; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Prevalence; HIV Infections; HIV Seropositivity
PubMed: 38526997
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297619 -
Transplantation Oct 2021There is no consensus guidance on when to reinitiate Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients at increased risk. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
There is no consensus guidance on when to reinitiate Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients at increased risk. The 2019 American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice (AST IDCOP) guidelines suggested to continue or reinstitute PJP prophylaxis in those receiving intensified immunosuppression for graft rejection, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, higher dose of corticosteroids, or prolonged neutropenia.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted evaluating all literature from existence through April 22, 2020, using MEDLINE and EMBASE. (The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews registration number: CRD42019134204).
RESULTS
A total of 30 studies with 413 276 SOT recipients were included. The following factors were associated with PJP development: acute rejection (pooled odds ratio [pOR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-3.26); study heterogeneity index [I2] = 23.4%), CMV-related illnesses (pOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 2.30-4.29; I2 = 48%), absolute lymphocyte count <500 cells/mm3 (pOR, 6.29; 95% CI, 3.56-11.13; I2 = 0%), BK polyomavirus-related diseases (pOR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.22-5.49; I2 = 0%), HLA mismatch ≥3 (pOR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.06-3.17; I2 = 0%), rituximab use (pOR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.82-5.04; I2 = 0%), and polyclonal antibodies use for rejection (pOR, 3.92; 95% CI, 1.87-8.19; I2 = 0%). On the other hand, sex, CMV mismatch, interleukin-2 inhibitors, corticosteroids for rejection, and plasmapheresis were not associated with developing PJP.
CONCLUSIONS
PJP prophylaxis should be considered in SOT recipients with lymphopenia, BK polyomavirus-related infections, and rituximab exposure in addition to the previously mentioned risk factors in the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice guidelines.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Female; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Opportunistic Infections; Organ Transplantation; Pneumocystis carinii; Pneumonia, Pneumocystis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33323766
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003576