-
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and... Sep 2022Textilomas, gossypibomas, muslinomas and gauzomas, otherwise collectively known as Retained Non-absorbable Hemostatic Material (RNHM), are surgical materials such as... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Textilomas, gossypibomas, muslinomas and gauzomas, otherwise collectively known as Retained Non-absorbable Hemostatic Material (RNHM), are surgical materials such as cotton or gauze pads that are accidentally retained in the surgical bed post-operatively. They may present acutely with signs of infection or may rarely remain chronic and asymptomatic; the latter posing a significant challenge to clinical and imaging diagnosis. Textilomas are not routinely reported due to their medicolegal implications and are usually encountered fortuitously. Here, we report a case of an individual who presented with a non-specific lower backache, had a remote history of lumbar discectomy and in whom a textiloma at the postoperative site was seen to mimic a soft-tissue mass on imaging. In addition, we review current, up-to-date literature on delayed presentations of such retained materials after surgery of the lumbar spine.
CASE REPORT
A 43-year-old male presented with pain in his right lower back and gluteal region. He had undergone an L4-L5 discectomy 11 years ago, remained asymptomatic since, and noticed an insidious, worsening pain a week before presentation. Mild tenderness was elicited over the region of pain. A clinical diagnosis of L4-L5 extraforaminal disc prolapse with deep surgical site infection was made. Ultrasound showed an iso-to-hyperechogenic lesion in the right lower paraspinal region. MRI showed a very well-defined, ovoid T1-hypointense and T2-iso-hypointense lesion in the deep posterior paraspinal region of the L4/5 level adjacent to right laminar process of L4 vertebra. The lesion caused scalloping and chronic erosion of the laminar process. No obvious air pockets were present. The features of infection, like soft tissue oedema and collection, were absent. Based on imaging, differentials of nerve sheath tumour and gossipybomas was made. Open wound exploration was performed, which showed a wad of gauze within the right L4-L5 interlaminar space, with thin surrounding granulation tissue The L4-L5 disc and exiting nerve root were normal. The mass was removed, local washing was done and wound was closed.
CONCLUSION
Though unfortunate and relatively rare, the possibility of a textiloma must be considered among the differential diagnoses of a mass in the spinal region in the event of prior surgery, no matter how remote the history. Clinical presentation may vary, but the imaging appearance is largely consistent and can be relied upon to prevent unnecessary investigation and facilitate early surgical removal of the offending retained material.
PubMed: 36051862
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101967 -
International Journal of Cardiology Feb 2022Subcutaneous (S-ICD) and transvenous (TV-ICD) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices effectively reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death in patients at a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Subcutaneous (S-ICD) and transvenous (TV-ICD) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices effectively reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death in patients at a high risk of ventricular arrhythmias. This study aimed to evaluate the safe replacement of TV-ICD with S-ICD based on updated recent evidence.
METHODS
We systematically searched EMBASE, JSTOR, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library on 30 July 2021 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
RESULTS
We identified 26 studies that examined 7542 (58.27%) patients with S-ICD and 5400 (41.72%) with TV-ICD. The findings indicated that, compared to patients with TV-ICD, patients with S-ICD had a lower incidence of defibrillation lead failure (odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.98; p = 0.05), lead displacement or fracture (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.86; p = 0.0003), pneumothorax and/or hemothorax (OR: 0.22, 95% CI 0.05, 0.97, p = 0.05), device failure (OR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.51, 0.95, p = 0.02), all-cause mortality (OR: 0.44 [95% CI 0.32, 0.60], p < 0.001), and lead erosion (OR: 0.01, 95% CI 0.00, 0.05, p < 0.001). Patients with TV-ICD had a higher incidence of pocket complications than patients with S-ICD (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.23-3.69; p = 0.007) and a higher but insignificant incidence of inappropriate sensing (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 0.97-12.86; p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS
The S-ICD algorithm was safer and more effective than the TV-ICD system as it minimized the incidence of pocket complications, lead displacement or fracture, inappropriate sensing, defibrillation lead failure, pneumothorax/hemothorax, device failure, lead erosion, and all-cause mortality. Future studies should explore the scope of integrating novel algorithms with the current S-ICD systems to improve cardiovascular outcomes.
Topics: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Defibrillators, Implantable; Humans; Incidence; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34801615
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.11.029