-
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Jun 2020We investigated the effectiveness of tocilizumab (an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody) in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).
OBJECTIVE
We investigated the effectiveness of tocilizumab (an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody) in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature review from the inception dates until August 7, 2019 for articles reporting tocilizumab administration to treat isolated PMR.
RESULTS
We identified 59 patients with isolated PMR treated with tocilizumab. All studies used intravenously administered tocilizumab at a dose of 8 mg/kg monthly. Tocilizumab monotherapy was administered to 24 and combination therapy (tocilizumab + glucocorticoid) to 35 patients. Tocilizumab monotherapy achieved low disease activity scores in only 17% of patients at week 4 and in only 71% patients even at week 12. Compared to glucocorticoid monotherapy, the reduction in the cumulative glucocorticoid dose was between 58% and 70% using a combination of tocilizumab and glucocorticoids, and 33-100% of the patients eventually showed glucocorticoid-free remission. All relapses occurred in patients administered tocilizumab monotherapy. No new safety event was reported.
CONCLUSION
Tocilizumab is effective in cases of isolated PMR, particularly in combination with glucocorticoids. In addition to its glucocorticoid-sparing effect, it achieves glucocorticoid-free remission and reduces relapse rates. Tocilizumab monotherapy is not recommended.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Receptors, Interleukin-6; Secondary Prevention
PubMed: 32107035
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.12.005 -
Clinical Rheumatology Jan 2022A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, according to the PRISMA methodology, to summarize current evidence on the prevalence and predictors of long-term... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Long-term glucocorticoid treatment and high relapse rate remain unresolved issues in the real-life management of polymyalgia rheumatica: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, according to the PRISMA methodology, to summarize current evidence on the prevalence and predictors of long-term glucocorticoid (GC) treatment and disease relapses in the real-life management of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).Out of 5442 retrieved studies, 21 were eligible for meta-analysis and 24 for qualitative analysis. The pooled proportions of patients still taking GCs at 1, 2, and 5 years were respectively 77% (95%CI 71-83%), 51% (95%CI 41-61%), and 25% (95CI% 15-36%). No significant difference was recorded by distinguishing study cohorts recruited before and after the issue of the international recommendations in 2010. The pooled proportion of patients experiencing at least one relapse at 1 year from treatment initiation was 43% (95%CI 29-56%). Female gender, acute-phase reactants levels, peripheral arthritis, starting GCs dosage, and tapering speed were the most frequently investigated potential predictors of prolonged GC treatment and relapse, but with inconsistent results. Only a few studies and with conflicting results evaluated the potential role of early treatment with methotrexate in reducing the GC exposure and the risk of relapse in PMR.This study showed that a high rate of prolonged GC treatment is still recorded in the management of PMR. The relapse rate, even remarkable, can only partially explain the long-term GC treatment, suggesting that other and not yet identified factors may be involved. Additional research is needed to profile patients with a higher risk of long-term GC treatment and relapse and identify more effective steroid-sparing strategies. Key Points: • High rate of long-term glucocorticoid (GC) treatment is recorded in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), being 77%, 51%, and 25% of patients still on GCs after respectively 1, 2, and 5 years. • A pooled relapse rate of 43% at 1 year, even remarkable, can only partially explain the long-term GC treatment in PMR. • Several studies have attempted to identify potential predictors of prolonged treatment with GCs and relapse, but with inconsistent results. • Additional research is needed to profile patients with a higher risk of long-term GC treatment and relapse and identify more effective steroid-sparing strategies.
Topics: Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Giant Cell Arteritis; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Recurrence
PubMed: 34415462
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05819-z -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Oct 2020Studies on the seasonality of onset of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) have shown conflicting results. The aim of this systematic literature... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Studies on the seasonality of onset of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) have shown conflicting results. The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to determine from aggregated data whether there is a seasonal distribution for these diseases.
METHODS
A literature search was performed using Pubmed Central and Embase scientific databases. The incidences per 6-month periods, season or month of onset, that were reported in the studies were summarised in tables considering the two diseases as separate conditions or together. The Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) for the cold period versus the warm period was pooled across studies by random effects meta-analysis weighed by inverse variance. Funnel plots and Egger test were used to explore possible publication biases. A sensitivity analysis was performed to weigh articles with a disproportionate number of patients compared to the rest.
RESULTS
In the scientific literature 22 suitable papers were found: 6 on PMR with 803 patients, 11 on GCA with 2,807 patients, and 5 studies considering both diseases with 19,613 patients. There was considerable heterogeneity amongst studies regarding their quality, the classification criteria used, and the definition of onset of symptoms. No seasonal aggregation was found for GCA and PMR. The pooled IRR estimate of the meta-analysis (1.13[0.89,1.36]) showed a non-significant, higher frequency of diseases onset in the warm season.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis did not confirm a seasonal onset for PMR and GCA.
Topics: Giant Cell Arteritis; Humans; Incidence; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Seasons
PubMed: 32920326
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.05.023 -
Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) Nov 2020: Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) is one of the most frequent rheumatologic immune-related adverse effects (IRAEs) in cancer patients following therapy with immune... (Review)
Review
Identification and Classification of Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) and PMR-Like Syndromes Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) Therapy: Discussion Points and Grey Areas Emerging from a Systematic Review of Published Literature.
: Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) is one of the most frequent rheumatologic immune-related adverse effects (IRAEs) in cancer patients following therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Atypical findings in many patients often lead to diagnosing PMR-like syndromes. : The aim of our research was to review reported diagnoses of PMR and PMR-like syndromes following ICIs therapy, and assess whether they can be redefined as adverse drug reaction (ADR). In line with PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a systematic search on three main bibliographic databases, based on a combination of subject headings and free text. We included all studies and case-reports published after 2011 (when FDA approved the use of the first ICI) describing the association of PMR or PMR-like syndromes with all types of ICIs therapy. We excluded reviews, conference abstracts, comments, secondary articles, and non-English language studies. : We reviewed data from seven studies and eight case-reports, involving a total of 54 patients. Limitations included: the small size of all studies; only one retrospective study used validated criteria for PMR; most reports assessed IRAEs by clinical judgment only and did not seek validation through assessment scales. To date, it remains a conundrum whether IRAEs-PMR is identical to the idiopathic form of the disease, or whether it should be considered a subset of the disease or a new entity. Our review indicates that the relationship between PMR and ICIs therapy is yet to be clearly understood and defined and that future research should remedy the current limits in study design.
PubMed: 33153016
DOI: 10.3390/medicines7110068 -
The Journal of Rheumatology Jun 2021To systematically identify the outcome measures and instruments used in clinical studies of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and to evaluate evidence about their measurement...
OBJECTIVE
To systematically identify the outcome measures and instruments used in clinical studies of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and to evaluate evidence about their measurement properties.
METHODS
Searches based on the MeSH term "polymyalgia rheumatica" were carried out in 5 databases. Two researchers were involved in screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Once outcomes and instruments used were identified and categorized, key instruments were selected for further review through a consensus process. Studies on measurement properties of these instruments were appraised against the COSMIN-OMERACT (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology) checklist to determine the extent of evidence supporting their use in PMR.
RESULTS
Forty-six studies were included. In decreasing order of frequency, the most common outcomes (and instruments) used were markers of systemic inflammation [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP)], pain [visual analog scale (VAS)], stiffness (duration in minutes), and physical function (elevation of upper limbs). Instruments selected for further evaluation were ESR, CRP, pain VAS, morning stiffness duration, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Five studies evaluated measurement properties of these instruments, but none met all of the COSMIN-OMERACT checklist criteria.
CONCLUSION
Measurement of outcomes in studies of PMR lacks consistency. The critical patient-centered domain of physical function is poorly assessed. None of the candidate instruments considered for inclusion in the core outcome set had high-quality evidence, derived from populations with PMR, on their full range of measurement properties. Further studies are needed to determine whether these instruments are suitable for inclusion in a core outcome measurement set for PMR.
Topics: Blood Sedimentation; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pain Measurement; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Visual Analog Scale
PubMed: 32739892
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.200248 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Aug 2022To determine the prevalence and predictors of subclinical giant cell arteritis (GCA) in patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To determine the prevalence and predictors of subclinical giant cell arteritis (GCA) in patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection were systematically searched (date of last search July 14, 2021) for any published information on any consecutively recruited cohort reporting the prevalence of GCA in steroid-naïve patients with PMR without cranial or ischemic symptoms. We combined prevalences across populations in a random-effect meta-analysis. Potential predictors of subclinical GCA were identified by mixed-effect logistic regression using individual patient data (IPD) from cohorts screened with PET/(CT).
RESULTS
We included 13 cohorts with 566 patients from studies published between 1965 to 2020. Subclinical GCA was diagnosed by temporal artery biopsy in three studies, ultrasound in three studies, and PET/(CT) in seven studies. The pooled prevalence of subclinical GCA across all studies was 23% (95% CI 14%-36%, I=84%) for any screening method and 29% in the studies using PET/(CT) (95% CI 13%-53%, I=85%) (n=266 patients). For seven cohorts we obtained IPD for 243 patients screened with PET/(CT). Inflammatory back pain (OR 2.73, 1.32-5.64), absence of lower limb pain (OR 2.35, 1.05-5.26), female sex (OR 2.31, 1.17-4.58), temperature >37° (OR 1.83, 0.90-3.71), weight loss (OR 1.83, 0.96-3.51), thrombocyte count (OR 1.51, 1.05-2.18), and haemoglobin level (OR 0.80, 0.64-1.00) were most strongly associated with subclinical GCA in the univariable analysis but not C-reactive protein (OR 1.00, 1.00-1.01) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR 1.01, 1.00-1.02). A prediction model calculated from these variables had an area under the curve of 0.66 (95% CI 0.55-0.75).
CONCLUSION
More than a quarter of patients with PMR may have subclinical GCA. The prediction model from the most extensive IPD set has only modest diagnostic accuracy. Hence, a paradigm shift in the assessment of PMR patients in favour of implementing imaging studies should be discussed.
Topics: Biopsy; Female; Giant Cell Arteritis; Humans; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prevalence
PubMed: 35537222
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152017 -
Zeitschrift Fur Rheumatologie Feb 2024This study aimed to update the prevalence estimates of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to update the prevalence estimates of inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) in Germany.
METHODS
A systematic literature search in PubMed and Web of Science (last search 08 November 2022) identified original articles (regional and nationwide surveys and claims data analyses for arthritides, connective tissue diseases, and vasculitides) on prevalences for the period 2014-2022. Data sources, collection period, case definition, and risk of bias are reported. Prevalences were estimated from available national data, with consideration of international data.
RESULTS
Screening by two authors yielded 263 hits, of which 18 claims data analyses and 2 surveys met the inclusion criteria. Prevalences ranged from 0.42 to 1.85% (rheumatoid arthritis), 0.32-0.5% (ankylosing spondylitis), 0.11-0.32% (psoriatic arthritis), 0.037-0.14% (systemic lupus erythematosus), 0.07-0.77% (Sjögren's disease/sicca syndrome), 0.14-0.15% (polymyalgia rheumatica, ≥ 40 years), 0.04-0.05% (giant cell arteritis, ≥ 50 years), and 0.015-0.026% (ANCA-associated vasculitis). The risk of bias was moderate in 13 and high in 7 studies. Based on the results, we estimate the prevalence of IRD in Germany to be 2.2-3.0%, which corresponds to approximately 1.5-2.1 million affected individuals. The prevalence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis was reported to be around 0.10% (0.07-0.10%) of 0-18-year-olds, corresponding to about 14,000 children and adolescents in Germany.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review shows an increase in the prevalence of IRD in Germany, which is almost exclusively based on claims data analyses. In the absence of multistage population studies, the available data are, overall, uncertain sources for prevalence estimates, with a moderate to high risk of bias.
Topics: Child; Adolescent; Humans; Prevalence; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Spondylitis, Ankylosing; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Sjogren's Syndrome; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Rheumatic Fever; Giant Cell Arteritis; Rheumatic Diseases
PubMed: 36749363
DOI: 10.1007/s00393-022-01302-5 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2022Several studies showed inconsistencies in the relationships between inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) and the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD). Therefore, we...
BACKGROUND
Several studies showed inconsistencies in the relationships between inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) and the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD). Therefore, we carried out a meta-analysis to investigate the associations between different IRDs and PD risk.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was undertaken on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to June 2022. Studies reporting the relationships between IRDs and PD risk were included. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using random-effects models.
RESULTS
Twenty-two publications covering seven IRDs containing data from 833,004 patients were identified for quantitative analysis. The pooled results indicated that ankylosing spondylitis (RR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.31-1.83, I = 32.1%, < 0.001), Sjögren's syndrome (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.22-1.47, I = 58.5%, < 0.001), and Behcet's disease (RR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.07-3.49, I = 57.6%, = 0.030) were associated with an increased PD risk. However, no significant associations were observed between gout, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, as well as polymyalgia rheumatica and the subsequent development of PD.
CONCLUSION
Ankylosing spondylitis, Sjögren's syndrome, and Behcet's disease may increase PD risk.
PubMed: 36438950
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.999820 -
Journal of Clinical Rheumatology :... Jan 2021Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic vasculitis that commonly co-occurs with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) in elderly patients. Pericardial disease is an unusual...
BACKGROUND
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic vasculitis that commonly co-occurs with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) in elderly patients. Pericardial disease is an unusual manifestation of these inflammatory conditions, which has been reported only in case reports and small observational studies. However, no extensive research has been performed to study the demographics and clinical history of GCA or PMR patients with concomitant pericardial features. As a result, the medical evidence to help guide the physicians when evaluating such individuals is limited.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review of the medical literature in order to summarize the epidemiological and clinicopathological aspects of this unique association.
METHODS
We conducted an extensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Google Scholar, and gray literature to identify all the cases of GCA and PMR with pericardial involvement. The demographics, clinical features, and outcomes of the final cohort were reviewed and analyzed.
RESULTS
The analysis comprised 52 clinical cases (51 identified from 46 articles and 1 from the residents' clinic). These included 44 patients with GCA and 8 with PMR. The mean age at presentation was 69.5 years, with only 46% of patients older than 70 years. The most common abnormality was pericardial effusion (85%), and in 37%, the pericardial event was the initial disease manifestation. Although a significant proportion of the patients were symptomatic (69%), the classic cranial symptoms were present in only 40%. Overall, the outcome was good even in the presence of large-vessel disease, which is usually a poor prognostic factor in classic GCA. On group analysis, patients with PMR were more likely to develop cardiac tamponade (37.5%; odds ratio, 25.8; confidence interval, 2.2-297.5; p = 0.01), whereas those with GCA were more likely to have large-vessel vasculitis (43%; odds ratio, 5.18; confidence interval, 0.58-252.1; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS
This study illustrates that patients with pericardial involvement represent a clinical phenotype of GCA (and possibly PMR), which is quite different from the cranial or large-vessel forms. These patients have a better prognosis likely due to younger age and presence of more overt symptoms resulting in early diagnosis.
Topics: Giant Cell Arteritis; Humans; Pericardial Effusion; Pericardium; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Prognosis
PubMed: 31483352
DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001140 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Jan 2024The pathogenesis of shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) is incompletely understood, but it is postulated to be an immune-mediated inflammatory... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The pathogenesis of shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) is incompletely understood, but it is postulated to be an immune-mediated inflammatory response to a vaccine antigen, leading to shoulder pain and dysfunction. The purpose of this investigation is to systematically review the literature related to SIRVA specifically after the COVID-19 vaccination by describing the diagnostic and clinical characteristics, diagnoses associated with SIRVA, and incidence between vaccine types.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed to identify level I to IV studies and case descriptions of shoulder pain occurring after COVID-19 vaccination. To confirm that no studies were missing from the systematic review, references of studies from the initial search were scanned for additional relevant studies.
RESULTS
A total of 22 studies, comprised of 81 patients, were identified meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Reports were most commonly published from countries in Asia (53.1%; n = 43/81). The most commonly described vaccines were Oxford-AstraZeneca at 37.0% (n = 30/81) and Pfizer-BioNTech at 33.3% (n = 27/81). Symptoms occurred most commonly after at least 72 hours of administration (30.9%, n = 25/81). One hundred percent of patients (n = 81/81) described pain as an associated symptom and 90.1% of patients (n = 73/81) described multiple symptoms. The diagnostic modalities utilized to identify a specific pathology consisted of magnetic resonance imaging (55.6%; n = 45/81), ultrasound (28.4; n = 23/81), radiograph (25.9%; n = 21/81), and computed tomography (4.9%; 4/81). Nearly a third of patients (32.1%; n = 26/81) were diagnosed with bursitis, while 22 (27.2%) were diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis, 17 (21.0%) with either rotator cuff tear or tendinopathy, and 14 (17.3%) with polymyalgia rheumatica or polymyalgia rheumatica-like syndrome. The 2 most common treatment options were physical therapy (34.6%; n = 28/81) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (33.3%; 27/81). The majority of SIRVA cases (52.1%; n = 38/73) completely resolved within a few weeks to months.
CONCLUSION
Despite the limited quality and lack of large-scale studies, it is important for providers to recognize SIRVA as a potential risk factor as the number of patients receiving COVID-19 vaccinations and boosters continues to rise.
Topics: Humans; Shoulder Pain; COVID-19 Vaccines; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; COVID-19; Shoulder Injuries; Bursitis; Vaccines; Vaccination
PubMed: 37660886
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.040