-
Epilepsia Jul 2023Improved quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome goal following epilepsy surgery. This study aims to quantify change in QoL for adults with drug-resistant epilepsy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Improved quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome goal following epilepsy surgery. This study aims to quantify change in QoL for adults with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who undergo epilepsy surgery, and to explore clinicodemographic factors associated with these changes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All studies reporting pre- and post-epilepsy surgery QoL scores in adults with DRE via validated instruments were included. Meta-analysis assessed the postsurgery change in QoL. Meta-regression assessed the effect of postoperative seizure outcomes on postoperative QoL as well as change in pre- and postoperative QoL scores. A total of 3774 titles and abstracts were reviewed, and ultimately 16 studies, comprising 1182 unique patients, were included. Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 item (QOLIE-31) meta-analysis included six studies, and QOLIE-89 meta-analysis included four studies. Postoperative change in raw score was 20.5 for QOLIE-31 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.9-30.1, I = 95.5) and 12.1 for QOLIE-89 (95% CI = 8.0-16.1, I = 55.0%). This corresponds to clinically meaningful QOL improvements. Meta-regression demonstrated a higher postoperative QOLIE-31 score as well as change in pre- and postoperative QOLIE-31 score among studies of cohorts with higher proportions of patients with favorable seizure outcomes. At an individual study level, preoperative absence of mood disorders, better preoperative cognition, fewer trials of antiseizure medications before surgery, high levels of conscientiousness and openness to experience at the baseline, engagement in paid employment before and after surgery, and not being on antidepressants following surgery were associated with improved postoperative QoL. This study demonstrates the potential for epilepsy surgery to provide clinically meaningful improvements in QoL, as well as identifies clinicodemographic factors associated with this outcome. Limitations include substantial heterogeneity between individual studies and high risk of bias.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Quality of Life; Epilepsy; Seizures; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Antidepressive Agents
PubMed: 37157209
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17644 -
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... Jul 2022Prophylaxis against infusion-related reactions (IRR) from paclitaxel with steroids and antihistamines is a standard of care due to high rates of IRR. This systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Prophylaxis against infusion-related reactions (IRR) from paclitaxel with steroids and antihistamines is a standard of care due to high rates of IRR. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively summarize the evidence behind various prophylaxis strategies.
METHODS
EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched (1946 to May 14, 2021). The primary outcomes were Grade 3/4 IRR and any-grade IRR. Secondary outcomes included treatment delay or discontinuation and adverse events secondary to pre-medications.
RESULTS
Of the 1285 unique citations, 26 studies were selected: 11 studies for quantitative analysis and 15 studies for qualitative analysis. Studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies (n = 25-281). There was a non-significant benefit in favour of oral steroids starting 12 h prior to paclitaxel administration versus intravenous steroids immediately prior to paclitaxel administration for grade 3/4 IRRs, with a risk difference (RD) of 2% [95%CI 0 to 5%], any-grade IRR with a RD of 4% [95%CI: -1% to 9%] and treatment discontinuation with a RD of 1% [95%CI -1% to 2%]. For de-escalation strategies, a point-estimate for any-grade IRR was 0.44% [95% CI, 0 to 0.02, p = 0.98] and for grade 3/4 IRR was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07, p = 0.11).
CONCLUSION
Although studies have high risk of bias and risk, differences between steroid routes of administration were small, there was a non-significant trend in favour of oral steroids. De-escalation strategies after two previous successful paclitaxel infusions have an overall low incidence rate of severe IRR and warrant further prospective clinical trials. Insufficient evidence remains to recommend for or against other interventions for the prevention of paclitaxel IRR.
Topics: Clinical Protocols; Humans; Paclitaxel; Steroids
PubMed: 35150312
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06891-0 -
Clinical Hypertension Sep 2023In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis, hypertension is common but often inadequately controlled. The prevalence of hypertension varies... (Review)
Review
In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis, hypertension is common but often inadequately controlled. The prevalence of hypertension varies widely among studies because of differences in the definition of hypertension and the methods of used to measure blood pressure (BP), i.e., peri-dialysis or ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Recently, ABPM has become the gold standard for diagnosing hypertension in dialysis patients. Home BP monitoring can also be a good alternative to ABPM, emphasizing BP measurement outside the hemodialysis (HD) unit. One thing for sure is pre- and post-dialysis BP measurements should not be used alone to diagnose and manage hypertension in dialysis patients. The exact target of BP and the relationship between BP and all-cause mortality or cause-specific mortality are unclear in this population. Many observational studies with HD cohorts have almost universally reported a U-shaped or even an L-shaped association between BP and all-cause mortality, but most of these data are based on the BP measured in HD units. Some data with ABPM have shown a linear association between BP and mortality even in HD patients, similar to the general population. Supporting this, the results of meta-analysis have shown a clear benefit of BP reduction in HD patients. Therefore, further research is needed to determine the optimal target BP in the dialysis population, and for now, an individualized approach is appropriate, with particular emphasis on avoiding excessively low BP. Maintaining euvolemia is of paramount importance for BP control in dialysis patients. Patient heterogeneity and the lack of comparative evidence preclude the recommendation of one class of medication over another for all patients. Recently, however, β-blockers could be considered as a first-line therapy in dialysis patients, as they can reduce sympathetic overactivity and left ventricular hypertrophy, which contribute to the high incidence of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Several studies with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have also reported promising results in reducing mortality in dialysis patients. However, safety issues such as hyperkalemia or hypotension should be further evaluated before their use.
PubMed: 37653470
DOI: 10.1186/s40885-023-00240-x -
Research in Social & Administrative... Mar 2022Older adults with cancer often require multiple medications (polypharmacy) comprising cancer-specific treatments, supportive care medications (e.g. analgesics), and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Older adults with cancer often require multiple medications (polypharmacy) comprising cancer-specific treatments, supportive care medications (e.g. analgesics), and medications for pre-existing health conditions. Increasing numbers of medications may increase risks of potentially inappropriate prescribing and non-adherence.
OBJECTIVE
To provide an overview of evaluations of interventions aimed at optimising medication prescribing and/or adherence in older adults with cancer.
METHODS
A systematic scoping review was undertaken. Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were searched using relevant search terms (e.g. cancer, older adults). Eligible studies evaluated interventions seeking to improve medication prescribing and/or adherence in older adults (≥65 years) with cancer using a comparative evaluation. All outcomes for studies that met inclusion criteria were included in the review. Extracted data were collated using tables and accompanying narrative descriptive summaries. The review was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.
RESULTS
Nine studies met inclusion criteria comprising five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and four before-and-after study designs. Studies were primarily conducted in oncology clinics, ranging from single study sites to 109 oncology clinics. Sample sizes ranged between 33 and 4844 patients. Interventions most commonly involved patient education (n = 6) delivered by pharmacists or nurses. Three studies reported on prescribing-related outcomes and seven studies reported on adherence-related outcomes, using different terminology and assessment methods. Prescribing-related outcomes focused on medication appropriateness (using Beers criteria) and drug-related problems including drug interactions. Adherence-related outcomes included assessments of self-reported medication adherence and calculation of patients' medication possession ratio.
CONCLUSIONS
This scoping review highlights a lack of robust evaluations of interventions aimed at optimising medication prescribing and adherence in older adults with cancer. Future research should improve rigour during intervention development, evaluation and reporting in order to generate findings that could inform future practice.
Topics: Aged; Drug Prescriptions; Humans; Inappropriate Prescribing; Medication Adherence; Neoplasms; Polypharmacy; Potentially Inappropriate Medication List
PubMed: 33903064
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.011 -
Research in Social & Administrative... May 2020One of the strategies to promote patient safety in care transitions is medication reconciliation (MR), which is conducted by the pharmacist at the patient's discharge... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
One of the strategies to promote patient safety in care transitions is medication reconciliation (MR), which is conducted by the pharmacist at the patient's discharge from hospital. However, there are divergences about this process and about the pharmacist's role in conducting such intervention.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the literature that reports the MR process led by pharmacists at patient discharge and map the different methods, strategies and tools used in the process.
METHODS
Relevant studies were searched in the following databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), The Cochrane Library, and LILACS. No language restriction or publication date was applied. The studies considered eligible were those involving and describing pharmacist-led MR processes at acute patient discharge from hospital, with an experimental, quasi-experimental, or observational design. The characteristics of the studies and the MR processes were identified and then a qualitative synthesis was performed.
RESULTS
Fifty studies were included. The majority of them were observational ones (82%), and the main outcome was medication discrepancies (42%). The studies were mostly conducted in university hospitals (70%) and in internal medicine wards (54%). Pharmacists were responsible mainly for gathering medication histories (72%), and identifying (96%) and solving (98%) pharmacotherapeutic problems. The main sources of information on pre-admission medications were patient/caregiver interviews (66%) and records from other care providers (40%). Only 30% of the studies described a patient discharge plan, and 14% shared information of the patient's pharmacotherapy with community pharmacists.
CONCLUSION
The concept of MR and the pharmacist-led activities in the process varied in the literature, as well as the pharmacotherapy assessment focus and the communication strategies towards patients and other care providers, showing that standardization of the process and concepts is necessary.
Topics: Hospitals; Humans; Medication Reconciliation; Patient Discharge; Patient Transfer; Pharmacists; Pharmacy Service, Hospital
PubMed: 31395445
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.08.001 -
Cureus Aug 2023Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) refers to the occurrence of an open erosion in the inner lining of the stomach, duodenum, or sometimes lower esophagus. Treatments like proton... (Review)
Review
Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists in the Management of Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review.
Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) refers to the occurrence of an open erosion in the inner lining of the stomach, duodenum, or sometimes lower esophagus. Treatments like proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are available on the market to efficiently treat the break in the mucosal lining. However, there is little evidence about the effects of the medication on the type and location of the ulcer and the epigastric pain caused by disintegration and increased acidity in the stomach. Given the above, we conducted a systematic review comparing the safety and efficacy of PPIs and H2RAs in various ulcer locations (gastric, duodenal, and pre-pyloric) and the effect of prolonging the treatment with the same medication or changing into a drug from another class in treatment-resistant ulcers. We employed major research literature databases and search engines such as PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Science Direct, and Google Scholar to find relevant articles. After a thorough screening, a quality check using various tools, and applying filters that suited our eligibility criteria, we identified eight articles, of which five were random clinical trials (RCTs), two review articles, and one meta-analysis. This study compares the different side effects of PPIs and H2RAs. Most studies concluded that omeprazole is superior in healing ulcers and bringing pain relief and that patients resistant to H2RAs can be treated better when switched to a PPI. This study also discusses the adverse effects of chronic use, such as diarrhea, constipation, headaches, and gastrointestinal infections. Patients on long-term PPI therapy are required to take calcium supplements to prevent the risk of fractures in older adults. Regarding long-term outcomes, PPIs remain the mainstay of treatment for peptic ulcer disease, based on the papers we reviewed.
PubMed: 37779765
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44341 -
Obesity Reviews : An Official Journal... Feb 2023Obesity is a risk factor for asthma. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a safe and effective treatment option for obesity. Weight reduction via MBS, in turn, may... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Obesity is a risk factor for asthma. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a safe and effective treatment option for obesity. Weight reduction via MBS, in turn, may improve asthma outcomes and decrease the need for asthma medications. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the available evidence focused on the impact of MBS on the improvement of asthma outcomes via the discontinuation and reduction of asthma medications. After a comprehensive search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases, 15 studies, including pre-post MBS data on asthma medication use among adults, were eligible for the systematic review. Thirteen studies reported the proportion of patient who discontinued asthma medication post-MBS and was meta-analyzed using random effects. Results showed 54% patients completely discontinued asthma medications (95% confidence interval 42%-67%, I = 86.2%, p < 0.001). The average number of asthma medications was also decreased by approximately 22%-46%. MBS provides strong therapeutic benefits for patients with asthma, as evidenced by the complete discontinuation of asthma medications in over 50% of MBS completers. The inference was limited by the small number, variations in follow-up time and rates, and heterogeneity of studies. Studies that include more ethnically diverse participant samples are needed to improve generalizability.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Bariatric Surgery; Obesity; Asthma; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36345564
DOI: 10.1111/obr.13527 -
Seizure Nov 2022Perampanel a third-generation antiseizure medication, belongs to a new promising class of drugs called AMPA receptor antagonists, approved to treat focal-onset seizures... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Perampanel a third-generation antiseizure medication, belongs to a new promising class of drugs called AMPA receptor antagonists, approved to treat focal-onset seizures with or without focal to bilateral tonic clonic seizures and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.
METHODS
This review included RCTs on patients with epilepsy exposed to perampanel compared with placebo, or one or more pre-existing antiseizure medications. Four databases and two clinical trial registries were searched from inception to July 2021. Included outcomes were 50% responder rate, seizure-free rate, discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE)s, having any TEAEs, and most reported TEAEs. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the internal validity of the included RCTs.
RESULTS
From 2211 retrieved citations, eight RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Fifty-percent responder and seizure freedom rates were significantly higher in patients receiving perampanel when compared to placebo (RR 1.57, 95 % CI 1.35 to 1.82, I 15% and RR 2.79, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.93, I 7%, respectively). The 50% responder rates for 8mg and 12 mg, when compared to placebo, were similar. The most-reported TEAEs were dizziness and somnolence with <1% reporting serious psychological outcomes.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review reports significant reduction in seizures and a potential dose-based increase in discontinuations due to TEAE. The most-reported TEAEs were non-threatening, with the possibility of rare but serious adverse psychological outcomes. Further independent RCTs studying the most efficient dose for efficacy and safety are needed.
Topics: Humans; Anticonvulsants; Treatment Outcome; Pyridones; Seizures; Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36206645
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.09.020 -
Clinical Rheumatology Mar 2023Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common chronic systemic autoimmune disease affecting women of childbearing age. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of published... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common chronic systemic autoimmune disease affecting women of childbearing age. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of published observational studies to systematically evaluate the association between RA and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS
Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for keywords from the date of inception to December 28, 2021, to identify relevant studies reporting adverse maternal and/or fetal outcomes in RA pregnancies. Data from individual studies were pooled using random-effects models and presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Eighteen studies with a total number of over 50 million participants were eligible for inclusion. This current analysis showed that in pregnant women with RA, there was a significantly increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes, including caesarean section (OR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.24-1.55), pre-eclampsia (OR, 1.48; 95% CI 1.19-1.83), gestational hypertension (OR, 1.34; 95% CI 1.07-1.68) and spontaneous abortion (OR, 1.16; 95% CI 1.04-1.29). Similarly, maternal RA during pregnancy was also associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse fetal outcomes, including preterm birth (OR, 1.58; 95% CI 1.44-1.74), small for gestational age (OR, 1.49; 95% CI 1.22-1.82), low birth weight (OR, 1.45; 95% CI 1.30-1.63), congenital anomalies (OR, 1.36; 95% CI 1.01-1.83) and stillborn (OR, 1.38; 95% CI 1.09-1.74).
CONCLUSION
Maternal RA is significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Close monitoring of the clinical status of RA patients before and during pregnancy is essential in clinical practice. Key Points • Pregnant women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at significantly increased risk for adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. • The increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with RA may be closely related to medication use and disease activity. • Close monitoring of the clinical status of RA patients before and during pregnancy is essential in clinical practice.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Premature Birth; Pregnant Women; Cesarean Section; Pregnancy Outcome; Arthritis, Rheumatoid
PubMed: 36357630
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06436-0 -
Joint Commission Journal on Quality and... Jul 2021The goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review on the impact of in-hospital electronic/enhanced medication reconciliation compared to basic medication... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review on the impact of in-hospital electronic/enhanced medication reconciliation compared to basic medication reconciliation on medication errors, discrepancies, and adverse drug events (ADEs).
METHODS
The study team searched for peer-reviewed English-language articles in EMBASE, OVID, and Scopus databases up to October 2019. Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pre-post, or interrupted time series designs with medication errors, discrepancies, or ADEs as an outcome, and medication reconciliation applied at hospital discharge. Basic medication reconciliation was defined as using a paper-based format, electronic medication reconciliation as using an electronic format, and enhanced medication reconciliation as incorporating additional interventions to reduce medication errors.
RESULTS
Ten studies (three RCTs, one retrospective cohort study, two interrupted time series studies, three pre-post studies, and one longitudinal study) were identified, with six and four studies comparing basic medication reconciliation to electronic and enhanced medication reconciliation, respectively. The overall risk of bias of the included studies was low (three), unclear (two), moderate (three), and serious/high (two). In general, studies demonstrated that electronic medication reconciliation reduced the odds of a medication discrepancy or ADE and may reduce the mean number of medication discrepancies. Enhanced medication reconciliation was more equivocal, with some studies showing improvement; however, risk of bias was generally significant.
CONCLUSION
Electronic medication reconciliation tends to reduce the risk of ADE; however, these conclusions were limited due to a lack of consistency in study settings, interventions, and outcome definitions. Future studies with more rigorous designs and standardized outcome definitions would provide clarity on this topic.
Topics: Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Hospitals; Humans; Medication Errors; Medication Reconciliation; Patient Discharge
PubMed: 34103267
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.03.011