-
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Sep 2019To review systematically current literature on kidney function changes during pregnancy, in order to estimate the extent of adaptation over the course of both healthy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To review systematically current literature on kidney function changes during pregnancy, in order to estimate the extent of adaptation over the course of both healthy physiological and complicated singleton pregnancies, and to determine healthy pregnancy reference values.
METHODS
PubMed (NCBI) and EMBASE (Ovid) electronic databases were searched, from inception to July 2017, for studies on kidney function during uncomplicated and complicated pregnancies. Included studies were required to report a non-pregnant reference value of kidney function (either in a non-pregnant control group or as a prepregnancy or postpartum measurement) and a pregnancy measurement at a predetermined and reported gestational age. Kidney function measures assessed were glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured by inulin clearance, GFR measured by creatinine clearance and serum creatinine level. Pooled mean differences between pregnancy measurements and reference values were calculated for predefined intervals of gestational age in uncomplicated and complicated pregnancies using a random-effects model described by DerSimonian and Laird.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. As early as the first trimester, GFR was increased by up to 40-50% in physiological pregnancy when compared with non-pregnant values. Inulin clearance in uncomplicated pregnancy was highest at 36-41 weeks, with a 55.6% (53.7; 95% CI, 44.7-62.6 mL/min) increase when compared with non-pregnant values, and creatinine clearance was highest at 15-21 weeks' gestation, with a 37.6% (36.6; 95% CI, 26.2-46.9 mL/min) increase. Decrease in serum creatinine level in uncomplicated pregnancy was most prominent at 15-21 weeks, with a 23.2% (-0.19; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.15 mg/dL) decrease when compared with non-pregnant values. Eight studies reported on pregnancies complicated by a hypertensive disorder. Meta-regression analysis showed a significant difference in all kidney function parameters when comparing uncomplicated and hypertensive complicated pregnancies.
CONCLUSIONS
In healthy pregnancy, GFR is increased as early as the first trimester, as compared with non-pregnant values, and the kidneys continue to function at a higher rate throughout gestation. In contrast, kidney function is decreased in hypertensive pregnancy. © 2018 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Adult; Creatinine; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced; Kidney Function Tests; Nitric Oxide; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Vascular Resistance
PubMed: 30288811
DOI: 10.1002/uog.20137 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Aug 2023This study aimed to describe the characteristics of fetal demise after SARS-CoV-2 infections and clarify whether it is associated with clinical severity, placental... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to describe the characteristics of fetal demise after SARS-CoV-2 infections and clarify whether it is associated with clinical severity, placental lesions, or malformations or due to actual fetal infections.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched between December 1, 2019, and April 30, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies and case series or case reports describing stillbirths or late miscarriages (ie, pregnancy loss occurring between 14 and 22 weeks of gestation, before and after the onset of labor) from mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy (demonstrated by at least 1 positive real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction from nasopharyngeal swabs and/or SARS-CoV-2 placental infection). No language restriction was applied; cases with other causes possibly explaining the fetal demise were excluded.
METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed. The quality of the case series and case reports was evaluated using the specific Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center tool. Maternal and clinical fetal data and placental and fetal virology and histology findings were collected. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics using the World Health Organization criteria to classify disease severity and fetal-neonatal infections.
RESULTS
Data from 184 mothers and 190 fetuses were analyzed. No clear link to maternal clinical severity or fetal malformation was evident. Approximately 78% of fetal demise cases occurred during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, approximately 6 to 13 days after the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection or the onset of symptoms. Most placentas (88%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 or presented the histologic features of placentitis (massive fibrin deposition and chronic intervillositis) previously observed in transplacentally transmitted infections (85%-91%). Of note, 11 fetuses (5.8%) had a confirmed in utero transmitted SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 114 fetuses (60%) had a possible in utero transmitted SARS-CoV-2 infection.
CONCLUSION
The synthesis of available data showed that fetal demise generally occurs a few days after the infection with histologic placental inflammatory lesions associated with transplacental SARS-CoV-2 transmission and eventually causing placental insufficiency.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Abortion, Spontaneous; COVID-19; Cross-Sectional Studies; Fetal Death; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Placenta; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; SARS-CoV-2; Stillbirth
PubMed: 36706855
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.019 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Jun 2022There is limited information related to COVID-19 in pregnancy.
BACKGROUND
There is limited information related to COVID-19 in pregnancy.
OBJECTIVES
Evaluate the impact of COVID-19 during pregnancy. Searches were systematically carried out in PubMed, Scopus database and WHO database. Studies with information related to the effects of COVID-19 in pregnancy, concerning maternal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes were included. Data were extracted for systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. CARE and STROBE were used to evaluate the quality of data. A total of 8 studies involving 95 pregnant women and 51 neonates were included. Overall, the quality was considered good in four studies, moderate in three and poor in one. Among pregnant women, 26% had a history of epidemiological exposure to SARS-CoV-2. The most common symptoms presented were fever (55%), cough (38%) and fatigue (11%). In 50 deliveries, 94% were cesarean sections and 35% were preterm births. Of the 51 neonates, 20% had low birth weight and 1 tested positive for Sars-CoV-2. There was 1 neonatal death, not related to the viral infection, and no cases of severe neonatal asphyxia.
CONCLUSIONS
The information compiled in this systematic review may help healthcare providers administer the best possible care.
Topics: COVID-19; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 32635775
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1781809 -
The Lancet. Psychiatry May 2020Prenatal and perinatal insults are implicated in the aetiopathogenesis of psychotic disorders but the consistency and magnitude of their associations with psychosis have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Prenatal and perinatal insults are implicated in the aetiopathogenesis of psychotic disorders but the consistency and magnitude of their associations with psychosis have not been updated for nearly two decades. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis of the evidence on the association between prenatal or perinatal risk and protective factors and psychotic disorders.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the Web of Science database for articles published up to July 20, 2019. We identified cohort and case-control studies examining the association (odds ratio [OR]) between prenatal and perinatal factors and any International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) non-organic psychotic disorder with a healthy comparison group. Other inclusion criteria were enough data available to do the analyses, and non-overlapping datasets. We excluded reviews, meta-analyses, abstracts or conference proceedings, and articles with overlapping datasets. Data were extracted according to EQUATOR and PRISMA guidelines. Extracted variables included first author, publication year, study type, sample size, type of psychotic diagnosis (non-affective psychoses or schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, affective psychoses) and diagnostic instrument (DSM or ICD and version), the risk or protective factor, and measure of association (primary outcome). We did random-effects pairwise meta-analyses, Q statistics, I index, sensitivity analyses, meta-regressions, and assessed study quality and publication bias. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO, CRD42017079261.
FINDINGS
152 studies relating to 98 risk or protective factors were eligible for analysis. Significant risk factors were: maternal age younger than 20 years (OR 1·17) and 30-34 years (OR 1·05); paternal age younger than 20 years (OR 1·31) and older than 35 years (OR 1·28); any maternal (OR 4·60) or paternal (OR 2·73) psychopathology; maternal psychosis (OR 7·61) and affective disorder (OR 2·26); three or more pregnancies (OR 1·30); herpes simplex 2 (OR 1·35); maternal infections not otherwise specified (NOS; OR 1·27); suboptimal number of antenatal visits (OR 1·83); winter (OR 1·05) and winter to spring (OR 1·05) season of birth in the northern hemisphere; maternal stress NOS (OR 2·40); famine (OR 1·61); any famine or nutritional deficits in pregnancy (OR 1·40); maternal hypertension (OR 1·40); hypoxia (OR 1·63); ruptured (OR 1·86) and premature rupture (OR 2·29) of membranes; polyhydramnios (OR 3·05); definite obstetric complications NOS (OR 1·83); birthweights of less than 2000 g (OR 1·84), less than 2500 g (OR 1·53), or 2500-2999 g (OR 1·23); birth length less than 49 cm (OR 1·17); small for gestational age (OR 1·40); premature birth (OR 1·35), and congenital malformations (OR 2·35). Significant protective factors were maternal ages 20-24 years (OR 0·93) and 25-29 years (OR 0·92), nulliparity (OR 0·91), and birthweights 3500-3999 g (OR 0·90) or more than 4000 g (OR 0·86). The results were corrected for publication biases; sensitivity and meta-regression analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings for most factors.
INTERPRETATION
Several prenatal and perinatal factors are associated with the later onset of psychosis. The updated knowledge emerging from this study could refine understanding of psychosis pathogenesis, enhance multivariable risk prediction, and inform preventive strategies.
FUNDING
None.
Topics: Adult; Birth Weight; Congenital Abnormalities; Famine; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Herpes Simplex; Herpesvirus 2, Human; Humans; Hypertension; Hypoxia; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Small for Gestational Age; Male; Malnutrition; Maternal Age; Mood Disorders; Parity; Paternal Age; Polyhydramnios; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Premature Birth; Prenatal Care; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Protective Factors; Psychotic Disorders; Risk Factors; Seasons; Stress, Psychological; Young Adult
PubMed: 32220288
DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30057-2 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Aug 2023Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Fetal cardiac dysfunction may be 1 part of the pathophysiology of pregnancies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Fetal cardiac dysfunction may be 1 part of the pathophysiology of pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and fetal cardiac dysfunction.
DATA SOURCES
Systematic searches were performed on the databases of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library (up to March 2, 2023) for studies evaluating fetal cardiac function in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in addition to the reference lists of included studies.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies were eligible for inclusion if they assessed the fetal cardiac function by fetal echocardiography in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (mild or severe) and compared with fetuses of healthy pregnant women. The studies published in English were included.
METHODS
The quality of the retrieved studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data on fetal myocardial performance index, E wave/A wave peak velocities ratio, and PR interval were pooled for the meta-analysis using random-effects models. The results were presented as weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. This meta-analysis was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42022334801).
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies were included in this qualitative analysis. Of note, 10 studies that reported data on fetal myocardial performance index, E wave/A wave peak velocities ratio, and PR interval were included in the quantitative analysis and showed a significant association between intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and fetal cardiac dysfunction. Significantly higher fetal left ventricular myocardial performance index values (weighted mean difference, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.16) and longer fetal PR intervals (weighted mean difference, 10.10 ms; 95% confidence interval, 7.34-12.86) were revealed in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Compared with the situation in pregnancies complicated by mild intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, PR intervals were even longer in pregnancies complicated by severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (weighted mean difference, 5.98 ms; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-11.77). There was no significant difference in fetal E wave/A wave peak velocities ratio between the group with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and the healthy pregnant group (weighted mean difference, 0.01; 95% confidence interval, -0.03 to 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Our findings supported the idea that intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with overall impaired fetal myocardial performance and impaired fetal cardiac conduction system. However, current evidence about the association between fetal cardiac dysfunction and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy-induced stillbirth is lacking. Further studies are needed to reveal the relationship between fetal cardiac dysfunction and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Pregnancy Complications; Stillbirth; Cholestasis, Intrahepatic; Fetus
PubMed: 37023984
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100952 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Feb 2024Pre-conceptual comorbidities, an inherent risk of graft loss, rejection during pregnancy, and the postpartum period in women with thoracic lung transplant may predispose... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Pre-conceptual comorbidities, an inherent risk of graft loss, rejection during pregnancy, and the postpartum period in women with thoracic lung transplant may predispose them to increased risk of adverse feto-maternal outcomes. The study aimed to systematically analyze and assess the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with thoracic organ transplant.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for publication between January 1990 and June 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs critical appraisal tool for case series. The primary outcomes included maternal mortality and pregnancy loss. The secondary outcomes were maternal complications, neonatal complications, and adverse birth outcomes. The analysis was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model.
RESULTS
Eleven studies captured data from 275 parturient with thoracic organ transplant describing 400 pregnancies. The primary outcomes included maternal mortality {pooled incidence (95% confidence interval) 4.2 (2.5-7.1) at 1 year and 19.5 (15.3-24.5) during follow-up}. Pooled estimates yielded 10.1% (5.6-17.5) and 21.8% (10.9-38.8) risk of rejection and graft dysfunction during and after pregnancy, respectively. Although 67% (60.2-73.2) of pregnancies resulted in live birth, total pregnancy loss and neonatal death occurred in 33.5% (26.7-40.9) and 2.8% (1.4-5.6), respectively. Prematurity and low birth weight were reported in 45.1% (38.5-51.9) and 42.7% (32.8-53.2), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite pregnancies resulting in nearly 2/3rd of live births, high incidence of pregnancy loss, prematurity and low birth weight remain a cause of concern. Focused pre-conceptual counseling to avoid unplanned pregnancy, especially in women with transplant-related organ dysfunctions and complications, is vital to improve pregnancy outcomes.
PROSPERO NUMBER
CRD42020164020.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Abortion, Spontaneous; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Premature; Organ Transplantation; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 37147484
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07065-x -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Dec 2023The association between extreme birth spacing and adverse outcomes is controversial, and available evidence is fragmented into different classifications of birth spacing. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The association between extreme birth spacing and adverse outcomes is controversial, and available evidence is fragmented into different classifications of birth spacing.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of observational studies to evaluate the association between birth spacing (i.e., interpregnancy interval and interoutcome interval) and adverse outcomes (i.e., pregnancy complications, adverse birth outcomes). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model, and the dose-response relationships were evaluated using generalized least squares trend estimation.
RESULTS
A total of 129 studies involving 46 874 843 pregnancies were included. In the general population, compared with an interpregnancy interval of 18-23 months, extreme intervals (<6 months and ≥ 60 months) were associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, including preterm birth, small for gestational age, low birthweight, fetal death, birth defects, early neonatal death, and premature rupture of fetal membranes (pooled OR range: 1.08-1.56; p < 0.05). The dose-response analyses further confirmed these J-shaped relationships (p < 0.001-0.009). Long interpregnancy interval was only associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes (p < 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). Similar associations were observed between interoutcome interval and risk of low birthweight and preterm birth (p < 0.001). Moreover, interoutcome interval of ≥60 months was associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery (pooled OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.04-2.83). For pregnancies following preterm births, an interpregnancy interval of 9 months was not associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, according to dose-response analyses (p = 0.008). Based on limited evidence, we did not observe significant associations between interpregnancy interval or interoutcome interval after pregnancy losses and risk of small for gestational age, fetal death, miscarriage, or preeclampsia (pooled OR range: 0.76-1.21; p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Extreme birth spacing has extensive adverse effects on maternal and infant health. In the general population, interpregnancy interval of 18-23 months may be associated with potential benefits for both mothers and infants. For women with previous preterm birth, the optimal birth spacing may be 9 months.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Female; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Birth Intervals; Pre-Eclampsia; Birth Weight; Abortion, Spontaneous; Pregnancy Complications; Fetal Growth Retardation; Mothers; Fetal Death
PubMed: 37675816
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14648 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Dec 2022Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is responsible of one fifth of cases of ischemic stroke, but is uncommon during pregnancy or the early postpartum period and evidence...
BACKGROUND
Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is responsible of one fifth of cases of ischemic stroke, but is uncommon during pregnancy or the early postpartum period and evidence is derived from published case reports and case series.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review with a prospectively registered protocol was conducted to study the clinical presentation, management and prognosis of this condition.
METHODS
Ovid-Medline, PubMed Central, and CINAHL were searched without language restriction.
RESULTS
Fifty-seven articles (50 case reports and seven case series) reporting on 77 patients were included. The mean age was 33.7 years. The main possible risk factors identified were migraine, hyperlipidemia, connective tissue disorders, preeclampsia and eclampsia, HELLP syndrome and prolonged second stage of labor. Headache was the most frequent symptom, followed by neck pain. Acute medical treatments included anticoagulation, antiplatelets, and endovascular therapy. No patients received thrombolysis. The overall prognosis was good with 77.8% of patients making full clinical recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
Cervical artery dissection is a rare, but an important complication of pregnancy and puerperium. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion. The strong association with hypertensive and connective tissue disorders requires further research.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; HELLP Syndrome; Postpartum Period; Pre-Eclampsia; Vertebral Artery Dissection; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Risk Factors
PubMed: 36176066
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2122799 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Jan 2023This study aimed to investigate the association between early pregnancy with subchorionic hematoma and preterm delivery and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to investigate the association between early pregnancy with subchorionic hematoma and preterm delivery and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies.
DATA SOURCES
English studies published from 2000 to July 15, 2022 were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
The inclusion criteria were: singleton pregnancy, subchorionic hematoma, and perinatal outcomes. Studies including multiple pregnancy, basic molecular studies, case reports (series), and conference reviews were excluded.
METHODS
Data analysis was mainly conducted with Review Manager (RevMan) and Stata, and the results were represented with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by the Cochrane risk assessment scale.
RESULTS
In total, 370 studies were retrieved from the above databases. Our review included 16 studies and divided them into 2 subgroups: natural pregnancy (12 studies) and assisted reproductive pregnancy (4 studies). The relevant characteristics of each study were analyzed in detail. The primary outcome was preterm delivery. The secondary outcomes were miscarriage, fetal growth restriction, cesarean delivery, and preeclampsia. We found that subchorionic hematoma in the first trimester was not significantly associated with preterm delivery (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.51) or other adverse outcomes in singleton pregnancy. Regression analysis found that the large heterogeneity of the included studies might be related to whether the included study population (early pregnancy with subchorionic hematoma) was complicated with threatened abortion (P<.05). However, no studies caused large heterogeneity according to sensitivity analysis. Finally, 15 studies related to preterm delivery did not have publication bias (Egger test: P=.26). However, subchorionic hematoma in the first trimester was associated with miscarriage in single pregnancies (natural pregnancy: odds ratio, 3.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-4.75; assisted reproductive pregnancy: odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.90).
CONCLUSION
In singleton pregnancy, we found no association between subchorionic hematoma in the first trimester and preterm delivery. Although there was a correlation with miscarriage, the possible gestational age of miscarriage was not stated. More studies are needed to further address the herein posed research questions.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Premature Birth; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Abortion, Spontaneous; Hematoma
PubMed: 36328350
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100791 -
Der Nervenarzt May 2021The benefits and risks of treatment with antipsychotics during pregnancy must be weighed up carefully and individually because antipsychotics can penetrate the placental... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The benefits and risks of treatment with antipsychotics during pregnancy must be weighed up carefully and individually because antipsychotics can penetrate the placental barrier and prescription is off-label.
OBJECTIVE
Evaluation of the risks and benefits of administering antipsychotics during pregnancy or for women who wish to become pregnant regarding teratogenic effects, risk of fetal death and stillbirths, perinatal complications, persisting postnatal impairments or disorders and gestational diabetes.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature is provided to aid the selection of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy and in determining whether to begin, continue or switch an antipsychotic treatment during pregnancy.
RESULTS
Large, well-designed and controlled studies are missing; however, most studies suggest that the group of antipsychotics seem to be safe in terms of teratogenicity during pregnancy, at least in monotherapy.
CONCLUSION
Treating mental illnesses during pregnancy requires an individual assessment of the benefits and risks. The risk of an untreated mental illness versus the benefit of a suitable treatment with antipsychotics and the potential harm to the infant must be evaluated. If certain rules are observed and a suitable antipsychotic is selected the risk to the newborn child and/or mother during pregnancy can be minimized, however, a decision about subsequent medication can only be indirectly made from the results of this study.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Mental Disorders; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Psychotropic Drugs
PubMed: 33000289
DOI: 10.1007/s00115-020-01006-8