-
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Nov 2019The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of body mass index category on pregnancy outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE DATA
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of body mass index category on pregnancy outcomes.
STUDY
Five databases (Medline, Embase, PubMed, www.clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane) were searched from inception until February 2019 for English or French publications that reported on pregnancy outcomes in women with body mass index ≥30 kg/m. Reference lists of included articles were searched, and authors were contacted for missing data where necessary. Because no randomized trials were identified, we included single-center and population-based cohort studies that stratified pregnancy outcomes under the following body mass index categories: underweight, standard weight, overweight, and obese classes I-III, based on the World Health Organization international classification system.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Study quality was appraised with the use of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale Quality Assessment Scale for cohort studies. Because significant heterogeneity was anticipated among studies, we used random-effects metaanalysis to arrive at pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals for pregnancy outcomes in each body mass index category and relative risks in relation to women with a standard body mass index.
RESULTS
We identified 10,258 studies, of which 13 studies with a low risk-of-bias that described 3,722,477 pregnancies that were included in the metaanalysis. Most adverse pregnancy outcomes increased steadily with increasing body mass index category. Compared with women with body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m, women with body mass index >40 kg/m were at increased risk for gestational diabetes mellitus [17% vs 3.9%; relative risk, 4.6 [95% confidence interval, 3.6-5.9]), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (15.9% vs 3.5%; relative risk, 4.6 [95% confidence interval, 3.4-6.0]), and cesarean delivery (47.7% vs 26.0%; relative risk, 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.75-1.97]). Babies were at increased risk for hypoglycemia (4.1% vs 1.4%; relative risk, 3.3 [95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.8]), macrosomia (12.9% vs 6.2%; relative risk, 2.6 [95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.7]), infection (2.8% vs 1.3%; relative risk, 2.3 [95% confidence interval, 1.6-3.3]), birth trauma (1.3% vs 0.9%; relative risk, 2.1 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.8]), respiratory distress (5.1% vs 2.7%; relative risk, 2.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.2]), death (1.4% vs 0.9%; relative risk, 1.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.9]), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (13.5% vs 9.5%; relative risk, 1.6 [95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.9]).
CONCLUSION
There is a linear association between maternal body mass index and almost all adverse pregnancy outcomes. These risks, stratified by body mass index category as presented in this article, would facilitate counselling and encourage appropriate interventions to improve outcomes for mothers and babies.
Topics: Body Mass Index; Cesarean Section; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 33345836
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100041 -
Schizophrenia Research Dec 2023Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness that affects a significant proportion of the global population, particularly those of childbearing age. Several studies have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness that affects a significant proportion of the global population, particularly those of childbearing age. Several studies have attempted to find an association between schizophrenia and obstetric complications, with varying results.
OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to summarize the relationship between maternal schizophrenia and perinatal pregnancy outcomes.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Web of Science and Ovid EMBASE were searched from January 2001 to September 2022 using keywords related to pregnancy, women, schizophrenia.
STUDY SELECTION
A total of 23 independent studies across 21,253 individuals with schizophrenia were identified and included in the analysis.
DATA EXTRACTION
The following data were extracted: author, year of publication, country/continent of data collection, study design, demographic characteristics, diagnoses criteria, related complications. Data were analyzed using random-effects pairwise meta-analysis and were reported as prevalence and odd ratios (OR). Statistical heterogeneity was quantified with the I statistic.
RESULTS
The prevalence of adverse perinatal pregnancy outcomes was represented in descending order: cesarean section (26.0 %); labor induction (24.0 %); small for gestational age (10.5 %); gestational diabetes mellitus (9.2 %); preterm birth (9.1 %); low birth weight (7.8 %); preterm rupture of membranes (6.1 %); 1-Minute Apgar Score < 7 (5.6 %); large for gestational age (5.5 %); birth defect (5.4 %); antepartum hemorrhage (4.4 %);preeclampsia/eclampsia (4.8 %); postpartum hemorrhage (3.9 %); 5-Minute Apgar Score < 7 (3.6 %); gestational hypertension (3.3 %); placental abruption (1.0 %); placenta previa (0.6 %); thromboembolic disease (0.4 %); neonatal mortality (0.3 %) (P ≤ 0.05). There was a higher risk of adverse outcomes including gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia/eclampsia, placental abruption, thromboembolic disease, preterm birth, birth defect, 1-Minute Apgar score < 7, small for gestational age, low birth weight and neonatal mortality compared with non-schizophrenia population (P ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Women with schizophrenia are at higher risk of adverse perinatal pregnancy outcomes. It is imperative that research efforts continue to focus on the reproductive safety of women with schizophrenia during their childbearing years.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Diabetes, Gestational; Abruptio Placentae; Cesarean Section; Pre-Eclampsia; Eclampsia; Schizophrenia; Placenta
PubMed: 37979419
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.11.001 -
Public Health Jul 2023Lockdown was implemented in many countries during the pandemic, which led to myriad changes in pregnant women's lives. However, the potential impacts of the COVID-19... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Lockdown was implemented in many countries during the pandemic, which led to myriad changes in pregnant women's lives. However, the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on neonatal outcomes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between the pandemic and neonatal birth weight.
STUDY DESIGN
This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the previous literature.
METHODS
We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases up to May 2022 and extracted 36 eligible studies that compared neonatal birth weight between the pandemic and the prepandemic period. The following outcomes were included: mean birth weight, low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), macrosomia, small for gestational age (SGA), very small for gestational age (VSGA), and large for gestational age (LGA). Statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed to determine whether a random effects model or fixed effects model was conducted.
RESULTS
Of the 4514 studies identified, 36 articles were eligible for inclusion. A total of 1,883,936 neonates during the pandemic and 4,667,133 neonates during the prepandemic were reported. We identified a significant increase in mean birth weight (pooled mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 15.06 [10.36, 19.76], I = 0.0%, 12 studies) and a reduction in VLBW (pooled OR [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.77, 0.97], I = 55.4%, 12 studies). No overall effect was identified for other outcomes: LBW, macrosomia, SGA, VSGA, and LGA. There was publication bias for mean birth weight with a borderline significance (Egger's P = 0.050).
CONCLUSION
Pooled results showed the pandemic was significantly associated with an increase in mean birth weight and a reduction in VLBW, but not for other outcomes. This review provided clues about the indirect effects of the pandemic on neonatal birth weight and more healthcare measures needed to improve neonatal long-term health.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Birth Weight; Pregnancy Outcome; Pandemics; Fetal Macrosomia; COVID-19; Communicable Disease Control
PubMed: 37201437
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.04.009 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Oct 2022This study aimed to systematically assess the impact of cardiomyopathy on maternal pregnancy outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to systematically assess the impact of cardiomyopathy on maternal pregnancy outcomes.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to April 24, 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Observational cohort, case-control, and case-cohort studies in human populations were included if they reported predefined maternal outcomes for pregnant women with cardiomyopathy (any subtype) and for an appropriate control population (pregnant women with no known heart disease or pregnant women with noncardiomyopathy heart disease).
METHODS
Two reviewers independently assessed the articles for eligibility and risk of bias, and conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer. Data were extracted and synthesized according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies (n=57,539,306 pregnancies) were eligible for inclusion. Women with cardiomyopathy were more likely to deliver by cesarean delivery than women with no heart disease (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 2.47-3.55; I=95%; P≤.00001) or women with noncardiomyopathy heart disease (odds ratio, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.62-2.22; I=91%; P<.00001). Having cardiomyopathy conferred a greater risk for experiencing severe maternal adverse cardiovascular events during pregnancy when compared with not having any heart disease (odds ratio, 206.64; 95% confidence interval, 192.09-222.28; I=73%; P<.0001) or having noncardiomyopathy heart disease (odds ratio, 7.09; 95% confidence interval; 6.08-8.27; I=88%; P<.00001). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among women with cardiomyopathy than among women with no heart disease (odds ratio, 126.67; 95% confidence interval, 43.01-373.07; I=87%; P<.00001) or among women with noncardiomyopathy heart disease (odds ratio, 4.30; 95% confidence interval, 3.42-5.40; I=0%; P<.00001).
CONCLUSION
Pregnant women with cardiomyopathy have increased risks for adverse maternal outcomes, including maternal death, when compared with both women with no heart disease and women with noncardiomyopathy heart disease. Our results highlight the importance of preconception risk assessments to allow for informed decision-making before pregnancy. Pregnancies affected by cardiomyopathy are high risk and should be managed by expert, multidisciplinary obstetrical and cardiology teams.
Topics: Cardiomyopathies; Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Odds Ratio; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 35609641
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.039 -
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and... Sep 2021Maternal thyroid hormones are vital for a normal pregnancy and the development of fetus and childhood; inadequate availability of thyroid hormones during pregnancy is...
Maternal thyroid hormones are vital for a normal pregnancy and the development of fetus and childhood; inadequate availability of thyroid hormones during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Isolated maternal hypothyroxinemia (IMH) is defined as a low maternal T4 in the absence of TSH elevation. This systematic review aimed to investigate the association between IMH and adverse pregnancy outcomes. PubMed, Scopus and Web of science were searched for retrieving observational studies published up to September 2020, investigating the association of IMH with adverse pregnancy outcomes. From a total of 308 articles, 17 met our eligibility criteria and were used for the purpose of the present study. Definition of IMH varied in different studies. While some studies reported no adverse pregnancy outcomes for IMH, other studies found a positive association between first trimester IMH and feto-maternal outcomes including gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, preterm delivery, fetal distress, small for gestational age, musculoskeletal malformations, spontaneous abortion, placental abruption and macrosomia. IMH, identified in the second trimester was associated with an increase in the risk of gestational diabetes, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in one study. There is no consensus on the adverse effects of IMH on pregnancy outcomes. Further comprehensive cohort studies using one standard definition for IMH, with large sample size and control of important confounders such as iodine status and maternal Thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) are needed for precise assessment of this association.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Hypothyroidism; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 33401029
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102057 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Aug 2020Despite increasing reports of pregnancy in liver transplant recipients, questions remain about the impact of transplantation in pregnancy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Despite increasing reports of pregnancy in liver transplant recipients, questions remain about the impact of transplantation in pregnancy.
METHODS
This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines and eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 26th December 2019 for studies reporting pregnancy with liver transplant. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modelling and prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database.
RESULTS
Of 1239 unique studies, 28 met inclusion criteria, representing 1496 pregnancies in 1073 liver transplant recipients. The live-birth rate was 85.6% (CI95%: 80.5%-90.7%). The rate of other pregnancy outcomes was as follows: induced abortions (5.7%), miscarriages (7.8%) and stillbirths (3.3%). Pooled rates of obstetric complications were hypertension (18.2%), pre-eclampsia (12.8%) and gestational diabetes (7.0%). Pooled rates of delivery outcomes for caesarean section (C-section) and pre-term birth were 42.2% and 27.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, live birth outcomes are good among liver transplant recipients and this favourable trend is consistent at an international level. However, special attention should be given to obstetric complications such as hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and preterm delivery. The high incidence of these complications supports the high-risk classification of post-liver transplant pregnancies and it is necessary for a multidisciplinary team to be involved in the monitoring and counselling of liver transplant recipients both before and during pregnancy. Whilst majority data originate from institutions from high-income countries, data from low-middle income countries (LMIC) are needed owing to rising rates of liver transplantation in LMIC.
Topics: Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Liver Transplantation; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 32636057
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.05.001 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Sep 2022The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether maternal exposure to statins is associated with increased rates of major congenital malformations and other... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether maternal exposure to statins is associated with increased rates of major congenital malformations and other adverse pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS
PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and Reprotox® databases were searched. Cohort and case control studies with prenatal exposure to statins were included.
RESULTS
Analysis of five cohort studies and one case-control study showed no significant increase in rate of major congenital malformations when the exposed group was compared with the control ([OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.80-2.04], [aOR 1.05; 95% CI 0.84-1.31]). A significant increase in heart defect risk was detected in the statin-exposed group when unadjusted ORs were combined (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.36-4.49). Further analysis of the same outcome by using adjusted ORs showed no significant increase in heart defect risk in the statin-exposed group compared with the controls (aOR 1.24; 95% CI 0.93-1.66). A significantly lower live birth rate (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.75) and a higher spontaneous abortion rate (OR 1.36; 95% Cl 1.06-1.75) were detected in the statin-exposed group.
CONCLUSIONS
Gestational statin exposure was not associated with a significant increase in risk of major congenital malformations, heart defects and other adverse pregnancy outcomes, except spontaneous abortion and live birth rate, which may be associated with maternal comorbidity and other unadjusted risk factors. Further research focusing on particular statins is needed to draw more definitive conclusions.
Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Maternal Exposure; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 35639354
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15423 -
BMC Women's Health Mar 2023Vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy are common and can cause extensive inflammation, which could contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Symptomatic yeast... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy are common and can cause extensive inflammation, which could contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Symptomatic yeast infections are likely to cause more inflammation than asymptomatic. The objective of this study was to investigate associations between symptomatic and asymptomatic vulvovaginal yeast infections in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes.
METHODS
We did a systematic review and searched eight databases until 01 July 2022. We included studies reporting on pregnant women with and without laboratory confirmed vulvovaginal yeast infection and preterm birth or eight other perinatal outcomes. We used random effects meta-analysis to calculate summary odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals for the association between yeast infection and outcomes. We described findings from studies with multivariable analyses. We assessed the risk of bias using published tools.
RESULTS
We screened 3909 references and included 57 studies. Only 22/57 studies reported information about participant vulvovaginal symptoms. Preterm birth was an outcome in 35/57 studies (49,161 women). In 32/35 studies with available data, the summary OR from univariable analyses was 1.01 (95% CI 0.84-1.21, I 60%, prediction interval 0.45-2.23). In analyses stratified by symptom status, we found ORs of 1.44 (95% CI 0.92-2.26) in two studies with ≥ 50% symptomatic participants, 0.84 (95% CI 0.45-1.58) in seven studies with < 50% symptomatic participants, and 1.12 (95% CI 0.94-1.35) in four studies with asymptomatic participants. In three studies with multivariable analysis, adjusted ORs were greater than one but CIs were compatible with there being no association. We did not find associations between vulvovaginal yeast infection and any secondary outcome. Most studies were at high risk of bias in at least one domain and only three studies controlled for confounding.
CONCLUSIONS
We did not find strong statistical evidence of an increased risk for preterm birth or eight other adverse perinatal outcomes, in pregnant women with either symptomatic or asymptomatic vulvovaginal yeast infection. The available evidence is insufficient to make recommendations about testing and treatment of vulvovaginal yeast infection in pregnancy. Future studies should assess vulvovaginal symptoms, yeast organism loads, concomitant vaginal or cervical infections, and microbiota using state-of-the-art diagnostics.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42020197564.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Female; Humans; Premature Birth; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Pregnancy Outcome; Vagina; Inflammation
PubMed: 36944953
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02258-7 -
The Pan African Medical Journal 2022Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific multisystem disorder that is a leading cause of maternal and foetal/neonatal morbidity and mortality. Thus this systematic review... (Review)
Review
Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific multisystem disorder that is a leading cause of maternal and foetal/neonatal morbidity and mortality. Thus this systematic review aims to identify the neonatal outcomes of preeclamptic patients. A systematic literature review of works published between January 2015 and March 2021 written in the English language and freely accessed online were used considering the PRISMA guidelines. The results from the search were managed using the endnote X7 software and extracted data from the full articles were documented in Microsoft Word. The neonatal outcomes of preeclampsia identified are; preterm birth, stillbirth, low birth weight (LBW), low Apgar score, intrauterine growth reduction (IUGR), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission are foetal/neonatal outcomes of preeclampsia and were subsequently classified into six groups according to the similarities of their outcome; group 1: death related neonatal outcomes, group 2: weight-related neonatal outcomes, group 3: prematurity related neonatal outcomes, group 4: respiratory related neonatal outcomes, group 5: injury-related neonatal outcomes, and Group 6: internal organ related outcome. The magnitude of occurrence of the classified neonatal outcomes is; respiratory-related neonatal outcome, death-related neonatal outcome, weight-related neonatal outcome, prematurity related neonatal outcome, internal related neonatal outcome and injury-related outcome in that sequence. All round interventions to improve neonatal morbidity and mortality of preeclamptic mothers should be targeted in addition to adequate provision of health/ medical resources for the tending of preterm neonates.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Infant, Premature, Diseases; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth
PubMed: 35432694
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.82.31413 -
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research Apr 2024To determine whether prenatal cannabis use alone increases the likelihood of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. We searched bibliographic databases, such as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To determine whether prenatal cannabis use alone increases the likelihood of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. We searched bibliographic databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane reviews, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar from inception through February 14, 2022. Cohort or case-control studies with prespecified fetal or neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with prenatal cannabis use. Primary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB; <37 weeks of gestation), small-for-gestational-age (SGA), birthweight (grams), and perinatal mortality. Two independent reviewers screened studies. Studies were extracted by one reviewer and confirmed by a second using a predefined template. Risk of bias assessment of studies, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation for evaluating the certainty of evidence for select outcomes were performed by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, using adjusted and unadjusted effect estimates, to compare groups according to prenatal exposure to cannabis use status. Fifty-three studies were included. Except for birthweight, unadjusted and adjusted meta-analyses had similar results. We found very-low- to low-certainty evidence that cannabis use during pregnancy was significantly associated with greater odds of PTB (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 1.69; , 93%; =0.0001), SGA (aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.05; , 86%; <0.0001), and perinatal mortality (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.62; , 0%; <0.0001), but not significantly different for birthweight (mean difference, -40.69 g; 95% CI, -124.22 to 42.83; , 85%; =0.29). Because of substantial heterogeneity, we also conducted a narrative synthesis and found comparable results to meta-analyses. Prenatal cannabis use was associated with greater odds of PTB, SGA, and perinatal mortality even after accounting for prenatal tobacco use. However, our confidence in these findings is limited. Limitations of most existing studies was the failure to not include timing or quantity of cannabis use. This review can help guide health care providers with counseling, management, and addressing the limited existing safety data. PROSPERO CRD42020172343.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Cannabis; Birth Weight; Perinatal Mortality; Fetal Growth Retardation; Perinatal Death
PubMed: 36730710
DOI: 10.1089/can.2022.0262