-
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Jan 2024Type-III vasa previa (VP) is a rare form of VP, not necessarily associated with other placental or vascular anomalies, in which aberrant vessels run from the placenta to... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Type-III vasa previa (VP) is a rare form of VP, not necessarily associated with other placental or vascular anomalies, in which aberrant vessels run from the placenta to the amniotic membranes, near the internal cervical os, before returning to the placenta. Early diagnosis of Type-III VP is important but technically challenging. The objective of this study was to gather the current available evidence on the perinatal diagnosis and outcome of Type-III VP.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature on the perinatal diagnosis of atypical Type-III VP was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE accordingto PRISMA guidelines from inception to March 2023. Data extraction and tabulation were performed by two operators and checked by a third senior author. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the National Institutes of Health tool for the quality assessment of case-series studies. Our local ultrasound database was searched for previously unreported recent cases. Characteristics of prenatally and postnatally diagnosed Type-III VP, including clinical features and perinatal outcomes, were summarized using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
Eighteen cases of Type-III VP were included, of which 16 were diagnosed prenatally (14 cases were retrieved from 10 publications and two were unpublished cases from our center) and two were diagnosed postnatally (retrieved from two publications). All prenatal cases were diagnosed on transvaginal ultrasound at a mean gestational age of 29 weeks (median, 31 weeks; range, 19-38 weeks). Conception was achieved with in-vitro fertilization in 4/16 (25.0%) cases. There were no prenatal symptoms in 15/18 (83.3%) cases, while in two (11.1%) cases there was vaginal bleeding and in one (5.6%) preterm labor occurred. In 15/18 (83.3%) cases, at least one placental abnormality was observed, including low-lying insertion (9/17), succenturiate or accessory lobe (1/17), velamentous cord insertion (3/18) and marginal insertion (9/18). All prenatally diagnosed cases were liveborn and were delivered by Cesarean section before rupture of membranes at a median gestational age of 35 weeks (range, 32-38 weeks) without neonatal complications. Emergency Cesarean section was performed in 2/16 (12.5%) cases with a prenatal diagnosis and 1/2 (50.0%) cases with a postnatal diagnosis (P = 0.179). Among those with data available, an Apgar score of ≤ 7 was observed in the prenatally vs postnatally diagnosed group in 5/13 vs 1/1 cases, respectively, at the 1-min evaluation and 3/13 vs 1/1 cases, respectively, at the 5-min evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS
The prenatal diagnosis of Type-III VP is challenging, with few cases reported in the literature; however, it is crucial for minimizing the risk of adverse outcome by enabling early-term elective Cesarean delivery prior to rupture of membranes. Given that clinical manifestations and risk factors are non-specific, and that Type-III VP cannot be excluded when there is a normal cord insertion or a singular placental mass, systematic screening by transvaginal ultrasound in the general pregnant population is recommended, particularly in those with a low-lying or morphologically abnormal placenta and those who conceived using assisted reproductive technology. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Cesarean Section; Placenta; Placenta Diseases; Prenatal Diagnosis; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Vasa Previa
PubMed: 37470694
DOI: 10.1002/uog.26315 -
The Lancet. Psychiatry May 2020Prenatal and perinatal insults are implicated in the aetiopathogenesis of psychotic disorders but the consistency and magnitude of their associations with psychosis have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Prenatal and perinatal insults are implicated in the aetiopathogenesis of psychotic disorders but the consistency and magnitude of their associations with psychosis have not been updated for nearly two decades. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis of the evidence on the association between prenatal or perinatal risk and protective factors and psychotic disorders.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the Web of Science database for articles published up to July 20, 2019. We identified cohort and case-control studies examining the association (odds ratio [OR]) between prenatal and perinatal factors and any International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) non-organic psychotic disorder with a healthy comparison group. Other inclusion criteria were enough data available to do the analyses, and non-overlapping datasets. We excluded reviews, meta-analyses, abstracts or conference proceedings, and articles with overlapping datasets. Data were extracted according to EQUATOR and PRISMA guidelines. Extracted variables included first author, publication year, study type, sample size, type of psychotic diagnosis (non-affective psychoses or schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, affective psychoses) and diagnostic instrument (DSM or ICD and version), the risk or protective factor, and measure of association (primary outcome). We did random-effects pairwise meta-analyses, Q statistics, I index, sensitivity analyses, meta-regressions, and assessed study quality and publication bias. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO, CRD42017079261.
FINDINGS
152 studies relating to 98 risk or protective factors were eligible for analysis. Significant risk factors were: maternal age younger than 20 years (OR 1·17) and 30-34 years (OR 1·05); paternal age younger than 20 years (OR 1·31) and older than 35 years (OR 1·28); any maternal (OR 4·60) or paternal (OR 2·73) psychopathology; maternal psychosis (OR 7·61) and affective disorder (OR 2·26); three or more pregnancies (OR 1·30); herpes simplex 2 (OR 1·35); maternal infections not otherwise specified (NOS; OR 1·27); suboptimal number of antenatal visits (OR 1·83); winter (OR 1·05) and winter to spring (OR 1·05) season of birth in the northern hemisphere; maternal stress NOS (OR 2·40); famine (OR 1·61); any famine or nutritional deficits in pregnancy (OR 1·40); maternal hypertension (OR 1·40); hypoxia (OR 1·63); ruptured (OR 1·86) and premature rupture (OR 2·29) of membranes; polyhydramnios (OR 3·05); definite obstetric complications NOS (OR 1·83); birthweights of less than 2000 g (OR 1·84), less than 2500 g (OR 1·53), or 2500-2999 g (OR 1·23); birth length less than 49 cm (OR 1·17); small for gestational age (OR 1·40); premature birth (OR 1·35), and congenital malformations (OR 2·35). Significant protective factors were maternal ages 20-24 years (OR 0·93) and 25-29 years (OR 0·92), nulliparity (OR 0·91), and birthweights 3500-3999 g (OR 0·90) or more than 4000 g (OR 0·86). The results were corrected for publication biases; sensitivity and meta-regression analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings for most factors.
INTERPRETATION
Several prenatal and perinatal factors are associated with the later onset of psychosis. The updated knowledge emerging from this study could refine understanding of psychosis pathogenesis, enhance multivariable risk prediction, and inform preventive strategies.
FUNDING
None.
Topics: Adult; Birth Weight; Congenital Abnormalities; Famine; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Herpes Simplex; Herpesvirus 2, Human; Humans; Hypertension; Hypoxia; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Small for Gestational Age; Male; Malnutrition; Maternal Age; Mood Disorders; Parity; Paternal Age; Polyhydramnios; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Premature Birth; Prenatal Care; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Protective Factors; Psychotic Disorders; Risk Factors; Seasons; Stress, Psychological; Young Adult
PubMed: 32220288
DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30057-2 -
Addiction (Abingdon, England) Oct 2022Several studies have indicated an association between maternal prenatal substance use and offspring externalizing disorders; however, it is uncertain whether this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Several studies have indicated an association between maternal prenatal substance use and offspring externalizing disorders; however, it is uncertain whether this relationship is causal. We conducted a systematic review to determine: (1) if the literature supports a causal role of maternal prenatal substance use on offspring externalizing disorders diagnosis and (2) whether these associations differ across externalizing disorders.
METHODS
We searched Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO and Medline databases. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and where possible meta-analysis was conducted for studies classed as low risk of bias. We included studies of any design that examined prenatal smoking, alcohol or caffeine use. Studies in non-English language, fetal alcohol syndrome and comorbid autism spectrum disorders were excluded. Participants in the included studies were mothers and their offspring. Measurements included prenatal smoking, alcohol or caffeine use as an exposure, and diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), conduct disorder (CD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) in offspring as an outcome.
RESULTS
We included 63 studies, 46 of which investigated smoking and ADHD. All studies were narratively synthesized, and seven studies on smoking and ADHD were meta-analysed. The largest meta-analysis based on genetically sensitive design included 1 011 546 participants and did not find evidence for an association [odds ratio (OR) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83-1.11; OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.79-1.36). Studies on alcohol exposure in all the outcomes reported inconsistent findings and no strong conclusions on causality can be made. Studies on caffeine exposure were mainly limited to ADHD and these studies do not support a causal effect.
CONCLUSIONS
There appears to be no clear evidence to support a causal relationship between maternal prenatal smoking and offspring attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Findings with alcohol and caffeine exposures and conduct disorder and oppositional-defiant disorder need more research, using more genetically sensitive designs.
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Caffeine; Conduct Disorder; Ethanol; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Smoking; Substance-Related Disorders
PubMed: 35385887
DOI: 10.1111/add.15858 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Feb 2021Pfeiffer syndrome (PS) is a rare autosomal dominant craniofacial disorder characterized by primary craniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia, and extremities' abnormalities... (Review)
Review
Pfeiffer syndrome (PS) is a rare autosomal dominant craniofacial disorder characterized by primary craniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia, and extremities' abnormalities including syndactyly. The purpose of this article was to review the current knowledge regarding how PS affects the nervous system. Methodologically, we conducted a systematic review of the existing literature concerning involvement of the nervous system in PS. Multiple-suture synostosis is common, and it is the premature fusion and abnormal growth of the facial skeleton's bones that cause the characteristic facial features of these patients. Brain abnormalities in PS can be primary or secondary. Primary anomalies are specific developmental brain defects including disorders of the white matter. Secondary anomalies are the result of skull deformity and include intracranial hypertension, hydrocephalus, and Chiari type I malformation. Spinal anomalies in PS patients include fusion of vertebrae, "butterfly" vertebra, and sacrococcygeal extension. Different features have been observed in different types of this syndrome. Cloverleaf skull deformity characterizes PS type II. The main neurological abnormalities are mental retardation, learning difficulties, and seizures. The tricky neurological examination in severely affected patients makes difficult the early diagnosis of neurological and neurosurgical complications. Prenatal diagnosis of PS is possible either molecularly or by sonography, and the differential diagnosis includes other craniosynostosis syndromes. Knowing how PS affects the nervous system is important, not only for understanding its pathogenesis and determining its prognosis but also for the guidance of decision-making in the various critical steps of its management. The latter necessitates an experienced multidisciplinary team.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Brain; Craniosynostoses; Facial Bones; Humans; Hydrocephalus
PubMed: 33083874
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04934-7 -
Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2021The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has exerted a significant impact on prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) is performed... (Review)
Review
The introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has exerted a significant impact on prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Exome Sequencing (pES) is performed with increasing frequency in fetuses with structural anomalies and negative chromosomal analysis. The actual diagnostic value varies extensively, and the role of incidental/secondary or inconclusive findings and negative results has not been fully ascertained. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the diagnostic yield, as well as inconclusive and negative-result rates of pES. Papers were divided in two groups. The former includes fetuses presenting structural anomalies, regardless the involved organ; the latter focuses on specific class anomalies. Available findings on non-informative or negative results were gathered as well. In the first group, the weighted average diagnostic yield resulted 19%, and inconclusive finding rate 12%. In the second group, the percentages were extremely variable due to differences in sample sizes and inclusion criteria, which constitute major determinants of pES efficiency. Diagnostic pES availability and its application have a pivotal role in prenatal diagnosis, though more homogeneity in access criteria and a consensus on clinical management of controversial information management is envisageable to reach widespread use in the near future.
PubMed: 33540854
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020224 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Mar 2022Abnormalities of the left brachiocephalic vein (LBCVA) are rare and poorly studied prenatally. An association with congenital heart defects (CHD), extracardiac and... (Review)
Review
Abnormalities of the left brachiocephalic vein (LBCVA) are rare and poorly studied prenatally. An association with congenital heart defects (CHD), extracardiac and genetic abnormalities was described. The aim of our study was to estimate the rate and summarize the available evidence concerning prenatal diagnosis, associated anomalies, and outcomes of these anomalies. A systematic literature review was carried out selecting studies reporting on prenatal diagnosis of LBCVA, including unpublished cases from our experience. Frequencies were pooled from cohort studies to calculate prenatal incidence. Pooled proportions were obtained from all the studies including rates of associated CHD, extracardiac or genetic abnormalities and neonatal outcomes. The search resulted in the selection of 16 studies with 311 cases of LBCVA, with an incidence of 0.4% from six cohort studies. CHD occurred in 235/311 (75.6%) fetuses: 23 (7.4%) were major in cases of double, retroesophageal or subaortic course and 212 (68.2%) were minor in cases of absence (always associated with a persistent left superior vena cava) or intrathymic course. Data on other associated outcomes were scarce showing rare extracardiac anomalies (3.5%), rare genetic abnormalities (RASopathies and microdeletions associated with the retroesophageal course), and neonatal outcomes favorable in most cases, particularly in intrathymic forms.
PubMed: 35407413
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071805 -
Journal of Advanced Nursing Oct 2021To analyse the effect of decision aids (DAs) used by pregnant women on prenatal testing decisions. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
To analyse the effect of decision aids (DAs) used by pregnant women on prenatal testing decisions.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA RESOURCES
We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Library ending October 2020.
REVIEW METHODS
Papers were selected for analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.3 software. The quality of the studies was assessed using the risk of bias tool recommended by the Cochrane Handbook. The result is knowledge, decision conflict, anxiety and other secondary outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 18 studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Comprehensive analysis showed that DAs could significantly improve knowledge and decision-making satisfaction, reduce decision conflict, increase the proportion of women who make informed choice and had no influence on anxiety and decision regret.
CONCLUSIONS
This article systematically reviewed the positive effect of DAs on the decision-making of pregnant women facing prenatal testing. In the future, nurses should be encouraged to develop DAs in accordance with strict standards and apply them to pregnant women of different backgrounds.
IMPACT
There is a growing consensus that health care should be patient-centred, and the values and preferences of pregnant women who undergo prenatal testing need to be incorporated into the clinical decision-making process. This review reports that the use of DAs can increase pregnant women's chances of participating in prenatal testing decisions and may improve the quality of their decision-making. It also provides information on the role and practice of nurses in promoting evidence-based prenatal testing for DAs.
Topics: Anxiety Disorders; Clinical Decision-Making; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Humans; Patient Participation; Pregnancy
PubMed: 33942356
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14875 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Oct 2022Mirror syndrome is a rare disease associated with high fetal mortality of up to 67.2%. It is thought to be underdiagnosed and is often associated with preeclampsia.... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Mirror syndrome is a rare disease associated with high fetal mortality of up to 67.2%. It is thought to be underdiagnosed and is often associated with preeclampsia. Mirror syndrome is characterized by "triple edema": generalized maternal, placental, and fetal edema.
OBJECTIVE
This comprehensive review aims to thoroughly summarize the existing data and provide a broad update on the topic to help accurate diagnosis and encourage further research.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of several databases (Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus) was conducted.
RESULTS
The last systematic review of mirror syndrome cases was conducted in 2016 and included 113 patients. Much is still unknown about the pathophysiology of the disease and it remains underdiagnosed.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Mirror syndrome is likely more prevalent than current data suggests for it is often misdiagnosed as pre-eclampsia. The differential of Mirror syndrome should be considered in anomalous presentations of pre-eclampsia as intervention may save the fetus and improve maternal symptoms. It is important to further the study on the pathophysiology of the disease to better understand, diagnose and potentially treat it, to avoid its high morbidity and mortality.
Topics: Edema; Female; Humans; Hydrops Fetalis; Placenta; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Syndrome; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 33722118
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1844656 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Apr 2020Primary cysts are believed to arise from the splitting of the arachnoid membrane during prenatal development and can be diagnosed in utero. Prenatal diagnosis is...
INTRODUCTION
Primary cysts are believed to arise from the splitting of the arachnoid membrane during prenatal development and can be diagnosed in utero. Prenatal diagnosis is uncommon; therefore, the evidence base for counselling expectant mothers is limited. The purpose of this article is to present a case series and review the current literature on prenatally diagnosed arachnoid cysts.
METHOD
A keyword search of hospital electronic records was performed for all patients with a prenatally diagnosed arachnoid cyst at a tertiary neurosurgical centre. Case notes were reviewed for all patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2017. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to structure a systematic review of all English language articles published up to May 2018.
RESULTS
A total of eight eligible patients were identified from our own records and 123 from the literature. Sixty-eight per cent of patients had a normal outcome. Sixty-three per cent of patients underwent surgical intervention which was not associated with abnormal outcome. The diagnosis of syndromic/genetic diagnosis (p < 0.001) and the presence of other intra-cranial anatomical abnormalities (p = 0.05) were significant predictors of abnormal outcome.
CONCLUSION
The pathogenesis and prognosis of a prenatal arachnoid cyst diagnosis remain unclear. These results suggest favourable outcomes from simple cysts without associated abnormalities and expectant mothers should be counselled accordingly. A wider prospective review is required to better established evidence-based practice.
Topics: Arachnoid Cysts; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis; Prognosis; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 31897633
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-019-04477-6 -
European Journal of Paediatric... Nov 2019The aim is to present a systematic review of all the published cases of prenatally diagnosed pericallosal lipomas, their features and associations with other anomalies...
The aim is to present a systematic review of all the published cases of prenatally diagnosed pericallosal lipomas, their features and associations with other anomalies or syndromes and their post-natal evolution. We performed a Pubmed-based systematic review, including all the published cases of prenatal diagnosis of pericallosal lipoma, written in English, Spanish or French. We analysed gestational age at diagnosis, prenatal ultrasound characteristics of the lipoma, prenatally diagnosed associated anomalies, neonatal findings, outcomes and duration of follow-up. We gathered data from 49 cases of prenatally diagnosed pericallosal lipoma. Mean gestational age at diagnosis was 29.6 weeks. The type of lipoma was: not specified in 8 cases, tubulonodular in 17 cases, curvilinear in 24 cases. Corpus callosum was hypoplastic in 19 cases of curvilinear lipomas (79.2%) and 3 cases of tubulonodular lipomas (17.6%) (p < 0.001). There was agenesis (partial or complete) of corpus callosum in 76.5% of the cases of tubulonodular lipoma and 8.3% of the cases of curvilinear lipoma (p < 0.001). There were three cases of Pai syndrome, and three cases of Goldenhar syndrome. Mean post-natal follow-up was 36.3 months. Neurological evaluation was normal in 92.1% of the cases (75% of the tubulonodular lipoma, 100% of the curvilinear lipoma, p < 0.05). Tubulonodular lipomas present a higher frequency of associated neurological anomalies. A thorough study of the lipoma and a search of associated anomalies is paramount. Parental counselling should take into account this classification and associated findings as the prognosis varies widely. Further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to increase our knowledge.
Topics: Abnormalities, Multiple; Brain Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lipoma; Male; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis
PubMed: 31587959
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2019.09.009