-
Asian Journal of Surgery Dec 2022The association between NSM and prognosis of esophageal cancer remains controversial, though several studies have been conducted drawing their own conclusion. Therefore,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The association between NSM and prognosis of esophageal cancer remains controversial, though several studies have been conducted drawing their own conclusion. Therefore, we firstly carried out this meta-analysis aiming to explore the association. We performed a comprehensive literature search online, including PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. We selected deaths at 5 years and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% (CI) to perform the meta-analysis with Review Manager 5.3, predicting value of clinic-pathological features in NSM also been analyzed. A total of 7 studies were finally enrolled in this study. NSM, defined by either JSED criterion or anatomical compartment criterion, neither showed significant prognostic value on OS of esophageal cancer (P = 0.64), (P = 0.24). Subgroup analysis of JSED criterion, NSM was not a prognostic factor in solitary node metastasis patients (P = 0.39), whereas NSM demonstrated a poor prognostic factor (P = 0.01) for ESCC. Subgroup analysis according to anatomical criterion, NSM was a favorable factor for OS in middle thoracic ESCC (P = 0.003). Pathological N1 status was found to be a risk factor for NSM (P < 0.00001) according to JSED criterion and middle thoracic ESCC was identified as a predictor for NSM (P = 0.0003) according to anatomical compartment criterion. According to JSED criterion, NSM demonstrated poor prognosis on ESCC and N1 status was a risk factor for NSM. Concerning the anatomical compartment criterion, a favorable prognosis of NSM was found in middle thoracic ESCC and NSM was prone to occur in middle thoracic ESCC. CRD42021219333.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Esophageal Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Risk Factors; Proportional Hazards Models
PubMed: 35221181
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.12.071 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2021The landscape of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is present from the tumor evolution. ITH is a promising clinical indicator, but the association between ITH and prognosis...
BACKGROUND
The landscape of intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is present from the tumor evolution. ITH is a promising clinical indicator, but the association between ITH and prognosis remains controversial. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to explore whether ITH can serve as a valuable prognostic indicator in solid tumors.
METHODS
All included studies were from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases up to October 10, 2020. Studies based on ITH with available prognostic information were included. Three researchers independently completed study selection and data extraction following PRISMA guidelines. The random-effect model was used for synthesis. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used with the endpoint defined by overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS
A total of 9,804 solid tumor patients from 21 studies were included. Analysis of specific cancers in the TCGA database showed similar results based on different ITH assessment methods, which provided the logical support for data consolidation. Available evidence revealed a negative relationship between ITH and prognosis for a specific cancer (such as lung cancer). However, the OS results from 14 tumor types showed that high ITH associated with shorter survival time [HR 1.65 (95% CI, 1.42-1.91)]. PFS and DFS analyses showed similar results [HR 1.89 (95% CI, 1.41-2.54) and HR 1.87 (95% CI, 1.15-3.04)] in general. The status of tumor metastasis and sampling models were not the confounding factors.
CONCLUSIONS
High ITH is associated with worse prognosis in many solid tumors in general although this association was absent for some cancers. ITH is expected to be a promising clinical prognostic factor for the improvement of assessment, treatment, and surveillance strategy.
PubMed: 34722299
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.744064 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Jul 2022To clarify in patients with covid-19 the recovery rate of smell and taste, proportion with persistent dysfunction of smell and taste, and prognostic factors associated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To clarify in patients with covid-19 the recovery rate of smell and taste, proportion with persistent dysfunction of smell and taste, and prognostic factors associated with recovery of smell and taste.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and medRxiv from inception to 3 October 2021.
REVIEW METHODS
Two blinded reviewers selected observational studies of adults (≥18 years) with covid-19 related dysfunction of smell or taste. Descriptive prognosis studies with time-to-event curves and prognostic association studies of any prognostic factor were included.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers extracted data, evaluated study bias using QUIPS, and appraised evidence quality using GRADE, following PRISMA and MOOSE reporting guidelines. Using iterative numerical algorithms, time-to-event individual patient data (IPD) were reconstructed and pooled to retrieve distribution-free summary survival curves, with recovery rates reported at 30 day intervals for participants who remained alive. To estimate the proportion with persistent smell and taste dysfunction, cure fractions from Weibull non-mixture cure models of plateaued survival curves were logit transformed and pooled in a two stage meta-analysis. Conventional aggregate data meta-analysis was performed to explore unadjusted associations of prognostic factors with recovery.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcomes were the proportions of patients remaining with smell or taste dysfunction. Secondary outcomes were the odds ratios of prognostic variables associated with recovery of smell and taste.
RESULTS
18 studies (3699 patients) from 4180 records were included in reconstructed IPD meta-analyses. Risk of bias was low to moderate; conclusions remained unaltered after exclusion of four high risk studies. Evidence quality was moderate to high. Based on parametric cure modelling, persistent self-reported smell and taste dysfunction could develop in an estimated 5.6% (95% confidence interval 2.7% to 11.0%, I=70%, τ=0.756, 95% prediction interval 0.7% to 33.5%) and 4.4% (1.2% to 14.6%, I=67%, τ=0.684, 95% prediction interval 0.0% to 49.0%) of patients, respectively. Sensitivity analyses suggest these could be underestimates. At 30, 60, 90, and 180 days, respectively, 74.1% (95% confidence interval 64.0% to 81.3%), 85.8% (77.6% to 90.9%), 90.0% (83.3% to 94.0%), and 95.7% (89.5% to 98.3%) of patients recovered their sense of smell (I=0.0-77.2%, τ=0.006-0.050) and 78.8% (70.5% to 84.7%), 87.7% (82.0% to 91.6%), 90.3% (83.5% to 94.3%), and 98.0% (92.2% to 95.5%) recovered their sense of taste (range of I=0.0-72.1%, τ=0.000-0.015). Women were less likely to recover their sense of smell (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.72, seven studies, I=20%, τ=0.0224) and taste (0.31, 0.13 to 0.72, seven studies, I=78%, τ=0.5121) than men, and patients with greater initial severity of dysfunction (0.48, 0.31 to 0.73, five studies, I=10%, τ<0.001) or nasal congestion (0.42, 0.18 to 0.97, three studies, I=0%, τ<0.001) were less likely to recover their sense of smell.
CONCLUSIONS
A substantial proportion of patients with covid-19 might develop long lasting change in their sense of smell or taste. This could contribute to the growing burden of long covid.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42021283922.
Topics: COVID-19; Female; Humans; Olfaction Disorders; Prognosis; Smell; Taste; Taste Disorders; Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
PubMed: 35896188
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069503 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery May 2023For early distal gastric cancers, a proximal margin (PM) > 2-3 cm might probably be sufficient. For advanced tumors, many confounding factors have a prognostic impact on... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
For early distal gastric cancers, a proximal margin (PM) > 2-3 cm might probably be sufficient. For advanced tumors, many confounding factors have a prognostic impact on survival and recurrence and negative margin involvement may be more relevant than negative margin length.
INTRODUCTION
In gastric cancer surgery, microscopic positive margin is a poor prognostic factor whereas complete resection with tumor-free margins remains a challenging issue. European guidelines recommended a macroscopic margin of 5 or even 8 cm for diffuse-type cancers to achieve R0 resection. However, it is unclear if the length of negative proximal margin (PM) could have a prognostic impact on survival. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature analyzing PM length and its prognostic impact in gastric adenocarcinoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for "gastric cancer" or "gastric adenocarcinoma," combined with "proximal margin," between January 1990 and June 2021. English-written studies that specified PM length were included. Survival data, in relation to PM, were extracted.
RESULTS
Twelve retrospective studies, with a total number of 10,067 patients, met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Mean length of proximal margin on the whole population varied from 2.6 to 5.29 cm. Three studies found minimal PM cut-off to improve overall survival in univariate analysis. Concerning recurrence-free survival analysis, only 2 series showed better results with PM > 2 or > 3 cm, using Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an independent impact of PM on overall survival in 2 studies.
CONCLUSION
For early distal gastric cancers, a PM > 2-3 cm might probably be sufficient. For advanced or proximal tumors, many confounding factors have a prognostic impact on survival and recurrence and negative margin involvement may be more relevant than negative margin length.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Prognosis; Adenocarcinoma; Stomach Neoplasms; Gastrectomy; Margins of Excision; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 37133626
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02910-8 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Apr 2023Presence of multiple hepatic lesions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is included in staging as a negative prognostic factor, but both prognostic value and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Presence of multiple hepatic lesions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is included in staging as a negative prognostic factor, but both prognostic value and therapeutic implications remain debated. The aim of this study was to systematically review the prognostic influence of multiple lesions on survival after resection for iCCA, with stratification for distribution and number of lesions.
METHODS
Medline and Embase were systematically searched to identify records (2010-2021) reporting survival for patients undergoing primary resection for iCCA. Included were original articles reporting overall survival, with data on multiple lesions including tumour distribution (satellites/other multiple lesions) and/or number. For meta-analysis, the random effects model and inverse variance method were used. PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed.
RESULTS
Thirty-one studies were included for review. For meta-analysis, nine studies reporting data on the prognostic influence of satellite lesions (2737 patients) and six studies reporting data on multiple lesions other than satellites (1589 patients) were included. Satellite lesions (hazard ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.67-2.13) and multiple lesions other than satellites (hazard ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval 1.72-3.37) were significant negative prognostic factors. Data stratified for tumour number, while limited, indicated increased risk per additional lesion.
CONCLUSION
Satellite lesions, as well as multiple lesions other than satellites, was a negative prognostic factor in resectable iCCA. Considering the prognostic impact, both tumour distribution and number of lesions should be evaluated together with other risk factors to allow risk stratification for iCCA patients with multiple lesions, rather than precluding resection for the entire patient group.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Cholangiocarcinoma; Liver; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
PubMed: 36710214
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.006 -
The Laryngoscope Sep 2022Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection has been confirmed as a favorable prognostic factor in oropharyngeal cancer. However, the prognostic value of HPV in oral squamous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS
Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection has been confirmed as a favorable prognostic factor in oropharyngeal cancer. However, the prognostic value of HPV in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is still unclear. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of HPV infection in OSCC patients.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic literature review with meta-analysis.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines in PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and secondary outcomes were local control (LC), regional control (RC), and distant control (DC).
RESULTS
A total of 22 articles with 3065 OSCC patients were included in this study. Meta-analysis demonstrated that compared to HPV-negative OSCC patients, HPV-positive OSCC patients had a significantly shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45, 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.10-1.93) and lower DC (HR = 2.16, 95% CI, 1.54-3.04). There was no significant difference in DFS (HR = 1.20, 95% CI, 0.63-2.26), DSS (HR = 1.20, 95% CI, 0.63-2.26), LC (HR = 1.44, 95% CI, 0.97-2.14), and RC (HR = 1.50, 95% CI, 0.98-2.30) between HPV-positive and negative OSCC patients. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the above results.
CONCLUSIONS
Our systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that HPV-positive is associated with significantly decreased OS and DC, suggesting HPV infection is an adverse prognostic factor in OSCC. Laryngoscope, 132:1760-1770, 2022.
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Mouth Neoplasms; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Papillomaviridae; Papillomavirus Infections; Prognosis; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
PubMed: 34953144
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29996 -
PloS One 2022Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a simple parameter which reflects patient's nutritional and inflammatory status and reported as a prognostic factor for renal cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a simple parameter which reflects patient's nutritional and inflammatory status and reported as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Studies were included from database inception until February 2, 2022. The aim of this study is to evaluate prognostic value of PNI by meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy in RCC.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases and assessed sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) and area under curve (AUC). Totally, we identified 11 studies with a total of 7,296 patients were included to evaluate the prognostic value of PNI in RCC finally. They indicated a pooled sensitivity of 0.733 (95% CI, 0.651-0.802), specificity of 0.615 (95% CI, 0.528-0.695), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 4.382 (95% CI, 3.148-6.101) and AUC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68-0.76). Heterogeneity was significant and univariate meta-regression revealed that metastasis and cut-off value of PNI might be the potential source of heterogeneity. Multivariate meta-regression analysis also demonstrated that metastasis might be the source of heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS
PNI demonstrated a good diagnostic accuracy as a prognostic factor for RCC and especially in case of metastatic RCC.
Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Nutrition Assessment; Prognosis; ROC Curve
PubMed: 35930538
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271821 -
Reviews in Medical Virology Sep 2023Serum ferritin levels serves as biomarkers in many inflammatory and infectious diseases. This current systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether serum... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Serum ferritin levels serves as biomarkers in many inflammatory and infectious diseases. This current systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether serum ferritin levels are associated with severe dengue and its utility as a biomarker of disease severity. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane library, and Google Scholar. A total of 18 studies examining the serum ferritin levels in dengue cases in the context of disease severity (nine studies having dengue classification as non-severe vs. severe dengue cases, and nine studies having dengue classification as dengue without warning signs (DwoWS), dengue with warning signs (DwWS), and severe dengue cases) were included and the quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies tool. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA software to calculate the effect size as a standardized mean difference (SMD) or Hedges 'g' for the continuous outcome. Higher serum ferritin levels were found in severe dengue cases compared to non-severe cases [SMD (Hedges 'g') 4.05 (95% C.I. 2.09-6.00), (I = 98.8%)]. In the second group, DwWS cases showed high serum ferritin levels compared to DwoWS [SMD 2.01 (95% C.I. 0.92-3.10), (I = 97.89%)], and severe dengue cases showed higher levels of serum ferritin compared to DwWS [SMD 2.66 (95% C.I. 1.72-4.48), (I = 98.78%)] and DwoWS cases [SMD 6.65 (95% C.I. 1.72-11.59), (I = 99.78%]. Subgroup analysis for the country of study (India vs. others), ferritin testing methods, and ferritin measurement day revealed testing method as a significant contributor to heterogeneity. To conclude, the present study suggests serum ferritin as a prognostic marker for dengue disease severity. Multi-centric studies involving a large number of dengue patients with a uniform case definition accounting for all the confounding variables might help in determining a universal cut-off value to discriminate between non-severe and severe dengue.
Topics: Humans; Severe Dengue; Prognosis; Biomarkers; Patient Acuity; Ferritins; Dengue
PubMed: 37347209
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2468 -
Laboratory Investigation; a Journal of... Jun 2023Recently, tumor budding (TB) has been suggested as a strong prognostic marker in urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UC). The aim of this systematic review is to test... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Recently, tumor budding (TB) has been suggested as a strong prognostic marker in urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UC). The aim of this systematic review is to test the prognostic value of TB in UC by a meta-analysis of previously published studies. We systematically reviewed the literature related to TB by using the databases of Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. The search was limited to publications in the English language up to July 2022. There were 790 patients from 7 retrospective studies in which TB has been evaluated in UC. Two authors independently extracted the results from eligible studies. The meta-analysis of eligible studies revealed that TB is a significant prognosticator for progression-free survival in UC, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.51 (95% CI, 1.86-6.62; P < .001) in univariate analysis and a HR of 2.78 (95% CI, 1.57-4.93; P < .001) in multivariate analysis; a significant prognosticator for overall survival and cancer-specific survival in UC, with a HR of 3.07 (95% CI, 2.04-4.64; P < .001) and a HR of 2.18 (95% CI, 1.11-4.29; P = .02) respectively in univariate analysis. Our findings confirm that UC with a high TB count is at a high risk of progress. TB could be considered as an element in pathology reports and future oncologic staging systems.
Topics: Humans; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Prognosis; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36990153
DOI: 10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100136 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023To identify the risk factors associated with prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) via meta-analysis.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Development and validation of prognostic risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts.
OBJECTIVE
To identify the risk factors associated with prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) via meta-analysis. And to construct prediction models to aid in the prediction and improvement of prognosis.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for relevant studies from inception to March 29, 2023. After completing literature screening and data extraction, we performed meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis to identify risk factors associated with OS and PFS. Using the pooled hazard ratio value for each risk factor, we constructed prediction models, which were then validated using datasets from 19 centers in Japan and two centers in China, comprising a total of 204 patients.
RESULTS
A total of 47 studies, involving a total of 7649 ICI-treated HCC patients, were included in the meta-analysis. After analyzing 18 risk factors, we identified AFP, ALBI, NLR, ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh stage, BCLC stage, tumor number, vascular invasion and combination therapy as predictors for OS prediction model, while AFP, ALBI, NLR, ECOG performance status, Child-Pugh stage, BCLC stage, tumor number and vascular invasion were selected as predictors for PFS model. To validate the models, we scored two independent cohorts of patients using both prediction models. Our models demonstrated good performance in these cohorts. In addition, in the pooled cohort of 204 patients, Our models also showed good performance with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.712, 0.753, and 0.822 for the OS prediction model at 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year follow-up points, respectively, and AUC values of 0.575, 0.749 and 0.691 for the PFS prediction model Additionally, the calibration curve, decision curve analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves in the pooled cohort all supported the validity of both models.
CONCLUSION
Based on the meta-analysis, we successfully constructed the OS and PFS prediction models for ICI-treated HCC patients. We also validated the models externally and observed good discrimination and calibration. The model's selected indicators are easily obtainable, making them suitable for further application in clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Prognosis; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Liver Neoplasms; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 37520554
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1215745