-
Epilepsia Apr 2021Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe form of childhood onset epilepsy in which patients require multiple medications and may be candidates for palliative surgical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe form of childhood onset epilepsy in which patients require multiple medications and may be candidates for palliative surgical intervention. In this meta-analysis, we sought to evaluate the impact of palliative vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), corpus callosotomy (CC), and resective surgery (RS) by analyzing their impact on seizure control, antiepileptic drug (AED) usage, quality of life (QOL), behavior, cognition, prognostic factors, and complications. A systematic search of PubMed MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was performed to find articles that met the following criteria: (1) prospective/retrospective study with original data, (2) at least one LGS surgery patient aged less than 18 years, and (3) information on seizure frequency reduction (measured as percentage, Engel class, or qualitative comment). Seizures were analyzed quantitatively in a meta-analysis of proportions and a random-effects model, whereas other outcomes were analyzed qualitatively. Forty studies with 892 LGS patients met the selection criteria, with 19 reporting on CC, 17 on VNS, four on RS, two on RS + CC, one on CC + VNS, and one on deep brain stimulation. CC seizure reduction rate was 74.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.5%-83.7%), and VNS was 54.6% (95% CI = 42.9%-66.3%), which was significantly different (p < .001). RS seizure reduction was 88.9% (95% CI = 66.1%-99.7%). Many VNS patients reported alertness improvements, and most had no major complications. VNS was most effective for atonic/tonic seizures; higher stimulation settings correlated with better outcomes. CC patients reported moderate cognitive and QOL improvements; disconnection syndrome, transient weakness, and respiratory complications were noted. Greater callosotomy extent correlated with better outcomes. AED usage most often did not change after surgery. RS showed considerable QOL improvements for patients with localized seizure foci. In the reported literature, CC appeared to be more effective than VNS for seizure reduction. VNS may provide a similar or higher level of QOL improvement with lower aggregate risk of complications. Patient selection, anatomy, and seizure type will inform decision-making.
Topics: Disease Management; Humans; Lennox Gastaut Syndrome; Prospective Studies; Psychosurgery; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33626200
DOI: 10.1111/epi.16851 -
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B Nov 2019Temporal lobectomy with amygdalohippocampectomy is the standard surgical treatment for appropriate candidates with medically-intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. More...
OBJECT
Temporal lobectomy with amygdalohippocampectomy is the standard surgical treatment for appropriate candidates with medically-intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. More recently, because of the risk of postoperative language/memory decline in a subset of patients with intact memory, a multiple hippocampal transection (MHT) approach has been proposed to preserve function.
METHODS
Studies of MHT reporting both Engel and verbal memory outcome measures were included in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting of systematic reviews. Data were extracted on verbal memory function pre- and postoperatively, seizure outcome, and demographic factors. A random effects model was used to determine overall verbal memory function after MHT, and a meta-regression model was applied to identify factors associated with outcome.
RESULTS
A total of 114 patients across five studies were included. Engel class I seizure outcome across all studies ranged from 64.7% to 94.7%, with 84 of the 114 patients achieving this outcome. Preoperative verbal memory score was most strongly associated with postoperative verbal memory preservation (p = 0.003). Of 59 patients with full verbal memory outcome scores, 86.8% (95% CI [confidence interval]: 77.6%-96%) had complete preservation of verbal memory relative to preoperative functional baseline.
CONCLUSION
Multiple hippocampal transection is an evolving surgical technique. Although the present data are limited, the current systematic review suggests that this approach is effective at preserving verbal memory in patients with good baseline function. Although reasonable seizure outcomes have been reported with MHT, comparison to a well-established procedure such as temporal lobectomy and amydalohippocampectomy must be guided by further evidence.
Topics: Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe; Hemispherectomy; Hippocampus; Humans; Memory Disorders; Neurosurgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Psychosurgery; Seizures; Verbal Learning
PubMed: 31654940
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106496 -
World Neurosurgery Jul 2021Pain is a common occurrence in patients with cancer, which, in some cases, is not adequately controlled with medical analgesia. Thalamotomy is a treatment option in such...
Pain is a common occurrence in patients with cancer, which, in some cases, is not adequately controlled with medical analgesia. Thalamotomy is a treatment option in such circumstances, but synthesis of historical evidence and thalamic stratified data are lacking. We therefore sought to systematically review evidence supporting radiofrequency thalamotomy for intractable cancer pain. This review was performed using multiple electronic databases and a (PICO) patient/problem, intervention, comparison, outcome search with the terms "radiofrequency thalamotomy" and "cancer pain." Of 22 full-text studies assessed for eligibility, 14 were included for review. Articles were excluded in which radiofrequency ablation was not used, chronic implantation was used, or the study did not include patients with cancer pain. Thirteen case series and 1 case report were included. Thalamic targets included ventral posterior, central lateral, dorsomedial, centromedian, centromedian/parafascicular, centromedian and anterior pulvinar, pulvinar, limitans, suprageniculate and posterior nuclei. Patient characteristics, operative methods, lesioning parameters, patient follow-up, and outcomes were variably reported across the studies. Where relevant outcome data were available, 97% of patients experienced initial pain relief and 79% experienced significant lasting relief. Adverse events were typically transient. We conclude that radiofrequency thalamotomy for cancer pain is well tolerated and can produce significant relief from intractable cancer pain. No superiority of thalamic target could be determined.
Topics: Cancer Pain; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Neoplasms; Pain, Intractable; Psychosurgery; Radiosurgery
PubMed: 33905910
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.075 -
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and... Feb 2022Four ablative neurosurgical procedures are used in the treatment of refractory psychiatric illness. The long-term effects of these procedures on psychiatric symptoms... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Four ablative neurosurgical procedures are used in the treatment of refractory psychiatric illness. The long-term effects of these procedures on psychiatric symptoms across disorders has never been synthesised and meta-analysed.
METHODS
A preregistered systematic review was performed on studies reporting clinical results following ablative psychiatric neurosurgery. Four possible outcome measures were extracted for each study: depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, anxiety and clinical global impression. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedge's g. Equipercentile linking was used to convert symptom scores to a common metric. The main outcome measures were the magnitude of improvement in depression, obsessive compulsive symptoms, anxiety and clinical global impression. The secondary outcome was a subgroup analysis comparing the magnitude of symptom changes between the four procedures.
RESULTS
Of 943 articles, 43 studies reporting data from 1414 unique patients, were included for pooled effects estimates with a random-effects meta-analysis. Results showed that there was a large effect size for improvements in depression (g=1.27; p<0.0001), obsessive-compulsive symptoms (g=2.25; p<0.0001) and anxiety (g=1.76; p<0.0001). The pooled clinical global impression improvement score was 2.36 (p<0.0001). On subgroup analysis, there was only a significant degree of heterogeneity in effect sizes between procedure types for anxiety symptoms, with capsulotomy resulting in a greater reduction in anxiety than cingulotomy.
CONCLUSIONS
Contemporary ablative neurosurgical procedures were significantly associated with improvements in depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, anxiety and clinical global impression.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020164784.
Topics: Anxiety; Depression; Humans; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Psychosurgery
PubMed: 34261748
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325308 -
Epilepsy Research Aug 2019RCTs are the gold standard in determining intervention efficacy with journal impact factor assumed to index research quality. Flint et al's (2017) systematic review...
PURPOSE
RCTs are the gold standard in determining intervention efficacy with journal impact factor assumed to index research quality. Flint et al's (2017) systematic review examined neurocognitive outcomes following paediatric temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Retrieved evidence was restricted to non-RCTs, which pose greater risk of bias and thus diminish research quality. The current study evaluated risk of bias in sources retrieved by Flint et al. and explored whether impact factor related to research quality within this selected field.
METHODS
Methodological and reporting bias was evaluated using categories of bias specified by Cochrane. The relationship between the identified number of biases and journal impact factors of retrieved sources was examined.
RESULTS
All studies carried substantial risk for bias. Methodology bias included low sample size (76.71%; 56/73), risk of confounding cognitive outcomes due to failure to report pre-surgery neurocognitive data (21.92%; 16/73) and to determine whether patients were prescribed antiepileptic drugs at follow-up (53.42%; 39/73). Reporting bias included overstating claims based on findings (53.42%; 39/73), failure to report individual patient characteristics (66%; 33/50) and omitting the nature of surgical interventions (15.07%; 11/73). The number of sources of common bias within studies was not associated significantly with journal impact factor (p = .878).
CONCLUSION
This evaluation highlights risk of bias when sources are predominantly uncontrolled non-RCTs and provides evidence that journal impact factor is not a reliable indicator of quality within this field. Authors should limit bias in their methods and reporting of results, to ensure the highest quality evidence possible is used to inform treatment decisions and prognosis.
Topics: Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe; Humans; Mental Status and Dementia Tests; Neurocognitive Disorders; Psychosurgery; Qualitative Research; Retrospective Studies; Temporal Lobe; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31125839
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.03.013