-
The Journal of Obstetrics and... Jul 2023To estimate the incidence and identify risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal delivery. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To estimate the incidence and identify risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal delivery.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched from inception to April 30th, 2022. Cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, and secondary analysis of randomized controlled studies that reported the incidence of PPH and the related risk factors in vaginal delivery were eligible through screening of 2343 articles. The incidence, associated standard error, adjusted odds ratios, relative risks and associated 95% confidence intervals were combined in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Thirty-six articles were included in the descriptive review. The incidence of PPH (blood loss ≥500 mL and blood loss ≥1000 mL) was 17% and 6%, respectively. Forty-one identified risk factors were divided into five categories under two criteria: history and demographics; maternal comorbidity; pregnancy-related factors; labor-related factors; delivery-related factors.
CONCLUSIONS
With the increasing incidence of PPH globally, obstetric health care providers need to improve their awareness of these multi-factorial risks to optimize obstetric care and reduce maternal morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis have raised important questions about the nature of vaginal delivery, such as the duration of prolonged labor, details on the use of oxytocin, and the presence of genital tract trauma. There should be highlighted by obstetric personnel on these factors during a patients' labor process.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Oxytocics; Incidence; Cross-Sectional Studies; Delivery, Obstetric; Oxytocin; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37069822
DOI: 10.1111/jog.15654 -
Maternal and Child Health Journal Dec 2023Postpartum depression (PPD) has deleterious effects on both maternal and child outcomes. Poor maternal nutrition during pregnancy has been implicated in the development...
OBJECTIVE
Postpartum depression (PPD) has deleterious effects on both maternal and child outcomes. Poor maternal nutrition during pregnancy has been implicated in the development of PPD. This review aimed to explore the association between the overall dietary intake patterns during pregnancy and the development of PPD.
METHODS
A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases for relevant randomized controlled trials, cohort and cross-sectional studies published up to 17th September 2020. Included studies assessed at least one dietary pattern during pregnancy and reported on PPD. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of methodology. A narrative analysis was conducted.
RESULTS
Ten studies (eight cohort and two cross-sectional) were included with substantial heterogeneity in measurements of dietary intake exposures and PPD. The studies identified several types of healthy dietary patterns, including a 'healthy', 'health conscious', 'Japanese', 'high-glycemic index/glycemic load', 'Vegetable', 'Nut-Fruit', 'Seafood', and 'compliance with the Australian Dietary Guidelines'. The 'Western', 'unhealthy', 'Beverage', 'Cereal-Meat', and 'Egg' were labelled as unhealthy dietary patterns. Four of the eight studies showed an inverse association between adherence to healthy diets and risk of PPD, whereas only one of the seven studies showed that adherence to unhealthy diets was associated with increased risk of PPD. Methodological quality of the studies varied across the sample.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings indicate that adherence to a healthy diet may be beneficial for PPD. However, the relationship between unhealthy diets and PPD needs to be corroborated by more high-quality studies.
Topics: Child; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Australia; Cross-Sectional Studies; Depression, Postpartum; Diet; Diet, Healthy
PubMed: 37814068
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-023-03781-7 -
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and... Dec 2021Hyperprolactinemia is a neuroendocrine disease that is responsible for a quarter of cases of secondary amenorrhea, which can lead to infertility in women. Dopaminergic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE
Hyperprolactinemia is a neuroendocrine disease that is responsible for a quarter of cases of secondary amenorrhea, which can lead to infertility in women. Dopaminergic agonists (bromocriptine, cabergoline, quinagolide) can be used in the treatment. However, there is a lack of secondary studies that compare their efficacy and safety, especially through a network meta-analysis. Thus, to contribute to the decision-making, a systematic review and network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dopaminergic agonists in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia.
METHODS
Randomized clinical trials (RCT) were retrieved through PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases. The efficacy and safety of the drugs were compared, considering the following outcomes: prolactin (PRL) levels, number of patients with galactorrhoea, menstrual irregularities and adverse drug reactions. NMA was built for each outcome. Results were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% credibility intervals. Ranking probabilities were calculated by surface under the cumulative ranking analysis (SUCRA) and Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Seventeen RCTs were included in the systematic review and fifteen in the meta-analyses. The drugs had similar efficacy, considering the PRL levels. The SUCRA analysis showed that quinagolide (0.075 and 0.05 mg/day) was superior for reducing irregular menstruation, whereas bromocriptine was the best (97%) for galactorrhoea. Cabergoline proved to be the safest drug, except for abdominal pain at a dose of 1 mg/week. The SMAA demonstrated similar results to SUCRA.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION
This is the first network meta-analysis that evaluated the efficacy and safety of dopaminergic agonists in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. The results of this review revealed that these drugs have similar efficacy, but cabergoline has a better safety profile.
Topics: Dopamine Agonists; Female; Galactorrhea; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Menstruation Disturbances; Network Meta-Analysis; Prolactin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34137053
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13460 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Mar 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to conduct a thorough and contemporary assessment of maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with water birth in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to conduct a thorough and contemporary assessment of maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with water birth in comparison with land-based birth.
DATA SOURCES
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and gray literature sources, from inception to February 28, 2023.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We included randomized and nonrandomized studies that assessed maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients who delivered either conventionally or while submerged in water.
METHODS
Pooled unadjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effects model (restricted maximum likelihood method). We assessed the 95% prediction intervals to estimate the likely range of future study results. To evaluate the robustness of the results, we calculated fragility indices. Maternal infection was designated as the primary outcome, whereas postpartum hemorrhage, perineal lacerations, obstetrical anal sphincter injury, umbilical cord avulsion, low Apgar scores, neonatal aspiration requiring resuscitation, neonatal infection, neonatal mortality within 30 days of birth, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were considered secondary outcomes.
RESULTS
Of the 20,642 articles identified, 52 were included in the meta-analyses. Based on data from observational studies, water birth was not associated with increased probability of maternal infection compared with land birth (10 articles, 113,395 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.14). Patients undergoing water birth had decreased odds of postpartum hemorrhage (21 articles, 149,732 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.94). Neonates delivered while submerged in water had increased odds of cord avulsion (10 articles, 91,504 pregnancies; odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.24) and decreased odds of low Apgar scores (21 articles, 165,917 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.82), neonatal infection (15 articles, 53,635 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.97), neonatal aspiration requiring resuscitation (19 articles, 181,001 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.84), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (30 articles, 287,698 pregnancies; odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.70).
CONCLUSION
When compared with land birth, water birth does not appear to increase the risk of most maternal and neonatal complications. Like any other delivery method, water birth has its unique considerations and potential risks, which health care providers and expectant parents should evaluate thoroughly. However, with proper precautions in place, water birth can be a reasonable choice for mothers and newborns, in facilities equipped to conduct water births safely.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Delivery, Obstetric; Infant Mortality; Natural Childbirth; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Water
PubMed: 38462266
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.08.034 -
Journal of Affective Disorders Jul 2023Clinical prediction models have been widely used to screen and diagnose postpartum depression (PPD). This study systematically reviews and evaluates the risk of bias and... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Clinical prediction models have been widely used to screen and diagnose postpartum depression (PPD). This study systematically reviews and evaluates the risk of bias and the applicability of PPD prediction models.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in eight databases from inception to June 1, 2022. The literature was independently screened, and data were extracted by two investigators using the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modeling studies (CHARMS). The risk of bias and applicability was assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).
RESULTS
After the screening, 12 studies of PPD risk prediction models were included, with the area under the ROC curve of the models ranging from 0.611 to 0.937. The most-reported predictors of PPD included several aspects, including prenatal mood disorders, endocrine and hormonal influences, psychosocial aspects, the influence of family factors, and somatic illness factors. The applicability of all studies was good. However, there was some bias, mainly due to inadequate outcome events, missing data not appropriately handled, lack of model performance assessment, and overfitting of the models.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and evaluation indicate that most present PPD prediction models have a high risk of bias during development and validation. Despite some models' predictive solid performance, the models' clinical practice rate is low. Therefore, future research should develop predictive models with excellent performance in all aspects and clinical applicability to better inform maternal medical decisions.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Depression, Postpartum; Forecasting; Prognosis; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37084958
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.026 -
American Journal of Perinatology Jul 2024Despite patient interest, there is little evidence regarding waterbirth. This review sought to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in waterbirth, compared with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Despite patient interest, there is little evidence regarding waterbirth. This review sought to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in waterbirth, compared with landbirth. This search was conducted using MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID, and Cochrane Library from inception to November 15, 2021, with no language or geographic restrictions. Review was registered with PROSPERO under registration number: CRD42021288576. Selection criteria included randomized controlled trials of women with singleton cephalic gestations at ≥36 weeks comparing waterbirth to landbirth. The primary outcome was a perinatal composite outcome. Secondary outcomes included maternal and individual perinatal outcomes. Summary measures were reported as relative risk or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals using random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. (Higgins ) > 0% was used to identify heterogeneity. Six trials including 706 patients were included. When reported, all patients were ≥ 37 weeks' gestation. Labor augmentation (41.7 vs. 84.7%, < 0.0001) and neuraxial anesthesia (10.5 vs. 72.4%, < 0.0001) were less common with waterbirth. Estimated blood loss, postpartum hemorrhage, perineal laceration, episiotomy, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes did not differ between groups. Chorioamnionitis and endometritis were not reported by any trial. Maternal satisfaction was higher ( = 0.01) and pain scores lower ( = 0.003) with waterbirth. Length of first stage ( < 0.00001), third stage ( = 0.02), and labor ( = 0.04) were shorter with waterbirth. The composite perinatal outcome could not be calculated due to lack of individual patient data. Compared with landbirth, waterbirth was associated with lower rates of neuraxial anesthesia and lower pain scores, with improved maternal satisfaction. KEY POINTS: · Data are limited regarding the safety and potential benefits of waterbirth.. · With waterbirth, maternal satisfaction was higher and pain scores lower. The first and third stages of labor and labor overall were shorter. No significant differences noted in other maternal outcomes, such as hemorrhage or laceration.. · Insufficient data are available regarding neonatal outcomes..
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Natural Childbirth; Water; Delivery, Obstetric; Postpartum Hemorrhage
PubMed: 36791786
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764145 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Jul 2024Postpartum depression (PPD) is a growing mental health concern worldwide and has detrimental effects on the social and cognitive health of both mothers and infants. This... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Postpartum depression (PPD) is a growing mental health concern worldwide and has detrimental effects on the social and cognitive health of both mothers and infants. This review was performed to assess the risk of PPD in women with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and to identify potential moderators.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database on June 17, 2023 (registration number: CRD42023432955). Two researchers independently performed a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for articles published before May 25, 2023, with no filters and no language or location restrictions. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of PPD in women with vs. without PPH. We performed sensitivity analyses and meta-regression analyses to resolve heterogeneity. Meta-regression analyses included the effects of age, maternal smoking, marital status, preterm labor, maternal education level, preeclampsia, anemia during pregnancy, and cesarean section.
RESULTS
In total, seven studies involving 540 558 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Women with PPH were at increased risk of PPD compared with women without PPH (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.03-1.16), and heterogeneity was low (I = 23%; τ = 0.0007; p = 0.25). Moreover, the results of the sensitivity analyses showed that the I value decreased from 23% to 0% after excluding one particular study, which may have been a source of heterogeneity. In the meta-regression analyses, the OR of PPD was greatly affected by maternal smoking (OR -0.26; 95% CI -0.30 to -0.22; p < 0.001). However, we did not observe any effects for maternal age, marital status, preterm labor, maternal education level, preeclampsia, anemia during pregnancy, or cesarean section.
CONCLUSIONS
Women with PPH must be closely monitored because they have a higher risk of PPD than women without PPH. Early recognition and management of these patients will improve treatment outcomes, maternal health, and newborn development.
Topics: Humans; Female; Depression, Postpartum; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38475881
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14795 -
Reproductive Health Nov 2020Postnatal depression is among the common mental health problems that occur during the postnatal period. However, it is left undiagnosed in low- and middle-income... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Postnatal depression is among the common mental health problems that occur during the postnatal period. However, it is left undiagnosed in low- and middle-income countries including Ethiopia. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to systematically summarize the available evidence on the epidemiology of postnatal depression in Ethiopia and suggest recommendations for future clinical practice.
METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases for the relevant articles that assessed the prevalence of postnatal depression in Ethiopia. We used a random-effect model to conduct a meta-analysis. We conducted a subgroup and sensitivity analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity. Cochrane Q- and the I-test were used to check the heterogeneity of the included studies. The presence of publication bias was also checked by visual inspection of symmetry and Egger's test.
RESULTS
The pooled estimated prevalence of postnatal depression in Ethiopia was 20.1% (95% CI 12.7-30.2). The pooled prevalence of postnatal depression in the studies that were conducted in community settings and used the Patient Health Questionnaire to assess postnatal depression [16.6% (95% CI 8.90-28.99)] was lower than the prevalence in studies based in institutions and that used the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [23.2% (95% CI 14.50-28.5)]. Further, in a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis the prevalence of postnatal depression ranges between 15.4% and 25.4%. Unplanned pregnancy [AOR = 3.46, 95% CI (2.37-5.04)], age between 15-24 years [AOR = 1.72, 95% CI (1.11-2.68)], marital problems [AOR = 3.07, 95% CI (2.36-3.99)], experiencing the death of infant [AOR = 3.41, 95% CI (1.91-6.09)] and history of substance use [AOR = 3.47, 95% CI (2.17-5.56)] were associated with the increased odds of postnatal depression in Ethiopia.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of postnatal depression in Ethiopia was high. Therefore, the concerned body should give due attention to improve reproductive health services through early detection of risk factors of postnatal depression.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Depression, Postpartum; Domestic Violence; Ethiopia; Female; Humans; Interpersonal Relations; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy, Unplanned; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Social Support; Socioeconomic Factors; Young Adult
PubMed: 33213434
DOI: 10.1186/s12978-020-01035-1 -
Journal of Affective Disorders Oct 2023The current study endeavored to systematically integrate and quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of interpersonal psychological interventions for postpartum... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The current study endeavored to systematically integrate and quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of interpersonal psychological interventions for postpartum depression patients.
METHODS
Four electronic databases Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science were employed for literature retrieval, and the search time was from the inception of the database to May 30, 2022. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers.
RESULTS
A total of 528 studies were screened, and 9 of them were finally included. There were 1012 subjects, 518 of them were assigned in experimental group and 494 in control. Evidence from interpersonal psychological interventions indicated that the data on postpartum depression, satisfaction with family, and social support in both groups after intervention included: depression score [MD = -2.80, 95%CI (-3.86 to -1.74), P < 0.05], satisfaction score [MD = 8.41, 95%CI (1.49 to -15.33), P < 0.05], and social support score [MD = 1.83, 95%CI (-2.10 to -5.76)] of postpartum depression patients. P values < 0.05 indicated substantial improvement as compared to control.
LIMITATIONS
During the research process, it is impossible for the experimental group and the researchers to use double-blind trials simultaneously, which may present a Hawthorne effect, but this can be avoided by general psychological intervention for the control.
CONCLUSIONS
Interpersonal psychotherapy could improve depression in patients with postpartum depression, but the appropriate intervention time was between 4 and 8 weeks, and it also improved satisfaction with family of patients, and the longer the intervention, the higher the satisfaction with the family.
Topics: Female; Humans; Depression, Postpartum; Psychotherapy; Depression; Interpersonal Psychotherapy; Social Support; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37459968
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.067 -
Association between perinatal pain and postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Affective Disorders Sep 2022In recent years, clinical studies have shown that perinatal pain could increase the risk of postpartum depression, while such a conclusion appears controversial.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, clinical studies have shown that perinatal pain could increase the risk of postpartum depression, while such a conclusion appears controversial. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the association between perinatal pain and postpartum depression, and to evaluate the effectiveness of epidural labor analgesia in reducing the risk of postpartum depression.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to Jan 30th, 2022. The effect size of the meta-analysis was calculated using odds ratio and 95 % confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software.
RESULTS
There were 19 studies included with a total of 96,378 patients. Among the included studies, 10 investigated the association between perinatal pain and the risk of postpartum depression, and 9 reported that between labor analgesia and the risk of postpartum depression. The results of meta-analysis showed that perinatal pain increased the risk of postpartum depression [OR = 1.43, 95% CI (1.23, 1.67), p<0.05], and epidural analgesia could reduce the risk of postpartum depression [OR = 0.42, 95% CI (0.33, 0.55), p < 0.05].
LIMITATIONS
Source of heterogeneity in the association between perinatal pain and PPD could not be identified due to the limitations of the original studies. There were mainly cohort studies included in the assessment for effectiveness of epidural analgesia in reducing the incidence of postpartum pain. Therefore, we look forward to more RCTs to confirm our results.
CONCLUSION
Perinatal pain is one of the risk factors for postpartum depression, and epidural analgesia could reduce the risk of PPD. This result might provide guidance for clinical practice. However, psychological health counseling should be combined with epidural analgesia for perinatal pain to reduce the risk of PPD.
Topics: Analgesia, Epidural; Analgesics; Depression, Postpartum; Female; Humans; Labor Pain; Labor, Obstetric; Pain Management; Pregnancy
PubMed: 35716784
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.010