-
Frontiers in Surgery 2022Hypoxemia and fluctuations in respiratory mechanics parameters are common during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in thoracic surgery. Additionally, the incidence of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Hypoxemia and fluctuations in respiratory mechanics parameters are common during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in thoracic surgery. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) in thoracic surgery is higher than that in other surgeries. Previous studies have demonstrated that driving pressure-oriented ventilation can reduce both mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the incidence of PPC in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Our aim was to determine whether driving pressure-oriented ventilation improves intraoperative physiology and outcomes in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov and performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of driving pressure-oriented ventilation with other ventilation strategies on patients undergoing OLV. The primary outcome was the PaO/FiO ratio (P/F ratio) during OLV. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of PPC during follow-up, compliance of the respiratory system during OLV, and mean arterial pressure during OLV.
RESULTS
This review included seven studies, with a total of 640 patients. The PaO/FiO ratio was higher during OLV in the driving pressure-oriented ventilation group (mean difference [MD]: 44.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.22-65.70.32; : 58%; < 0.0001). The incidence of PPC was lower (OR: 0.58; 95% CI, 0.34-0.99; : 0%; = 0.04) and the compliance of the respiratory system was higher (MD: 6.15; 95% CI, 3.97-8.32; : 57%; < 0.00001) in the driving pressure-oriented group during OLV. We did not find a significant difference in the mean arterial pressure between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
Driving pressure-oriented ventilation during OLV in patients undergoing thoracic surgery was associated with better perioperative oxygenation, fewer PPC, and improved compliance of the respiratory system.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021297063.
PubMed: 35722525
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.914984 -
International Journal of Cardiology Jun 2021Pulmonary arterial capacitance or compliance (PAC) has been reported as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Pulmonary arterial capacitance or compliance (PAC) has been reported as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and pulmonary hypertension secondary to left heart disease (PH-LHD).
METHODS
We conducted a literature search of PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases from July 30th to September 4th, 2020, and identified all the relevant studies reporting mortality outcomes in patients with PAH and PH-LHD. Pooled data from these studies were used to perform a meta-analysis to identify the role of PAC in predicting all-cause mortality in this subset of patients.
RESULTS
Pooled data on 4997 patients from 15 individual studies showed that the mortality risk in patients with PAH and PH-LHD varies significantly per unit change in PAC either from baseline or during follow-up. A reduction in PAC per 1 ml/mmHg was associated with a 4.25 times higher risk of all-cause mortality (95% CI 1.42-12.71; p = 0.021) in PAH patients. Among patients with PH-LHD, mortality risk increased by ~30% following a unit decrease in PAC (HR, 1.29; p = 0.019), whereas an increase in PAC by 1 ml/mmHg lowered the mortality risk by 30% (HR, 0.70).
CONCLUSION
PAC is a strong and independent predictor of all-cause mortality in both patients with PAH and PH-LHD. A decrease in PAC by 1 ml/mmHg from baseline or during follow-up significantly increases the risk of all-cause mortality among both patients with PAH and PH-LHD. Treatment modalities targeted at PAC improvement can affect the overall survival and quality of life in such patients.
Topics: Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension; Pulmonary Artery; Quality of Life
PubMed: 33621628
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.043 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Oct 2022Background: Lung-protective ventilation strategies are recommended for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. However, there are currently no guidelines to follow... (Review)
Review
Background: Lung-protective ventilation strategies are recommended for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. However, there are currently no guidelines to follow regarding recruitment maneuvers (RMs). We attempted to identify the effects of RMs on patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, the Cochrane Library databases, Embase, Web of Science and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for trials published up to December 2021. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The secondary outcomes consisted of the static lung compliance, driving pressure (DP), intraoperative oxygenation index (OI), OI in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). Seventeen RCTs with a total of 3480 patients were examined. Results: Patients who received RMs showed a considerable reduction in PPCs (risk ratio (RR) = 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62 to 0.79; p < 0.01), lower DP (weighted mean difference (WMD) = −3.96; 95% CI: −5.97 to −1.95; p < 0.01), elevated static lung compliance (WMD = 10.42; 95% CI: 6.13 to 14.71; p < 0.01) and improved OI (intraoperative: WMD = 53.54; 95% CI: 21.77 to 85.31; p < 0.01; PACU: WMD = 59.40; 95% CI: 39.10 to 79.69; p < 0.01) without substantial changes in MAP (WMD = −0.16; 95% CI −1.35 to 1.03; p > 0.05) and HR (WMD = −1.10; 95% CI: −2.29 to 0.10; p > 0.05). Conclusions: Recruitment maneuvers reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and improve respiratory mechanics and oxygenation in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. More data are needed to elucidate the effect of recruitment maneuver on the circulatory system.
PubMed: 36233708
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195841 -
Annals of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic... Feb 2023A systematic review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA statement standards to identify all studies reporting outcomes of laparoscopic resection of benign or... (Review)
Review
A systematic review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA statement standards to identify all studies reporting outcomes of laparoscopic resection of benign or malignant lesions located in caudate lobe of liver. Pooled outcome data were calculated using random-effects models. A total of 196 patients from 12 studies were included. Mean operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 225 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], 181-269 minutes), 134 mL (95% CI, 85-184 mL), and 7 days (95% CI, 5-9 days), respectively. The pooled risk of need for intraoperative transfusion was 2% (95% CI, 0%-5%). It was 3% (95% CI, 1%-6%) for conversion to open surgery, 6% (95% CI, 0%-19%) for need for intra-abdominal drain, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) for postoperative mortality, 2% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for biliary leakage, 2% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for intra-abdominal abscess, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for biliary stenosis, 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) for postoperative bleeding, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for pancreatic fistula, 2% (95% CI, 1%-5%) for pulmonary complications, 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for paralytic ileus, and 1% (95% CI, 0%-4%) for need for reoperation. Although the available evidence is limited, the findings of the current study might be utilized for hypothesis synthesis in future studies. They can be used to inform surgeons and patients about estimated risks of perioperative complications until a higher level of evidence is available.
PubMed: 36245071
DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.22-045 -
Geriatric Nursing (New York, N.Y.) 2022To systematically evaluate and integrate the qualitative research on physical activity (PA) experience of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
OBJECTIVE
To systematically evaluate and integrate the qualitative research on physical activity (PA) experience of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
METHODS
Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL and other databases were searched, and the qualitative research on PA experience of patients with COPD was collected. The systematic review was conducted in line with Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence.
RESULTS
12 studies were included and 3 themes were summarized, included: COPD patients experience more barriers while participating in physical activities than facilitators; COPD patients experience more positive effects post-physical activities than negative effects; Guaranteeing safety, goal setting, and establishing a professional support group improve compliance in COPD patients.
CONCLUSION
Health care professionals should help patients overcome the obstacles of PA, pay attention to the PA experience of patients, adopt diversified PA methods, improve PA participation and compliance, and make patients develop good PA habits.
Topics: Exercise; Health Personnel; Humans; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Qualitative Research
PubMed: 35940039
DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.07.013 -
BMC Health Services Research Apr 2022Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is considered a key component in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, uptake remains suboptimal. This...
BACKGROUND
Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is considered a key component in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, uptake remains suboptimal. This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness of home-based PR (HBPR) programs for COPD patients.
METHODS
A systematic review of scholarly literature published within the last 10 years from the conception of this project was conducted using internationally recognized guidelines. Search strategies were applied to electronic databases and clinical trial registries through March 2020 and updated in November 2021 to identify studies comparing HBPR with 'usual care' or outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (OPR). To critically appraise randomized studies, the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool (ROB) was used. The quality of non-randomized studies was evaluated using the ACROBAT-NRSI tool. The quality of evidence relating to key outcomes was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), exacerbation frequencies, COPD-related hospital admissions, and program adherence. Three independent reviewers assessed methodologic quality and reviewed the studies.
RESULTS
Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 comparative observational studies were included. While considerable evidence relating to the effectiveness of HBPR programs for COPD patients exist, overall quality is low. There were no differences between HBPR and OPR in terms of safety, HRQoL, functional exercise capacity and health care resource utilization. Compared to usual care, functional exercise capacity seemed to significantly improve after HBPR. While patient compliance with HBPR is good, two factors appeared to increase the 'risk' of non-compliance: expectations of patients to 1) complete daily diaries/activity logs and 2) engage in solely unsupervised exercise sessions.
CONCLUSION
The overall quality for most outcomes was low to very low; however, HBPR seems to offer comparable short-term benefits to OPR.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Hospitalization; Humans; Outpatients; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35473597
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07779-9 -
International Journal of Infectious... Nov 2022We aimed to investigate published data on treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant (MDR)/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in Central and West Africa because... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to investigate published data on treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant (MDR)/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in Central and West Africa because these, to the best of our knowledge, are sparsely available.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies were included, representing 4268 individuals in 14 of the 26 countries. Using a random-effects model meta-analysis, we observed a pooled success rate of 80.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56.0-93.3) for the Central African subgroup and 69.2% (95% CI 56.3-79.7) for the West African subgroup (P = 0.0522). The overall treatment success for all studies was 74.6% (95% CI 65.0-82.2). We found high heterogeneity among included studies (I = 96.1%). The estimated proportion of successfully treated individuals with MDR/rifampicin-resistant TB was considerably higher than the global estimate provided by the World Health Organization (59%), reaching the 2015 World Health Organization target of at least 75% treatment success for MDR-TB.
CONCLUSION
The use of shorter treatment regimens and the standardized treatment conditions, including directly observed therapy in these studies, could have contributed to a high treatment success. Yet, the available literature was not fully representative of the regions, possibly highlighting the sparse resources in many of these countries. The review was registered at PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/) (CRD42022353163).
Topics: Humans; Antitubercular Agents; Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant; Rifampin; Directly Observed Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Mycobacterium tuberculosis
PubMed: 36007688
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.08.015 -
Journal of Global Antimicrobial... Sep 2020Antimicrobial stewardship is one of the strategic objectives of the WHO global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. This paper sought to review the extent of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Antimicrobial stewardship is one of the strategic objectives of the WHO global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. This paper sought to review the extent of implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) in African countries and the reported outcomes.
METHODS
We searched five electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, African Journal Online, CINAHL and Google scholar for papers published between 1990 and March 2019. We combined the names of countries in the five regions of Africa with antimicrobial stewardship terms. Studies of any design, employing any stewardship strategies were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) quality assessment tool for before and after studies.
RESULTS
Of 1752 titles identified, 13 studies met the criteria for inclusion. Seven of the studies were conducted in South Africa, three in Kenya and one each in Sudan, Tanzania and Egypt. Eleven studies were of high quality with low risk of bias. The included studies mainly assessed the outcome using process measures and these were associated with improved compliance with antibiotic guidelines, appropriateness of prescribing, reduction in antibiotic use and cost savings. Decrease in rate of surgical site infections and nonsignificant change in mortality and 30-day readmission rate were reported in two studies respectively.
CONCLUSION
Findings of this review show the paucity of data on implementation of ASPs in African countries. Although the continent is faced with challenges which impact on effective implementation of ASPs, the successes reported in the included studies show that other African countries can implement these programmes.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antimicrobial Stewardship; Egypt; South Africa; Tanzania
PubMed: 32247077
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.03.009 -
Critical Care Medicine Mar 2021Prone positioning has been shown to be a beneficial adjunctive supportive measure for patients who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome. Studies have excluded... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Prone positioning has been shown to be a beneficial adjunctive supportive measure for patients who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome. Studies have excluded patients with reduced intracranial compliance, whereby patients with concomitant neurologic diagnoses and acute respiratory distress syndrome have no defined treatment algorithm or recommendations for management. In this study, we aim to determine the safety and feasibility of prone positioning in the neurologically ill patients.
DESIGN AND SETTING
A systematic review of the literature, performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses 2009 guidelines, yielded 10 articles for analysis. Using consensus from these articles, in combination with review of multi-institutional proning protocols for patients with nonneurologic conditions, a proning protocol for patients with intracranial pathology and concomitant acute respiratory distress syndrome was developed.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Among 10 studies included in the final analysis, we found that prone positioning is safe and feasible in the neurologically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Increased intracranial pressure and compromised cerebral perfusion pressure may occur with prone positioning. We propose a prone positioning protocol for the neurologically ill patients who require frequent neurologic examinations and intracranial monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS
Although elevations in intracranial pressure and reductions in cerebral perfusion pressure do occur during proning, they may not occur to a degree that would warrant exclusion of prone ventilation as a treatment modality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and concomitant neurologic diagnoses. In cases where intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation can be monitored, prone position ventilation should be considered a safe and viable therapy.
Topics: Brain; Clinical Protocols; Critical Care; Humans; Patient Positioning; Prone Position; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome
PubMed: 33481406
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004820 -
Respiratory Medicine Jan 2022Adherence to therapy has been reported worldwide as a major problem, and that is particularly relevant on inhaled therapy for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Adherence to therapy has been reported worldwide as a major problem, and that is particularly relevant on inhaled therapy for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), considering its barriers and features. We reviewed the global literature reporting the main determinants for adherence on these patients.
METHODS
Searches were made using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science databases. Analytical, observational and epidemiological studies (cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies) were included, reporting association between any type of determinant and the adherence for inhaler therapy on Asthma or COPD. Random-effects meta-analysis were used to summarise the numerical effect estimates.
RESULTS
47 studies were included, including a total of 54.765 participants. In meta-analyses, the significant determinants of adherence to inhaled therapy were: older age [RR = 1.07 (1.03-1.10); I = 94; p < 0.0001] good disease knowledge/literacy [RR = 1.37 (1.28-1.47); I = 14; p = 0.33]; obesity [RR = 1.30 (1.12-1.50); I = 0; p = 0.37]; good cognitive performance [RR = 1.28 (1.17-1.40); I = 0; p = 0.62]; higher income [RR = 1.63 (1.05-2.56); I = 0; p = 0.52]; being employed [RR = 0.87 (0.83-0.90); I = 0; p = 0.76] and using multiple drugs/inhalers [RR = 0.81 (0.79-0.84); I = 0; p = 0.80]. Overall, the strength of the underlying evidence was only low to moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
Many determinants may be associated to patient's adherence, and personalised interventions should be taken in clinical practice to address it by gaining an understanding of their individual features.
Topics: Asthma; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Patient Compliance; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
PubMed: 34954637
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106724