-
Thrombosis Research Jan 2021The direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have similar half-lives, but the dosing regimen varies between once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID). For some prescribers, the QD... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
The direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have similar half-lives, but the dosing regimen varies between once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID). For some prescribers, the QD regimen improves compliance. Others prefer BID regimens to promote better stability of plasma concentrations, particularly in the event of missed doses. Limited level of evidence provides guidance about the best treatment strategy. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment effect of QD vs. BID administration of DOACs in major orthopedic surgery (MOS), non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review up to April 2020. We included phase II clinical trials comparing DOAC QD vs BID with same daily dose. We extracted data for the occurrence of major thrombosis (proximal deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke) and major hemorrhage (ISTH criteria and recommendations of the European Medicines Agency for surgical patients). Relative risks (RR) were combined using a fixed and random effects weighted meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Twelve randomized, controlled, phase II trials were included (10,716 patients), representing 24 dosing regimen comparisons of apixaban, darexaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, letaxaban, and dabigatran. There was no difference for major thrombotic event (RR = 1.06, 95%IC 0.86-1.30) nor for major bleeding (RR = 1.02, 95%IC 0.84-1.23) between the BID vs QD regimens, without heterogeneity (I = 0%).
CONCLUSION
Our study does not support a global difference in term of efficacy and safety of the BID and QD regimens of DOAC in MOS, NVAF, VTE and ACS.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Dabigatran; Hemorrhage; Humans; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33161284
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.10.011 -
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery Jul 2021Laparoscopic surgery may be advantageous for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients because it leads to fewer complications than open surgery. However, it could still lead to...
INTRODUCTION
Laparoscopic surgery may be advantageous for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients because it leads to fewer complications than open surgery. However, it could still lead to pulmonary and cardiovascular complications in CF patients. We aimed to systematically review the use of laparoscopic surgery in CF patients.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, with "cystic fibrosis and laparoscopic surgery" and "cystic fibrosis and minimally invasive surgery" used as the search terms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria were applied. The protocol was registered with the PROSPERO register.
RESULTS
Six studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria; accordingly, two studies provided high-quality evidence and four provided moderate-quality evidence. The interrater correlation was convincing (r = .95, P = .02, two-tailed). Therefore, three quantitative studies and three qualitative studies were assessed and evidence-graded in accordance with the GRADE protocol.
CONCLUSION
The benefits of laparoscopic surgical interventions for patients with CF were supported with good evidential value and recognized as a safe and suitable surgical option.
Topics: Cystic Fibrosis; Humans; Laparoscopy
PubMed: 33025750
DOI: 10.1111/ases.12874 -
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Dec 2023Mechanical ventilation, particularly one-lung ventilation (OLV), can cause pulmonary dysfunction. This meta-analysis assessed the effects of dexmedetomidine on the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Mechanical ventilation, particularly one-lung ventilation (OLV), can cause pulmonary dysfunction. This meta-analysis assessed the effects of dexmedetomidine on the pulmonary function of patients receiving OLV.
METHODS
The Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry databases were systematically searched. The primary outcome was oxygenation index (OI). Other outcomes including the incidence of postoperative complications were assessed.
RESULTS
Fourteen randomized controlled trials involving 845 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Dexmedetomidine improved the OI at 30 (mean difference [MD]: 40.49, 95% CI [10.21, 70.78]), 60 (MD: 60.86, 95% CI [35.81, 85.92]), and 90 min (MD: 55, 95% CI [34.89, 75.11]) after OLV and after surgery (MD: 28.98, 95% CI [17.94, 40.0]) and improved lung compliance 90 min after OLV (MD: 3.62, 95% CI [1.7, 5.53]). Additionally, dexmedetomidine reduced the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio: 0.44, 95% CI [0.24, 0.82]) and length of hospital stay (MD: -0.99, 95% CI [-1.25, -0.73]); decreased tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and malondialdehyde levels; and increased superoxide dismutase levels. However, only the results for the OI and IL-6 levels were confirmed by the sensitivity and trial sequential analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
Dexmedetomidine improves oxygenation in patients receiving OLV and may additionally decrease the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and shorten the length of hospital stay, which may be related to associated improvements in lung compliance, anti-inflammatory effects, and regulation of oxidative stress reactions. However, robust evidence is required to confirm these conclusions.
Topics: Humans; One-Lung Ventilation; Dexmedetomidine; Lung; Blood Gas Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36924790
DOI: 10.4097/kja.22787 -
BMJ Open Aug 2019In England, the NHS111 service provides assessment and triage by telephone for urgent health problems. A digital version of this service has recently been introduced. We...
OBJECTIVES
In England, the NHS111 service provides assessment and triage by telephone for urgent health problems. A digital version of this service has recently been introduced. We aimed to systematically review the evidence on digital and online symptom checkers and similar services.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
DATA SOURCES
We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Management Information Consortium, Web of Science and ACM Digital Library up to April 2018, supplemented by phrase searches for known symptom checkers and citation searching of key studies.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies of any design that evaluated a digital or online symptom checker or health assessment service for people seeking advice about an urgent health problem.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data extraction and quality assessment (using the Cochrane Collaboration version of QUADAS for diagnostic accuracy studies and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute tool for observational studies) were done by one reviewer with a sample checked for accuracy and consistency. We performed a narrative synthesis of the included studies structured around pre-defined research questions and key outcomes.
RESULTS
We included 29 publications (27 studies). Evidence on patient safety was weak. Diagnostic accuracy varied between different systems but was generally low. Algorithm-based triage tended to be more risk averse than that of health professionals. There was very limited evidence on patients' compliance with online triage advice. Study participants generally expressed high levels of satisfaction, although in mainly uncontrolled studies. Younger and more highly educated people were more likely to use these services.
CONCLUSIONS
The English 'digital 111' service has been implemented against a background of uncertainty around the likely impact on important outcomes. The health system may need to respond to short-term changes and/or shifts in demand. The popularity of online and digital services with younger and more educated people has implications for health equity.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42018093564.
Topics: England; Health Services Accessibility; Health Services Research; Hotlines; Humans; Information Seeking Behavior; Quality of Health Care; Telemedicine; Triage
PubMed: 31375610
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743 -
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Jun 2024The determination of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values in patients undergoing general anesthesia remains controversial. Electrical impedance... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The determination of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values in patients undergoing general anesthesia remains controversial. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) directed individualized PEEP has emerged as a novel approach to PEEP setting and has garnered increasing attention. This meta-analysis aims to systematically assess the effect of EIT-guided PEEP setting compared to traditional fixed PEEP values or other PEEP titration strategies in patients undergoing general anesthesia.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted from inception to January 2023, with no language restrictions. The search terms used were "EIT"and "PEEP" with their corresponding free words. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation. The primary outcomes of interest were oxygenation index (OI), lung compliance, and number of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The secondary outcomes included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and number of vasoactive drug injections. RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the data and draw the forest plot, and Stata 14.2 software was used to conduct sensitivity analysis to assess the stability of the results.
RESULTS
5 studies involving 272 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Our findings suggest that EIT-guided individualized PEEP setting is superior to traditional fixed PEEP values and other individualized PEEP titration methods in terms of intraoperative OI(OR = 95.73, 95%CI: (49.10, 142.37); P < 0.0001) and lung compliance(OR = 7.69, 95%CI: (5.55, 9.83); P < 0.00001), without affecting intraoperative hemodynamic parameters such as MAP(OR = 2.07, 95%CI: (-1.00, 5.13); P = 0.19) and the number of intravenous vasoactive drugs(OR = 1.22, 95%CI: (0.68, 2.21); P = 0.51) or increasing the incidence of postoperative PPCs(OR = 0.87, 95%CI: (0.41, 1.82); P = 0.71).
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis suggests potential benefits of EIT-guided individualized PEEP setting in improving intraoperative oxygenation and lung compliance in patients undergoing general anesthesia. However, further research is needed to establish conclusive evidence, and caution should be exercised in interpreting these findings as the current literature remains inconclusive regarding the impact on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative complications.
Topics: Humans; Anesthesia, General; Electric Impedance; Lung; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Postoperative Complications; Tomography
PubMed: 38278058
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111397 -
Resuscitation Oct 2019To provide an overview of cadaver models for cardiac arrest and to identify the most appropriate cadaver model to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation through a...
AIM
To provide an overview of cadaver models for cardiac arrest and to identify the most appropriate cadaver model to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation through a systematic review.
METHODS
The search strategy included PubMed, Embase, Current contents, Pascal, OpenSIGLE and reference tracking. The search concepts included "heart arrest", "cardiopulmonary resuscitation" and "cadavers". All studies, published until February 2019, in English or French, on research or simulation in the field of cardiac arrest and using cadaver models were eligible for inclusion.
RESULTS
Overall, 29 articles out of the 244 articles located were selected. The characteristics of the studies and the cadaver models were heterogenous. Indeed, 31% of the studies lacked a proper description of the model used and its specificities. Fresh cadavers were used in 55% of the studies and chest compressions were performed in 90%. This model was appreciated for its realism in terms of mechanical properties and tissue conservation. Thiel-embalmed cadavers also showed promising results concerning lung and chest compliance. The lack of circulation stood out as the strongest limitation of all types of human cadaver models.
CONCLUSION
Four types of cadaver models are used in cardiac arrest research. The great heterogeneity of these models coupled with unequal quality in reporting makes comparisons between studies difficult. There is a need for uniform reporting and standardisation of human cadaver models in cardiac arrest research.
Topics: Cadaver; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Heart Arrest; Heart Massage; Humans
PubMed: 31412293
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.009 -
Frontiers in Radiology 2024Chronic pulmonary embolism (PE) may result in pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Automated CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) interpretation using artificial intelligence (AI)...
BACKGROUND
Chronic pulmonary embolism (PE) may result in pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Automated CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) interpretation using artificial intelligence (AI) tools has the potential for improving diagnostic accuracy, reducing delays to diagnosis and yielding novel information of clinical value in CTEPH. This systematic review aimed to identify and appraise existing studies presenting AI tools for CTPA in the context of chronic PE and CTEPH.
METHODS
MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched on 11 September 2023. Journal publications presenting AI tools for CTPA in patients with chronic PE or CTEPH were eligible for inclusion. Information about model design, training and testing was extracted. Study quality was assessed using compliance with the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM).
RESULTS
Five studies were eligible for inclusion, all of which presented deep learning AI models to evaluate PE. First study evaluated the lung parenchymal changes in chronic PE and two studies used an AI model to classify PE, with none directly assessing the pulmonary arteries. In addition, a separate study developed a CNN tool to distinguish chronic PE using 2D maximum intensity projection reconstructions. While another study assessed a novel automated approach to quantify hypoperfusion to help in the severity assessment of CTEPH. While descriptions of model design and training were reliable, descriptions of the datasets used in training and testing were more inconsistent.
CONCLUSION
In contrast to AI tools for evaluation of acute PE, there has been limited investigation of AI-based approaches to characterising chronic PE and CTEPH on CTPA. Existing studies are limited by inconsistent reporting of the data used to train and test their models. This systematic review highlights an area of potential expansion for the field of AI in medical image interpretation.There is limited knowledge of A systematic review of artificial intelligence tools for chronic pulmonary embolism in CT. This systematic review provides an assessment on research that examined deep learning algorithms in detecting CTEPH on CTPA images, the number of studies assessing the utility of deep learning on CTPA in CTEPH was unclear and should be highlighted.
PubMed: 38654762
DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1335349 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022New ventilation modes have been proposed to support the perioperative treatment of patients with obesity, but there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
New ventilation modes have been proposed to support the perioperative treatment of patients with obesity, but there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal strategy. Therefore, a network meta-analysis update of 13 ventilation strategies was conducted to determine the optimal mode of mechanical ventilation as a protective ventilation strategy decreases pulmonary atelectasis caused by inflammation.
METHODS
The following databases were searched: MEDLINE; Cochrane Library; Embase; CINAHL; Google Scholar; and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials of mechanical ventilation in patients with obesity published up to May 1, 2022.
RESULTS
Volume-controlled ventilation with individualized positive end-expiratory pressure and a recruitment maneuver (VCV+PEEPind+RM) was found to be the most effective strategy for improving ratio of the arterial O partial pressure to the inspiratory O concentration (PaO/FiO), and superior to pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), volume-controlled ventilation with recruitment maneuver (VCV+RM), volume-controlled ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure (VCV+lowPEEP), volume-controlled ventilation with lower positive expiratory end pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuver (VCV+lowPEEP+RM), and the mean difference [MD], the 95% confidence intervals [CIs] and [quality of evidence] were: 162.19 [32.94, 291.45] [very low]; 180.74 [59.22, 302.27] [low]; 171.07 [40.60, 301.54] [very low]; 135.14 [36.10, 234.18] [low]; and 139.21 [27.08, 251.34] [very low]. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value showed VCV+PEEPind+RM was the best strategy for improving PaO/FiO (SUCRA: 0.963). VCV with high positive PEEP and recruitment maneuver (VCV+highPEEP+RM) was more effective in decreasing postoperative pulmonary atelectasis than the VCV+lowPEEP+RM strategy. It was found that volume-controlled ventilation with high positive expiratory end pressure (VCV+highPEEP), risk ratio [RR] [95% CIs] and [quality of evidence], 0.56 [0.38, 0.81] [moderate], 0.56 [0.34, 0.92] [moderate]. SUCRA value ranked VCV+highPEEP+RM the best strategy for improving postoperative pulmonary atelectasis intervention (SUCRA: 0.933). It should be noted that the quality of evidence was in all cases very low or only moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
This research suggests that VCV+PEEPind+RM is the optimal ventilation strategy for patients with obesity and is more effective in increasing PaO/FiO, improving lung compliance, and among the five ventilation strategies for postoperative atelectasis, VCV+highPEEP+RM had the greatest potential to reduce atelectasis caused by inflammation.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021288941.
Topics: Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Lung; Pulmonary Atelectasis; Obesity; Inflammation
PubMed: 36330511
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1032783 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Aug 2020The low nonadherence rates reported by large low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening trials were not necessarily replicated outside of trial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The low nonadherence rates reported by large low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening trials were not necessarily replicated outside of trial conditions. This systematic review and meta-analysis identified predictors of participant nonadherence to returning for annual LDCT screening. The systematic review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42019118347). MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AgeLine, grey literature sources, and reference lists of included studies were searched until March 1st, 2020. Primary research articles were eligible for inclusion if they screened current or former smokers using LDCT as their primary screening modality and reported on participant demographics or programmatic interventions that predicted nonadherence. Risk of bias assessment was performed at both study and outcome levels. The primary outcome was predictors of nonadherence. The secondary outcomes were relative risks (RR) of second round nonadherence based on identified predictors, which were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses. Across 13 included studies (total n = 15,790; range: 157-3642), the overall rate of nonadherence was 28% (95% CI: 20-37%). Studies identified greater nonadherence in participants younger than 60 or older than 74, with longer travel distances to screening centers, and having a low risk perception of lung cancer. Meta-analyses identified higher nonadherence in community-based compared to academic-based programs, but this did not reach significance (32% versus 27%; p = 0.32). Current smokers were more likely to be nonadherent compared to former smokers (RR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09-1.40; p < 0.01) while white participants were less likely nonadherent compared to non-white participants (RR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.81; p < 0.0001). No differences existed between male and female participants (RR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.85-1.15; p = 0.85). Programmatic interventions, including dedicated program coordinators, reminder calls/letters, and mobile LDCT scanners reduced nonadherence in lung cancer screening programs. These interventions should be targeted/tailored toward the subpopulations with the highest nonadherence rates.
Topics: Early Detection of Cancer; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Mass Screening; Smokers; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 32535225
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.05.013 -
Journal of Thoracic Disease Mar 2020Thoracotomy is a major cause of respiratory impairment, increasing the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Systems assessing ribcage kinematics may... (Review)
Review
Thoracotomy is a major cause of respiratory impairment, increasing the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Systems assessing ribcage kinematics may detect changes in chest expansion following thoracotomy and may thus aid in the development of patient-tailored chest physiotherapy. Hence, we aimed to identify studies assessing changes in chest wall movement following thoracotomy using objective measures. The Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched to find relevant articles providing an objective assessment of chest wall movement following thoracotomy. Methodological quality of included studies concerning chest wall movement following thoracotomy was assessed by use of QUADAS-2 tool. A total of 12 articles were included for the assessment of chest wall changes following thoracotomy using objective measures. Four studies measured changes in the cross-sectional area of the ribcage and abdomen using the respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP), 1 study computed the chest wall compliance by monitoring the intra-pleural pressure, 3 studies measured changes in chest circumference with a simple tape measure and 4 articles performed a compartmental analysis of the chest wall volume by means of an optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP). There was no delay in the collection of data of the index test and reference standard, resulting in a low risk of bias for the flow and timing domain. Across all studies, participants underwent the same reference standard, resulting in a low risk of verification bias. Several objective measures were able to detect changes in chest wall displacement following thoracotomy and differed in the practical use and invasive nature. OEP allows a compartmental analysis of the chest wall volume. Hence, this system allows to assess chest wall movement changes following thoracotomy and the impact of different types of surgical approach. Furthermore, it could aid in the development of tailored physiotherapy.
PubMed: 32274172
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.93