-
Global Heart 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of macitentan in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of macitentan in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH).
METHODS
A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of PH with macitentan, compared with placebo or blank, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to weighted mean differences (WMDs) and risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Six RCTs (enrolling 1,003 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Macitentan showed significant effects on 6-min walk distance (6MWD) (WMD 12.06 m, 95% CI 2.12 to 21.99 m), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (WMD -186.51 dyn·s/cm, 95% CI -232.72 to -140.29 dyn·s/cm), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) (WMD -3.20 mmHg, 95% CI -5.93 to -0.47 mmHg), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (WMD -232.47 ng/L, 95% wCI -318.22 to -146.72 ng/L), and cardiac index (WMD 0.39 L/min/m, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.58 L/min/m).
CONCLUSION
Macitentan significantly improved 6MWD, PVR, mPAP, NT-proBNP, and cardiac index in patients with PH. Macitentan should be further validated in patients with PH.
Topics: Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pyrimidines
PubMed: 37901601
DOI: 10.5334/gh.1274 -
European Respiratory Review : An... Mar 2020Schistosomiasis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (Sch-PAH) is a life-threatening complication of chronic hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. It is suggested to be... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Schistosomiasis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (Sch-PAH) is a life-threatening complication of chronic hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. It is suggested to be the leading cause of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) worldwide. However, pathophysiological data on Sch-PAH are scarce. We examined the hypothesis that there are pronounced similarities in pathophysiology, haemodynamics, and survival of Sch-PAH and idiopathic PAH (iPAH).This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO database (identifier CRD42018104066). A systematic search and review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines for studies published between 01 January 1990 and 29 June 2018.For Sch-PAH, 18 studies evaluating pathophysiological mechanisms, eight studies on haemodynamics (n=277), and three studies on survival (n=191) were identified. 16 clinical registries reporting data on haemodynamics and survival including a total of 5792 patients with iPAH were included for comparison. Proinflammatory molecular pathways are involved in both Sch-PAH and iPAH. The transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signalling pathway is upregulated in Sch-PAH and iPAH. While there was no difference in mean pulmonary artery pressure (54±17 mmHg 55±15 mmHg, p=0.29), cardiac output (4.4±1.3 L·min 4.1±1.4 L·min, p=0.046), and cardiac index (2.6±0.7 L·min·m 2.3±0.8 L·min·m, p<0.001) were significantly higher in Sch-PAH compared to iPAH, resulting in a lower pulmonary vascular resistance in Sch-PAH (10±6 Woods units 13±7 Woods units, p<0.001). 1- and 3-year survival were significantly better in the Sch-PAH group (p<0.001).Sch-PAH and iPAH share common pathophysiological mechanisms related to inflammation and the TGF-β signalling pathway. Patients with Sch-PAH show a significantly better haemodynamic profile and survival than patients with iPAH.
Topics: Animals; Arterial Pressure; Familial Primary Pulmonary Hypertension; Humans; Prognosis; Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension; Pulmonary Artery; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Schistosomiasis
PubMed: 32024722
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0089-2019 -
Heart & Lung : the Journal of Critical... 2020Aorto-cardiac fistulae are a rare but increasingly reported entity, and data are scarce. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Aorto-cardiac fistulae are a rare but increasingly reported entity, and data are scarce.
METHOD
The authors performed a systematic review of ACFs to characterize the underlying etiology, clinical presentation, and compare outcomes of treatment strategies.
RESULTS
3,733 publications were identified in the search. Of those, 292 studies including 300 patients were included. Etiology of ACFs was 38% iatrogenic, 25% infectious, 14% traumatic, and 15% due to other causes. Most patients (74%) presented with heart failure. Common locations were aortic-right atrium (37%), and aortic-pulmonary artery (25%). The majority of patients (71%) were treated surgically, while 13% were treated percutaneously, and 16% were treated conservatively. Patients who were managed conservatively had a higher mortality than those treated with invasive closure (53% vs. 12% vs. 3%, p = <0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review sheds light on this highly morbid condition. Once recognized, fistula closure appears to be superior to conservative management.
Topics: Aortic Diseases; Fistula; Heart Atria; Humans; Pulmonary Artery; Vascular Fistula
PubMed: 31735456
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.11.002 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular... Nov 2023The authors performed a systematic review to evaluate the effect of pharmacologic therapy on pulmonary hypertension in the perioperative setting of elective cardiac...
OBJECTIVE
The authors performed a systematic review to evaluate the effect of pharmacologic therapy on pulmonary hypertension in the perioperative setting of elective cardiac surgery (PROSPERO CRD42023321041).
DESIGN
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
SETTING
The authors searched biomedical databases for randomized controlled trials on the perioperative use of inodilators and pulmonary vasodilators in adult cardiac surgery, with in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome and duration of ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit, stage 3 acute kidney injury, cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical support, and change in mean pulmonary artery pressure as secondary outcomes.
PARTICIPANTS
Twenty-eight studies randomizing 1,879 patients were included.
INTERVENTIONS
Catecholamines and noncatecholamine inodilators, arterial pulmonary vasodilators, vasodilators, or their combination were considered eligible interventions compared with placebo or standard care.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Ten studies reported in-hospital mortality and assigned 855 patients to 12 interventions. Only inhaled prostacyclin use was supported by a statistically discernible improvement in mortality, with a number-needed-to-treat estimate of at least 3.3, but a wide credible interval (relative risk 1.26 × 10 - 0.7). Inhaled prostacyclin and nitric oxide were associated with a reduction in intensive care unit stay, and none of the included interventions reached a statistically evident difference compared to usual care or placebo in the other secondary clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Inhaled prostacyclin was the only pharmacologic intervention whose use is supported by a statistically discernible improvement in mortality in the perioperative cardiac surgery setting as treatment of pulmonary hypertension. However, available evidence has significant limitations, mainly the low number of events and imprecision.
PubMed: 37652847
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.07.041 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023Pulmonary hypertension due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) is classified as group 3 pulmonary hypertension. Inhaled... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pulmonary hypertension due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) is classified as group 3 pulmonary hypertension. Inhaled treprostinil, a prostaglandin I analogue also known as prostacyclin, has recently been approved as a first drug for patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to ILD. However, due to a lack of evidence, no therapies are currently approved for those with COPD-associated pulmonary hypertension. Thus, this systematic review aims to summarise the current evidence to assess the impact of inhaled prostaglandin I analogue use on the pulmonary hemodynamics, exercise function, lung function, and gas exchange in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to COPD.
METHODS
We systematically searched the electronic databases of Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane from inception to 1 February 2023. Studies of adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD-associated pulmonary hypertension who received inhaled drugs targeting the prostacyclin pathway were included in the systematic review. Case reports, systematic reviews, conference abstracts with no full text, non-full-text articles, non-English manuscripts and book chapters were excluded from this systematic review. A risk-of-bias assessment was carried out for the studies included in this review, using two different Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for randomised and non-randomised clinical trials.
RESULTS
A total of four studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. The results of one prospective clinical trial showed an improvement in the pulmonary hemodynamics (e.g., cardiac index, cardiac output and mean pulmonary artery pressure) in response to inhaled prostacyclin use in patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to COPD. However, the severity of dyspnoea, lung function, exercise capacity and gas exchange were not affected when inhaled prostacyclin was used for patients with COPD-related pulmonary hypertension.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review demonstrated that although inhaled prostacyclin does not seem to improve COPD-related outcomes (e.g., lung function and exercise capacity), short-term use of inhaled prostacyclin has the potential to reduce mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance without impairing ventilation-perfusion mismatch. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
CRD42022372803, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=372803.
PubMed: 37706024
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1217156 -
Pulmonary Circulation 2021Pregnancy is hazardous with pulmonary arterial hypertension, but maternal mortality may have fallen in recent years. We sought to systematically evaluate pulmonary... (Review)
Review
Pregnancy is hazardous with pulmonary arterial hypertension, but maternal mortality may have fallen in recent years. We sought to systematically evaluate pulmonary arterial hypertension and pregnancy-related outcomes in the last decade. We searched for articles describing outcomes in pregnancy cohorts published between 2008 and 2018. A total of 3658 titles were screened and 13 studies included for analysis. Pooled incidences and percentages of maternal and perinatal outcomes were calculated. Results showed that out of 272 pregnancies, 214 pregnancies advanced beyond 20 gestational weeks. The mean maternal age was 28 ± 2 years, mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure on echocardiogram was 76 ± 19 mmHg. Etiologies include idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (22%), congenital heart disease (64%), and others (15%). Majority (74%) had good functional class I/II. Only 48% of women received pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific therapy. Premature deliveries occur in 58% of pregnancies at mean of 34 ± 1 weeks, most (76%) had Cesarean section. Maternal mortality rate was 12% overall ( = 26); even higher for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension etiology alone (20%). Reported causes of death included right heart failure, cardiac arrest, pulmonary arterial hypertension crises, pre-eclampsia, and sepsis; 61% of maternal deaths occur at 0-4 days postpartum. Stillbirth rate was 3% and neonatal mortality rate was 1%. In conclusion, pulmonary arterial hypertension in pregnancy continues to be perilous with high maternal mortality rate. Continued prospective studies are needed.
PubMed: 34104423
DOI: 10.1177/20458940211013671 -
Journal of Cardiovascular Development... Dec 2023Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-associated pulmonary hypertension (PH-COPD) results in a significant impact on symptoms, quality of life, and survival. There is... (Review)
Review
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-associated pulmonary hypertension (PH-COPD) results in a significant impact on symptoms, quality of life, and survival. There is scant and conflicting evidence about the use of pulmonary hypertension (PH) specific therapy in patients with PH-COPD. PubMed, OVID, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using various MESH terms to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies investigating PH-specific therapies in patients with severe PH-COPD, defined by mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of more than 35 mm Hg or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of more than 5 woods units on right heart catheterization. The primary outcome was a change in mPAP and PVR. Secondary outcomes were changes in six-minute walk distance (6MWD), changes in the brain-natriuretic peptide (BNP), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, oxygenation, and survival. Thirteen studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, including a total of 328 patients with severe PH-COPD. Out of these, 308 patients received some type of specific therapy for PH. There was a significant reduction in mPAP (mean difference (MD) -3.68, 95% CI [-2.03, -5.32], < 0.0001) and PVR (MD -1.40 Wood units, 95% CI [-1.97, -0.82], < 0.00001). There was a significant increase in the cardiac index as well (MD 0.26 L/min/m, 95% CI [0.14, 0.39], < 0.0001). There were fewer patients who had NYHA class III/lV symptoms, with an odds ratio of 0.55 (95% CI [0.30, 1.01], = 0.05). There was no significant difference in the 6MWD (12.62 m, 95% CI [-8.55, 33.79], = 0.24), PaO (MD -2.20 mm Hg, 95% CI [-4.62, 0.22], = 0.08), or BNP or NT-proBNP therapy (MD -0.15, 95% CI [-0.46, 0.17], = 0.36). The use of PH-specific therapies in severe PH-COPD resulted in a significant reduction in mPAP and PVR and increased CI, with fewer patients remaining in NYHA functional class III/IV. However, no significant difference in the 6MWD, biomarkers of right ventricular dysfunction, or oxygenation was identified, demonstrating a lack of hypoxemia worsening with treatment. Further studies are needed to investigate the use of PH medications in patients with severe PH-COPD.
PubMed: 38132665
DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10120498 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Sep 2023Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease with a high morbidity and mortality. The treatment is based on the type of PH. Prognosis still remains poor despite... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease with a high morbidity and mortality. The treatment is based on the type of PH. Prognosis still remains poor despite the use of different medications. Pulmonary artery denervation (PADN) has been studied as a novel therapeutic option in these patients. PUBMED, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases were searched by 2 investigators until January 2023. Information was analyzed for the following outcomes: 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance and cardiac output. Subgroup analysis comparing pre and post PADN in different PH groups was done. Statistical analysis was performed with the Review Manager version 5.4. This meta- analysis included 6 controlled trials and 6 single-arm prospective studies with a total of 616 patients. Our pooled analysis showed a significant reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure [WMD -6.51, 95% CI (-9.87, -3.15), p = 0.0001], pulmonary vascular resistance [WMD -3.69, 95% CI (-6.74, -0.64), p = 0.02] and increased cardiac output [WMD -0.37, 95% CI (0.08, 0.65), p = 0.01]. Subgroup analysis pre and post PADN demonstrated a significant improvement in 6MWD in the WHO group 1 [WMD 99.53, 95% CI (19.60, 179.47), p = 0.01], group 2 [WMD: 69.96, 95% CI (36.40, 103.51), p = < 0.0001] and group 4 [WMD: 99.54, 95% CI (21.80, 177.28), p = 0.01]. This meta-analysis supports PADN as a therapeutic option for patients with PH, regardless of group class. Further randomized trials are still needed to evaluate safety and efficacy.
Topics: Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Pulmonary Artery; Prospective Studies; Denervation
PubMed: 37121454
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101776 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2020Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cause of death, accounting for 50,000 to 200,000 deaths annually. It is the third most common cause of mortality among the cardiovascular diseases, after coronary artery disease and stroke. The advent of multi-detector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has allowed better assessment of PE regarding visualisation of the peripheral pulmonary arteries, increasing its rate of diagnosis. More cases of peripheral PEs, such as isolated subsegmental PE (SSPE) and incidental PE, have thereby been identified. These two conditions are usually found in patients with few or none of the classic PE symptoms such as haemoptysis or pleuritic pain, acute dyspnoea or circulatory collapse. However, in patients with reduced cardiopulmonary reserve, classic PE symptoms can be found with isolated SSPEs. Incidental SSPE is found casually in asymptomatic patients, usually by diagnostic imaging performed for other reasons (for example routine CT for cancer staging in oncology patients). Traditionally, all PEs are anticoagulated in a similar manner independent of their location, or number and size of the thrombi. It has been suggested that many patients with SSPE may be treated without benefit, increasing adverse events by a possible unnecessary use of anticoagulants. Patients with isolated SSPE, or incidental PE, may have a more benign clinical presentation compared to those with proximal PEs. However, the clinical significance in patients, and their prognosis, needs to be studied to evaluate whether anticoagulation therapy is required. This is the second update of the Cochrane systematic review published in 2014.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and AMED databases and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 26 November 2019. We also undertook reference checking to identify additional studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with SSPE or incidental SSPE.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors inspected all citations identified to ensure reliable assessment. If relevant studies were identified, we planned for two review authors to independently extract data and to assess the methodological quality of identified trials using the criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
MAIN RESULTS
We did not identify any studies that met the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials to assess the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation therapy versus control in patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) or incidental SSPE. Well-conducted research is required before informed practice decisions can be made.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Dyspnea; Humans; Prognosis; Pulmonary Embolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 32030721
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010222.pub4 -
Annals of Intensive Care Apr 2020The echocardiography working group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine recognized the need to provide structured guidance for future CCE research... (Review)
Review
Systematic review and literature appraisal on methodology of conducting and reporting critical-care echocardiography studies: a report from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine PRICES expert panel.
BACKGROUND
The echocardiography working group of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine recognized the need to provide structured guidance for future CCE research methodology and reporting based on a systematic appraisal of the current literature. Here is reported this systematic appraisal.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review, registered on the Prospero database. A total of 43 items of common interest to all echocardiography studies were initially listed by the experts, and other "topic-specific" items were separated into five main categories of interest (left ventricular systolic function, LVSF n = 15, right ventricular function, RVF n = 18, left ventricular diastolic function, LVDF n = 15, fluid management, FM n = 7, and advanced echocardiography techniques, AET n = 17). We evaluated the percentage of items reported per study and the fraction of studies reporting a single item.
RESULTS
From January 2000 till December 2017 a total of 209 articles were included after systematic search and screening, 97 for LVSF, 48 for RVF, 51 for LVDF, 36 for FM and 24 for AET. Shock and ARDS were relatively common among LVSF articles (both around 15%) while ARDS comprised 25% of RVF articles. Transthoracic echocardiography was the main echocardiography mode, in 87% of the articles for AET topic, followed by 81% for FM, 78% for LVDF, 70% for LVSF and 63% for RVF. The percentage of items per study as well as the fraction of study reporting an item was low or very low, except for FM. As an illustration, the left ventricular size was only reported by 56% of studies in the LVSF topic, and half studies assessing RVF reported data on pulmonary artery systolic pressure.
CONCLUSION
This analysis confirmed sub-optimal reporting of several items listed by an expert panel. The analysis will help the experts in the development of guidelines for CCE study design and reporting.
PubMed: 32335780
DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00662-y