-
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and... Jan 2021Our objective was to assess and rank different pharmacological interventions for relieving endometriosis-related pain. We conducted an online bibliographic search in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Our objective was to assess and rank different pharmacological interventions for relieving endometriosis-related pain. We conducted an online bibliographic search in different databases from their inception until March 2019. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed different medical therapies in the management of endometriosis-related pain. We applied this network meta-analysis (NMA) based on the frequentist approach using statistical package "netmeta" (version 1.0-1) in R software. Our main outcomes were the change in severity of pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea score, non-menstrual pelvic pain score, and dyspareunia score. Overall, 36 RCTs were included in this study (patients no. = 7942). Dienogest (0.94), combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) (0.782), and elagolix (0.38) were the highest-ranked interventions for reducing the severity of pelvic pain at three months, while at six months, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (0.75), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) (0.73), and dienogest (0.65) were linked to more reduction in pelvic pain. The ranking p-score showed that GnRH analogues was the highest-ranked treatment for reducing dysmenorrhea at 3 months (1.00), while CHCs were the highest-ranked treatment at 6 months (0.97), followed by GnRH analogues (0.89). GnRH analogues (0.63) and elagolix (0.54) at three months while desogestrel (0.94) and CHCs (0.91) at six months were the highest-ranked treatment to reduce non-menstrual pelvic pain. GnRH analogues and elagolix were the highest-ranked pharmacologic therapies for reducing dyspareunia. In conclusion, CHCs, GnRH analogues, progesterone, and elagolix were the best approaches in reducing the pain of endometriosis.
Topics: Contraceptive Agents, Hormonal; Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal; Dysmenorrhea; Endometriosis; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated; Levonorgestrel; Nandrolone; Network Meta-Analysis; Pelvic Pain; Pyrimidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Visual Analog Scale
PubMed: 32479894
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101798 -
European Review For Medical and... Sep 2022Multi-agent regimens such as Folfirinox and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel have shown significant improvements compared with single-agent gemcitabine as neoadjuvant... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant Folfirinox and Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
Multi-agent regimens such as Folfirinox and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel have shown significant improvements compared with single-agent gemcitabine as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of Folfirinox and GNP as NAC for BRPC and LAPC is still controversial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The eligible studies including prospective, retrospective, and randomized controlled trial related to Folfirinox and GNP as NAC for patients with BRPC or LAPC up to March 2022 were searched and assessed. Pooled analysis for chemotherapy response rate, resection rate, R0 resection rate, progress free survival, overall survival, and grade 3/4 events of toxicity were performed in the study.
RESULTS
Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with GNP, Folfirinox had higher resection rate (HR=0.82; 95% CI 0.59-1.14) and R0 resection rate (HR=0.77; 95% CI 0.60-0.97), better PFS (HR=0.78; 95% CI 0.55-1.12) and OS (HR=0.68; 95% CI 0.46-0.99), and without increasing severe toxicity rate (HR=0.95; 95% CI 0.71-1.28). There are no differences in rate of stable disease (HR=1.06; 95% CI 0.92-1.22) and partial/complete regression (HR=0.85; 95% CI 0.59-1.23) between two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Higher resection and R0 resection rate and better PFS and OS results were obtained in Folfirinox group compared with GNP group for patients with BRPC and LAPC. There was no increased severe toxicity rate for Folfirinox compared with GNP.
Topics: Albumins; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Deoxycytidine; Fluorouracil; Humans; Irinotecan; Leucovorin; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Oxaliplatin; Paclitaxel; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 36111933
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202209_29656 -
Journal of Medical Virology Feb 2021Treatment options for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are limited with no clarity on efficacy and safety profiles. We performed a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Treatment options for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are limited with no clarity on efficacy and safety profiles. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on patients ≥18 years reporting data on therapeutic interventions in SARS-CoV-2. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were rates of mechanical ventilation, viral clearance, adverse events, discharge, and progression to severe disease. Pooled rates and odds ratios (OR) were calculated. Twenty-nine studies with 5207 patients were included. Pooled all-cause mortality in intervention arm was 12.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1%-17.4%). Mortality was significantly higher for studies using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for intervention (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.97-1.89). Adverse events were also higher in HCQ subgroup (OR: 3.88; 95% CI: 1.60-9.45). There was no difference in other secondary outcomes. There is a need for well-designed randomized clinical trials for further investigation of every therapeutic intervention for further insight into different therapeutic options.
Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Alanine; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antiviral Agents; COVID-19; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Immunization, Passive; Lopinavir; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Ritonavir; SARS-CoV-2; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; COVID-19 Serotherapy
PubMed: 32667699
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26302 -
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Dec 2024Brivudine has been used in herpes zoster (HZ) treatment for years, but the safety and efficacy of brivudine are inconclusive. Here we perform a meta-analysis to assess... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Brivudine has been used in herpes zoster (HZ) treatment for years, but the safety and efficacy of brivudine are inconclusive. Here we perform a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy, safety, incidence of postherpetic neuralgia of brivudine.
METHODS
Data of randomized controlled Trials (RCTS) were obtained from the databases of both English (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science Journal Database, and WanFang Database) literatures from inception to 12 September 2022. Meta-analyses of efficacy and safety of Brivudine for the treatment of herpes zoster for RCTS were conducted.
RESULTS
The analyses included seven RCTS (2095 patients in experimental group and 2076 patients in control group) in the treatment of HZ with brivudine. It suggested that the brivudine group was superior to the control group in terms of efficacy ( = .0002) and incidence of postherpetic neuralgia ( = .04). But the incidence of adverse reactions has no significant difference between the brivudine and the control groups ( = .22). In addition, subgroup analysis of adverse events also showed that brivudine was about the same safety as other modalities in the treatment of HZ ( > .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Brivudine is effective for HZ. However, the evidence on the safety of brivudine is insufficient.
Topics: Humans; Herpes Zoster; Neuralgia, Postherpetic; Antiviral Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Incidence; Bromodeoxyuridine
PubMed: 38811010
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2355256 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Jul 2020Gemcitabine combined the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine (GemCap) is an active antitumor therapy in the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, and has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Gemcitabine combined the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine (GemCap) is an active antitumor therapy in the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, and has been shown potential synergistic activity in previous clinical trials. In this study, we sought to systematically review and synthesize the efficacy and safety of GemCap in the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed through PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up to Jul 10, 2019 to identify clinical trials that included advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated with GemCap. Data of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year survival rate, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events were extracted and meta-analyzed.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies were identified for systematic review, of which 13 were included in the metaanalysis. In comparison with Gem monotherapy, the pooled hazard ratios (HR) of GemCap treatment for OS and PFS were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75-0.95, P=0.007) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72-1.04, P=0.0002). The pooled 1-year survival rate, ORR and DCR of GemCap were, respectively, 33.1% (95% CI: 28.7-37.5), 22.9% (95% CI: 17.6-28.3) and 65.7% (95% CI: 56.7-74.8). GemCap combination therapy showed significantly higher ORR (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.34-2.67, P=0.0003) and DCR (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05- 1.88, P=0.02) compared to Gem monotherapy. The most common grade ≥3 hematological toxicities in patients treated with GemCap combination therapy were neutropenia (19.7%), leucocytopenia (7.9%) and anemia (4.9%). The most common grade ≥3 non-hematological toxicities were hand-foot syndrome (6.3%), fatigue (5.7%) and nausea (4.8%).
CONCLUSIONS
GemCap combination therapy had an encouraging activity and might be a better treatment strategy compared with Gem alone in the first-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Capecitabine; Deoxycytidine; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 32576005
DOI: 10.21037/apm-20-45 -
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine... Jul 2024We aimed to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of mavacamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
We aimed to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of mavacamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, and efficacy [changes in postexercise left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), peak oxygen consumption (pVO 2 ), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ CSS), and the proportion of patients exhibiting an improvement of at least one New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class from baseline)], safety (total count of treatment-emergent adverse events and SAEs, as well as the proportion of patients experiencing at least one adverse event or SAE), and cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP and cTnI) outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS
We incorporated data from four randomized controlled trials, namely EXPLORER-HCM, VALOR-HCM, MAVERICK-HCM, and EXPLORER-CN. Mavacamten demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing the postexercise LVOT gradient by 49.44 mmHg ( P = 0.0001) and LVEF by 3.84 ( P < 0.0001) and improving pVO 2 by 0.69 ml/kg/min ( P = 0.4547), KCCQ CSS by 8.11 points ( P < 0.0001), and patients with at least one NYHA functional class improvement from baseline by 2.20 times ( P < 0.0001). Importantly, mavacamten increased 1.11-fold adverse events ( P = 0.0184) 4.24-fold reduced LVEF to less than 50% ( P = 0.0233) and 1.06-fold SAEs ( P = 0.8631). Additionally, mavacamten decreased NT-proBNP by 528.62 ng/l ( P < 0.0001) and cTnI by 8.28 ng/l ( P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
Mavacamten demonstrates both safety and efficacy in patients with HCM, suggesting its potential as a promising therapeutic strategy for this condition. Further research is warranted to confirm these results and explore its long-term effects.
Topics: Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ventricular Function, Left; Stroke Volume; Middle Aged; Male; Female; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Pyrimidines; Exercise Tolerance; Biomarkers; Adult; Recovery of Function; Oxygen Consumption; Aged; Benzylamines; Uracil
PubMed: 38814051
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001638 -
Theranostics 2021Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide and poses a threat to humanity. However, no specific therapy has been established for this disease yet. We...
Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of , , and clinical trials.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide and poses a threat to humanity. However, no specific therapy has been established for this disease yet. We conducted a systematic review to highlight therapeutic agents that might be effective in treating COVID-19. We searched Medline, Medrxiv.org, and reference lists of relevant publications to identify articles of , , and clinical studies on treatments for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and COVID-19 published in English until the last update on October 11, 2020. We included 36 studies on SARS, 30 studies on MERS, and 10 meta-analyses on SARS and MERS in this study. Through 12,200 title and 830 full-text screenings for COVID-19, eight studies, 46 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 6,886 patients, and 29 meta-analyses were obtained and investigated. There was no therapeutic agent that consistently resulted in positive outcomes across SARS, MERS, and COVID-19. Remdesivir showed a therapeutic effect for COVID-19 in two RCTs involving the largest number of total participants (n = 1,461). Other therapies that showed an effect in at least two RCTs for COVID-19 were sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (n = 114), colchicine (n = 140), IFN-β1b (n = 193), and convalescent plasma therapy (n = 126). This review provides information to help establish treatment and research directions for COVID-19 based on currently available evidence. Further RCTs are required.
Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Alanine; Animals; Antiviral Agents; COVID-19; Carbamates; Coronavirus Infections; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Combinations; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Imidazoles; Immunization, Passive; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Valine; COVID-19 Serotherapy
PubMed: 33391531
DOI: 10.7150/thno.48342 -
The Pan African Medical Journal 2024Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is commonly complicated by anemia. Treating dialysis-dependent patients with anemia, including daprodustat and other inhibitors of prolyl... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study Review
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is commonly complicated by anemia. Treating dialysis-dependent patients with anemia, including daprodustat and other inhibitors of prolyl hydroxylase of hypoxia-inducible factor, recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), and iron supplements. We conducted this study to test our postulation; daprodustat is superior to rhEPO and other conventional treatments respecting efficacy and safety parameters. We made systematic search through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane. Seven unique trials were eventually included for systematic review; six of them with a sample size of 759 patients entered our network meta-analysis (NMA). Daprodustat 25-30 mg was associated with the greatest change in serum hemoglobin (MD=1.86, 95%CI= [1.20; 2.52]), ferritin (MD= -180.84, 95%CI= [-264.47; -97.20]), and total iron binding capacity (TIBC) (MD=11.03, 95%CI= [3.15; 18.92]) from baseline values. Dialysis-dependent patients with anemia had a significant increment in serum Hemoglobin and TIBC and a reduction in serum ferritin, in a dose-dependent manner, when administered daprodustat.
Topics: Humans; Anemia; Renal Dialysis; Hemoglobins; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Glycine; Ferritins; Barbiturates; Network Meta-Analysis; Erythropoietin; Recombinant Proteins; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Iron
PubMed: 38828426
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.114.37278 -
Endocrine Practice : Official Journal... Jul 2024Resmetirom, a liver-directed, thyroid hormone receptor beta-selective agonist, has recently been approved to treat nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Resmetirom, a liver-directed, thyroid hormone receptor beta-selective agonist, has recently been approved to treat nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the efficiency and safety of resmetirom in treating NASH.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of resmetirom vs placebo in patients with NASH. The primary outcomes were the changes from baseline in hepatic fat content, liver histology, including NASH resolution, and noninvasive markers of hepatic fibrosis.
RESULTS
Three randomized controlled trials (n = 2231) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to placebo, resmetirom achieved greater reductions from baseline in hepatic fat content assessed by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (for resmetirom 80 mg: MD -27.76% [95%CI: -32.84, -22.69]; for resmetirom 100 mg: MD -36.01% [95%CI: -41.54, -30.48]; P < .00001 for both) and FibroScan controlled attenuation parameter (for resmetirom 80 mg: MD -21.45 dBm [95%CI: -29.37, -13.52]; for resmetirom 100 mg: MD -25.51 dBm [95%CI: -33.53, -17.49]; P < .00001 for both). Resmetirom 80 mg outperformed placebo in NASH resolution and ≥2-point nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score reduction. Moreover, resmetirom 80 mg and 100 mg were superior to placebo in cytokeratin-18 (M30) reduction. Greater reductions in liver enzymes, lipids, and reverse triiodothyronine were observed in the resmetirom arms with no impact on triiodothyronine. Nausea and diarrhea were more common with resmetirom than with placebo; other adverse events were comparable.
CONCLUSION
Resmetirom improves hepatic fat content, liver enzymes, and fibrosis biomarkers in NASH patients. Resmetirom generally does not affect thyroid function and is well-tolerated.
Topics: Humans; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Thyroid Hormone Receptors beta; Liver; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pyridazines; Uracil
PubMed: 38697306
DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.04.016 -
Gynecologic Oncology Dec 2019More than 80 % of women with advanced ovarian cancer relapse either during or after adjuvant therapy. Platinum-sensitive women are rechallenged with a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
More than 80 % of women with advanced ovarian cancer relapse either during or after adjuvant therapy. Platinum-sensitive women are rechallenged with a platinum-combination therapy and platinum-resistant women are challenged with non-platinum drugs. Gemcitabine is one of many treatments that can be used both as single-agent or as combination therapy for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.
METHODS
We included all randomised controlled trials investigating patients treated with gemcitabine for recurrent ovarian cancer and reporting data on overall survival, progression-free survival and toxicity. CENTRAL, EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched on the 31 of May 2019.
RESULTS
We included six randomised controlled trials that evaluated gemcitabine either alone or as combination therapy. Two studies compared gemcitabine to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in women with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. Difference in overall and progression-free survival was non-significant. Gemcitabine treatment was associated with significantly more neutropenia, whereas pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was associated with significantly more hand-foot syndrome. One study evaluated carboplatin and gemcitabine to carboplatin. Difference in overall survival was non-significant, but progression-free survival was longer with gemcitabine and carboplatin (HR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.9). One study evaluated gemcitabine with gemcitabine and pertuzumab. Overall survival and progression-free survival was similar between the two arms. One study compared gemcitabine and carboplatin to gemcitabine, carboplatin and bevacizumab. Overall survival was similar in the two arms. Progression-free survival was significantly better in the bevacizumab arm (HR 0.48 95% CI 0.39-0.61). One study compared etoposide and gemcitabine to etoposide. The study showed similar overall survival and progression-free survival.
DISCUSSION
The results show that gemcitabine is an active and safe agent in the treatment of both platinum-sensitive and resistant recurrent ovarian cancer but might highlight the need of new randomised studies in heavily pre-treated patients.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Deoxycytidine; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ovarian Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 31604664
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.09.026