-
Journal of Neuro-oncology Oct 2023Pachymeningeal disease (PMD) is a newly recognized pattern of brain metastasis (BrM) failure that specifically occurs following surgery with adjuvant stereotactic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Pachymeningeal disease (PMD) is a newly recognized pattern of brain metastasis (BrM) failure that specifically occurs following surgery with adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and has unique prognostic implications relative to leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Here, we report its prevalence, prognostic implications, and associated risk factors.
METHODS
A literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on PUBMED and Cochrane from January 2000 to June 2023.
RESULTS
We identified 12 studies that included a total of 3992 BrM patients, 659 (16.5%) of whom developed meningeal disease (MD) following surgery plus adjuvant SRS, including either PMD or LMD. The mean prevalence of MD across studies was 20.9% (7.9-38.0%), with PMD accounting for 54.6% of this prevalence and LMD comprising the remaining 45.4%. Mean of the median overall survivals following diagnosis of PMD and LMD was 10.6 months and 3.7 months p = 0.007, respectively, a significant difference. Only 2 risk factors for PMD were reported in ≥ 2 studies and also identified as statistically significant per our meta-analysis: infratentorial location and controlled systemic disease status.
CONCLUSION
While PMD has a superior prognosis to LMD, it is nevertheless a critical oncologic event associated with significant mortality and remains poorly recognized. PMD is predominantly observed in patients with controlled systemic disease status and infratentorial location. Future treatment strategies should focus on reducing surgical seeding and sterilizing surgical cavities.
Topics: Humans; Meningeal Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37815737
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04476-3 -
World Neurosurgery Aug 2022The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of recurrent and residual intracranial primary melanocytomas (PMC) remains unclear. The aim of this study... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of recurrent and residual intracranial primary melanocytomas (PMC) remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SRS in the management of these rare tumors.
METHODS
One patient treated with SRS in our institution for an intracranial PMC was retrospectively identified. Additionally, a systematic review of English articles using MEDLINE was performed to identify studies reporting on treatment and tumor characteristics and patient outcomes following SRS-management of intracranial PMC.
RESULTS
Including our institution's patient, a total of 13 patients (11 male and 2 female) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The median age at SRS treatment was 49 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27). At a median follow-up of 24 (IQR 48) months, the aggregate local tumor-control rate was 76.9%. Progression occurred in 3 patients and was managed with repeat SRS (1 of 13) or salvage resection (2 of 13). One case of malignant transformation to melanoma leading to leptomeningeal dissemination and death was noted.
CONCLUSIONS
SRS appears to be a reasonable treatment option for recurrent and residual melanocytomas. A higher prescription dose might be reasonable in the treatment of intermediate grade or recurring PMC. Close longitudinal follow-up for recurrence or malignant transformation of melanocytomas after SRS is recommended.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Salvage Therapy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35552031
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.136 -
Neurosurgery Sep 2023Focused ultrasound (FUS-T) and stereotactic radiosurgery thalamotomy (SRS-T) targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus are effective incisionless surgeries for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Focused ultrasound (FUS-T) and stereotactic radiosurgery thalamotomy (SRS-T) targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus are effective incisionless surgeries for essential tremor (ET). However, their efficacy for tremor reduction and, importantly, adverse event incidence have not been directly compared.
OBJECTIVE
To present a comprehensive systematic review with network meta-analysis examining both efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of FUS-T vs SRS-T for treating medically refractory ET.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using the PubMed and Embase databases. We included all primary FUS-T/SRS-T studies with approximately 1-year follow-up, with unilateral Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale or Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor scores prethalamotomy/post-thalamotomy and/or AEs. The primary efficacy outcome was Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale A+B score reduction. AEs were reported as an estimated incidence.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies of 464 patients and 3 studies of 62 patients met inclusion criteria for FUS-T/SRS-T efficacy comparison, respectively. Network meta-analysis demonstrated similar tremor reduction between modalities (absolute tremor reduction: FUS-T: -11.6 (95% CI: -13.3, -9.9); SRS-T: -10.3 (95% CI: -14.2, -6.0). FUS-T had a greater 1-year adverse event rate, particularly imbalance and gait disturbances (10.5%) and sensory disturbances (8.3%). Contralateral hemiparesis (2.7%) often accompanied by speech impairment (2.4%) were most common after SRS-T. There was no correlation between efficacy and lesion volume.
CONCLUSION
Our systematic review found similar efficacy between FUS-T and SRS-T for ET, with trend toward higher efficacy yet greater adverse event incidence with FUS-T. Smaller lesion volumes could mitigate FUS-T off-target effects for greater safety.
Topics: Humans; Essential Tremor; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Radiosurgery; Thalamus; Treatment Outcome; Tremor; Ultrasonic Surgical Procedures; Network Meta-Analysis
PubMed: 37010324
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002462 -
Cancers Oct 2021To describe and evaluate outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GK) for the treatment of pituitary tumors over the past twenty years, a systematic review and... (Review)
Review
To describe and evaluate outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GK) for the treatment of pituitary tumors over the past twenty years, a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA statement was performed. Articles counting more than 30 patients were included. A weighted random effects models was used to calculate pooled outcome estimates. From 459 abstract reviews, 52 retrospective studies were included. Among them, 18 reported on non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA), 13 on growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas, six on adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting adenomas, four on prolactin hormone (PRL)-secreting adenomas, and 11 on craniopharyngiomas. Overall tumor control and five-year progression free survival (PFS) estimate after one GK procedure for NFPA was 93% (95% CI 89-97%) and 95% (95% CI 91-99%), respectively. In case of secreting pituitary adenomas, overall remission (cure without need for medication) estimates were 45% (95% CI 35-54%) for GH-secreting adenomas, 64% (95% CI 0.52-0.75%) for ACTH-secreting adenomas and 34% (95% CI: 19-48%) for PRL-secreting adenomas. The pooled analysis for overall tumor control and five-year PFS estimate after GK for craniopharyngioma was 74% (95% CI 67-81%) and 70% (95% CI: 64-76%), respectively. This meta-analysis confirms and quantifies safety and effectiveness of GK for pituitary tumors.
PubMed: 34638482
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194998 -
Neurosurgical Review Apr 2021Head and neck paragangliomas (HNPs) are rare, usually benign hyper vascularized neuroendocrine tumors that traditionally have been treated by surgery, with or without... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Head and neck paragangliomas (HNPs) are rare, usually benign hyper vascularized neuroendocrine tumors that traditionally have been treated by surgery, with or without endovascular embolization, or, more recently stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The aim of our study is to determine the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of SRS for treatment of HNPs. A systematic search of electronic databases was performed, and 37 articles reporting 11,174 patients (1144 tumors) with glomus jugulare (GJT: 993, 86.9%), glomus tympanicum (GTT: 94, 8.2%), carotid body tumors (CBTs: 28, 2.4%), and glomus vagale (GVT: 16, 1.4%) treated with SRS definitively or adjuvantly were included. The local control (LC) was estimated from the pooled analysis of the series, and its association with SRS technique as well as demographic and clinical factors was analyzed. The median age was 56 years (44-69 years). With a median clinical and radiological follow-up of 44 months (9-161 months), LC was 94.2%. Majority of the patients (61.0%) underwent Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKS), but there was no statistically significant difference in LC depending upon the SRS technique (p = 0.9). Spearmen's correlation showed that LC was strongly and negatively correlated with multiple parameters, which included female gender (r = - 0.4, p = 0.001), right-sided tumor (r = - 0.3, p = 0.03), primary SRS (r = - 0.5, p ≤ 0.001), and initial clinical presentation of hearing loss (r = - 0.4, p = 0.001). To achieve a LC ≥ 90%, a median marginal dose (Gy) of 15 (range, 12-30 Gy) was required. The results corroborate that SRS in HNPs is associated with good clinical and radiological outcome.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paraganglioma; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32318920
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01292-5 -
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience :... Dec 2022Gamma Knife® stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) is a non-invasive alternative to surgical resection for cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs), especially in eloquent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Gamma Knife® stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) is a non-invasive alternative to surgical resection for cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs), especially in eloquent locations.
METHODOLOGY
A retrospective review was performed on an Australian cohort of patients receiving GKSRS for CCMs at a single institution. All patients exhibited symptoms and/or radiological evidence of haemorrhage before therapy. The minimum follow-up was 1-year post-GKSRS. McNemar's test was used for differences in matched-pair outcomes pre- and post-GKSRS with an α = 0.05. A systematic review and meta-analysis was additionally performed to synthesise the current published evidence on the clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery in reducing haemorrhage risk in CCMs using a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model.
RESULTS
Thirty-five patients (39 cavernomas) underwent GKSRS. 87.2 % of patients had evidence of at least one haemorrhage before GKSRS and the remainder exhibited seizures. The median dose was 12.5 Gy in a single fraction (IQR 12-13). The median follow-up duration from GKSRS was 809 days (IQR 536-960). There was a significant reduction in matched annual bleed rate from pre-GKSRS (52.1 %) compared to after SRS (12.3 %) (p < 0.001) [OR = 0.07, 95 % 0.008-0.283] There was no statistically significant difference in seizure incidence pre- (30.7 %) versus post-GKSRS (17.9 %) (p = 0.13) [OR = 0.167, 95 %CI 0.004-1.37]. One patient (3 %) with a brainstem lesion experienced long-term treatment-related oedema with persistent ipsilateral weakness and tremors. On meta-analysis of 25 pooled studies, radiosurgery for the treatment of CCMs was associated with a statistically significantly relative risk (RR) reduction in haemorrhage events [random effects RR 0.12 (95 % CI 0.074-0.198), p < 0.001)], with most of the proportionate risk reduction occurring in the initial 2 years following SRS.
CONCLUSION
GKSRS significantly reduces the annual rate of haemorrhage for intracranial cavernomas in this cohort and on meta-analysis, particularly in the first 2 years following treatment. The overall risk of treatment-related morbidity is low.
Topics: Humans; Radiosurgery; Australia; Hemangioma, Cavernous, Central Nervous System; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Follow-Up Studies
PubMed: 36274300
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.10.015 -
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery May 2023Secondary trigeminal neuralgia is a facial pain in trigeminal nerve dermatome caused by an underlying disease, such as cerebellopontine angle tumours. Treatment options... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Secondary trigeminal neuralgia is a facial pain in trigeminal nerve dermatome caused by an underlying disease, such as cerebellopontine angle tumours. Treatment options to relieve the pains were surgical tumour resection and stereotactic radiosurgery of the tumour or trigeminal nerve. This study aims to review the efficacy of open surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery and recommend the treatment of choice for secondary trigeminal neuralgia due to cerebellopontine angle tumours.
METHOD
The inclusion criteria were studies covering patients with trigeminal neuralgia associated with cerebellopontine angle tumours that were treated with either open surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery and reported pain outcomes after treatment. Non-English articles or studies with a population of less than five were excluded. We systematically searched studies from PubMed, Ebscohost, and Cochrane Library from inception until December 20, 2021. Several works of literature from manual search were also added. Selected articles were appraised using a critical appraisal tool for prognostic studies.
RESULT
Included articles were 26 retrospective studies and one prospective study comprising 517 patients. Of 127 schwannomas, 226 epidermoids, 154 meningiomas, and ten other tumours, 320 cases received surgical tumour excision with or without MVD, 196 had tumour-targeted radiosurgery, and 22 underwent nerve-targeted radiosurgery. In surgical series, 92.2 % gained pain improvement, 2.8 % were unchanged, and 4.5 % had recurrence; none of the patients had worsened outcomes. In cases treated with tumour-targeted radiosurgery, the improvement rate was 79.1 %, unchanged at 14.3 %, recurrence at 26.5 %, and worse symptoms rate after the intervention was 6.6 %. Six patients with recurrent pain after tumour-targeted radiosurgery received secondary nerve-targeted radiosurgery with improved outcomes. Only one patient in our review underwent primary nerve-targeted radiosurgery, and the result was satisfactory. One study treated 15 patients with a single session of tumour-targeted and nerve-targeted radiosurgery, with an improvement rate of 93.3 % and a recurrence rate of 21.4 %.
CONCLUSION
Open surgery releasing the nerve root from compressive lesions is advocated to be the first-line treatment to gain satisfactory outcomes. Total removal surgery is recommended if possible. Nerve-targeted radiosurgery should be reserved as a secondary treatment for recurrent cases.
Topics: Humans; Trigeminal Neuralgia; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Facial Pain; Meningeal Neoplasms
PubMed: 37001475
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107683 -
European Journal of Dentistry May 2022Cyberknife radiosurgery is a frameless stereotactic robotic radiosurgery which has shown to deliver better treatment outcomes in the treatment of advanced head and neck...
Cyberknife radiosurgery is a frameless stereotactic robotic radiosurgery which has shown to deliver better treatment outcomes in the treatment of advanced head and neck (H&N) carcinomas, especially in previously irradiated and recurrent cases. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review of the available data on the outcomes of Cyberknife radiosurgery for treatment of head and neck cancer and to evaluate its collective outcomes. This systematic review was registered with the university with the registration no. FRP/2019/63 and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (RC/IRB/2019/132). Literature search was performed in the following: PubMed, Science direct, SciELO, MyScienceWork, Microsoft Academ EMBASE, Directory of Open Access Journals, and Cochrane databases with the keywords "Cyberknife," "oral cancer," "oropharyngeal cancer," and "head and neck cancer" and data was extracted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The records identified were 147 manuscripts. Excluded articles included 5 duplicate articles, 33 abstracts, 101 full text articles due to being off-topic, case reports, review, non-English, 1 survey, and 2 other articles containing data extracted from a main study which was already included. A total of 5 articles were evaluated for qualitative synthesis. The mean dose of Cyberknife radiosurgery delivered for previously irradiated recurrent H&N carcinoma patients was 34.57 Gy, with a mean sample size of 5 studied during the period of 2000 to 2016. The available evidence from the systematic review indicates that Cyberknife can be an efficacious treatment option for recurrent previously irradiated H&N carcinoma, especially for nonresectable tumors. There is paucity of homogenous data and studies in this arena; hence, meta-analysis could not be performed. Further standardized studies are essential, especially where the treatment of H&N carcinoma is considered.
PubMed: 34891184
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736330 -
Neurosurgery Jun 2023Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the main treatment options in the management of small to medium size vestibular schwannomas (VSs), because of high tumor... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the main treatment options in the management of small to medium size vestibular schwannomas (VSs), because of high tumor control rate and low cranial nerves morbidity. Series reporting long-term hearing outcome (>3 years) are scarce.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, with the aim of focusing on long-term hearing preservation after SRS.
METHODS
Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we reviewed articles published between January 1990 and October 2020 and referenced in PubMed or Embase. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical study or case series of VSs treated with SRS (single dose), reporting hearing outcome after SRS with a median or mean audiometric follow-up of at least 5 years. Hearing preservation, cranial nerves outcomes, and tumor control were evaluated.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies were included. Hearing preservation was found in 59.4% of cases (median follow-up 6.7 years, 1409 patients). Main favorable prognostic factors were young age, good hearing status, early treatment after diagnosis, small tumor volume, low marginal irradiation dose, and maximal dose to the cochlea. Tumor control was achieved in 96.1%. Facial nerve deficit and trigeminal neuropathy were found in 1.3% and 3.2% of patients, respectively, both significantly higher in Linear Accelerator series than Gamma Knife series ( P < .05).
CONCLUSION
Long-term hearing preservation remains one of the main issues after SRS, with a major impact on health-related quality of life. Our meta-analysis suggests that hearing preservation can be achieved in almost 60% of patients after a median follow-up of 6.7 years, irrespective of the technique.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Quality of Life; Hearing; Follow-Up Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36735500
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002354 -
Radiation Oncology (London, England) Jun 2023The risk of ototoxicity, characterized by hearing impairment, tinnitus, or middle ear inflammation, is elevated in both child and adult cancer survivors who have...
BACKGROUND
The risk of ototoxicity, characterized by hearing impairment, tinnitus, or middle ear inflammation, is elevated in both child and adult cancer survivors who have undergone head-neck or brain radiation, or a combination of the two. To provide optimal care for these cancer survivors and minimize subsequent complications, it is crucial to comprehend the relationship between radiotherapy and ototoxicity.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, was conducted from the inception of the knowledge base up until January 2023. The metafor-package was employed to compare ototoxicity rates in individuals receiving radiotherapy. Two independent assessors extracted data and analyzed targets using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Out of the 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the analysis, 25 were prospective RCTs. Subgroup analysis revealed that mean cochlear radiation dose, primary tumor location, radiotherapy modality, and patient age significantly influenced total hearing impairment. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was associated with less ototoxicity than 2D conventional radiotherapy (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.47-0.60; P = 0.73; I = 0%). Stereotactic radiotherapy appeared to be a superior option for hearing preservation compared to radiosurgery (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.00-2.07; P = 0.69; I = 0%). Children demonstrated a higher risk of hearing impairment than adults. More than 50% of patients with vestibular neuroadenoma experienced hearing impairment following radiation therapy. A strong association was observed between the average cochlear radiation dose and hearing impairment. Increased cochlear radiation doses may result in a heightened risk of hearing impairment.
CONCLUSION
Several risk factors for radiation-induced hearing impairment were identified in this study. High cochlear radiation doses were found to exacerbate the risk of hearing impairment resulting from radiation therapy.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Hearing; Hearing Loss; Ototoxicity; Radiosurgery; Radiotherapy; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
PubMed: 37270526
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02268-7