-
Journal of Neurology Apr 2020Rhabdomyolysis (RML) is an interdisciplinary condition due to muscle cell injury followed by the release of cell components into circulation. Etiology of RML has a broad...
BACKGROUND
Rhabdomyolysis (RML) is an interdisciplinary condition due to muscle cell injury followed by the release of cell components into circulation. Etiology of RML has a broad range; a serious complication is acute kidney injury (AKI). Despite its high relevance, there is no established formal definition for RML.
OBJECTIVES
A systematic review, focusing on RML definition, providing a recommendation for clinicians.
METHOD
Systematic literature research in PubMed and Embase (1968-07/2018).
RESULTS
The database research presented 8136 articles in PubMed and 2151 in Embase. After screening, 614 papers were retained for statistical analysis. A retrospective study was the most used design (44%). A definition of RML was stated in 231 studies (37.6%), including a precise creatine kinase level (CK) cut-off most frequently (67.1%). In 53/231 (22.9%) studies the CK cut-off was > 5 × upper limit of normal (ULN), and in 64/231 (27.7%) studies > 1000 IU/L. Further components of definitions were elevated CK without specific thresholds, and clinical symptoms. Exclusion criteria referring to the definition of RML were established in 113 studies, including myocardial, renal, cerebral and neuromuscular characteristics.
CONCLUSION
At present, we recommend a clinical syndrome of acute muscle weakness, myalgia, and muscle swelling combined with a CK cut-off value of > 1000 IU/L/ or CK > 5 × ULN for the standard definition of a mild RML. Additionally measured myoglobinuria and AKI indicate a severe type of RML. Exclusion criteria as well as the chronological sequence need to be considered for a conclusive RML definition.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Creatine Kinase; Humans; Muscle Weakness; Myalgia; Rhabdomyolysis; Syndrome
PubMed: 30617905
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09185-4 -
JTCVS Open Dec 2021A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the effects of miniaturized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) and conventional extracorporeal...
OBJECTIVE
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to compare the effects of miniaturized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) and conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) on morbidity and mortality rates after cardiac surgery.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Ovid, PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases. Randomized controlled trials from the year 2000 with n > 40 patients were considered. Key search terms included variations of "mini," "cardiopulmonary," "bypass," "extracorporeal," "perfusion," and "circuit." Studies were assessed for bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The primary outcomes were postoperative mortality and stroke. Secondary outcomes included arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, renal failure, blood loss, and a composite outcome comprised of mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction and renal failure. Duration of intensive care unit, and hospital stay was also recorded.
RESULTS
The 42 studies eligible for this study included a total of 2154 patients who underwent CECC and 2196 patients who underwent MECC. There were no significant differences in any preoperative or demographic characteristics. Compared with CECC, MECC did not reduce the incidence of mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and renal failure but did significantly decrease the composite of these outcomes (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.81; = .0002). MECC was also associated with reductions in arrhythmia (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.83; = .0003), blood loss (mean difference [MD], -96.37 mL; 95% CI, -152.70 to -40.05 mL; = .0008), hospital stay (MD, -0.70 days; 95% CI, -1.21 to -0.20 days; = .006), and intensive care unit stay (MD, -2.27 hours; 95% CI, -3.03 to -1.50 hours; < .001).
CONCLUSIONS
MECC demonstrates clinical benefits compared with CECC. Further studies are required to perform a cost-utility analysis and to assess the long-term outcomes of MECC. These should use standardized definitions of endpoints such as mortality and renal failure to reduce inconsistency in outcome reporting.
PubMed: 36004169
DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.037 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2022Cardiac surgery is performed worldwide. Most types of cardiac surgery are performed using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Cardiac surgery performed with CPB is associated... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cardiac surgery is performed worldwide. Most types of cardiac surgery are performed using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Cardiac surgery performed with CPB is associated with morbidities. CPB needs an extracorporeal circulation that replaces the heart and lungs, and performs circulation, ventilation, and oxygenation of the blood. The lower limit of mean blood pressure to maintain blood flow to vital organs increases in people with chronic hypertension. Because people undergoing cardiac surgery commonly have chronic hypertension, we hypothesised that maintaining a relatively high blood pressure improves desirable outcomes among the people undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of higher versus lower blood pressure targets during cardiac surgery with CPB.
SEARCH METHODS
We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search of databases was November 2021 and trials registries in January 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a higher blood pressure target (mean arterial pressure 65 mmHg or greater) with a lower blood pressure target (mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg) in adults undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Primary outcomes were 1. acute kidney injury, 2. cognitive deterioration, and 3. all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were 4. quality of life, 5. acute ischaemic stroke, 6. haemorrhagic stroke, 7. length of hospital stay, 8. renal replacement therapy, 9. delirium, 10. perioperative transfusion of blood products, and 11. perioperative myocardial infarction. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three RCTs with 737 people compared a higher blood pressure target with a lower blood pressure target during cardiac surgery with CPB. A high blood pressure target may result in little to no difference in acute kidney injury (risk ratio (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 2.08; I² = 72%; 2 studies, 487 participants; low-certainty evidence), cognitive deterioration (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.50; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 389 participants; low-certainty evidence), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.30 to 5.90; I² = 49%; 3 studies, 737 participants; low-certainty evidence). No study reported haemorrhagic stroke. Although a high blood pressure target may increase the length of hospital stay slightly, we found no differences between a higher and a lower blood pressure target for the other secondary outcomes. We also identified one ongoing RCT which is comparing a higher versus a lower blood pressure target among the people who undergo cardiac surgery with CPB.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
A high blood pressure target may result in little to no difference in patient outcomes including acute kidney injury and mortality. Given the wide CIs, further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of a higher blood pressure target among those who undergo cardiac surgery with CPB.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Acute Kidney Injury; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Hemorrhagic Stroke; Hypertension; Hypotension; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36448514
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013494.pub2 -
Porto Biomedical Journal 2022Although more commonly seen in adult population, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) can also be observed in pediatric patients. The etiopathogenesis of... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Although more commonly seen in adult population, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) can also be observed in pediatric patients. The etiopathogenesis of pediatric PRES is poorly understood, and the available evidence comes mostly from childhood cancer. Analysis of the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the different noncancer-related types can improve the understanding of pediatric PRES.
METHODS
Systematic review of characteristics and outcome of noncancer pediatric PRES. Primary sources of investigation were identified and selected through Pubmed and Scopus databases. The research was complemented by reference search in relevant publications. Study protocol was registered (Prospero CRD42020165798).
RESULTS
We identified 449 cases of noncancer pediatric PRES from 272 studies, median age 10 (newborn to 17 years), 49.9% girls. The 4 most common groups of conditions were renal 165 (36.7%), hematologic 84 (18.7%), autoimmune 64 (14.3%), and cardiovascular 28 (6.2%) disorders. The 4 most prevalent precipitants identified were hypertensive crisis 119 (26.5%), corticosteroids 56 (12.5%), immunosuppression drugs 44 (9.8%), and biologic drugs 14 (3.1%). Clinical presentations included seizures 100 (22.3%), headaches 22 (4.9%), encephalopathy 17 (3.8%), visual disturbances 6 (1.3%), and focal deficit 3 (0.7%). The distribution of lesions was (n = 380): combined anterior/posterior circulation (40.8%), isolated posterior circulation (24.1%), anterior circulation (6.2%), and deep structures (1.6%). Residual neurological deficits occurred in about 1 out 10 cases.
CONCLUSION
Pediatric PRES differs from the adult in etiology, precipitants, and clinical manifestations. Renal diseases predominate, acute raised blood pressure is less frequent, and cortical deficits are rarer. In addition, the proportion of patients with combined anterior/posterior circulation was higher. Permanent neurological sequels can occur.
PubMed: 35801219
DOI: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000147 -
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine... Jun 2023To evaluate the efficacy and safety of activating blood circulation and removing blood stasis in terms of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for managing renal fibrosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of activating blood circulation and removing blood stasis of Traditional Chinese Medicine for managing renal fibrosis in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of activating blood circulation and removing blood stasis in terms of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for managing renal fibrosis (RF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
METHODS
We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from eight databases.
RESULTS
Sixteen eligible studies with 1,356 participants were included in this study. Compared to treatment with Western Medicine (WM) alone, the combined treatment with activating blood circulation and removing blood stasis in terms of TCM (ARTCM) and WM to manage RF in patients with CKD significantly ameliorated type Ⅳ collagen (CⅣ) (: 2.17, 95% : 3.01 to 1.34), type Ⅲ procollagen (PCⅢ) (: 1.08, 95% : 1.64 to 0.53), laminin (LN) (: 1.28, 95% : 1.65 to 0.90), transforming growth factor β 1 (TGFβ1) (: 0.65, 95% : 1.18 to 0.12), serum creatinine (Scr) (: 1.36, 95% : 1.85 to 0.87), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (: 1.51, 95% : 2.59 to 0.43), and 24 h urine protein (24hUpro) (: 1.23; 95% : 1.96 to 0.50). The level of hyaluronic acid (HA) was similar in both types of treatment (: 0.74, 95% : 1.91 to 0.44). The subgroup analysis showed that the duration of 8 weeks might affect the concentration of C-Ⅳ, PC-Ⅲ, and LN (<0.05). The effectiveness of the longer duration to C-Ⅳ, PC-Ⅲ, and LN was not certain. However, the result should be interpreted in care. The safety of the treatment using ARTCM and WM could not be evaluated because a few studies had reported adverse effects. The results of the Metaanalysis were not stable enough. There was publication bias for the reports on Scr ( 0.001), C-Ⅳ ( 0.001), PC-Ⅲ ( 0.026), and LN ( 0.030) and no publication bias for the reports on BUN ( 0.293). The quality of evidence varied from low to very low.
CONCLUSIONS
The combined treatment using ARTCM and WM to manage RF in patients with CKD has some advantages over treatment with WM alone. Highquality RCTs need to be conducted for the strong support.
Topics: Humans; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Phytotherapy; Fibrosis
PubMed: 37147744
DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20230308.003 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Patients with a Fontan circulation are at risk for sequelae of Fontan physiology during follow-up. Fontan physiology affects all organ systems and an overview of...
INTRODUCTION
Patients with a Fontan circulation are at risk for sequelae of Fontan physiology during follow-up. Fontan physiology affects all organ systems and an overview of end-organ damage is needed.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of abnormalities in multiple organ systems for patients with a longstanding Fontan circulation. We searched online databases for articles describing abnormalities in multiple organ systems. Cardio-pulmonary abnormalities, protein losing enteropathy, and Fontan associated liver disease have already extensively been described and were excluded from this systematic review.
RESULTS
Our search returned 5,704 unique articles. After screening, we found 111 articles relating to multiple organ systems. We found abnormalities in, among others, the nervous system, pituitary, kidneys, and musculoskeletal system. Pituitary edema-relating to the unique pituitary vasculature- may affect the thyroid axis. Renal dysfunction is common. Creatinine based renal function estimates may be inappropriate due to myopenia. Both lean muscle mass and bone mineral density are decreased. These abnormalities in multiple organ systems may be related to Fontan physiology, cyanosis, iatrogenic factors, or lifestyle.
CONCLUSIONS
Health care providers should be vigilant for hypothyroidism, visual or hearing deficits, and sleep disordered breathing in Fontan patients. We recommend including cystatin C for assessment of renal function. This review may aid health care providers and guide future research. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021232461, PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021232461.
PubMed: 35391839
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.826096 -
Magma (New York, N.Y.) Feb 2020Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is a non-invasive method used to compute blood flow velocity and volume. This systematic review aims to discuss the...
OBJECTIVE
Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is a non-invasive method used to compute blood flow velocity and volume. This systematic review aims to discuss the current status of renal PC-MRI and provide practical recommendations which could inform future clinical studies and its adoption in clinical practice.
METHODOLOGY
A comprehensive search of all the PC-MRI studies in human healthy subjects or patients related to the kidneys was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 39 studies were included in which PC-MRI was used to measure renal blood flow (RBF) alongside other derivative hemodynamic parameters. PC-MRI generally showed good correlation with gold standard methods of RBF measurement, both in vitro and in vivo, and good reproducibility. Despite PC-MRI not being routinely used in clinical practice, there are several clinical studies showing its potential to support diagnosis and monitoring of renal diseases, in particular renovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.
DISCUSSION
Renal PC-MRI shows promise as a non-invasive technique to reliably measure RBF, both in healthy volunteers and in patients with renal disease. Future multicentric studies are needed to provide definitive normative ranges and to demonstrate the clinical potential of PC-MRI, likely as part of a multi-parametric renal MRI protocol.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Flow Velocity; Contrast Media; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Kidney; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Perfusion; Polycystic Kidney Diseases; Renal Artery Obstruction; Renal Circulation; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 31422518
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-019-00772-0 -
Journal of Clinical and Translational... Aug 2022Despite the advances in burn care, severe burns still impose significant morbidity and mortality. Severe burns are associated with an inflammatory response that ranges... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Despite the advances in burn care, severe burns still impose significant morbidity and mortality. Severe burns are associated with an inflammatory response that ranges from alterations in vital signs to shock, multiorgan failure, and death. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known for their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Therefore, MSCs were investigated for their potential benefits in modulating burn-induced inflammation and organ damage in several studies.
AIM
We have conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of MSCs in modulating burn-induced systemic inflammation and organ damage in animal models.
METHODS
Four databases were searched: PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis as our basis of organization.
RESULTS
Eight studies were included in the study. Bone marrow derived MSCs, umbilical cord derived MSCs (UC-MSCs), and UC-MSCs exosomes were used to modulate the burn-induced inflammation. MSCs therapy reduced serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, improved renal function, inhibited tissue damage, and improved survival after burn. Furthermore, MSCs reversed all the burn-induced pathological changes in blood brain barrier (BBB).
CONCLUSION
MSCs may attenuate the burn-induced inflammation by decreasing serum levels of inflammatory cytokines. However, the effect on anti-inflammatory cytokines is conflicting and mandates more substantial evidence. Furthermore, MSCs reduce tissue inflammation, tissue damage, and apoptosis in the lungs and kidneys. In addition, MSCs reversed the burn-induced pathophysiologic changes in the BBB. The underlying mechanisms of these effects are poorly understood and should be the focus of future stem cell research.
RELEVANCE TO PATIENTS
Severe burn patients are liable to systemic inflammation due to the release of inflammatory cytokines into the circulation. This inflammatory response has a broad spectrum of severity that ranges from alterations in vital signs to multiorgan failure and death. Despite the advances in burn care, burn-induced inflammation still imposes significant morbidity and mortality. This systematic review evaluates the potential benefits of stem cells in modulating burn-induced systemic inflammation in animal burn models.
PubMed: 35991083
DOI: No ID Found -
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic... Aug 2022Consensus regarding optimal cerebral protection strategy in aortic arch surgery is lacking. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Consensus regarding optimal cerebral protection strategy in aortic arch surgery is lacking. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess outcome differences between unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP), bilateral ACP, retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar for all papers published till February 2021 reporting on early clinical outcome after aortic arch surgery utilizing either unilateral, bilateral ACP, RCP or DHCA. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Other key secondary endpoints were occurrence of postoperative disabling stroke, paraplegia, renal and respiratory failure. Pooled outcome risks were estimated using random-effects models. A total of 222 studies were included with a total of 43 720 patients. Pooled postoperative mortality in unilateral ACP group was 6.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.3-8.1%], 9.1% (95% CI 7.9-10.4%), 7.8% (95% CI 5.6-10.7%), 9.2% (95% CI 6.7-12.7%) in bilateral ACP, RCP and DHCA groups, respectively. The incidence of postoperative disabling stroke was 4.8% (95% CI 3.8-6.1%) in the unilateral ACP group, 7.3% (95% CI 6.2-8.5%) in bilateral ACP, 6.4% (95% CI 4.4-9.1%) in RCP and 6.3% (95% CI 4.4-9.1%) in DHCA subgroups. The present meta-analysis summarizes the clinical outcomes of different cerebral protection techniques that have been used in clinical practice over the last decades. These outcomes may be used in advanced microsimulation model. These findings need to be placed in the context of the underlying aortic disease, the extent of the aortic disease and other comorbidities. Prospero registration number: CRD42021246372 METC: MEC-2019-0825.
Topics: Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Diseases; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Circulatory Arrest, Deep Hypothermia Induced; Humans; Perfusion; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35512204
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac128 -
Critical Care Medicine Jun 2021To investigate the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and to describe the characteristics...
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and to describe the characteristics and outcomes for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest within the ICU, compared with non-ICU patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. Finally, we evaluated outcomes stratified by age.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and preprint websites was conducted between January 1, 2020, and December 10, 2020. Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews identification: CRD42020203369.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies reporting on consecutive in-hospital cardiac arrest with a resuscitation attempt among patients with coronavirus disease 2019.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two authors independently performed study selection and data extraction. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus or through an independent third reviewer.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Eight studies reporting on 847 in-hospital cardiac arrest were included. In-hospital cardiac arrest incidence varied between 1.5% and 5.8% among hospitalized patients and 8.0-11.4% among patients in ICU. In-hospital cardiac arrest occurred more commonly in older male patients. Most initial rhythms were nonshockable (83.9%, [asystole = 36.4% and pulseless electrical activity = 47.6%]). Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in 33.3%, with a 91.7% in-hospital mortality. In-hospital cardiac arrest events in ICU had higher incidence of return of spontaneous circulation (36.6% vs 18.7%; p < 0.001) and relatively lower mortality (88.7% vs 98.1%; p < 0.001) compared with in-hospital cardiac arrest in non-ICU locations. Patients greater than or equal to 60 years old had significantly higher in-hospital mortality than those less than 60 years (93.1% vs 87.9%; p = 0.019).
CONCLUSIONS
Approximately, one in 20 patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 received resuscitation for an in-hospital cardiac arrest. Hospital survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest within the ICU was higher than non-ICU locations and seems comparable with prepandemic survival for nonshockable rhythms. Although the data provide guidance surrounding prognosis after in-hospital cardiac arrest, it should be interpreted cautiously given the paucity of information surrounding treatment limitations and resource constraints during the pandemic. Further research is into actual causative mechanisms is needed.
Topics: COVID-19; Cause of Death; Heart Arrest; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Incidence; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33710030
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004950