-
International Journal of Environmental... Apr 2021Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are the most common ligament injury of the knee, accounting for between 100,000 and 200,000 injuries among athletes per year.... (Review)
Review
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are the most common ligament injury of the knee, accounting for between 100,000 and 200,000 injuries among athletes per year. ACL injuries occur via contact and non-contact mechanisms, with the former being more common in males and the later being more common in females. These injuries typically require surgical repair and have relatively high re-rupture rates, resulting in a significant psychological burden for these individuals and long rehabilitation times. Numerous studies have attempted to determine risk factors for ACL rupture, including hormonal, biomechanical, and sport- and gender-specific factors. However, the incidence of ACL injuries continues to rise. Therefore, we performed a systematic review analyzing both ACL injury video analysis studies and studies on athletes who were pre-screened with eventual ACL injury. We investigated biomechanical mechanisms contributing to ACL injury and considered male and female differences. Factors such as hip angle and strength, knee movement, trunk stability, and ankle motion were considered to give a comprehensive, joint by joint analysis of injury risk and possible roles of prevention. Our review demonstrated that poor core stability, landing with heel strike, weak hip abduction strength, and increased knee valgus may contribute to increased ACL injury risk in young athletes.
Topics: Anterior Cruciate Ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Athletes; Biomechanical Phenomena; Female; Humans; Knee Joint; Male
PubMed: 33917488
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073826 -
Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review Jun 2021The optimal postoperative management of Achilles tendon (AT) rupture remains unknown. The past 2 decades have witnessed a trend toward less rigid immobilization, earlier...
The optimal postoperative management of Achilles tendon (AT) rupture remains unknown. The past 2 decades have witnessed a trend toward less rigid immobilization, earlier weightbearing, and accelerated functional rehabilitation postoperatively. The objective of this study was to identify all high-quality studies pertaining to rehabilitation after AT repair and characterize the various rehabilitation protocols that have been described. A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All included studies represented level 1, 2, or 3 evidence and examined postoperative rehabilitation protocols following the repair of an acute AT rupture. A total of 1187 subjects were included. Surgical technique, rehabilitation protocol, and outcome assessment varied widely between studies. Early postoperative weightbearing with less rigid immobilization appears to accelerate short-term functional recovery. An aggressive rehabilitation program may also be advantageous in the short term, but further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of these accelerated physical therapy and return-to-play protocols.
Topics: Achilles Tendon; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Postoperative Care; Recovery of Function; Rupture; Tendon Injuries
PubMed: 33972490
DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000309 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Aug 2022Distal biceps tendon rupture is a rare injury associated with decreased elbow flexion and forearm supination strength. This impairment is not tolerated by high-demand... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Distal biceps tendon rupture is a rare injury associated with decreased elbow flexion and forearm supination strength. This impairment is not tolerated by high-demand patients like athletes.
PURPOSE
To review treatment and rehabilitation applied to injured athletes and study their impact in return to sports.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus online databases were searched. A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines; studies published on distal biceps tendon rupture treatment and rehabilitation of athletes until June 30, 2021, were identified. A quantitative synthesis of factor related to return to preinjury sport activity was made.
RESULTS
Ten articles were identified, including 157 athletes. Mean age was 40.5 years, and the dominant arm was injured in 103 cases (66%). Rupture was acute in 121 athletes (77%), and the mean follow-up was 25.7 months. A hundred and fifty-three athletes (97.5%) successfully returned to sport within a mean time of 6.2 months. Surgical treatment was followed in all cases. One-incision technique was chosen in 115 (73%) and suture anchor fixation in 52 (33%) cases. No postsurgical immobilization was reported in 38 (24%) and immobilization for 2 weeks in 124 (79%) athletes. Decreased supination-pronation and flexion-extension arc was found in 63 (40%) and 27 (17%) cases, respectively. Earlier return to sport was associated with nondominant-side (P = .007) and acute (P < .001) injuries, participation in weightlifting (P = .001), double-incision approach (P = .005), cortical button fixation (P < .001), and absence of supination-pronation restriction (P = .032). Time of return to sport activity was independent of rehabilitation, including immobilization (P = .539) and strengthening (P = .155), and decreased flexion-extension arc (P = .059).
CONCLUSION
Athletes sustaining distal biceps tendon rupture have a high postoperative return to sport rate, independently of selected surgical technique or rehabilitation program. However, a relation between the surgical technique and time of return to sport was found. Rehabilitation did not influence time of return to sport.
Topics: Adult; Arm Injuries; Athletes; Elbow; Humans; Range of Motion, Articular; Rupture; Tendon Injuries; Tendons; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35367620
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.027 -
Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review Jun 2021Rotator cuff tears are the most common cause of shoulder disability and can cause significant pain and dysfunction. This systematic review summarizes the latest research...
Rotator cuff tears are the most common cause of shoulder disability and can cause significant pain and dysfunction. This systematic review summarizes the latest research on rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they pertained to postoperative rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were published between 2003 and 2019 with a level of evidence of 1 or 2. Two blinded reviewers screened, graded, and extracted data from articles and recommendations on various aspects of rehabilitation were summarized. A total of 4067 articles were retrieved from the database search and 22 studies were included for data extraction. We noted similar outcomes between early and delayed mobilization following surgery. Reviewed articles support the use of supervised physical therapy, bracing in 15 degrees external rotation, and adjunctive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain management. Early isometric loading improved outcomes in 1 study. Evidence is lacking for exercise prescription parameters and postoperative rehabilitation of the subscapularis.
Topics: Braces; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Pain Management; Physical Therapy Modalities; Postoperative Care; Rotator Cuff Injuries
PubMed: 33972488
DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000310 -
The Physician and Sportsmedicine Dec 2023Identifying risk factors for Achilles Tendon Rupture (ATR) is one of the first necessary steps for its prevention. This systematic review aimed to update the systematic... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Identifying risk factors for Achilles Tendon Rupture (ATR) is one of the first necessary steps for its prevention. This systematic review aimed to update the systematic review published in 2014 in ATR etiology.
METHODOLOGY
A systematic review was carried out using PubMed, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect databases. All types of research studies (Randomized Control Trials - RCTs, Cohort studies, Case-control studies and Cross-sectional studies) that considered ATR, were eligible. The inclusion criteria for eligibility of the studies were to be written in the English language, and to include populations of men and/or women, both athletes, and non-athletes, healthy individuals, and patients. Two independent reviewers used the assessment instrument Newcastle-Ottawa Scale independently, to evaluate the quality of each selected study. Further, two reviewers worked independently to extract the study characteristics, and the GRADE methodology was used to assess the level of certainty of each risk factor.
RESULTS
From 9526 studies initially identified, 19 studies were eligible for further analysis to identify risk factors for ATR. Seventeen studies were considered good quality, and two studies fair quality. Low to very low certainty of evidence was found for the following medications: steroids, quinolones, and oral bisphosphonate, as well as for other factors such as chronic tendon inflammation and Achilles' tendinopathy, spring season, diabetes, previous musculoskeletal injury, regular participation in athletic activity, hyperparathyroidism, renal failure, and genetic factors.
CONCLUSIONS
The risk factors found prove that ATR is a multifactorial injury. Appropriate methodologies and well-designed studies are needed to determine the factors and their significance in ATR risk. Finally, the role of biomechanical and psychological aspects in the ATR etiology may be of interest in future studies, as we could not extract relative data in our review.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Achilles Tendon; Cross-Sectional Studies; Tendon Injuries; Risk Factors; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Rupture
PubMed: 35670156
DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2085505 -
EFORT Open Reviews Oct 2022The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare re-rupture rates, complication rates, functional outcomes, as well as return to work (RTW)/sport (RTS)... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare re-rupture rates, complication rates, functional outcomes, as well as return to work (RTW)/sport (RTS) among different rehabilitation protocols following operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Five databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing at least two rehabilitation protocols following surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Rehabilitation protocols were classified as a variation of either non-weightbearing (NWB) or weightbearing (WB) and immobilization (IM) or mobilization (M). The data collection consisted of re-ruptures, complications, and RTW/RTS.
RESULTS
Out of 2760 studies screened, 20 RCTs with 1007 patients were eligible. Fourteen studies included a group consisting of WB + M (Group 1), 11 of WB + IM (Group 2), 3 of NWB + M (Group 3), and 13 of NWB + IM (Group 4). Outcome parameters available for a meta-analysis were re-ruptures, complications, RTW, and RTS. Re-ruptures overall occurred in 2.7%, with prevalences ranging between 0.04 and 0.08. Major complications occurred in 2.6%, with prevalences ranging between 0.02 and 0.03. Minor complications occurred in 11.8% with prevalances ranging between 0.04 to 0.17. Comparing the odds-ratios between the four different groups revealed no significant differences with overall favourable results for group 1 (WB+M).
CONCLUSION
Early functional rehabilitation protocols with early ankle M and WB following surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures are safe and they apparently allow for a quicker RTW and RTS and seem to lead to favourable results.
PubMed: 36287109
DOI: 10.1530/EOR-22-0072 -
Archives of Physical Medicine and... Jul 2020To perform a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and semantic analysis of specific clinical recommendations for the management of rotator cuff...
OBJECTIVES
To perform a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and semantic analysis of specific clinical recommendations for the management of rotator cuff disorders in adults.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic bibliographic search was conducted up until May 2018 in Medline, Embase, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database, or PEDro, databases, in addition to 12 clinical guidelines search engines listed on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) website.
STUDY SELECTION
Nine CPGs on the management of rotator cuff disorders in adults or workers, available in English or French, and published from January 2008 onward, were included and screened by 2 independent reviewers.
DATA EXTRACTION
CPG methodology was assessed with the AGREE II checklist. A semantic analysis was performed to compare the strength of similar recommendations based on their formulation. The recommendations were categorized in a standardized manner considering the following 4 levels: "essential," "recommended," "may be recommended," and "not recommended."
DATA SYNTHESIS
Methodological quality was considered high for 3 CPGs and low for 6. All CPGs recommended active treatment modalities, such as an exercise program in the management of rotator cuff disorders. Acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions and corticosteroid injections were presented as modalities that may be recommended to decrease pain. Recommendations related to medical imagery and surgical opinion varied among the guidelines. The most commonly recommended return-to-work strategies included intervening early, use of a multidisciplinary approach, and adaptation of work organization.
CONCLUSIONS
Only 3 CPGs were of high quality. The development of more rigorous CPGs is warranted.
Topics: Adult; Exercise Test; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Female; Humans; Injury Severity Score; Male; Pain Measurement; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prognosis; Range of Motion, Articular; Recovery of Function; Return to Work; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder Pain; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32007452
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.12.017 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2019This review is one in a series of Cochrane Reviews of interventions for shoulder disorders. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This review is one in a series of Cochrane Reviews of interventions for shoulder disorders.
OBJECTIVES
To synthesise the available evidence regarding the benefits and harms of rotator cuff repair with or without subacromial decompression in the treatment of rotator cuff tears of the shoulder.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICRTP registry unrestricted by date or language until 8 January 2019.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including adults with full-thickness rotator cuff tears and assessing the effect of rotator cuff repair compared to placebo, no treatment, or any other treatment were included. As there were no trials comparing surgery with placebo, the primary comparison was rotator cuff repair with or without subacromial decompression versus non-operative treatment (exercises with or without glucocorticoid injection). Other comparisons were rotator cuff repair and acromioplasty versus rotator cuff repair alone, and rotator cuff repair and subacromial decompression versus subacromial decompression alone. Major outcomes were mean pain, shoulder function, quality of life, participant-rated global assessment of treatment success, adverse events and serious adverse events. The primary endpoint for this review was one year.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodologic procedures expected by Cochrane.
MAIN RESULTS
We included nine trials with 1007 participants. Three trials compared rotator cuff repair with subacromial decompression followed by exercises with exercise alone. These trials included 339 participants with full-thickness rotator cuff tears diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound examination. One of the three trials also provided up to three glucocorticoid injections in the exercise group. All surgery groups received tendon repair with subacromial decompression and the postoperative exercises were similar to the exercises provided for the non-operative groups. Five trials (526 participants) compared repair with acromioplasty versus repair alone; and one trial (142 participants) compared repair with subacromial decompression versus subacromial decompression alone. The mean age of trial participants ranged between 56 and 68 years, and females comprised 29% to 56% of the participants. Symptom duration varied from a mean of 10 months up to 28 months. Two trials excluded tears with traumatic onset of symptoms. One trial defined a minimum duration of symptoms of six months and required a trial of conservative therapy before inclusion. The trials included mainly repairable full-thickness supraspinatus tears, six trials specifically excluded tears involving the subscapularis tendon. All trials were at risk of bias for several criteria, most notably due to lack of participant and personnel blinding, but also for other reasons such as unclearly reported methods of random sequence generation or allocation concealment (six trials), incomplete outcome data (three trials), selective reporting (six trials), and other biases (six trials). Our main comparison was subacromial decompression versus non-operative treatment and results are reported for the 12 month follow up. At one year, moderate-certainty evidence (downgraded for bias) from 3 trials with 258 participants indicates that surgery probably provides little or no improvement in pain; mean pain (range 0 to 10, higher scores indicate more pain) was 1.6 points with non-operative treatment and 0.87 points better (0.43 better to 1.30 better) with surgery.. Mean function (zero to 100, higher score indicating better outcome) was 72 points with non-operative treatment and 6 points better (2.43 better to 9.54 better) with surgery (3 trials; 269 participants), low-certainty evidence (downgraded for bias and imprecision). Participant-rated global success rate was 873/1000 after non-operative treatment and 943/1000 after surgery corresponding to (risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.22; low-certainty evidence (downgraded for bias and imprecision). Health-related quality of life was 57.5 points (SF-36 mental component score, 0 to 100, higher score indicating better quality of life) with non-operative treatment and 1.3 points worse (4.5 worse to 1.9 better) with surgery (1 trial; 103 participants), low-certainty evidence (downgraded for bias and imprecision). We were unable to estimate the risk of adverse events and serious adverse events as only one event was reported across the trials (very low-certainty evidence; downgraded once due to bias and twice due to very serious imprecision).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
At the moment, we are uncertain whether rotator cuff repair surgery provides clinically meaningful benefits to people with symptomatic tears; it may provide little or no clinically important benefits with respect to pain, function, overall quality of life or participant-rated global assessment of treatment success when compared with non-operative treatment. Surgery may not improve shoulder pain or function compared with exercises, with or without glucocorticoid injections. The trials included have methodology concerns and none included a placebo control. They included participants with mostly small degenerative tears involving the supraspinatus tendon and the conclusions of this review may not be applicable to traumatic tears, large tears involving the subscapularis tendon or young people. Furthermore, the trials did not assess if surgery could prevent arthritic changes in long-term follow-up. Further well-designed trials in this area that include a placebo-surgery control group and long follow-up are needed to further increase certainty about the effects of surgery for rotator cuff tears.
Topics: Aged; Arthroscopy; Decompression, Surgical; Exercise Therapy; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rotator Cuff; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder Impingement Syndrome; Shoulder Pain; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31813166
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013502 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Nov 2023Controversies remain regarding the diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of acute adductor injuries in athletes.
BACKGROUND
Controversies remain regarding the diagnosis, imaging, and treatment of acute adductor injuries in athletes.
PURPOSE
To investigate the diagnostic imaging, treatment, and prevention of acute adductor injuries based on the most recent and relevant scientific evidence.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify articles studying acute adductor injury in athletes. Inclusion criteria were original publication on acute adductor injury in amateur or professional athletes, level 1 to 4 evidence, mean patient age >15 years, and results presented as return-to-sport, pain, or functional outcomes. Quality assessment was performed with the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement or the methodological index for non-randomized studies criteria. Articles were grouped as imaging, treatment, prevention focused, or mixed.
RESULTS
A total of 30 studies published between 2001 and 2021 were selected, involving 594 male patients with a mean age 26.2 years (range, 16-68 years). The most frequent sports were soccer (62%), basketball (14%), futsal (6%), American football (3%), and ice hockey and handball (2%). Risk factors for acute adductor injury were previous acute groin injury, adductor weakness compared with the uninjured side, any injury in the previous season, and reduced rotational hip range of motion. The frequency of complete adductor muscle tears on magnetic resonance imaging was 21% to 25%. For complete adductor tears, the average time to return to play was 8.9 weeks in patients treated nonoperatively and 14.2 weeks for patients treated surgically. Greater stump retraction was observed in individuals treated surgically. Partial acute adductor tears were treated nonoperatively with physical therapy in all studies in the present systematic review. The average time to return to play was 1 to 6.9 weeks depending on the injury grade. The efficacy of adductor strengthening on preventing acute adductor tears has controversial results in the literature.
CONCLUSION
Athletes with partial adductor injuries returned to play 1 to 7 weeks after injury with physical therapy treatment. Nonoperative or surgical treatment is an acceptable option for complete adductor longus tendon tear.
Topics: Humans; Male; Adult; Adolescent; Athletic Injuries; Muscle, Skeletal; Tendons; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Rupture; Groin; Soccer
PubMed: 36661128
DOI: 10.1177/03635465221140923 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Jan 2021This study aims to compare conservative versus surgical management for patients with full-thickness RC tear in terms of clinical and structural outcomes at 1 and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This study aims to compare conservative versus surgical management for patients with full-thickness RC tear in terms of clinical and structural outcomes at 1 and 2 years of follow-up.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar and reference lists of retrieved articles was performed since the inception of each database until August 2020. According to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, two independent authors screened all suitable studies for the inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Only randomised controlled trials comparing conservative and surgical management of full-thickness RC tear in adults were included. The primary outcome measure was the effectiveness of each treatment in terms of Constant-Murley score (CMS) and VAS pain score at different time points. The secondary outcome was the integrity of the repaired tendon evaluated on postoperative MRI at different time points. The GRADE guidelines were used to assess the critical appraisal status and quality of evidence.
RESULTS
A total of six articles met the inclusion criteria. The average value of CMS score at 12 months of follow-up was 77.6 ± 14.4 in the surgery group and 72.8 ± 16.5 in the conservative group, without statistically significant differences between the groups. Similar results were demonstrated at 24 months of follow-up. The mean of VAS pain score at 12 months of follow-up was 1.4 ± 1.6 in the surgery group and 2.4 ± 1.9 in the conservative group. Quantitative synthesis showed better results in favour of the surgical group in terms of VAS pain score one year after surgery (- 1.08, 95% CI - 1.58 to - 0.58; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
At a 2-year follow-up, shoulder function evaluated in terms of CMS was not significantly improved. Further high-quality level-I randomised controlled trials at longer term follow-up are needed to evaluate whether surgical and conservative treatment provide comparable long-term results.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Arthroscopy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rotator Cuff; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder; Shoulder Pain; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33419401
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03872-4