-
Musculoskeletal Surgery Dec 2021Reverse shoulder prostheses are increasingly used for treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy and other degenerative shoulder diseases. In recent years, aiming for... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Reverse shoulder prostheses are increasingly used for treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy and other degenerative shoulder diseases. In recent years, aiming for bone stock preservation has led to the design of metaphyseal humeral components without a stem. The aims of this study were to evaluate the complication and reintervention rates, as well as the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with stemless implants.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was completed until May 2020 using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases, according to PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
The literature search revealed 2942 studies, of which 13 were included in this review, with a total of 517 patients and a mean follow-up between 6.4 and 101.6 months. The total complication rate was 6.5%, while 3.3% were humeral associated complications. Finally, the rate of shoulders that underwent a reintervention was 6.7%, with 1.4% relating to a humeral component reason. Stemless RSA led to substantial improvements in patient reported outcome measures and range of motion across all studies. Scapular notching was reported in 15.2%, and lucencies around humeral component were reported in 0.8% of shoulders.
CONCLUSION
Stemless RSA resulted in low complication and reintervention rates at the mid-term follow-up. The reported clinical and radiological outcomes showed that these prostheses have at least equivalent outcomes with their stemmed counterparts. Further studies are required to investigate the long-term longevity and performance of the stemless humeral implants.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV; Systematic Review.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Humans; Prosthesis Design; Range of Motion, Articular; Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy; Shoulder Joint; Shoulder Prosthesis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34003464
DOI: 10.1007/s12306-021-00710-1 -
JBJS Reviews Jan 2021Frozen shoulder is a common, poorly understood condition affecting the shoulder joint, with poor long-term outcomes in some in relation to pain and mobility....
BACKGROUND
Frozen shoulder is a common, poorly understood condition affecting the shoulder joint, with poor long-term outcomes in some in relation to pain and mobility. Understanding the pathophysiology of frozen shoulder at a cellular level and a molecular level may help in the development of novel treatments. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of studies examining the cellular, molecular, and metabolic findings in frozen shoulder.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted using Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and PubMed using relevant terms. Studies were included if they assessed cellular, molecular, or metabolic alterations in tissue or blood samples of patients with frozen shoulder.
RESULTS
Of 4,794 studies identified, 25 were included for analysis. Histological findings included nonspecific chronic inflammation and the proliferation of fibroblasts, adipocytes, and blood vessels. Molecular studies showed increased pro-inflammatory mediators, reduced matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and increased activity of factors promoting fibroblast activation and nerve growth. Metabolic alterations included an increase in blood lipids.
CONCLUSIONS
Frozen shoulder is thought to occur after a primary insult to the shoulder triggers a complex cascade and upregulation of growth factors and cytokines with an increased turnover of the extracellular matrix, activation of myofibroblasts with deposition of collagen, and reduced matrix degradation. The presence of a background pro-inflammatory state (e.g., patients with diabetes or hyperlipidemia) may exacerbate these abnormalities. Further work assessing patients in early stages of the disease and comparing the inflammatory or fibrogenic characteristics of the shoulder capsule with those of the other joints may help to determine the initiating factors and to explain the predisposition of the shoulder to stiffness.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Our findings may form the basis for identifying new targets for the clinical management of frozen shoulder.
Topics: Bursitis; Humans; Inflammation; Matrix Metalloproteinases; Shoulder; Shoulder Joint
PubMed: 33512972
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00153 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Jul 2021Controversy exists regarding the optimal subscapularis management technique in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Controversy exists regarding the optimal subscapularis management technique in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes between subscapularis tenotomy (ST), lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO), and subscapularis peel (SP) techniques.
METHODS
We performed a level III systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing ST, LTO, and SP in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Our primary collection endpoints included range of motion, subscapularis function, subscapularis healing, functional patient-reported outcomes, complications, and revision surgery. Data were pooled and network meta-analysis was performed owing to the comparison of 3 groups.
RESULTS
Eight studies met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. There was no difference in sex or primary diagnosis between the 3 cohorts. No significant difference was found in postoperative external rotation or forward flexion between the groups. Meta-analysis found the SP cohort to have significantly greater internal rotation strength than the ST cohort. The belly-press test results were negative most commonly in the LTO group, and there was a significant difference compared with the ST or SP group (P < .0001). The weighted-mean healing rate for the LTO site was 98.9% on radiographic imaging. There was a significantly higher ultrasound healing rate in the LTO cohort than in the ST and SP cohorts. All groups had good postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score range, 78.6-87) and a relatively low rate of complications (3%).
CONCLUSION
This network meta-analysis demonstrates that the LTO group has superior healing and postoperative subscapularis-specific physical examination test results compared with the ST and SP groups. However, no difference in postoperative range of motion was found between the groups, and all techniques demonstrated good functional patient-reported outcomes, with a low rate of postoperative complications. These findings provide evidence-based support that ST, SP, and LTO all demonstrate similar outcomes; therefore, selection should be based on surgeon experience and comfort.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Range of Motion, Articular; Rotator Cuff; Shoulder Joint; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33096273
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.027 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Jun 2023Hemiarthroplasty is often considered in the setting of preserved glenoid cartilage given the high risk of revision associated with total shoulder arthroplasty.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Hemiarthroplasty is often considered in the setting of preserved glenoid cartilage given the high risk of revision associated with total shoulder arthroplasty. Pyrocarbon (PyC) has been used as an implant material that theoretically allows for formation of a neo-membrane that would act like cartilage to reduce glenoid wear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, revision rates, and complication rates in the existing literature on shoulder hemiarthroplasty using PyC.
METHODS
The MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for articles relating to shoulder hemiarthroplasty using the terms "pyrocarbon" or "pyrolytic carbon." Abstracts and articles were screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with a minimum of 24 months' follow-up required. Data on patient demographic characteristics, clinical outcome scores, complications, revision rates, and radiographic findings were recorded. Where appropriate, meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS
Twelve studies were selected for final inclusion, with a total of 536 patients. Among the studies reporting preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), an overall improvement in ROM was observed. The mean Constant score was 70.9 points postoperatively, with a mean improvement of 36.2 points (n = 359, 9 studies). Radiographically, 22.8% of patients (n = 536, 8 studies) had evidence of glenoid erosion, 10.4% had changes in implant positioning, and 9.9% had tuberosity thinning. In addition, 1.5% of patients had radiographic subacromial space reduction, whereas 0.7% had an increase in tuberosity thickness. Across all studies, there was an 8.6% complication rate, with the most common cause being glenoid erosion (2.6%, n = 14). There was an overall 7.7% revision rate (n = 41), with 63% of revisions (n = 26) undergoing conversion to reverse or total shoulder arthroplasty.
CONCLUSION
PyC hemiarthroplasty shows overall improvements in ROM and patient-reported outcomes for patients. However, there remains concern for glenoid erosion on radiographic evaluation at minimum 2-year follow-up. Although preliminary studies have shown encouraging results, this systematic review emphasizes the need for longer-term follow-up studies with further radiographic evaluation of the severity of glenoid erosion and the association with functional outcomes and failure risk.
Topics: Humans; Shoulder; Shoulder Joint; Hemiarthroplasty; Follow-Up Studies; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Range of Motion, Articular
PubMed: 36610477
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.005 -
European Journal of Trauma and... Apr 2021Anterior shoulder dislocations are the most common type of joint dislocation with the majority treated with closed reduction. Reduction methods can be grouped into their... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Anterior shoulder dislocations are the most common type of joint dislocation with the majority treated with closed reduction. Reduction methods can be grouped into their principle mode of action: traction-countertraction, leverage and scapular manipulation. The best method has yet to be identified and our aim was to find the most effective, safe and least painful method of closed reduction for acute anterior shoulder dislocations.
METHODS
A search of the online databases of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase was performed to identify randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing closed reduction methods for anterior shoulder dislocations. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
RESULTS
Twelve eligible RCTs were included with a total of 1055 patients. Our meta-analysis showed traction-countertraction methods are marginally less painful than leverage methods by 0.86 points on the VAS scale but leverage methods are quicker by 20 s. Amongst traction-countertraction methods, the Spaso technique was the least painful and quickest, albeit with no difference in overall success rate. A meta-analysis was not possible for comparisons involving scapular manipulation due to the paucity of studies, but within two studies, scapular manipulation was significantly less painful than both leverage and traction-countertraction methods by 1.5 and 2.3 points (VAS), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Traction-countertraction methods are less painful but slower than leverage methods with no difference in complication rates. However, there was no difference in overall reduction success rate between any of the groups.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
I.
Topics: Humans; Scapula; Shoulder; Shoulder Dislocation; Traction; Manipulation, Orthopedic
PubMed: 32607775
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01427-9 -
Archives of Physical Medicine and... Oct 2022To evaluate the effectiveness of home-based exercise to treat nonspecific shoulder pain (NSSP). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of home-based exercise to treat nonspecific shoulder pain (NSSP).
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database were searched from inception to January 2022.
STUDY SELECTION
Independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of home-based exercise alone with no treatment or other conservative treatments in individuals with nonsurgical painful shoulder disorders. The primary outcomes were shoulder pain intensity and function, and the secondary outcome was shoulder range of motion (ROM).
DATA EXTRACTION
Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the overall quality of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Twelve studies were included in the review, and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Low to moderate quality of evidence indicated that home-based exercise alone and other conservative treatments showed equal improvements in pain intensity reduction (mean difference [MD], 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.12 to 0.65; I=30%), function (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.12; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.38; I=16%), flexion ROM (MD, 4.61; 95% CI, -1.16 to 10.38; I=54%), and abduction ROM (MD, 3.74; 95% CI, -12.44 to 19.93; I=82%). Very low quality of evidence indicated that home-based exercise alone was more effective than no treatment for pain intensity reduction (MD, -1.47; 95% CI, -2.33 to -0.61) and function improvement (SMD, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.31 to -0.31; large effect).
CONCLUSIONS
Home-based exercise alone may be equally effective as other conservative treatments and superior to no treatment for the treatment of NSSP. To draw firmer conclusions, further research is required to validate these findings.
Topics: Exercise; Exercise Therapy; Humans; Range of Motion, Articular; Shoulder; Shoulder Pain
PubMed: 35661788
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.05.007 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Aug 2023Calcific tendinitis is a relatively common shoulder disorder, with 7%-17% of individuals with shoulder pain having rotator cuff calcium deposits. Several nonoperative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Calcific tendinitis is a relatively common shoulder disorder, with 7%-17% of individuals with shoulder pain having rotator cuff calcium deposits. Several nonoperative interventions, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and ultrasonography-guided needling (UGN), and surgical techniques have been described to treat calcific tendonitis with satisfactory outcomes. Clinical guidelines are lacking for surgical excision in cases refractory to nonoperative treatment. Several arthroscopic and open operative techniques have been described to treat calcific tendonitis with satisfactory clinical outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials is to compare outcomes and complications of nonoperative vs. operative management of chronic calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff, to provide evidence-based treatment guidelines for practitioners.
METHODS
EMBASE, PubMed, and OVID [MEDLINE] were searched from database inception until February 20, 2022, for randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes related to operative or nonoperative management for calcific tendonitis of the shoulder. Clinical outcomes including pain on visual analog scale (VAS), Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score (CMS), and resolution of calcific deposits were evaluated. Continuous data at last follow-up was pooled into mean differences using a random effects model for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 27 studies (2212 nonoperative patients and 140 operative patients) met the final inclusion criteria. Pooled mean difference in VAS for ESWT was -3.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.38, -2.27); P < .001), compared to -4.83 (95% CI -5.44, -4.22; P < .001) for UGN, and -4.65 (95% CI -5.47, -3.82; P < .001) for the operative interventions. Pooled mean difference in CMS score after ESWT was 18.30 (95% CI 10.95, 25.66; P < .001) compared to 22.01 (95% CI 8.17, 35.84; P = .002) for UGN, and 38.35 (95% CI 31.68, 45.02; P < .001) for the operative interventions. Eighty-five percent of patients receiving operative and 67% of patients receiving UGN management had complete radiographic resolution of calcific deposit.
CONCLUSIONS
Surgical treatment of chronic calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff results in larger improvement in functional outcome scores and comparable pain reduction to nonoperative interventions, particularly UGN. Both operative and nonoperative treatment modalities are likely to have clinically significant improvements in function and pain, and thus it is reasonable to trial UGN and ESWT as first-line treatment. Cost-effectiveness analyses will be needed to support one treatment over the other. High-quality randomized controlled trials directly comparing nonoperative interventions to operative interventions in patients prior to failing conservative treatment are needed to establish high-quality evidence-based guidelines.
Topics: Humans; Rotator Cuff; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tendinopathy; Shoulder; Shoulder Pain; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37080421
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.017 -
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia Jun 2021Adverse reactions to vaccine injections are usually mild and incredibly rare in nature, but multiple cases of shoulder events including bursitis, generalized pain or...
Adverse reactions to vaccine injections are usually mild and incredibly rare in nature, but multiple cases of shoulder events including bursitis, generalized pain or decreased range of motion have been reported following routine vaccine administrations. These events are known as Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration or SIRVA. A systematic review of literature was performed to identify all published accounts of SIRVA. Twenty-seven papers reporting one or more accounts of SIRVA were identified. The most common vaccination involved was the Influenza vaccine. The most common symptoms were pain that began in 48 hours or less and loss of shoulder range of motion. The most common treatment modalities were physical therapy, corticosteroid injections and anti-inflammatory medication; but in some patients, surgery was required. Regardless of intervention, the vast majority of outcomes demonstrated improved pain and functional except in the occasions of nerve injury. The etiology of SIRVA injuries has multiple possibilities including needle length, mechanical injury from needle overpenetration and the possibility of an immune inflammatory response from the vaccine components, but a unique definitive test or quantifiably result does not yet exist.
PubMed: 34239193
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719086 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Sep 2020Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is used in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint and other degenerative shoulder diseases. It has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is used in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint and other degenerative shoulder diseases. It has several proposed advantages over stemmed TSA including increased bone preservation, decreased operative time, and easier removal at revision.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) to retrieve all relevant studies.
RESULTS
The literature search yielded 1417 studies, of which 22 were included in this review, with 962 patients undergoing stemless TSA. Stemless TSA led to significant improvements in range of motion and functional scores in all included studies. Meta-analysis of comparative studies between stemless and stemmed TSA identified no significant differences in postoperative Constant scores (mean difference [MD], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.29 to 5.81 points; P = .59) or complication rates (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.71-4.54; P = .22). Stemless TSA resulted in a significantly shorter operative time compared with stemmed TSA (MD, -15.03 minutes; 95% CI, -23.79 to -6.26 minutes; P = .0008). Stemless TSA also resulted in significantly decreased intraoperative blood loss compared with stemmed TSA (MD, -96.95 mL; 95% CI, -148.53 to -45.36 mL; P = .0002).
CONCLUSION
Stemless anatomic TSA resulted in similar functional outcomes and complication rates to stemmed TSA with decreased operative time and lower blood loss. Further research is required to investigate the long-term durability of the stemless implant.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Blood Loss, Surgical; Humans; Operative Time; Osteoarthritis; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Range of Motion, Articular; Reoperation; Shoulder Joint; Shoulder Prosthesis
PubMed: 32220527
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.022 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Dec 2020The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence in the literature to determine how arthroscopic Bankart repair... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence in the literature to determine how arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and remplissage compare with ABR alone and the open Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability in patients with concomitant Hill-Sachs lesions.
METHODS
A literature search was performed based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Studies comparing ABR and remplissage vs. ABR alone or the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability in patients with Hill-Sachs lesions were included. Clinical outcomes were compared, with all statistical analysis performed using Review Manager (version 5.3). P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Twelve clinical trials were included. There was a significant difference between ABR plus remplissage and ABR alone in total recurrence rate (3.2% vs. 16.8%, P < .05) but not the rate of revision due to recurrence (1.7% vs. 8.5%, P = .06). There was no significant difference between the Latarjet procedure and ABR plus remplissage in total recurrence rate (7.0% vs. 9.8%, P = .39), total revision rate (3.7% vs. 5.7%, P = .41), and rate of revision due to recurrence (1.6% vs. 2.1%, P = .79). There was a significantly lower rate of complications with ABR and remplissage compared with the Latarjet procedure (0.5% vs. 8.6%, P = .003).
CONCLUSION
In patients with Hill-Sachs lesions and subcritical glenoid bone loss, ABR with remplissage resulted in lower rates of recurrent instability compared with ABR alone while resulting in similar recurrence rates, as well as similar patient-reported outcomes, with lower morbidity and fewer complications, compared with the Latarjet procedure.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III; Systematic Review.
Topics: Arthroscopy; Bankart Lesions; Humans; Joint Instability; Recurrence; Shoulder; Shoulder Dislocation; Shoulder Joint
PubMed: 32650087
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.021