-
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Dec 2023The advent of targeted therapies signaled novel avenues for more optimal oncological outcomes. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have risen as a cornerstone of the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The advent of targeted therapies signaled novel avenues for more optimal oncological outcomes. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have risen as a cornerstone of the ever-expanding targeted therapy era. The purpose of this systematic review is to delineate the rapidly evolving clinical landscape of ADCs for solid tumors.
METHODS
A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases for phase II and III clinical trials. Outcomes of interest were the objective response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival and adverse events.
RESULTS
A total of 92 clinical trials (76 phase II and 16 phase III) evaluated the efficacy and safety of ADCs for a plethora of solid tumors. Out of the 30 investigated ADCs, 8 have received approval by regulatory organizations for solid tumors. Currently, 52 phase III clinical trials for ADCs are ongoing.
CONCLUSION
ADCs have shown promising results for several solid tumors and various cancer settings.
Topics: Humans; Immunoconjugates; Antineoplastic Agents; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37866413
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104189 -
Cancer Reports (Hoboken, N.J.) Jan 2023Accumulating studies have evaluated the association between MAP3K1 polymorphisms and cancer prognosis. However, the results of these studies are conflicting. Given the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Accumulating studies have evaluated the association between MAP3K1 polymorphisms and cancer prognosis. However, the results of these studies are conflicting. Given the potential impact of MAP3K1 rs889312 SNP on the prognosis of various cancers, this meta-analysis was performed to obtain solid and credible evidence.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
This study was performed according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. A comprehensive article search was conducted to find and select articles from multiple databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, published up to 15th September 2022. The data analysis was performed with Review Manager v5.2. Pooled HR with its 95% CI and p-value was calculated where HR >1 suggests worse/poor survival and HR <1 suggests better survival of cancer patients.
RESULTS
A total of five articles comprising 24 439 patients were included for both qualitative and quantitative data synthesis. It was found that only the dominant genetic model (AC + CC vs. AA) showed a statistically significant poor overall survival for MAP3K1 rs889312 polymorphism (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06-1.47, p = .01). In addition, publication bias analysis by the Egger's test and the Begg-Mazumdar test reported no significant bias in the analysis of overall survival (p > .05).
CONCLUSIONS
The present study concludes that MAP3K1 gene rs889312 polymorphism plays a prognostic role in the survival of cancer patients. However, future research is recommended that will analyze more MAP3K SNPs along with rs889312, which may reveal more credible outcomes in terms of cancer prognosis.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Prognosis; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinase 1
PubMed: 36560873
DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1773 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Nov 2023The effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy for malignant solid tumors.
METHODS
This study has been registered with the number CRD42023407275 on PROSPERO. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases until March 17, 2023. In addition, manual searches were performed. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the utilization of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for patients with solid malignancies. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials (ROB1) were used. Risk ratios (RRs), hazared ratios (HRs) and their respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Stata17.0 MP and Review Manager 5.4 software.
RESULTS
A total of 2780 records were identified, and ultimately 10 studies involving 273 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that the addition of CTLA-4 inhibitors to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not demonstrate a significant effect on overall response rate, main pathological response, pathological complete response, surgical resection, radical resection, overall survival, progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival, grade 3-4 adverse events, all-cause mortality, and completed treatment (P > 0.05). However, further subgroup analysis indicated that the combination of PD-1 with CTLA-4 inhibitors significantly increased the occurrence of grade 3-4 adverse events in patients (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
As neoadjuvant therapy for malignant solid tumors, the addition of CTLA-4 inhibitors to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors does not appear to enhance efficacy.Moreover, there is a potential increase in the risk of grade 3-4 adverse events associated with this combination. However, it is important to note that the studies included in this analysis suffer from limitations such as small samples and single-center designs, which are inherent constrains with the available published literature. Further research involving large-sample and multicenter RCTs are warranted to obtain more reliable results.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; B7-H1 Antigen; Neoplasms; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37926852
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03212-5 -
Clinical Cancer Research : An Official... Aug 2022Because of the increased number of sequential treatments used for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is a need for surrogate endpoints of overall survival... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Because of the increased number of sequential treatments used for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is a need for surrogate endpoints of overall survival (OS). We analyze whether objective response (OR) is an independent predictor and surrogate endpoint of OS.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCT) in advanced HCC published between 2010 and 2020 was conducted to explore OS surrogacy of OR by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST (mRECIST). In parallel, RCTs exploring the impact of OR on OS in a time-dependent multivariate analysis were integrated in a meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Of 65 RCTs identified in advanced HCC, we analyzed 34 studies including 14,056 patients that reported OS and OR by either RECIST (n = 23), mRECIST (n = 5), or both (n = 6). When exploring surrogacy, the trial-level correlation between OR odds ratio and OS HR was R = 0.677 by mRECIST and R = 0.532 by RECIST. Meta-analysis of five RCTs assessing predictors of survival in multivariate analysis found that patients with OR by mRECIST presented a pooled HR for OS of 0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.70; P < 0.001) compared with nonresponders. Responses to atezolizumab-bevacizumab had a greater impact on OS than tyrosine kinase inhibitor responses.
CONCLUSIONS
OR-mRECIST is an independent predictor of OS in patients with advanced HCC. Although correlation of OR-mRECIST and OS is better than with OR-RECIST, the level of surrogacy is modest. Thus, it can be used as endpoint in proof-of-concept phase II trials, but the data do not support its use as a primary endpoint of phase III investigations assessing systemic therapies.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 34907081
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3135 -
Journal of Controlled Release :... Jan 2023Surgery is the only cure for many solid tumors, but positive resection margins, damage to vital nerves, vessels and organs during surgery, and the range and extent of... (Review)
Review
Surgery is the only cure for many solid tumors, but positive resection margins, damage to vital nerves, vessels and organs during surgery, and the range and extent of lymph node dissection are significant concerns which hinder the development of surgery. The emergence of fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) means a farewell to the era when surgeons relied only on visual and tactile feedback, and it gives surgeons another eye to distinguish tumors from normal tissues for precise resection and helps to find a balance between complete tumor lesions removal and maximal organ function conservation. However, the existing synthetic fluorescence contrast agent has flaws in safety, specificity and biocompatibility to various extents. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a group of heterogeneous types of cell-derived membranous structures present in all biological fluids. EVs, especially engineered targeting EVs, play an increasingly important role in drug delivery because of their good biocompatibility, validated safety and targeting ability. Nevertheless, few studies have employed EVs loaded with fluorophores to construct fluorescence contrast agents and used them in FGS. Here, we systematically reviewed the current state of knowledge regarding FGS, fundamental characteristics of EVs, and the development of engineered targeting EVs, and put forward a novel strategy and procedures to produce EVs-based fluorescence contrast agent used in fluorescence-guided surgery.
Topics: Humans; Contrast Media; Fluorescence; Neoplasms; Extracellular Vesicles; Drug Delivery Systems
PubMed: 36496053
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.12.013 -
International Immunopharmacology Jan 2023We sought to explore the prognostic role of the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score on survival outcomes in patients with solid tumors by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
We sought to explore the prognostic role of the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score on survival outcomes in patients with solid tumors by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for relevant articles through 02 Nov 2022. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were extracted and pooled to assess the association of the HALP score with survival outcomes in solid tumors using Stata 15.0. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression/disease/recurrence-free survival (PFS/DFS/RFS).
RESULTS
A total of 28 studies (31 cohorts) comprising 13,038 patients were enrolled. A low HALP score was associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.61; 95 % CI, 1.44-1.81; P < 0.001), CSS (HR, 1.80; 95 % CI: 1.54-2.09; P < 0.001) and PFS/DFS/RFS (HR, 1.61; 95 % CI: 1.45-1.80; P < 0.001). The prognostic value of HALP on OS was observed across various tumor types and tumor stages. meta-regression found that tumor stage was the major source of the heterogeneity for OS.
CONCLUSION
A low pretreatment HALP score is a reliable and negative prognostic biomarker for survival outcomes in patients with cancer.
Topics: Humans; Biomarkers, Tumor; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis; Albumins; Lymphocytes; Hemoglobins
PubMed: 36462339
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109496 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Jul 2023No clear evidence supports the advantage of fixed (up to two years (2yICI)) or continuous treatment (more than two years (prolonged ICI)) in cancer patients achieving... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
No clear evidence supports the advantage of fixed (up to two years (2yICI)) or continuous treatment (more than two years (prolonged ICI)) in cancer patients achieving stable disease or response on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting the duration of ICIs (alone or in combination with standard of care (SoC)) across various solid tumors. Overall, we identified 28,417 records through database searching. Based on the eligibility criteria, 57 studies were identified for the quantitative synthesis, including 22,977 patients receiving ICIs (with or without SoC). Prolonged ICI correlated with better overall survival (OS) than 2yICI in patients with melanoma (HR:1.55; 95%CI: 1.22,1.98), while 2yICI-SoC led to better OS than prolonged ICI-SoC in patients with NSCLC (HR: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.68,0.89). Prospective randomized trials are needed to assess the most appropriate duration of ICIs. OBJECTIVE: No clear evidence supports the advantage of fixed (up to two years (2yICI)) or continuous treatment (more than two years (prolonged ICI)) in cancer patients achieving stable disease or response on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Here, we assessed the optimal treatment duration for ICIs in solid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged ICIs administration does not seem to improve the outcomes of patients with NSCLC an RCC.
Topics: Humans; Duration of Therapy; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 37156405
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104016 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Aug 2023Leiomyomas (fibroids), the most common benign solid tumours in females, originate from the myometrium and are associated with poor quality of life for patients. The... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Leiomyomas (fibroids), the most common benign solid tumours in females, originate from the myometrium and are associated with poor quality of life for patients. The current management of uterine leiomyomas mainly includes surgical interventions such as hysterectomy and myomectomy, either by laparoscopy or laparotomy, which have several complications and are not ideal for preserving fertility. Therefore, there is a need to develop or repurpose medical treatments that do not require surgical intervention.
OBJECTIVE
Many drugs are used to treat the symptoms associated with uterine fibroids. The main objective of this systematic review is to give an up-to-date account of potential pharmacological agents (non-surgical methods) for the management of uterine leiomyomas.
SEARCH STRATEGY
PubMed was searched for scientific and clinical literature using the keyword 'uterine fibroids' along with the drug names described in each section. For example, 'uterine fibroids' and 'ulipristal acetate' were the keywords used to search for literature on ulipristal acetate (UPA).
RESULTS
Various preclinical and clinical studies have shown that some drugs and herbal formulations exhibit activity in the management of uterine leiomyomas. Recent studies found that drugs such as UPA, elagolix, EC313, asoprisnol, nutritional supplements and herbal preparations were helpful in treating the symptoms associated with uterine leiomyomas.
CONCLUSION
Many drugs show efficacy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. UPA is one of the most studied and prescribed medicines for uterine fibroids; however, its usage has been restricted due to a few recent incidences of hepatic toxicity. Herbal drugs and natural supplements have also shown promising effects on uterine fibroids. The synergistic effects of nutritional and herbal supplements have been reported in certain cases, and should be studied in detail. Further research is warranted to identify the mode of action of the drugs, and to determine the precise conditions that would explain the causes of toxicity in some patients.
Topics: Female; Humans; Uterine Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Leiomyoma; Uterine Myomectomy; Acetates
PubMed: 37385088
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.021 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023This review aims to determine the incidence and risk of pancreatic adverse events (AEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy for solid tumors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This review aims to determine the incidence and risk of pancreatic adverse events (AEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy for solid tumors.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to March 15, 2023, to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing ICIs with standard treatment in solid tumors. We included studies that reported immune-related pancreatitis or elevation of serum amylase or lipase levels. Following protocol registration in PROSPERO, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.
RESULTS
59 unique randomized controlled trials with at least one ICI-containing arm (41 757 patients) were retrieved. The incidences for all-grade pancreatitis, amylase elevation and lipase elevation were 0.93% (95% CI 0.77-1.13), 2.57% (95% CI 1.83-3.60) and 2.78% (95% CI 1.83-4.19), respectively. The incidences for grade ≥3 pancreatitis, amylase elevation and lipase elevation were 0.68% (95% CI 0.54-0.85), 1.17% (95% CI 0.83-1.64) and 1.71% (95% CI 1.18-2.49), respectively. The use of ICIs was associated with an increased risk of all-grade pancreatic immune-related AEs (irAEs) including pancreatitis (OR=2.04, 95% CI 1.42-2.94, P =0.0001), amylase elevation (OR=1.91, 95% CI 1.47-2.49, P < 0.0001) and lipase elevation (OR=1.77, 95% CI 1.37-2.29, P < 0.0001). In addition to these, the analysis found that PD-1 inhibitors had a significant higher risk of pancreatic AEs compared with PD-L1 inhibitors and the patients undergoing dual ICI therapy were at a significantly higher risk of pancreatic AEs than the patients receiving single ICI therapy.
CONCLUSION
Our study provides an overview of the incidence and risk of ICI-associated pancreatitis and pancreatic enzyme elevations in the treatment of solid tumors. Our findings may help raise awareness among clinicians of the potential for ICI-associated pancreatic AEs in clinical practice.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier 345350.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Pancreatitis; Neoplasms; Amylases; Lipase
PubMed: 37359551
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1166299 -
International Immunopharmacology Sep 2022Cancer patients particularly those with hematological malignancies are at higher risk of affecting by severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Cancer patients particularly those with hematological malignancies are at higher risk of affecting by severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to the immunocompromised nature of the disease and the immunosuppressive treatments, they are more likely to develop less antibody protection; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies.
METHODS
A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, as well as Google scholar search engine as of December 10, 2021. Our primary outcomes of interest comprised of estimating the antibody seropositive rate following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with hematological malignancies and to compare it with those who were affected by solid tumors or healthy subjects. The secondary outcomes were to assess the vaccine's immunogenicity based on different treatments, status of the disease, and type of vaccine. After the two-step screening, the data were extracted and the summary measures were calculated using a random-effect model.
RESULTS
A total of 82 articles recording 13,804 patients with a diagnosis of malignancy were included in the present review. The seropositive rates in patients with hematological malignancies after first and second vaccine doses were 30.0% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 11.9-52.0) and 62.3% (95%CI 56.0-68.5), respectively. These patients were less likely to develop antibody response as compared to cases with solid tumors (RR 0.73, 95%CI 0.67-0.79) and healthy subjects (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.54-0.71) following complete immunization. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients had the lowest response rate among all subtypes of hematological malignancies (first dose: 22.0%, 95%CI 13.5-31.8 and second dose: 47.8%, 95%CI 41.2-54.4). Besides, anti-CD20 therapies (5.7%, 95%CI 2.0-10.6) and bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (26.8%, 95%CI 16.9-37.8) represented the lowest seropositiveness post first and second doses, respectively. Notably, patients who were in active status of disease showed lower antibody detection rate compared to those on remission status (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.76-0.99). Furthermore, lower rate of seropositivity was found in patients received BNT162.b2 compared to ones who received mRNA-1273 (RR 0.89, 95%CI 0.79-0.99).
CONCLUSION
Our findings highlight the substantially low rate of seroprotection in patients with hematological malignancies with a wide range of rates among disease subgroups and different treatments; further highlighting the fact that booster doses might be acquired for these patients to improve immunity against SARS-CoV-2.
Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Viral; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Immunity; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccines
PubMed: 35843148
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109046