-
Cancer Medicine Feb 2023Research has demonstrated that solid tumor patients experience high levels of psychological distress at the time of diagnosis. While distress has been associated with... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Research has demonstrated that solid tumor patients experience high levels of psychological distress at the time of diagnosis. While distress has been associated with many adverse clinical outcomes, little is known about how this symptom may influence the disease trajectory for cancer patients, affecting outcomes such as progression, recurrence, and survival. The purpose of this systematic review was to explore the literature linking distress with survival in solid tumor patients, which may guide future work exploring clinical outcomes as a function of distress.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines with predefined eligibility criteria. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for review.
RESULTS
Findings from this review demonstrated a weak-to-moderate relationship between cancer patients' experience of distress and overall survival, with most included studies (11/13) finding at least one predictive analysis to be significant when controlling for confounders. However, significant heterogeneity in the literature, particularly with study sample characteristics and varying methodologies, made direct comparisons across studies challenging.
CONCLUSION
Findings from this review suggest that psychological distress may have an impact on disease-related outcomes, including (but not limited to) survival. Future work should consider performing disease-specific analyses controlling for key prognostic factors to better understand the nuanced relationship between distress and clinical outcomes, which may allow further understanding of the biological underpinnings of this relationship and enable the development of targeted interventions for improving distress.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Psychological Distress
PubMed: 36602400
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5200 -
Frontiers in Public Health 2023This review examines the current literature to identify biomarkers of frailty across patients with solid tumors. We conducted the systematic review using preferred... (Review)
Review
This review examines the current literature to identify biomarkers of frailty across patients with solid tumors. We conducted the systematic review using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines (PRISMA). PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from their inception to December 08, 2021, for reports of biomarkers and frailty. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. A quality assessment was conducted using NHLBI Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies, and Quality Assessment of Case-Control Studies. In total, 915 reports were screened, and 14 full-text articles were included in the review. Most studies included breast tumors, were cross-sectional in design, and measured biomarkers at baseline or pre-treatment. Frailty tools varied with Fried Frailty Phenotype and the geriatric assessment most frequently used. Increased inflammatory parameters (i.e., Interleukin-6, Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio, Glasgow Prognostic Score-2) were associated with frailty severity. Only six studies were rated as good quality using assessment ratings. Together, the small number of studies and heterogeneity in frailty assessment limited our ability to draw conclusions from the extant literature. Future research is needed to identify potential target biomarkers of frailty in cancer survivors that may aid in early detection and referral.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Frailty; Biomarkers; Neoplasms; Geriatric Assessment; Phenotype
PubMed: 37213604
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1171243 -
BMC Medicine Jul 2022Umbrella clinical trials in precision oncology are designed to tailor therapies to the specific genetic changes within a tumor. Little is known about the risk/benefit... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Umbrella clinical trials in precision oncology are designed to tailor therapies to the specific genetic changes within a tumor. Little is known about the risk/benefit ratio for umbrella clinical trials. The aim of our systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles in cancer umbrella trials testing targeted drugs or a combination of targeted therapy with chemotherapy.
METHODS
Our study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020171494). We searched Embase and PubMed for cancer umbrella trials testing targeted agents or a combination of targeted therapies with chemotherapy. We included solid tumor studies published between 1 January 2006 and 7 October 2019. We measured the risk using drug-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs), and the benefit by objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). When possible, data were meta-analyzed.
RESULTS
Of the 6207 records identified, we included 31 sub-trials or arms of nine umbrella trials (N = 1637). The pooled overall ORR was 17.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.5-25.9). The ORR for targeted therapies in the experimental arms was significantly lower than the ORR for a combination of targeted therapy drugs with chemotherapy: 13.3% vs 39.0%; p = 0.005. The median PFS was 2.4 months (95% CI 1.9-2.9), and the median OS was 7.1 months (95% CI 6.1-8.4). The overall drug-related death rate (drug-related grade 5 AEs rate) was 0.8% (95% CI 0.3-1.4), and the average drug-related grade 3/4 AE rate per person was 0.45 (95% CI 0.40-0.50).
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that, on average, one in five cancer patients in umbrella trials published between 1 January 2006 and 7 October 2019 responded to a given therapy, while one in 125 died due to drug toxicity. Our findings do not support the expectation of increased patient benefit in cancer umbrella trials. Further studies should investigate whether umbrella trial design and the precision oncology approach improve patient outcomes.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Humans; Medical Oncology; Neoplasms; Precision Medicine
PubMed: 35799149
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02420-2 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2023Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated significant efficacy in treating solid tumors. However, the occurrence of ADC drug-associated pneumonitis can limit the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated significant efficacy in treating solid tumors. However, the occurrence of ADC drug-associated pneumonitis can limit the use of ADCs or have severe consequences, and we know comparatively little about this.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were exhaustively searched for articles and conference abstracts published before September 30, 2022. Two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. A random-effects model was used to conduct a meta-analysis of the relevant outcomes. Forest plots reflected the incidence rates from each study, and binomial methods were used to calculate the 95 % confidence interval.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 7732 patients from 39 studies and evaluated the incidence of ADCs drug-associated pneumonitis which have received market approval for the treatment of solid tumors. The total incidence of solid tumors for all-grade pneumonitis was 5.86 % (95 % CI, 3.54-8.66 %) and for grade ≥3 was 0.68 % (95 % CI, 0.18-1.38 %). The incidence of all-grade pneumonitis was 5.08 % (95 % CI, 2.76-7.96 %) and for grade ≥3 was 0.57 % (95 % CI, 0.10-1.29 %) with ADC monotherapy. The incidence of all-grade and grade ≥3 pneumonitis in trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was 13.58 % (95 % CI, 9.43-18.29 %) and 2.19 % (95 % CI, 0.94-3.81 %), respectively, the highest in ADC therapy. Total incidence of all-grade pneumonitis was 10.58 % (95 % CI, 4.34-18.81 %) and for grade ≥3 pneumonitis was 1.29 % (95 % CI, 0.22-2.92 %) with ADC combination therapy. The incidence of pneumonitis was higher with combination therapy than with monotherapy in both all-grade and grade ≥3 groups, but there was no statistical significance (P = .138 and P = .281, respectively). The incidence of ADC-associated pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was 22.18 % (95 % CI, 2.14-52.61 %), the highest among solid tumors. The 11 included studies reported 21 pneumonitis-related deaths.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings will assist clinicians in choosing the optimal therapeutic options for patients with solid tumors treated with ADCs.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Incidence; Lung Neoplasms; Pneumonia; Immunoconjugates
PubMed: 36907365
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103960 -
International Journal of Molecular... May 2024Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is a novel and uncommon type of renal cell carcinoma, which has been recently recognized and introduced as a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is a novel and uncommon type of renal cell carcinoma, which has been recently recognized and introduced as a distinct entity in the WHO 2022 kidney tumor classification. Previously known as "unclassified RCC", followed by "tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated RCC", ESC-RCC is now a distinct category of kidney tumor, with its own name, with specific clinical manifestations, and a unique morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular profile. Due to its recent introduction and the limited available data, the diagnosis of ESC-RCC is still a complex challenge, and it is probably frequently misdiagnosed. The secret of diagnosing this tumor lies in the pathologists' knowledge, and keeping it up to date through research, thereby limiting the use of outdated nomenclature. The aim of our case-based review is to provide a better understanding of this pathology and to enrich the literature with a new case report, which has some particularities compared to the existing cases.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Kidney Neoplasms; Eosinophilia; Male
PubMed: 38892169
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115982 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022CD47-SIRPα interaction acts as a "don't eat me" signal and is exploited by cancer to downregulate innate and adaptive immune surveillance. There has been intense... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
CD47-SIRPα interaction acts as a "don't eat me" signal and is exploited by cancer to downregulate innate and adaptive immune surveillance. There has been intense interest to develop a mechanism of blockade, and we aimed to analyze the emerging data from early clinical trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant databases and conference abstracts including clinical trials using CD47 and/or SIRPα inhibitors in cancer treatment. Nonlinear mixed models were applied for comparison of response and toxicity. We retrieved 317 articles, 24 of which were eligible. These included 771 response-evaluable patients with hematologic (47.1%) and solid tumors (52.9%). Of these, 6.4% experienced complete response, 10.4% partial response, and 26.1% stable disease for a 16.7% objective response rate (ORR), 42.8% disease control rate, and 4.8-month median duration of response. ORR was significantly higher for hematologic cancers (25.3%) than solid cancers (9.1%, p=0.042). Comparing by mechanism, seven CD47 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and six selective SIRPα blockers were given alone or combined with checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapy, and/or chemotherapy. In solid cancers, selective SIRPα blockade showed a higher ORR (16.2%) than anti-CD47 mAbs (2.8%, p=0.079), which was significant for combination therapies (ORR 28.3% vs 3.0%, respectively, p=0.010). Responses were seen in head and neck, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, hepatocellular, non-small cell lung, and HER2+gastroesophageal cancers. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in 3.3% of patients (5.4% anti-CD47 mAbs, 1.4% selective SIRPα blockers; p=0.01). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) ≥grade 3 was 18.0%, similar between the two groups (p=0.082), and mostly laboratory abnormalities. For anti-CD47 mAbs, the most common toxicities included grade 1-2 fatigue (27.2%), headache (21.0%), and anemia (20.5%). For selective SIRPα blockers, these included grade 1-2 infusion reaction (23.1%) and fatigue (15.8%). Anti-CD47 mAbs were significantly more likely than selective SIRPα blockers to cause grade 1-2 fever, chills, nausea/vomiting, headache, and anemia. In conclusion, combination therapies using selective SIRPα blockade had higher response rates in solid tumors than anti-CD47 mAb combinations. Hematologic changes were the main TRAEs, and selective SIRPα blockers seemed to have a better grade 1-2 toxicity profile. Treatment was well-tolerated with minimal DLTs.
Topics: Humans; Protein Binding; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Fatigue; Headache; Neoplasms; CD47 Antigen
PubMed: 36439116
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1027235 -
Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic... Dec 2023Inflammation has been associated with tumor development and circulating inflammatory biomarkers have been proposed as possible predictors of recurrence of several solid... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Inflammation has been associated with tumor development and circulating inflammatory biomarkers have been proposed as possible predictors of recurrence of several solid tumors. However, the role of inflammation markers in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) is still uncertain.
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with DTC.
METHODS
Studies investigating the association between survival and preoperative circulating inflammatory markers in DTC patients were included. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Cumulative logarithms of the hazard ratio (log-HRs) with 95% CI were calculated through the inverse variance method using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 7599 patients with a mean age of 48.89 (95% CI 44.16-53.63) were included. The estimated pooled log-HRs for DFS were 0.07 for NLR (95% CI -0.12-0.26; p = 0.43), -0.58 for LMR (95% CI -1.21-0.05; p = 0.06), and 0.01 (95% CI 0-0.01; p = 0.21) for PLR.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis showed no association between NLR, PLR, LMR and DFS in DTC; however, more prospective data are needed to better define the association between inflammatory status and prognosis of DTC.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Lymphocytes; Inflammation; Thyroid Neoplasms
PubMed: 37828383
DOI: 10.1007/s11154-023-09845-x -
Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases... Aug 2024Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are rare clinical entity, with low malignancy and still unclear pathogenesis. They account for less than 2% of exocrine... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are rare clinical entity, with low malignancy and still unclear pathogenesis. They account for less than 2% of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the main clinical, surgical and oncological characteristics of pancreatic SPTs.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were systematically searched for the main clinical, surgical and oncological characteristics of pancreatic SPTs up to April 2021, in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Primary endpoints were to analyze treatments and oncological outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 823 studies were recorded, 86 studies underwent full-text reviews and 28 met inclusion criteria. Overall, 1384 patients underwent pancreatic surgery. Mean age was 30 years and 1181 patients (85.3%) were female. The most common clinical presentation was non-specific abdominal pain (52.6% of cases). Mean overall survival was 98.1%. Mean recurrence rate was 2.8%. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years.
CONCLUSIONS
Pancreatic SPTs are rare, and predominantly affect young women with unclear pathogenesis. Radical resection is the gold standard of treatment achieving good oncological impact and a favorable prognosis in a yearly life-long follow-up.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatectomy; Female; Adult; Male; Young Adult; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Adolescent; Carcinoma, Papillary
PubMed: 37236826
DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.05.004 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 2023To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Capivasertib on patients with solid tumors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Capivasertib on patients with solid tumors.
METHODS
Data from four RCTs were pooled to create a systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on Capivasertib-treated patients with solid tumor. Progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AE) were the primary outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 540 individuals from four RCTs were included. The analysis showed that Capivasertib improved PFS for the ITT population with an HR of 0.75 (95% CI = 0.62-0.90, p = 0.002), whereas it did not show improvement in PFS of the PI3K/AKT/PTEN-altered group with an HR = 0.61 (95% CI = 0.32-1.16, p = 0.13). The analysis also showed that Capivasertib improved OS for the ITT population with an HR = 0.61 (95% CI = 0.47-0.78, p = 0.0001). For safety, four studies were included; statistical differences between Capivasertib and placebo were found in discontinuation of Capivasertib due to toxicity or AE (RR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.37-4.10, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION
Capivasertib plus chemotherapy or hormonal therapy combination has shown promising antitumor efficacy and promising safety profile in the treatment of individuals with solid tumor.
Topics: Humans; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37224269
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2218085 -
Scientific Reports Mar 2023NTRK gene fusions are rare somatic mutations found across cancer types with promising targeted therapies emerging. Healthcare systems face significant challenges in...
NTRK gene fusions are rare somatic mutations found across cancer types with promising targeted therapies emerging. Healthcare systems face significant challenges in integrating these treatments, with uncertainty in prevalence and optimal testing methods to identify eligible patients. We performed a systematic review of NTRK fusion prevalence to inform efficient diagnostic screening and scale of therapeutic uptake. We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases on 31/03/2021. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting fusion rates in solid tumours, English language, post-2010 publication and minimum sample size. Critical appraisal was performed using a custom 11-item checklist. Rates were collated by cancer type and pooled if additional synthesis criteria were met. 160 studies were included, with estimates for 15 pan-cancer and 429 specific cancer types (63 paediatric). Adult pan-cancer estimates ranged 0.03-0.70%, with higher rates found in RNA-based assays. In common cancers, rates were consistently below 0.5%. Rare morphological subtypes, colorectal microsatellite instability, and driver mutation exclusion cancers had higher rates. Only 35.6% of extracted estimates used appropriate methods and sample size to identify NTRK fusions. NTRK fusion-positive cancers are rare and widely distributed across solid tumours. Small-scale, heterogeneous data confound prevalence prediction. Further large-scale, standardised genomic data are needed to characterise NTRK fusion epidemiology.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Receptor, trkA; Prevalence; Neoplasms; Genomics; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Gene Fusion
PubMed: 36914665
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31055-3