-
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and... 2023Obesity is an epidemiological issue that negatively affects public health and has led to a high global burden on the healthcare system. Several approaches to control and... (Review)
Review
The Efficacy of GLP-1 Analogues on Appetite Parameters, Gastric Emptying, Food Preference and Taste Among Adults with Obesity: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
BACKGROUND
Obesity is an epidemiological issue that negatively affects public health and has led to a high global burden on the healthcare system. Several approaches to control and overcome the obesity crisis have been established. However, Nobel discoverers found that glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues (GLP-1 analogues) positively regulate appetite and food intake, eventually leading to weight loss.
OBJECTIVE
The present systematic review aims to summarize the currently available evidence of the impact of GLP-1 analogues on appetite, gastric emptying, taste sensitivity, and food preferences among adults with obesity without other chronic diseases.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted from October 2021 to December 2021 from three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect), including only randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Studies were based on the use of GLP-1 analogues, of any dosage and duration among adults with obesity without other medical diseases; studies measured appetite, gastric emptying, food preferences, and taste as a primary or secondary outcome. The risk of publication bias in each study was assessed independently using the updated Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).
RESULTS
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria with a total sample size of 445 participants. All the included studies measured at least one or more of the primary outcomes. The promising effect was evidenced by most studies showing appetite suppression, delayed gastric emptying, and changes in taste and food preferences.
CONCLUSION
GLP-1 analogues are effective obesity management therapy that could decrease food intake and eventually reduce weight by suppressing appetite, reducing hunger, decreasing gastric emptying, and altering food preferences and taste. However, high-quality, long-term, large sample size studies are crucial to examine the efficacy and effective dose of GLP-1 analogues intervention.
PubMed: 36890965
DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S387116 -
Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Dec 2021The use of activated charcoal in poisoning remains both a pillar of modern toxicology and a source of debate. Following the publication of the joint position statements...
INTRODUCTION
The use of activated charcoal in poisoning remains both a pillar of modern toxicology and a source of debate. Following the publication of the joint position statements on the use of single-dose and multiple-dose activated charcoal by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the routine use of activated charcoal declined. Over subsequent years, many new pharmaceuticals became available in modified or alternative-release formulations and additional data on gastric emptying time in poisoning was published, challenging previous assumptions about absorption kinetics. The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology founded the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative to create a framework for evidence-based recommendations for the management of poisoned patients. The activated charcoal workgroup of the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative was tasked with reviewing systematically the evidence pertaining to the use of activated charcoal in poisoning in order to update the previous recommendations.
OBJECTIVES
The main objective was: Does oral activated charcoal given to adults or children prevent toxicity or improve clinical outcome and survival of poisoned patients compared to those who do not receive charcoal? Secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetic outcomes, the role of cathartics, and adverse events to charcoal administration. This systematic review summarizes the available evidence on the efficacy of activated charcoal.
METHODS
A medical librarian created a systematic search strategy for Medline (Ovid), subsequently translated for Embase ( Ovid), CINAHL ( EBSCO), BIOSIS Previews ( Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library/DARE. All databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2019. There were no language limitations. One author screened all citations identified in the search based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Excluded citations were confirmed by an additional author and remaining articles were obtained in full text and evaluated by at least two authors for inclusion. All authors cross-referenced full-text articles to identify articles missed in the searches. Data from included articles were extracted by the authors on a standardized spreadsheet and two authors used the GRADE methodology to independently assess the quality and risk of bias of each included study.
RESULTS
From 22,950 titles originally identified, the final data set consisted of 296 human studies, 118 animal studies, and 145 studies. Also included were 71 human and two animal studies that reported adverse events. The quality was judged to have a Low or Very Low GRADE in 469 (83%) of the studies. Ninety studies were judged to be of Moderate or High GRADE. The higher GRADE studies reported on the following drugs: paracetamol (acetaminophen), phenobarbital, carbamazepine, cardiac glycosides (digoxin and oleander), ethanol, iron, salicylates, theophylline, tricyclic antidepressants, and valproate. Data on newer pharmaceuticals not reviewed in the previous American Academy of Clinical Toxicology/European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists statements such as quetiapine, olanzapine, citalopram, and Factor Xa inhibitors were included. No studies on the optimal dosing for either single-dose or multiple-dose activated charcoal were found. In the reviewed clinical data, the time of administration of the first dose of charcoal was beyond one hour in 97% ( = 1006 individuals), beyond two hours in 36% ( = 491 individuals), and beyond 12 h in 4% ( = 43 individuals) whereas the timing of the first dose in controlled studies was within one hour of ingestion in 48% ( = 2359 individuals) and beyond two hours in 36% ( = 484) of individuals.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review found heterogenous data. The higher GRADE data was focused on a few select poisonings, while studies that addressed patients with unknown and or mixed ingestions were hampered by low rates of clinically meaningful toxicity or death. Despite these limitations, they reported a benefit of activated charcoal beyond one hour in many clinical scenarios.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Animals; Carbamazepine; Charcoal; Decontamination; Drug Overdose; Humans
PubMed: 34424785
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1961144 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jul 2022To evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stent placement for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stent placement for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
METHODS
PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched up to February 26, 2022. Studies comparing outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without pancreatic duct stents were included. The primary outcome measured was postoperative pancreatic fistula rate, and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality rate, reoperation rate, delayed gastric emptying rate and wound infection rate.
RESULTS
Seven RCTs involving 847 patients met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant difference between the stent group and non-stent group was detected in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.57-1.26, P = 0.41), in-hospital mortality, reoperation, delayed gastric emptying rate and wound infection. Subgroup analyses revealed that use of an external stent significantly reduced the incidence of pancreatic fistula (RR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.43-0.86, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS
Our preliminary results from this systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that pancreatic duct stents did not reduce the risk of POPF and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with no stents. External stents were associated with a reduced POPF rate compared with no stents. Large-scale RCTs are required to assess the effectiveness and assist in clarifying the real role of pancreatic duct stents with respect to the POPF rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Topics: Gastroparesis; Humans; Pancreatic Ducts; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Postoperative Complications; Stents; Wound Infection
PubMed: 35697324
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106707 -
The British Journal of Surgery Feb 2022This individual-patient data meta-analysis investigated the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols compared with conventional care on postoperative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This individual-patient data meta-analysis investigated the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols compared with conventional care on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.
METHODS
The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched systematically for articles reporting outcomes of ERAS after pancreatoduodenectomy published up to August 2020. Comparative studies were included. Main outcomes were postoperative functional recovery elements, postoperative morbidity, duration of hospital stay, and readmission.
RESULTS
Individual-patient data were obtained from 17 of 31 eligible studies comprising 3108 patients. Time to liquid (mean difference (MD) -3.23 (95 per cent c.i. -4.62 to -1.85) days; P < 0.001) and solid (-3.84 (-5.09 to -2.60) days; P < 0.001) intake, time to passage of first stool (MD -1.38 (-1.82 to -0.94) days; P < 0.001) and time to removal of the nasogastric tube (3.03 (-4.87 to -1.18) days; P = 0.001) were reduced with ERAS. ERAS was associated with lower overall morbidity (risk difference (RD) -0.04, 95 per cent c.i. -0.08 to -0.01; P = 0.015), less delayed gastric emptying (RD -0.11, -0.22 to -0.01; P = 0.039) and a shorter duration of hospital stay (MD -2.33 (-2.98 to -1.69) days; P < 0.001) without a higher readmission rate.
CONCLUSION
ERAS improved postoperative outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy. Implementation should be encouraged.
Topics: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Humans; Length of Stay; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Patient Readmission; Postoperative Complications; Recovery of Function
PubMed: 35037019
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab436 -
Advances in Nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) Oct 2022Gastroparesis (Gp) is a delay in gastric emptying in the absence of a mechanical obstruction and has the capacity to cause symptoms that significantly impact a patient's...
Gastroparesis (Gp) is a delay in gastric emptying in the absence of a mechanical obstruction and has the capacity to cause symptoms that significantly impact a patient's quality of life. Dietary interventions are the first-line treatment in Gp, but the efficacy of different diets is unclear. This systematic review seeks to determine the effectiveness of dietary interventions on clinical outcomes in Gp. A literature search of MEDLINE Ovid from 1 March 2008 to 1 October 2021 was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies that reported dietary interventions in Gp. From the initial search, 2789 studies resulted. These were assessed by 2 independent reviewers and selected based on the primary outcomes of interest: changes in symptom-specific patient-reported outcomes and changes in gastric emptying time. A third reviewer resolved any discrepancies. Six adult studies (185 subjects) met the inclusion criteria, whereas no pediatric study did. Five of the included studies were randomized controlled trials and one was an observational study. The systematic review suggested low-fat diets, small-particle diets, diets with isoflavones, and foods considered bland, starchy, sweet, and salty did not exacerbate Gp symptoms. Small-particle diets and diets with isoflavones were found to improve gastric emptying time in patients. Additionally, small-particle diets were shown to reduce anxiety in comparison to large-particle diets. Of the randomized controlled trials, 80% were low risk of bias and 20% were fair risk of bias. The observational study was considered fair quality. The data presented in this review suggest specific dietary interventions could potentially improve Gp symptoms and gastric emptying in adult patients, particularly low-fat and small-particle diets. For pediatric Gp, data are lacking. The limited data available highlights a critical gap in the literature.
Topics: Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diet; Gastroparesis; Humans; Isoflavones; Observational Studies as Topic; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35425953
DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmac037 -
Surgery For Obesity and Related... May 2023Gastroparesis is a gastric motility disorder characterized by delayed gastric emptying. It is a rare disease and difficult to treat effectively; management is a dilemma... (Review)
Review
Gastroparesis is a gastric motility disorder characterized by delayed gastric emptying. It is a rare disease and difficult to treat effectively; management is a dilemma for gastroenterologists and surgeons alike. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate current diagnostic tools as well as treatment options. We describe key elements in the pathophysiology of the disease, in addition to current evidence on treatment alternatives, including nutritional considerations, medical and surgical options, and related outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Gastroparesis; Surgeons; Gastric Emptying
PubMed: 37080885
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.02.018 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Oct 2022The effect of early oral feeding (EOF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) upon perioperative complications and outcomes is unknown, therefore the aim of this systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The effect of early oral feeding (EOF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) upon perioperative complications and outcomes is unknown, therefore the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of EOF on clinical outcomes after PD, such as postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and length of stay (LOS).
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance and assimilated evidence from studies reporting outcomes for patients who received EOF after PD compared to enteral tube feeding (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN).
RESULTS
Four studies reported outcomes after EOF compared to EN/PN after PD and included 553 patients. Meta-analyses showed no difference in rates of CR-POPF (OR 0.74; 95%CI 0.44-1.24; p = 0.25) or DGE (Grade B/C) (OR 0.83; 95%CI 0.31-2.21; p = 0.70). LOS was significantly shorter in the EOF group compared to the EN/PN group (Mean Difference -3.40 days; 95% -6.11-0.70 days; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Current available evidence suggests that EOF after PD is not associated with increased risk of DGE, does not exacerbate POPF and appears to reduce length of stay.
Topics: Humans; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Enteral Nutrition; Length of Stay; Parenteral Nutrition; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 35606323
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.04.005 -
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aug 2023Limited data are available on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic total pancreatectomy (RTP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Limited data are available on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic total pancreatectomy (RTP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of RTP and open total pancreatectomy (OTP). We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis according to the PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2 guidelines. We included studies conducted through August 10, 2022, that systematically searched electronic databases and compared RTP with OTP. We retained four controlled clinical trials in the literature search, including 156 patients: 65 in the RTP group and 91 in the OTP group. There was no difference between the RTP group and OTP group in terms of mortality, severe complications, morbidity, bleeding, biliary leak, delayed gastric emptying, reoperation, operative time, length of stay, harvested lymph nodes, and positive resection margin. The RTP reduces the delay of the first liquid diet, first oral diet, and out of bed. RTP is feasible and safe in selected patients. Robotic surgery allows for a quicker recovery. In cases of major vessel invasion, conversion to laparotomy should be preoperatively considered.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Laparoscopy; Robotics; Length of Stay; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36920720
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01569-z -
International Journal of Surgery... Jul 2022Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (l-RAMPS) provides a new surgical approach for patients with pancreatic cancers of the body and tail.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (l-RAMPS) provides a new surgical approach for patients with pancreatic cancers of the body and tail. However, whether it can achieve comparable outcomes to the open RAMPS (o-RAMPS) remains an issue.
METHODS
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of l-RAMPS, the studies in the databases of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library published before September 13, 2021 were searched and a meta-analysis was performed using the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The perioperative and oncological outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS
Five retrospective cohorts involving 189 patients were included for final pooled analysis. There were no significant differences in the patients' operation time, intra-abdominal bleeding rate, intra-abdominal infection rate, mild morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification = 1), moderate to severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥2), overall morbidity, wound infection rate, pancreatic fistula rate, delayed gastric emptying rate, reoperation rate, length of hospital stay, postoperative mortality, R0 resection rate, and 2-year overall survival between the 2 approaches. Besides, l-RAMPS was associated with less blood loss (mean difference (MD) = -232.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -316.93 to -148.46, P < 0.00001) and shorter days until oral feeding (MD = -0.79, 95% CI = -1.35 to -0.22, P = 0.006). However, the pooled analysis also indicated a significantly fewer lymph nodes dissected (MD = -3.01, 95% CI = -5.59 to -0.43, P = 0.02) in l-RAMPS approach.
CONCLUSIONS
Although l-RAMPS provides similar outcomes associated with benefits of minimal invasiveness compared to o-RAMPS, it harvested significantly fewer lymph nodes which might have potentially negative influence on the patients' long-term survival. L-RAMPS is still in the infancy stage and further investigation is needed to verify its feasibility.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Lymph Node Excision; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Splenectomy
PubMed: 35577311
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106676 -
Surgery For Obesity and Related... Mar 2023Management of refractory gastroparesis is challenging after diet, prokinetics, and long-term nutritional support have failed. In this review, the efficacy and safety of... (Review)
Review
Management of refractory gastroparesis is challenging after diet, prokinetics, and long-term nutritional support have failed. In this review, the efficacy and safety of surgical interventions (sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery) are evaluated systematically in patients with refractory gastroparesis. The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched to identify relevant studies published up to June 2021. Outcome of interest was symptom improvement and gastric emptying. Nineteen studies with 222 refractory gastroparesis patients (147 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 39 sleeve gastrectomy, and 36 subtotal gastrectomy) were included. All studies reported symptom improvement postoperatively, particularly vomiting and nausea. Gastric emptying improved postoperatively in 45% up to 67% for sleeve gastrectomy and 87% for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The findings of our systematic review suggest that sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery improve symptoms and gastric emptying in patients with refractory gastroparesis. Surgery may be effective as treatment for a small group of patients when all other therapies have failed.
Topics: Humans; Gastric Bypass; Obesity, Morbid; Gastroparesis; Laparoscopy; Gastrectomy; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36274017
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.09.009