-
Neuropsychology Review Jun 2023Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidum internus (GPi) improves motor functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) but... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidum internus (GPi) improves motor functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) but may cause a decline in specific cognitive domains. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the long-term (1-3 years) effects of STN or GPi DBS on four cognitive functions: (i) memory (delayed recall, working memory, immediate recall), (ii) executive functions including inhibition control (Color-Word Stroop test) and flexibility (phonemic verbal fluency), (iii) language (semantic verbal fluency), and (iv) mood (anxiety and depression). Medline and Web of Science were searched, and studies published before July 2021 investigating long-term changes in PD patients following DBS were included. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed using the R software to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) computed as Hedges' g with 95% CI. 2522 publications were identified, 48 of which satisfied the inclusion criteria. Fourteen meta-analyses were performed including 2039 adults with a clinical diagnosis of PD undergoing DBS surgery and 271 PD controls. Our findings add new information to the existing literature by demonstrating that, at a long follow-up interval (1-3 years), both positive effects, such as a mild improvement in anxiety and depression (STN, Hedges' g = 0,34, p = 0,02), and negative effects, such as a decrease of long-term memory (Hedges' g = -0,40, p = 0,02), verbal fluency such as phonemic fluency (Hedges' g = -0,56, p < 0,0001), and specific subdomains of executive functions such as Color-Word Stroop test (Hedges' g = -0,45, p = 0,003) were observed. The level of evidence as qualified with GRADE varied from low for the pre- verses post-analysis to medium when compared to a control group.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Parkinson Disease; Deep Brain Stimulation; Subthalamic Nucleus; Globus Pallidus; Cognition; Neuropsychological Tests
PubMed: 35318587
DOI: 10.1007/s11065-022-09540-9 -
World Neurosurgery Mar 2021Lesioning the Forel field or the subthalamic region is considered a possible treatment for tremoric patients with Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and other...
BACKGROUND
Lesioning the Forel field or the subthalamic region is considered a possible treatment for tremoric patients with Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and other diseases. This surgical treatment was performed in the 1960s to 1970s and was an alternative to thalamotomy. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the reappraisal of stimulating and/or lesioning these targets, partly as a result of innovations in imaging and noninvasive ablative technologies, such as magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasonography.
OBJECTIVE
We wanted to perform a thorough review of the subthalamic region, both from an anatomic and a surgical standpoint, to offer a comprehensive and updated analysis of the techniques and results reported for patients with tremor treated with different techniques.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the literature, gathering articles that included patients who underwent ablative or stimulation surgical techniques, targeting the pallidothalamic pathways (pallidothalamic tractotomy), cerebellothalamic pathway (cerebellothalamic tractotomy), or subthalamic area.
RESULTS
Pallidothalamic tractotomy consists of a reduced area that includes pallidofugal pathways. It may be considered an interesting target, given the benefit/risk ratio and the clinical effect, which, compared with pallidotomy, involves a lower risk of injury or involvement of vital structures such as the internal capsule or optic tract. Cerebellothalamic tractotomy and/or posterior subthalamic area are other alternative targets to thalamic stimulation or ablative surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the significant breakthrough that magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasonography has meant in the neurosurgical world, some classic targets such as the pallidothalamic tract, Forel field, and posterior subthalamic area may be reconsidered as surgical alternatives for patients with movement disorders.
Topics: Cerebellum; Deep Brain Stimulation; Essential Tremor; Globus Pallidus; Humans; Implantable Neurostimulators; Neural Pathways; Parkinson Disease; Prosthesis Implantation; Radiofrequency Ablation; Subthalamus; Thalamus; Tremor; Ultrasonic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 33276174
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.143 -
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and... Jan 2021To compare the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRIgFUS) in parkinsonian tremor. We performed a network meta-analysis based on... (Review)
Review
To compare the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRIgFUS) in parkinsonian tremor. We performed a network meta-analysis based on a Bayesian framework. We searched the literature for articles published between January 1990 and October 2020 using three databases: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library (The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). A total of 24 studies were included in our analysis, comprising data from 784 participants. Our findings revealed similar efficacy of DBS and MRIgFUS in parkinsonian tremor suppression. Compared with internal globus pallidus (GPi)-MRIgFUS, GPi-DBS -1.84 (-6.44, 2.86), pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN)_DBS -3.28 (-9.28, 2.78), PPN and caudal zona incerta (cZI)-DBS 0.40 (-6.16, 6.87), subthalamic nucleus (STN)_DBS 0.89 (-3.48, 5.30), STN and cZI-DBS 1.99 (-4.74, 8.65), ventral intermediate nucleus(VIM)_DBS 1.75 (-2.87, 6.48), VIM_FUS 0.72 (-5.27, 6.43), cZI-DBS 0.27 (-4.75, 5.36) were no significantly difference. Compared with VIM-MRIgFUS, GPi-DBS -2.55(-6.94, 2.21), GPi-FUS -0.72 (-6.43, 5.27), PPN_DBS -4.01(-9.97, 2.11), PPN and cZI-DBS -0.32 (-6.73, 6.36), STN_DBS 0.16 (-3.98, 4.6), STN and cZI-DBS 1.31(-5.18,7.87), VIM-DBS 1.00(-3.41, 5.84)and cZI-DBS -0.43 (-5.07, 4.68) were no significantly difference. With respect to the results for the treatment of motor symptoms, GPi-DBS, GPi-MRIgFUS, STN-DBS and cZI-DBS were significantly more efficacious than baseline (GPi-DBS 15.24 (5.79, 24.82), GPi-MRIgFUS 13.46 (2.46, 25.10), STN-DBS 19.62 (12.19, 27.16), cZI-DBS 14.18 (1.73, 26.89). The results from the surface under the cumulative ranking results showed that STN-DBS ranked first, followed by combined PPN and cZI-DBS, and PPN-DBS ranked last. MRIgFUS, an efficacious intervention for improving parkinsonian tremor, has not demonstrated to be inferior to DBS in parkinsonian tremor suppression. Hence, clinicians should distinguish individual patients' symptoms to ensure that the appropriate intervention and therapeutic approach are applied.
PubMed: 33461975
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323656 -
Brain : a Journal of Neurology Apr 2021Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus, pallidum, and thalamus is an established therapy for various movement disorders. Limbic targets have also been...
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus, pallidum, and thalamus is an established therapy for various movement disorders. Limbic targets have also been increasingly explored for their application to neuropsychiatric and cognitive disorders. The brainstem constitutes another DBS substrate, although the existing literature on the indications for and the effects of brainstem stimulation remains comparatively sparse. The objective of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the pertinent anatomy, indications, and reported stimulation-induced acute and long-term effects of existing white and grey matter brainstem DBS targets. We systematically searched the published literature, reviewing clinical trial articles pertaining to DBS brainstem targets. Overall, 164 studies describing brainstem DBS were identified. These studies encompassed 10 discrete structures: periaqueductal/periventricular grey (n = 63), pedunculopontine nucleus (n = 48), ventral tegmental area (n = 22), substantia nigra (n = 9), mesencephalic reticular formation (n = 7), medial forebrain bundle (n = 8), superior cerebellar peduncles (n = 3), red nucleus (n = 3), parabrachial complex (n = 2), and locus coeruleus (n = 1). Indications for brainstem DBS varied widely and included central neuropathic pain, axial symptoms of movement disorders, headache, depression, and vegetative state. The most promising results for brainstem DBS have come from targeting the pedunculopontine nucleus for relief of axial motor deficits, periaqueductal/periventricular grey for the management of central neuropathic pain, and ventral tegmental area for treatment of cluster headaches. Brainstem DBS has also acutely elicited numerous motor, limbic, and autonomic effects. Further work involving larger, controlled trials is necessary to better establish the therapeutic potential of DBS in this complex area.
Topics: Brain Stem; Deep Brain Stimulation; Humans
PubMed: 33313788
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa374 -
Journal of Neurology May 2023To evaluate the difference of tau burden between patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and healthy controls (HCs) or other neurodegenerative diseases using... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the difference of tau burden between patients with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and healthy controls (HCs) or other neurodegenerative diseases using tau-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.
METHODS
A systematic search on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was performed for tau-PET studies in PSP patients, up to April 1, 2022. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) of tau tracer uptake were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analysis based on the type of tau tracers, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis were conducted.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven studies comprising 553 PSP, 626 HCs, and 406 other neurodegenerative diseases were included. Compared with HCs, PSP patients showed elevated tau binding in basal ganglia, midbrain, dentate nucleus, cerebellar white matter, and frontal lobe with decreasing SMD (SMD: 0.390-1.698). Compared with Parkinson's disease patients, increased tau binding was identified in the midbrain, basal ganglia, dentate nucleus, and frontal and parietal lobe in PSP patients with decreasing SMD (SMD: 0.503-1.853). PSP patients showed higher tau binding in the subthalamic nucleus (SMD = 1.351) and globus pallidus (SMD = 1.000), and lower binding in the cortex and parahippocampal gyrus than Alzheimer's disease patients (SMD: - 2.976 to - 1.018). PSP patients showed higher midbrain tau binding than multiple system atrophy patients (SMD = 1.269).
CONCLUSION
Tau PET imaging indicates different topography of tau deposition between PSP patients and HCs or other neurodegenerative disorders. The affinity and selectivity of tracers for 4R-tau and the off-target binding of tracers should be considered when interpreting the results.
Topics: Humans; Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive; tau Proteins; Basal Ganglia; Parkinson Disease; Positron-Emission Tomography
PubMed: 36633672
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11556-3 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2019There are recent reports of zolpidem being effective for the treatment of a variety of movement disorders, due to its action on the gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors...
There are recent reports of zolpidem being effective for the treatment of a variety of movement disorders, due to its action on the gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors in the thalamus, subthalamic nucleus, and globus pallidus, hence facilitating inhibitory pathways in the basal ganglia motor loop. Its beneficial effects have been described for Parkinson's disease and other related disorders. The objective of this study was to assess the therapeutic effects of zolpidem for various types of dystonia. We conducted a literature search using MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar. There were no randomized controlled trials. The literature included 6 case reports, 4 case series, and 1 non-randomized, non-controlled interventional trial. Overall, 49 adult participants (range 1-34 participants) with a mean age of 49.5 years were treated. Regardless of the dystonia subtype, a single dose of zolpidem at 10 mg causes improvement of symptoms for a mean duration of 3.4 h until patient returns to baseline. The main adverse effect noted was drowsiness, which was dose-dependent. While the current available literature suggests that zolpidem may be an effective pharmacologic option for treating dystonia, however the quality of evidence remains limited. Larger sample size, methodological consistency, and randomized controlled trials with long-term patient follow-ups are necessary to come up with definitive conclusion.
PubMed: 31379728
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00779 -
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders Nov 2023Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. The targeted physiological structure for lead location is commonly... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. The targeted physiological structure for lead location is commonly the subthalamic nucleus (STN). The efficacy of DBS for improving motor symptoms is assessed via the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating III Scale (UPDRS-III). In this study, we sought to compare the efficacy of frequency settings utilized for STN-DBS.
METHODS
Following PRISMA Guidelines, a search on PUBMED and MEDLINE was performed to include full-length randomized controlled trials evaluating STN-DBS. The frequency stimulation parameters and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) outcomes were extracted in the search. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) was defined as ≥100 Hz and low-frequency stimulation (LFS) was defined as <100 Hz. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed with odds ratios (OR) and pooling performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Statistics are presented as OR [95% CI].
RESULTS
15 studies consisting of 298 patients were included for analysis. Bilateral HFS -0.68 [-0.89; -0.46] was associated with better UPDRS-III scores compared to bilateral LFS. On the other hand, bilateral LFS with medications (MEDS) was favored over HFS with MEDS (-0.28 [-0.63; 0.07]). Bilateral LFS and MEDS, HFS and MEDS, stimulation (STIM) OFF MEDS ON, HFS, LFS, STIM OFF MEDS OFF UPDRS outcomes were ranked from best to worst outcomes.
DISCUSSION
The outcomes of this study suggest that bilateral HFS has better utility for those with no response to medication, while LFS has additive benefits to medication by improving unique symptoms via different neurophysiological mechanisms.
Topics: Humans; Subthalamic Nucleus; Parkinson Disease; Network Meta-Analysis; Deep Brain Stimulation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37604755
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105809 -
Cureus Aug 2023Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is extensively used to treat motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to investigate the... (Review)
Review
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is extensively used to treat motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to investigate the difference between subthalamic (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS on mood and quality of life with reference to minimal clinically important differences (MCID). A systematic literature search for articles published until November 2022 yielded 14 studies meeting the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1,088 patients undergoing STN (n=571) or GPi (n=517) stimulation. Baseline patient and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Results showed that GPi stimulation demonstrated a greater reduction in the Beck depression inventory (mean difference (MD)=1.68) than STN stimulation (MD=0.84). Hospital anxiety and depression scale showed a 2.69- and 3.48-point decrease by the GPi group in the depression and anxiety categories, respectively. The summary index (SI) of the PD questionnaire depicted a greater improvement in the GPi group from baseline (mean=41.01, 95% CI 34.89, 47.13) to follow-up (mean=30.85, 95% CI 22.08, 39.63) when compared to the STN group (baseline mean=42.43, 95% CI 34.50, 50.37; follow-up mean=34.21, 95% CI 25.43, 42.99). The emotions category also demonstrated a similar trend. However, STN stimulation showed greater reductions in motor symptoms and medication than GPi stimulation. This meta-analysis demonstrated that GPi stimulation seems to offer an advantage over STN stimulation in improving mood and quality of life in PD, but those effects must be further validated by larger studies.
PubMed: 37753046
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44177 -
Medicine Aug 2023Sleep disorders significantly affect the quality of life in Parkinson disease (PD) patients. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus has been reported to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Sleep disorders significantly affect the quality of life in Parkinson disease (PD) patients. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus has been reported to improve motor symptoms and decrease medication usage. However, the impact of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on sleep quality in PD patients remains to be definitively determined. This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, aimed to clarify the effect of STN-DBS on sleep quality in PD patients.
METHODS
A rigorous literature search identified 6 studies, including 1 randomized controlled trial and 5 self-controlled trials, totaling 154 patients who underwent deep brain stimulation, providing 308 pairs of data for analysis. Parkinson disease sleep scale was the primary measure of interest, while the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the unified Parkinson disease rating scale was documented in all trials. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
RESULTS
STN-DBS significantly improved Parkinson disease sleep scale scores (mean difference = 20.41, 95% CI: [13.03, 27.79], I² = 60.8%, P < .001), indicating enhanced sleep quality. Furthermore, a significant reduction in movement disorder society unified Parkinson disease rating scale part III scores postoperatively (mean difference = -12.59, 95% CI: [-14.70, -10.49], I² = 89.9%, P < .001) suggested improved motor function. PD medication usage was also significantly reduced postoperatively (mean difference = -314.71, 95% CI: [-468.13, -161.28], I² = 52.9%, P < .001). A sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the main findings. The sample size was adequate, allowing for conclusive inferences.
CONCLUSION
The present study, which comprises a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, offers compelling evidence that STN-DBS can ameliorate sleep quality, augment motor function, and curtail medication consumption among individuals afflicted with PD.
Topics: Humans; Subthalamic Nucleus; Parkinson Disease; Deep Brain Stimulation; Quality of Life; Sleep; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37565888
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034509 -
Acta Neurologica Belgica Feb 2023Recently, the feature of generating constant current output has been added to the implantable pulse generators (IPGs). The efficacy of the conventionally used constant... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Recently, the feature of generating constant current output has been added to the implantable pulse generators (IPGs). The efficacy of the conventionally used constant voltage (CV) stimulation has been proved in different movement and psychiatric disorders. In this systematic review, we aimed to discuss the effect of constant current (CC) and constant voltage stimulation on patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who had subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation implantation; we also compared these methods of stimulation with each other.
METHODS
Using the words "Deep brain stimulation", "constant current" and "constant voltage", we developed a broad search strategy and a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane electronic bibliographic databases. Studies on the Parkinson's disease patients with subthalamic deep brain stimulation, which mentioned constant current or/and constant voltage setting stimulation were included.
RESULTS
After screening of 284 articles, 10 reports were found eligible for this study. The score of unified Parkinson's disease rating scale part 3 was improved compared to the baseline, whether the stimulation was CV at baseline or CC. No significant change in non-motor outcomes was found.
CONCLUSIONS
Although CC stimulation has shown a significant improvement in both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD, switching from CV to CC did not result in a significant change in the score of these items based on UPDRS. To sum up, implantation of constant current devices is safe and significantly improves motor function; it also maintains an acceptable safety profile in patients with PD.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Treatment Outcome; Electrodes, Implanted; Subthalamic Nucleus; Mental Status and Dementia Tests
PubMed: 36309957
DOI: 10.1007/s13760-022-02118-5