-
Heliyon Mar 2024Globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) are two common deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets. This meta-analysis was to compared the efficacy and...
BACKGROUND
Globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) are two common deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets. This meta-analysis was to compared the efficacy and safety of these two DBS targets for the treatment of Meige syndrome (MS).
METHODS
A systematic search was performed using EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify DBS trials for MS. Review Manager 5.3 was used to perform meta-analysis and the mean difference (MD) was analyzed and calculated with a random effect model. Pearson's correlation coefficients and meta-regression analyses were utilized to identify relevant predictive markers.
RESULTS
Twenty trials involving 188 participants with GPi-DBS and 110 individuals with STN-DBS were eligible. Both groups showed improvement of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale-Movement (BFMDRS-M) and Disability (BFMDRS-D) scores (BFMDRS-M: MD = 10.57 [7.74-13.41] for GPi-DBS, and MD = 8.59 [4.08-13.11] for STN-DBS; BFMDRS-D: MD = 5.96 [3.15-8.77] for GPi-DBS, and MD = 4.71 [1.38-8.04] for STN-DBS; all < 0.001) from baseline to the final follow-up, while no notable disparity in improvement rates was observed between them. Stimulation-related complications occurrence was also similar between two groups (38.54 ± 24.07% vs. 43.17 ± 29.12%, P = 0.7594). Simultaneously, preoperative BFMDRS-M score and disease duration were positively connected with the relative changes in BFMDRS-M score at the final visit.
CONCLUSION
Both GPi-DBS and STN-DBS are effective MS therapies, with no differences in efficacy or the frequency of stimulation-related problems. Higher preoperative scores and longer disease duration probably predict greater improvement.
PubMed: 38510025
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27945 -
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders Mar 2023Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now well established for the treatment of dystonic movement disorders. There is limited data, however, on the efficacy of DBS in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now well established for the treatment of dystonic movement disorders. There is limited data, however, on the efficacy of DBS in hemidystonia. This meta-analysis aims to summarize the published reports on DBS for hemidystonia of different etiologies, to compare different stimulation targets, and to evaluate clinical outcome.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed on PubMed, Embase and Web of Science to identify appropriate reports. The primary outcome variables were the improvement in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale movement (BFMDRS-M) and disability (BFMDRS-D) scores for dystonia.
RESULTS
Twenty-two reports (39 patients; 22 with pallidal stimulation, 4 with subthalamic stimulation, 3 with thalamic stimulation, and 10 with combined target stimulation) were included. Mean age at surgery was 26.8 years. Mean follow-up time was 31.72 months. An overall mean improvement of 40% in the BFMDRS-M score was achieved (range 0%-94%), which was paralleled by a mean improvement of 41% in the BFMDRS-D score. When considering a 20% cut-off for improvement, 23/39 patients (59%) would qualify as responders. Hemidystonia due to anoxia did not significantly improve with DBS. Several limitations of the results must be considered, most importantly the low level of evidence and the small number of reported cases.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the current analysis, DBS can be considered as a treatment option for hemidystonia. The posteroventral lateral GPi is the target used most often. More research is needed to understand the variability in outcome and to identify prognostic factors.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Dystonia; Deep Brain Stimulation; Treatment Outcome; Dystonic Disorders; Globus Pallidus
PubMed: 36813584
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105317 -
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice Nov 2019Deep brain stimulation (DBS) effects on postural deformities are still poorly explored. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) effects on postural deformities are still poorly explored.
METHODS
Systematic review in accord with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA).
RESULTS
All 38 studies that met predefined eligibility criteria had high risk of bias attributed to retrospective analysis of heterogeneous populations with variable and incompletely reported demographic and clinical characteristics, definitions, outcomes, DBS indications, targets, and settings. Five patient groups were identified in the 35 studies with individual data available: (1) parkinsonian camptocormia (n = 96): 89 patients underwent subthalamic (STN) and 7 globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) DBS. Camptocormia was the indication in 3 patients. After DBS, camptocormia improved in 57 of 96 patients (4.3-100% improvement) and remained stable or worsened in 39 of 96 patients (2-100% worsening). (2) dystonic camptocormia (n = 16): All underwent GPi-DBS. They were younger and with shorter disease duration, but longer deformity duration, compared with parkinsonian camptocormia. After GPi-DBS, camptocormia improved in all patients (50-100% improvement). (3) Parkinsonian Pisa syndrome (n = 14): 11 patients underwent STN-DBS for motor fluctuations whereas Pisa syndrome was the indication for pedunculopontine and GPi-DBS in 2 patients. After DBS, Pisa improved in 10 of 14 patients (33.3-66.7% improvement). (4) Dystonic opisthotonus: 2 young patients remarkably responded to GPi-DBS. (5) Parkinsonian anterocollis: There were variable responses in 3 patients after STN-DBS for motor fluctuations.
CONCLUSIONS
Low-quality level of evidence suggests that dystonic camptocormia and opisthotonus improve after GPi-DBS. Parkinsonian camptocormia, Pisa syndrome, and anterocollis have variable responses, and their dystonic features should be further explored.
PubMed: 31745470
DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12829 -
NeuroImage Oct 2022Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for several brain disorders, including Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, dystonia and epilepsy, and an... (Review)
Review
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for several brain disorders, including Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, dystonia and epilepsy, and an emerging therapeutic tool in many other neurological and psychiatric disorders. The therapeutic efficacy of DBS is dependent on the stimulation target, but its mechanisms of action are still relatively poorly understood. Investigating these mechanisms is challenging, partly because the stimulation devices and electrodes have limited the use of functional MRI in these patients. Molecular brain imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission tomography (SPET), offer a unique opportunity to characterize the whole brain effects of DBS. Here, we investigated the direct effects of DBS by systematically reviewing studies performing an `on' vs `off' contrast during PET or SPET imaging. We identified 62 studies (56 PET and 6 SPET studies; 531 subjects). Approximately half of the studies focused on cerebral blood flow or glucose metabolism in patients Parkinson's disease undergoing subthalamic DBS (25 studies, n = 289), therefore Activation Likelihood Estimation analysis was performed on these studies. Across disorders and stimulation targets, DBS was associated with a robust local increase in ligand uptake at the stimulation site and target-specific remote network effects. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease showed a specific pattern of changes in the motor circuit, including increased ligand uptake in the basal ganglia, and decreased ligand uptake in the primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area and cerebellum. However, there was only a handful of studies investigating other brain disorder and stimulation site combinations (1-3 studies each), or specific neurotransmitter systems, preventing definitive conclusions of the detailed molecular effects of the stimulation in these cases.
Topics: Brain; Deep Brain Stimulation; Humans; Ligands; Neuroimaging; Parkinson Disease
PubMed: 35842094
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119473 -
European Journal of Neurology Mar 2024The impact of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on caregivers' burden is understudied. We perform a systematic review and meta-synthesis aggregating... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The impact of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on caregivers' burden is understudied. We perform a systematic review and meta-synthesis aggregating qualitative studies involving partners of people with Parkinson disease (PwP) to explore their experiences and unmet needs.
METHODS
A systematic review for retrieving qualitative studies included six databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycInfo, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) studies on the experience of caregivers of PwP in the context of STN-DBS, (ii) English peer-reviewed articles, and (iii) qualitative or mixed methods studies reporting caregivers' quotations. After the appraisal of included studies, we performed meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Descriptive themes and conceptual elements related to PwP partners' experiences and unmet needs were generated.
RESULTS
A total of 1108 articles were screened, and nine articles were included. Three categories were identified: (i) dealing with Parkinson disease (PD) every day (the starting situation characterized by the impact of PD on ordinary life; the limitations to partners' socialization; partners' efforts in stepping aside for love and care activities), (ii) facing life changes with STN-DBS (the feeling of being unprepared for changes; the fear and concern due to loved ones' behavioral changes; struggling to find an explanation for those changes), and (iii) rebuilding the role of caregiver and partner after STN-DBS.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-synthesis elucidates concerns, challenges, and unmet needs of partners of PwP who underwent STN-DBS. It is important to provide them with information, education, and adequate support to face these challenges. Professionals need to involve partners in the care and decision process, because STN-DBS-related outcomes do not depend solely on the well-being of PwP but also on the well-being of individuals surrounding them.
Topics: Humans; Parkinson Disease; Caregivers; Deep Brain Stimulation; Subthalamic Nucleus; Emotions
PubMed: 37975788
DOI: 10.1111/ene.16149 -
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 2021While deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been extensively used for more than 20 years in Parkinson's disease (PD), the optimal area of... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
While deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been extensively used for more than 20 years in Parkinson's disease (PD), the optimal area of stimulation to relieve motor symptoms remains elusive.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed at localizing the sweet spot within the subthalamic region by performing a systematic review of the literature.
METHOD
PubMed database was searched for published studies exploring optimal stimulation location for STN DBS in PD, published between 2000 and 2019. A standardized assessment procedure based on methodological features was applied to select high-quality publications. Studies conducted more than 3 months after the DBS procedure, employing lateralized scores and/or stimulation condition, and reporting the volume of tissue activated or the position of the stimulating contact within the subthalamic region were considered in the final analysis.
RESULTS
Out of 439 references, 24 were finally retained, including 21 studies based on contact location and 3 studies based on volume of tissue activated (VTA). Most studies (all VTA-based studies and 13 of the 21 contact-based studies) suggest the superior-lateral STN and the adjacent white matter as the optimal sites for stimulation. Remaining contact-based studies were either inconclusive (5/21), favoured the caudal zona incerta (1/21), or suggested a better outcome of STN stimulation than adjacent white matter stimulation (2/21).
CONCLUSION
Using a standardized methodological approach, our review supports the presence of a sweet spot located within the supero-lateral STN and extending to the adjacent white matter.
Topics: Deep Brain Stimulation; Humans; Parkinson Disease; Subthalamic Nucleus; White Matter; Zona Incerta
PubMed: 34120117
DOI: 10.1159/000516098 -
Journal of Neurology Jan 2022Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for treating dystonia, commonly targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Optimal stimulation parameters are required to achieve... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for treating dystonia, commonly targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Optimal stimulation parameters are required to achieve satisfying results. However, recommended parameters for STN-DBS remain to be identified. In this review, we aimed to assess the optimal stimulation parameters by analyzing previously published STN-DBS data of patients with dystonia.
METHODS
We examined the STN-DBS stimulation parameters used in studies on dystonia selected on the PubMed/Medline database.
RESULTS
Of the 86 publications retrieved from the PubMed/Medline database, we included 24, which consisted of data from 94 patients and 160 electrodes. Overall, the following average stimulation parameters were observed: amplitude, 2.59 ± 0.67 V; pulse width, 83.87 ± 34.70 μs; frequency, 142.08 ± 37.81 Hz. The average improvement rate was 64.72 ± 24.74%. The improvement rate and stimulation parameters were linearly dependent. The average improvement rate increased by 3.58% at each 10-Hz increase in frequency. In focal and segmental dystonia, the improvement rate and stimulation parameters were linearly dependent. The improvement rate increased by 6.06% and decreased by 2.14% at each 10-Hz increase in frequency and pulse width, respectively. Seventeen publications (83 patients) mentioned stimulation-related adverse effects, including dyskinesia (17), depression (8), transient dysarthria (5), weight gain (4), transient dysphasia (3), transient paresthesia (2), and sustained hyperkinesia (2).
CONCLUSIONS
The optimal stimulation parameter for STN-DBS varies across patients. Our findings may be useful for DBS programming based on the specific dystonia subtypes, especially for patients with focal and segmental dystonia.
Topics: Deep Brain Stimulation; Dystonia; Dystonic Disorders; Humans; Subthalamic Nucleus; Weight Gain
PubMed: 33385242
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10372-x -
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders Mar 2022Atypical Parkinsonisms (APs) -including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)- are neurodegenerative... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Atypical Parkinsonisms (APs) -including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)- are neurodegenerative diseases lacking satisfying symptomatic therapies. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established neurosurgical option for advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Although DBS effectiveness in PD fed expectations for the treatment of APs, DBS is still not recommended for APs on the basis of expert consensus and lack of clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE
In this systematic review, we sought to analyze current evidence on the safety and efficacy of DBS in APs, discussing clinical indications, anatomical targets, and ethical issues.
METHODS
Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed for studies reporting the outcome of patients with APs treated with DBS.
RESULTS
We identified 25 eligible studies for a total of 66 patients with APs treated with DBS: 31 PSP, 22 MSA, 12 DLB, 1 unspecified parkinsonism with tongue tremor. Targeted nuclei were subthalamic nucleus (STN), globus pallidus pars-interna (GPi), pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN), and nucleus basalis of Meynert (nbM). Only 3/25 studies were randomized controlled trials, and most studies showed a high risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
Taking into account study biases and confounding factors, current evidence does not support the use of DBS in APs. However, some interesting insights arise from the literature, such as the high frequency of cognitive/neurobehavioral issues in MSA patients treated with STN-DBS, the low frequency of complications in trials of nbM-DBS for DLB, and the possible good response of dystonic symptoms in PSP with GPi DBS.
Topics: Basal Nucleus of Meynert; Deep Brain Stimulation; Globus Pallidus; Humans; Parkinson Disease; Subthalamic Nucleus
PubMed: 35288028
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.03.002 -
Medicine Nov 2023Parkinson disease (PD) is a common age-related neurodegenerative disease. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a safe and effective surgical treatment for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Parkinson disease (PD) is a common age-related neurodegenerative disease. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a safe and effective surgical treatment for medically resistant advanced PD. However, the relationship between the age at PD onset and the efficacy of subthalamic nucleus DBS surgery remains unclear. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare motor symptom improvements after DBS for the treatment of young-onset and late-onset PD.
METHODS
We systematically searched the Medline and Embase databases (from inception to March 2023) for English publications. All published studies comparing the outcomes (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III [UPDRS III] scores) of DBS between the young-onset Parkinson disease (YOPD) and late-onset Parkinson disease (LOPD) groups were identified. The effect size was defined as the standardized mean difference (Hedge g) with 95% confidence intervals. The standardized mean difference was calculated by dividing the difference in UPDRS III scores between old and young patients by the pooled and weighted standard deviations. The meta-analysis was performed using R Statistical Software version 4.2.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
RESULTS
Six studies were eligible for inclusion. The standardized mean difference of UPDRS III score between young and old patients ranged from -0.54 to 1.43 with a pooled difference of 0.0932 (95% confidence intervals: - 0.4666 to 0.6530, I2 = 86.77%). Subgroup analyses were performed with a cutoff age of 65 years and did not show a significant difference in UPDRS III scores between patients with YOPD and LOPD (0.1877, -0.6663 to 1.0417).
CONCLUSIONS
The efficacy of DBS in patients with YOPD and LOPD showed similar improvements in the UPDRS score; hence, DBS should be considered, if necessary, regardless of the onset age of PD.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Parkinson Disease; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Deep Brain Stimulation; Treatment Outcome; Mental Status and Dementia Tests
PubMed: 37933060
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035861 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2019Currently, some advanced treatments such as Levodopa-Carbidopa intestinal gel infusion (LCIG), deep-brain stimulation (DBS), and subcutaneous apomorphine infusion have...
Comparison Between Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Infusion and Subthalamic Nucleus Deep-Brain Stimulation for Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Currently, some advanced treatments such as Levodopa-Carbidopa intestinal gel infusion (LCIG), deep-brain stimulation (DBS), and subcutaneous apomorphine infusion have become alternative strategies for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, which treatment is better for individual patients remains unclear. This review aims to compare therapeutic effects of motor and/or non-motor symptoms of advanced PD patients between LCIG and DBS. We manually searched electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) and reference lists of included articles published until April 04, 2019 using related terms, without language restriction. We included case-controlled cohort studies and randomized-controlled trials, which directly compared differences between LCIG and DBS. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), proposed by the Cochrane Collaboration, was utilized to assess the quality of the included studies. Two investigators independently extracted data from each trial. Pooled standard-mean differences (SMDs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by meta-analysis. Outcomes were grouped according to the part III and part IV of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and adverse events. We also descriptively reviewed some data, which were unavailable for statistical analysis. This review included five cohort trials of 257 patients for meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between LCIG and subthalamic nucleus deep-brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on UPDRS-III and adverse events comparisons: UPDRS-III (pooled SMDs = 0.200, 95% CI: -0.126-0.527, = 0.230), total adverse events (pooled RRs = 1.279, 95% CI: 0.983-1.664, = 0.067), serious adverse events (pooled RRs = 1.539, 95% CI: 0.664-3.566, = 0.315). Notably, the improvement of UPDRS-IV was more significant in STN-DBS groups: pooled SMDs = 0.857, 95% CI: 0.130-1.584, = 0.021. However, the heterogeneity was moderate for UPDRS-IV ( = 73.8%). LCIG has comparable effects to STN-DBS on motor function for advanced PD, with acceptable tolerability. More large, well-designed trials are needed to assess the comparability of LCIG and STN-DBS in the future.
PubMed: 31507529
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00934