-
Neurosurgical Review Feb 2022Several scoring scales for the assessment of microsurgical skills have been established and validated with the same basic parameters. The study aims to review the... (Review)
Review
Several scoring scales for the assessment of microsurgical skills have been established and validated with the same basic parameters. The study aims to review the existing scales to highlight those parameters, which can be utilized uniformly across all neurosurgical training centers. An online search was conducted and all the surgical scores pertinent to microsurgical suturing were reviewed. The scales were compared to identify parameters, which were important for skill development and assessment in neurosurgical trainees. Seven assessment scales were identified which assessed the trainee's proficiency in microsurgical suturing. The objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) and Northwestern Objective Microanastomosis Assessment Tool (NOMAT) were identified as the most widely used and validated assessment scales. The newer scales University of Western Ontario microsurgical skills acquisition/assessment (UWOMSA) and structured assessment of microsurgery (SAMS) were notable for the division of the skills. The knot strength, suture separation, and suture intervals were the most important parameters in all scales. Each scale has its strength in the assessment of the microsurgical proficiency of neurosurgical trainees. However, a more uniform scale that can be applied as per the level of the neurosurgical trainee is necessary.
Topics: Clinical Competence; Humans; Internship and Residency; Microsurgery; Neurosurgical Procedures; Sutures
PubMed: 34075509
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01569-3 -
The Surgeon : Journal of the Royal... Apr 2022The laparoscopic approach is a very popular technique for many gastrointestinal operations and barbed sutures may improve the difficulties of intracorporeal anastomosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The laparoscopic approach is a very popular technique for many gastrointestinal operations and barbed sutures may improve the difficulties of intracorporeal anastomosis by eliminating the need for knot tying. The aim of this systematic review with a meta-analysis is to explore literature to establish the security profile of barbed suture compared with conventional laparoscopic sutures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search was performed in all electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE) and 12 studies were included in the analysis, involving 27,133 patients, whereof 3372 cases (patients undergone barbed suture usage) and 23,761 controls (patients undergone conventional suture usage). We found 3 studies discussing differences between barbed and conventional sutures in colorectal surgery and 8 studies presenting results in bariatric surgery, both in Roux-en-y gastric bypass and Mini Gastric/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.
RESULTS
We found comparable rate of leaks, bleedings and stenosis. The meta-regression analysis demonstrated that, both in case of bariatric and colorectal surgery, the demographic characteristic of patients and the oncological features of neoplasms did not impact of these findings. As expected, operative time is significantly shorter when barbed suture is used.
CONCLUSION
Our analysis on current literature define an acceptable security profile for barbed suture with effective results particularly in terms of shorter operative time.
Topics: Gastric Bypass; Humans; Laparoscopy; Postoperative Complications; Suture Techniques; Sutures
PubMed: 33820730
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.02.011 -
American Journal of Obstetrics &... Nov 2022Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated an association between uterine closure technique at the time of cesarean delivery and short- and long-term... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated an association between uterine closure technique at the time of cesarean delivery and short- and long-term operative outcomes with varied results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine types of suture material used for cesarean delivery.
DATA SOURCES
Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception of each database to October 2021.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
All randomized controlled trials that compared types of suture materials used for hysterotomy closure during low-transverse cesarean delivery at ≥24 weeks' gestation and examined maternal outcomes were included for this review. The primary outcome was estimated blood loss. Secondary outcomes included additional surgical complications.
METHODS
Results were summarized as mean difference or risk ratio with associated 95% confidence intervals. The quality of studies was evaluated with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions for judging risk of bias. Heterogeneity was measured using I-squared (Higgins I).
RESULTS
This review included 7 randomized controlled trials, of which 3 compared multifilament with barbed suture (136 vs 136 participants), 3 compared multifilament with conventional monofilament suture (245 vs 244 participants), and 1 trial compared multifilament with chromic suture (4590 vs 4595 participants). Primary analysis showed no difference in estimated blood loss between the multifilament and the barbed suture group (mean difference, 46.2 mL; 95% confidence interval, -13.6 to 105.9), nor in change in hemoglobin concentration between the multifilament and the conventional monofilament group (mean difference, -0.1%; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 0.3). Secondary outcomes showed a reduction in operative time with barbed vs multifilament suture (mean difference, 1.9 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-3.8). Analysis also demonstrated an increased uterine scar thickness with use of conventional monofilament vs multifilament suture (mean difference, -1.05 mm; 95% confidence interval, -1.9 to -0.2).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis does not support a specific type of suture material for uterine closure at cesarean delivery because of insufficient data. Although barbed suture was associated with an overall decrease in operative time, and use of conventional monofilament suture was associated with an increase in uterine scar thickness, the clinical utility of these differences is not clear. Further adequate randomized controlled trials are warranted for evaluation of different suture materials for hysterotomy closure.
PubMed: 35995367
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100726 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Feb 2022Effective suturing remains key to achieving successful outcomes in corneal surgery, especially anterior lamellar keratoplasty and full thickness transplantation.... (Review)
Review
Effective suturing remains key to achieving successful outcomes in corneal surgery, especially anterior lamellar keratoplasty and full thickness transplantation. Limitations in the technique may result in complications such as wound leak, infection, or high astigmatism post corneal graft. By using a systematic approach, this study reviews articles and conducts content analysis based on update 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria). The aim of this paper is to summarize the state of the art of corneal suturing techniques for every type of corneal transplant and patient age and also their outcomes regarding astigmatism and complications. Future developments for corneal transplantation will be also discussed. This is important because especially the young surgeon must have knowledge of the implications of every suture performed in order to achieve consistent and predictable post-operative outcomes and also be aware of all the possible complications.
PubMed: 35207352
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11041078 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Dec 2021Posterior plagiocephaly (PP) is a common clinical condition in pediatric age. There are two main causes of PP: postural plagiocephaly and craniosynostosis. Early... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Posterior plagiocephaly (PP) is a common clinical condition in pediatric age. There are two main causes of PP: postural plagiocephaly and craniosynostosis. Early diagnosis is important, as it prevents neurological complications and emergencies. Diagnosis in the past was often made late and with imaging tests that subjected the infant to a high radiation load. Suture ultrasound does not use ionizing radiation; it is easy to perform, allows an early diagnosis, and directs toward the execution of the cranial 3D-CT scan, neurosurgical consultation, and possible intervention. The aim of the study is to describe the high sensitivity and specificity of suture ultrasound for the differential diagnosis between plagiocephaly and craniosynostosis.
METHODS
We reported our prospective experience and compared it with the data in the literature through a systematic review. The systematic review was conducted on electronic medical databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science) evaluating the published literature up to November 2020. According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-ANALYSES (PRISMA statement), we identified 2 eligible studies. Additionally, according to AMSTAR 2, all included reviews have been critically rated as high quality. A total of 120 infants with abnormal skull shape were examined in NICU. All underwent clinical and ultrasound examination.
RESULTS
Of the total, 105 (87.5%) had plagiocephaly and 15 dolichocephaly/scaphocephaly (12.5%). None of these had associated other types of malformations and/or neurological disorders. The synostotic suture was identified ultrasonographically in 1 infant and subsequently confirmed by 3D CT scan (100%).
CONCLUSION
Cranial sutures ultrasonography can be considered in infants a selective, excellent screening method for the evaluation of skull shape deformities as first technique before the 3D CT scan exam and subsequent neurosurgical evaluation. Cranial suture ultrasonography should be considered part of clinical practice especially for pediatricians.
Topics: Child; Cranial Sutures; Craniosynostoses; Humans; Infant; Plagiocephaly; Prospective Studies; Skull; Sutures; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 34453581
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05324-3 -
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery :... 2022The Modified Broström has become the gold standard for operative management of chronic lateral ankle instability. Despite overall good clinical outcomes with this... (Review)
Review
The Modified Broström has become the gold standard for operative management of chronic lateral ankle instability. Despite overall good clinical outcomes with this procedure, recent biomechanical data have called into question the strength and durability of this technique. Accordingly, the addition of suture tape to the Modified Broström construct has been described in an attempt to more closely recreate the natural biomechanical properties of the ankle lateral ligament complex. We performed a systematic review of the literature was using PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL to identify English-language articles from 2009 to present discussing outcomes with the augmented Modified Broström technique. A total of 4 studies (2 retrospective cohort studies, 2 case series) involving 156 patients with Modified Broström with augmentation met inclusion criteria. Average follow-up time was 13.8 months. Of the 3 studies reporting patient-reported outcome measures both pre- and postoperatively, there was a significant improvement in all measures (p < .05). Two studies compared the Modified Broström directly with and without augmentation, one of which found a statistically significant difference in the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in favor of the augmentation group (93.1 vs 90.5, p = .027), while American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score was not significantly different (p > .05) between the 2 procedures across studies. There were no significant differences in complications between techniques. Modified Broström with suture tape augmentation for chronic lateral ankle instability can produce good short-term clinical outcomes with few complications, comparable to the Modified Broström alone.
Topics: Ankle Joint; Humans; Joint Instability; Lateral Ligament, Ankle; Retrospective Studies; Suture Anchors; Sutures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34862125
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.09.027 -
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and... Jun 2020This systematic review aimed to clarify the relative strengths and weaknesses of the all-suture anchors (ASAs) in both clinical and experimental studies. Our hypothesis... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review aimed to clarify the relative strengths and weaknesses of the all-suture anchors (ASAs) in both clinical and experimental studies. Our hypothesis was that there would be similar clinical and experimental data for ASAs regarding the biomechanical properties, clinical outcomes and complication rates.
METHODS
A systematic review of MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed. The inclusion criteria for clinical studies were both retrospective or prospective study design and minimum 1-year follow-up; for biomechanical studies, the inclusion criteria were performance on either cadaver and animal bones or synthetic surfaces. Studies were excluded if the studies were not in English or if they were review articles, commentaries, letters, case reports, or technical notes. The risk of bias assessment was done using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) tool.
RESULTS
We included 13 experimental and 3 clinical studies. The least displacement under cyclic loading was recorded with Q-Fix. Failure mode was mostly by suture breaking for the Q-Fix, whereas anchor pullout was the most common for the others. Cadaver humerus' greater tuberosity seemed to be less durable for the ASAs. Tests on cadaver glenoid showed similar biomechanical properties when compared to a control anchor. Studies investigating clinical and radiologic findings were very few, and only 3 case series were included in this review. Clinical findings of patients treated with ASAs for instability and rotator cuff repair showed satisfactory results and little increase in the complication rate (retear or revision surgery because of loose anchor).
CONCLUSIONS
ASAs have similar or better biomechanical properties compared to regular anchors. Low-profile design seems to be an important advantage. Case series can not distinguish between the possible clinical benefits and/or risks.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
ASAs have similar biomechanical properties when compared with other types of anchors. Their strength and performance vary with anatomic location, which may influence clinical success.
PubMed: 32548592
DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.007 -
Pediatric Surgery International Sep 2022Pelvi-ureteric anastomosis is a critical step to ensure good outcome of pyeloplasty. Continuous suturing technique, especially for laparoscopic surgeries, may offer... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Pelvi-ureteric anastomosis is a critical step to ensure good outcome of pyeloplasty. Continuous suturing technique, especially for laparoscopic surgeries, may offer faster operative time while allowing water-tight anastomosis and remains an alternative to interrupted suturing technique. There has been mixed data on comparison of outcomes of continuous and interrupted suturing techniques. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the outcomes of pyeloplasty based on continuous and interrupted suturing techniques. Following protocol registration on PROSPERO (CRD42021269706), a systematic review was performed in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration. A literature search was performed in September 2021 across Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Records comparing pyeloplasty outcomes between continuous and interrupted suture techniques were included. Five studies were identified for inclusion (2 prospective, 3 retrospective). Three studies involved pediatric patients. Three studies exclusively assessed laparoscopic technique. Four outcomes were meta-analyzed: operative time, length of stay, complications, and pyeloplasty failure. Interrupted sutures had longer OR time (mean difference 33.14 min [95% CI 29.35-36.94], p < 0.0001) and length of stay (mean difference 1.08 days [95% CI 0.84-1.32], p < 0.0001). However, there were similar complication (OR 1.73 [95% CI 0.98-3.06], p = 0.06) and failure rates (OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.43-3.43], p = 0.71) between the two suture types. The overall risk of bias in the studies was high. While limited by the number of studies available, continuous sutures for pelvi-ureteric anastomosis appear to confer benefits of faster operative time and decreased length of stay without increasing complication rates or failures.
Topics: Child; Humans; Kidney Pelvis; Laparoscopy; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Suture Techniques; Sutures; Treatment Outcome; Ureter; Ureteral Obstruction; Urologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 35842876
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05173-4 -
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Jun 2021Barbed sutures are used in cesarean delivery with the intended benefits of better tissue approximation, hemostasis, and strength, as well as reduced operative time. A... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Barbed sutures are used in cesarean delivery with the intended benefits of better tissue approximation, hemostasis, and strength, as well as reduced operative time. A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of the use of barbed suture compared with conventional sutures in cesarean delivery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and three clinical trial registries, were searched from inception to December 2019, without restriction by language or publication year. Randomized controlled trials comparing the use of barbed suture with conventional sutures in closure of any layer (uterine/fascial/skin) during cesarean delivery were included. The safety outcomes included estimated blood loss, pain, mortality, and other morbidity including infection, re-operation or re-admission. Effectiveness outcomes included closure time, need for additional suture and scar integrity. Study selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias, and quality assessment were independently performed by two authors. Primary analysis compared outcomes for all layers of surgical closure, whereas subgroup analysis was performed by individual layer. Pooled mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI were calculated using a random effects model. Level of evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020168859.
RESULTS
The review included four trials (three comparing uterine closure and one comparing skin closure), at high risk of bias, representing 460 participants. Primary analysis showed no morbidity differences between two groups. The use of barbed suture for uterine closure was associated with shorter incision closure time (MD 110.58 seconds, 95% CI 93.79-127.36 seconds), shorter total surgical time (MD 1.92 minutes, 95% CI 0.03-3.80 minutes), and a reduced need for additional hemostatic sutures (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.28-0.54), with no difference in estimated blood loss (MD 46.17 mL, 95% CI 13.55 to -105.89 mL) or postoperative morbidity (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.46-2.01). The level of evidence was deemed to be low to very low, based on inconsistency and imprecision of results.
CONCLUSIONS
Barbed sutures may be a suitable alternative to conventional sutures for uterine closure because they reduce uterine repair time, total surgical time, and the need for additional hemostatic sutures, without an increase in blood loss or maternal morbidity.
Topics: Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques; Blood Loss, Surgical; Cesarean Section; Dissection; Female; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Pregnancy; Surgical Wound Infection; Suture Techniques; Sutures
PubMed: 33404082
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14080 -
Developmental Neuropsychology Jul 2023There is conflicting evidence whether single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC), is linked to adversities of cognitive development. To assess the evidence for a link between... (Review)
Review
There is conflicting evidence whether single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC), is linked to adversities of cognitive development. To assess the evidence for a link between SSC and cognition, a systematic literature search was conducted and eligible studies assessed for inclusion by two independent readers. Forty-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Small to medium but persistent effects on both general and some specific cognitive functions across age bands were found in higher quality studies for SSC overall. There was limited evidence for effects related to surgical correction. Methodologies varied substantially and there was a lack of longitudinal studies using broad assessment batteries.
Topics: Humans; Craniosynostoses; Cognition; Longitudinal Studies; Sutures
PubMed: 37341559
DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2023.2225662