-
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford,... Sep 2023The recommended preoperative approach for HER2-positive breast cancer is unclear. We aimed to investigate the following: i) what is the optimal neoadjuvant regimen and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The recommended preoperative approach for HER2-positive breast cancer is unclear. We aimed to investigate the following: i) what is the optimal neoadjuvant regimen and ii) whether anthracyclines could be excluded.
METHODS
A systematic literature search in Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases was performed. Studies had to satisfy the following criteria: i) randomised controlled trials (RCTs), ii) enroled patients treated preoperatively for HER2-positive BC (breast cancer), iii) at least one treatment group received an anti-HER2 agent, iv) available information of any efficacy end-point and v) published in English. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework using random-effects model was used to pool direct and indirect evidence. Pathologic complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were the efficacy end-points of interest, and selected safety end-points were also analysed.
RESULTS
A total of 11,049 patients with HER2-positive BC (46 RCTs) were included in the network meta-analysis, and 32 different regimens were evaluated. Dual anti-HER2-therapy, with pertuzumab or tyrosine kinase inhibitors, combined with chemotherapy was significantly superior to trastuzumab and chemotherapy in terms of pCR, EFS and OS. However, a higher risk of cardiotoxicity was observed with dual anti-HER2-therapy. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy was not associated with better efficacy outcomes in comparison with non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy. In anthracycline-free regimens, the addition of carboplatin presented numerically better efficacy outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Dual HER2 blockade with chemotherapy is the recommended choice as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer, preferably by omitting anthracyclines in favour of carboplatin.
Topics: Humans; Female; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Carboplatin; Network Meta-Analysis; Receptor, ErbB-2; Breast Neoplasms; Trastuzumab; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Anthracyclines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 37142539
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.042 -
Cureus May 2023Patients diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer require treatment upfront because of the aggressive nature of this type of... (Review)
Review
Pathologic Complete Response Achieved in Early-Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy vs. Trastuzumab, Chemotherapy, and Pertuzumab: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Patients diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer require treatment upfront because of the aggressive nature of this type of cancer. Patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer are usually treated with neoadjuvant therapy. This neoadjuvant therapy comprises targeted therapy and chemotherapy. Targeted therapy is given with trastuzumab. Pertuzumab is either administered or not with trastuzumab as a targeted therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to find out and compare the benefit achieved in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR) by adding pertuzumab to the neoadjuvant treatment regimen for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Various databases were searched to find out relevant clinical trials. After going through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, three clinical trials were shortlisted for this systematic review and meta-analysis. These three clinical trials were double-armed. Pertuzumab was present in one arm while being absent in one arm to assess the benefit of adding pertuzumab in terms of pCR achieved. Data were analyzed using RevMan Web (Cochrane, London, UK). The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated for the outcome. The Mantel-Haenszel method and random effect model were used for analysis. The risk of bias in studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials (ROB2). The summary statistics showed that the incidence of pCR was more in the experimental group (having pertuzumab) as compared to the control group (without pertuzumab) with an odds ratio of 2.10 (95% CI: 1.56-2.83) with I2 = 0%. In three double-arm trials, there were 840 participants, 445 in the experimental group and 395 in the control group. A total of 203 (45%) patients out of 445 in the experimental group achieved pCR, whereas 127 (32%) patients out of 395 in the control group achieved pCR. Through the results of this study, it can be concluded that the rate of pCR achieved was higher in that arm in which pertuzumab was present compared to the study arm in which only trastuzumab was given as targeted therapy. Thus, it can be suggested that pertuzumab be added to the neoadjuvant regimen for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer patients. This would result in achieving a better pCR. And by improving pCR rates, the survival outcomes of patients can be significantly improved.
PubMed: 37398703
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39780 -
Heart Failure Reviews Nov 2023Anthracyclines and trastuzumab are widely used to treat breast cancer but increase the risk of cardiomyopathy and heart failure. With the use of trastuzumab and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Anthracyclines and trastuzumab are widely used to treat breast cancer but increase the risk of cardiomyopathy and heart failure. With the use of trastuzumab and anthracycline-containing medications, this study intends to evaluate the effectiveness and security of current treatments against cardiotoxicity. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which used at least one angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), or beta-blocker (BB) to prevent cardiotoxicity of antineoplastic agents for breast cancer, in 4 databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science) from inception to 11 May 2022, without language restrictions. The outcome of interest was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and adverse events. Stata 15 and R software 4.2.1 were used to perform all statistical analyses. The Cochrane version 2 of the risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) assessment was used to appraise the quality of the evidence. Fifteen randomized clinical studies with a total of 1977 patients were included in the analysis. The included studies demonstrated statistically significant LVEF in the ACEI/ARB and BB treatment groups (χ = 184.75, I = 88.6%, p = 0.000; SMD 0.556, 95% CI 0.299 to 0.813). In an exploratory subgroup analysis, the benefit of experimental agents on LVEF, whether anthracyclines or trastuzumab, was prominent in patients treated with ACEIs, ARBs, and BBs. Compared to placebo, ACEI/ARB and BB treatments in breast cancer patients protect against cardiotoxicity after trastuzumab and anthracycline-containing medication treatment, indicating a benefit for both.
Topics: Humans; Female; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Cardiotoxicity; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Trastuzumab; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Anthracyclines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37414918
DOI: 10.1007/s10741-023-10328-z -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2023Left ventricular dysfunction and cardiomyopathy are well documented adverse effects associated with chemotherapy agents. Limited information exists regarding the impact... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Left ventricular dysfunction and cardiomyopathy are well documented adverse effects associated with chemotherapy agents. Limited information exists regarding the impact of chemotherapeutic agents on the integrity and function of the right ventricle (RV).
OBJECTIVES
The current metanalysis compared pre- chemotherapy versus post- chemotherapy RV parameters measured on 2D echocardiography in patients receiving anthracycline and/or trastuzumab across all breast cancer patients.
METHODS
A systematic search across PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were performed from inception of the databases until November 2021 for relevant studies. We used the inverse variance method with a random effect model and DerSimonian and Laird method of Tau2 generation to calculate mean difference [MD] with 95% confidence interval [CI]. The analysis was carried out using RevMan Version 5.3 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014).
RESULTS
Fifteen studies, constituting total of 644 patients, met the inclusion criteria, with most studies having a follow up period of less than 12 months from initiation of chemotherapy. Anthracycline and/or Trastuzumab chemotherapy resulted in a statistically significant reduction in right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) at follow-up [MD: 2.70, 95% CI: 0.27 to 5.13, -value- 0.03, - 71%, -value < 0.05]. Treatment with Anthracycline and/or Trastuzumab chemotherapy resulted in a significant reduction in RV fractional area change (RVFAC) at follow-up [MD: 3.74, 95% CI: 1.33 to 6.15, -value < 0.01, - 68%, -value < 0.05]. RV free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS) was lower at baseline, while LVEF was significantly reduced at follow-up [MD: -1.00, 95% CI: -1.86 to -0.15, -value < 0.05, - 0%, -value-0.40], [MD: 4.04, 95% CI: 2.08 to 6.01, -value < 0.01, - 91%, -value < 0.05], respectively. However, treatment with Anthracycline and/or Trastuzumab chemotherapy had no statistically significant effect on Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) at follow-up [MD: 0.53, 95% CI: -0.11 to 1.17, -value-0.11, - 98%, -value < 0.05].
CONCLUSIONS
Chemotherapy with anthracyclines and trastuzumab negatively affects right ventricular function leading to decline in RVEF, RVFAC, RVFWLS and LVEF.
PubMed: 37600030
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1103941 -
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology Jul 2023We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of T-DXd in the treatment of HER2-expressing solid tumours. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of T-DXd in the treatment of HER2-expressing solid tumours.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library and collected studies published before March 17, 2023, on T-DXd for HER2-expressing tumours for a meta-analysis. We performed a subgroup analysis based on the different cancer types and the doses used.
RESULTS
There were 11 studies including 1349 HER2-expressing patients in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORR was 47.91%, and the pooled DCR was 87.01%. The mPFS and mOS combined were 9.63 and 10.71 months, respectively. The most common adverse reactions in grades 1-2 were decreased appetite (49.3%) and vomiting (43.0%). The netropemia (31.2%) and leukopenia (31.2%) were the most common grade 3 and higher adverse reactions. Subgroup analysis showed that breast cancer had the best ORR and DCR, with 66.96 and 96.52%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the efficacy of T-DXd in treating HER2-expressing solid tumours is encouraging, especially breast and non-small cell lung cancers, and has an acceptable safety profile. However, concerns remain about potentially serious treatment adverse events (e.g. interstitial lung disease/pneumonia). More well-designed, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to demonstrate our study.
Topics: Female; Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Camptothecin; Immunoconjugates; Lung Neoplasms; Receptor, ErbB-2; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 37114934
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad036 -
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice :... Jun 2023Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations have a poor prognosis and few therapeutic... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations have a poor prognosis and few therapeutic alternatives. We conducted a review of scientific evidence about therapies in NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic review in PubMed® database was performed up to November 19, 2022. Clinical trials (CTs) about treatments of patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic NSCLC harbouring EGFR exon 20 insertions who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy were selected. CTs with a sample size of less than 10 patients were discarded. Efficacy results were used to determine the most interesting drugs. Subsequently, a more exhaustive analysis of the design of the CTs and safety of the most interesting schemes was conducted. Comparisons were attempted to develop.
DATA SUMMARY
A total of 40 records were found in the systematic search. Twelve selected CTs included the following therapies: poziotinib, osimertinib, pertuzumab-trastuzumab-docetaxel scheme, mobocertinib, amivantamab, erlotinib-onalespib regimen, luminespib, ado-trastuzumab emtansine and dacomitinib. Mobocertinib, amivantamab and poziotinib were determined as the most interesting treatments according to efficacy data. Gastrointestinal and dermatological adverse reactions were relevant in these regimens. All CTs presented a non-randomised design. No reliable comparisons could be developed.
CONCLUSIONS
The efficacy of mobocertinib, amivantamab and poziotinib in NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations is promising. However, therapies were assessed in single-arm CTs with low-quality evidence. Comparative studies with more extensive patient follow-up, larger sample size and better design are needed to reliably quantify the effect of these drugs.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Mutagenesis, Insertional; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Mutation; ErbB Receptors; Exons
PubMed: 36916182
DOI: 10.1177/10781552231162545 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Mar 2022HER2 alterations are potential candidates for targeted treatments in metastatic urothelial/bladder cancer (mUC). ERBB2 gene amplification and mutations are found in... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
HER2 alterations are potential candidates for targeted treatments in metastatic urothelial/bladder cancer (mUC). ERBB2 gene amplification and mutations are found in around 6% and 4% of mUC, respectively.
METHODS
This is a systematic review of clinical trials evaluating HER2-targeting (amplification and mutations) in mUC. We assigned each study to one of the following strategies: HER2-targeting with single agents, anti-HER2 agents in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, dual HER2 blockade, HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and other novel therapeutic approaches.
RESULTS
36 clinical trials (17 with results and 19 ongoing) were included. As for ERBB2 amplification, anti-HER2 single agents (5 studies) and combinations with chemotherapy (4 studies) failed to provide any benefit, whereas dual HER2 blockade through monoclonal antibodies proved active in one trial in pretreated patients. Two studies assessed single-agent targeting for ERBB2 mutations with negative results. Most promising data come from 2 studies with ADCs in ERBB2 amplified tumors (disitamab-vedotin and trastuzumab-duocarmazine), while 2 other studies with TDM-1 and ADCT-502 was discontinued due to toxicity. In this category, trastuzumab-deruxtecan and other ADCs are still under investigation for either ERBB2-amplified or mutated mUC. Novel approaches include ADCs with immunotherapy (1 study with results), CAR-T cells, and HER2-sensitising vaccines.
CONCLUSIONS
ERBB2 amplification could become a novel target in mUC, although the magnitude of clinical benefit remains to be clarified. To this regard, novel ADCs are the most promising strategy. ERBB2 mutations are still at very early stage of clinical study.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Humans; Mutation; Receptor, ErbB-2; Trastuzumab; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 35180563
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102351 -
Breast Disease 2023Breast cancer (BC) is the 2nd most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are monoclonal antibodies linked to cytotoxic agents and are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Breast cancer (BC) is the 2nd most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are monoclonal antibodies linked to cytotoxic agents and are directed towards a specific tumor protein. Therefore, they are more potent and can have relatively less toxicity. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ADCs in breast cancer. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov for relevant studies and included 7 randomized clinical trials (N = 5,302) and 7 non-randomized clinical trials (N = 658). R programming language software was used to conduct this meta-analysis. In 4 RCTs on HER-2 positive BC (N = 2,825), the pooled HR of PFS and OS was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.61-0.84, I2 = 71%) and 0.73 (95% CI = 0.64-0.84, I2 = 20%), respectively in favor of ADCs versus chemotherapy. In RCT on triple negative BC (N = 468), HR of PFS and OS were 0.55 (95%CI = 0.51-0.61) and 0.59 (95% CI = 0.54-0.66), respectively, in favor of saci-gov versus chemotherapy. In RCT on HER-2 positive residual invasive BC, HR of recurrence/death was 0.61 (95% CI = 0.54-0.69) in favor of ADC versus chemotherapy. In an RCT (N = 524), the HR of PFS and OS were 0.28 (95% CI = 0.22-0.37) and 0.55 (95%CI = 0.36-0.86), respectively, in favor of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-der) as compared to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). Anemia, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, thrombocytopenia, and elevated aminotransferases were the common ≥grade 3 adverse events reported in 4%, 1%, 2%, 1%, 2%, 9%, and 3% of the patients, respectively. ADCs were more effective than single and double agent chemotherapy in patients with HER-2 positive or triple negative BC. Among ADCs, T-der was more effective than T-DM1.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Receptor, ErbB-2; Trastuzumab; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Immunoconjugates
PubMed: 37125539
DOI: 10.3233/BD-220052 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2020The availability of oncology biosimilars is deemed as a fundamental strategy to achieve sustainable health care. However, there is scarce systematic evidence on... (Review)
Review
The availability of oncology biosimilars is deemed as a fundamental strategy to achieve sustainable health care. However, there is scarce systematic evidence on economic effectiveness of cancer biosimilars. We aimed to synthesize evidence from pharmacoeconomic evaluation of oncology biosimilars globally, provide essential data and methodological reference for involved stakeholders. This systematic review was conducted in PubMed, embase, the Cochrane library, CRD, ISPOR and NICE utill December 31, 2019. Information on basic characteristics, evaluation methodology and results were extracted. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards Checklist. For 17 studies identified (13 from Europe and four from United States), the overall quality was generally acceptable. A total of seven biological molecules involved with filgrastim, EPOETIN , and trastuzumab leading the three. The mostly common evaluation perspective was payer, but the time horizon varied greatly. There were ten studies which adopted cost minimization analysis to evaluate efficiency while seven studies adopted budget impact analysis to address affordability, with cost ratio and cost saving being its corresponding primary endpoint. Although the comparability of included studies was limited and specific results were largely affected by uptake and price discount rates of the oncology biosimilar, the comprehensive results consistently favored its promotion. Globally, the economic evaluation of cancer biosimilars is in its initial phase. However, limited evidence from developed countries consistently supported both cost-effectiveness of efficiency and affordability of oncology biosimilars, while they were largely affected by uptake and price discount rate.
PubMed: 33536905
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.572569 -
JAMA Network Open Oct 2023The high cost of biologics used to treat cancer has been an increasing burden in the world. In China, the recent approval of cancer biosimilar drugs to resolve this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
The high cost of biologics used to treat cancer has been an increasing burden in the world. In China, the recent approval of cancer biosimilar drugs to resolve this problem is promising, but evidence of clinical benefits, price, and uptake for these drugs is still lacking.
OBJECTIVES
To compare characteristics of pivotal clinical trials in China and other countries for biosimilars of bevacizumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab and investigate the efficacy or effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity outcomes of cancer biosimilars compared with reference drugs by meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for published studies from database inception to February 1, 2023, using the search topics (cancers) AND (biosimilars).
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized clinical trials and cohort studies that included patients with cancer were included.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two authors independently extracted the outcome estimates and characteristics for each study. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to summarize the relative estimates with 95% CIs. This study was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Clinical trial characteristics were collected for biosimilars of bevacizumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab. The relative estimates of efficacy or effectiveness (objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival), safety, and immunogenicity outcomes were analyzed for biosimilars vs reference drugs. The weighted average price and uptake rate were evaluated for biosimilars relative to their reference drugs between 2015 and 2022.
RESULTS
A total of 39 RCTs (involving 18 791 patients) and 10 cohort studies (involving 1998 patients) were included. The biosimilars of bevacizumab (16 RCTs; risk ratio [RR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.01; P = .17), rituximab (12 RCTs; RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.98-1.08; P = .70), and trastuzumab (9 RCTs: RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.97-1.12; P = .29) met equivalence with reference biologics in regard to the objective response rate. The results summarized from cohort studies were consistent with those from RCTs. In 2022, cancer biosimilars were priced at 69% to 90% of the costs for the reference drugs, and their uptake reached 54% to 83% in China.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that cancer biosimilars provided comparable clinical benefits at lower prices compared with reference drugs. These findings suggest the potential feasibility of expediting the transition from reference drugs to biosimilars to benefit more patients with cancer.
Topics: Humans; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Rituximab; Bevacizumab; Neoplasms; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 37824143
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37348