-
PloS One 2022Trastuzumab is a valuable therapy option for women with ERBB2(HER2)+ breast cancer tumours, often used in combination with chemotherapy and alongside other therapies. It... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Trastuzumab is a valuable therapy option for women with ERBB2(HER2)+ breast cancer tumours, often used in combination with chemotherapy and alongside other therapies. It is known to have adverse effects, but these have proved difficult to separate from the effects of other concurrent therapies patients are usually taking. This study aims to assess the adverse effects specifically attributable to trastuzumab, and whether they vary by patient subgroup or concurrent therapies.
METHODS
As registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019146541), we used previous systematic reviews as well as the clinicaltrials.gov registry to identify randomised controlled trials in breast cancer which compared treatment regimes with and without trastuzumab. Neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic settings were examined. Data was extracted from those which had, as of July 2022, reported adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB2. Primary outcomes were adverse events of any type or severity (excluding death). A standard random-effects meta-analysis was performed for each outcome independently. In order to ascertain whether adverse effects differed by individual factors such as age or tumour characteristics, or by use of trastuzumab concurrently with hormone therapy, we examined individual-level patient data for one large trial, HERA.
RESULTS
79 relevant trials were found, of which 20 contained comparable arms of trastuzumab-containing therapy and corresponding matched therapy without trastuzumab. This allowed a comparison of 8669 patients receiving trastuzumab versus 9556 receiving no trastuzumab, which gave a list of 25 statistically and clinically significant adverse effects related to trastuzumab alone: unspecified pain, asthenia, nasopharyngitis, skin disorders (mainly rash), dyspepsia, paraesthesia, infections (often respiratory), increased lacrimation, diarrhoea, myalgia, oedema (limb/peripheral), fever, nose bleeds, cardiac events, insomnia, cough, back pain, dyspnoea, chills, dizziness or vertigo, hypertension, congestive heart failure, increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase, gastrointestinal issues and dehydration. Analysis of individual patient-level data from 5102 patients suggested that nausea is slightly more likely for women taking trastuzumab who are ER+ /also taking hormone therapy than for those who are ER-/not taking hormone therapy; no other potential treatment-subgroup interactions were detected. We found no evidence for significantly increased rates of neutropenia, anaemia or lymphopenia in patients on trastuzumab-containing regimes compared to those on comparable regimes without trastuzumab.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis should allow clinicians and patients to better identify and quantify the potential adverse effects of adding trastuzumab to their treatment regime for breast cancer, and hence inform their decision-making. However, limitations include serious risk of bias due to heterogeneity in reporting of the outcomes and the open-label nature of the trials.
Topics: Humans; Female; Trastuzumab; Breast Neoplasms; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Neutropenia; Hormones
PubMed: 36454979
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275321 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Apr 2023There is an increasing need for developing effective therapies for managing intracranial disease in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2... (Review)
Review
Epidemiology, clinical outcomes, and unmet needs of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases: A systematic literature review.
BACKGROUND
There is an increasing need for developing effective therapies for managing intracranial disease in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2 +) metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases (BM), as this population is growing and has historically been excluded from large clinical trials. In this systematic literature review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, unmet needs, and global treatment landscape for patients with HER2 + metastatic breast cancer and BM, with a particular focus on heterogeneity across clinical trial designs in this setting.
METHODS
We conducted literature searches of PubMed and select congress websites up to March 2022 and filtered for publications with a significant focus on epidemiology, unmet needs, or treatment outcomes in patients with HER2 + metastatic breast cancer and BM.
RESULTS
Key clinical trials of HER2-targeting treatments for HER2 + metastatic breast cancer had varying eligibility criteria relating to BM, with only two trials-HER2CLIMB and DEBBRAH-including patients with both active and stable BM. We also observed variance across assessed central nervous system (CNS)-focused endpoints (CNS objective response rate vs CNS progression-free survival vs time to CNS progression) and robustness of statistical analysis (prespecified vs exploratory).
CONCLUSIONS
There is an unmet need for standardization of clinical trial design for patients with HER2 + metastatic breast cancer and BM, to aid the interpretation of the global treatment landscape and ensure patients with all types of BM can access effective treatments.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Trastuzumab; Receptor, ErbB-2; Brain Neoplasms
PubMed: 36893691
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102527 -
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology Aug 2019: Breast cancer remains to be the globally leading female cancer. About 15% to 20% of breast cancers have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
: Breast cancer remains to be the globally leading female cancer. About 15% to 20% of breast cancers have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors - a more aggressive breast cancer subtype with shortened survival. In the light of new and updated trial data on trastuzumab therapy for HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to update the pooling of its relative treatment effects. : Systematic search was performed through Pubmed and Scopus to identify studies comparing survival outcomes and risks of heart toxicity effects of adjuvant trastuzumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for HER2-positive EBC patients. : Based on the eight included studies in the review, combining trastuzumab with chemotherapy continues to show lowered death and relapse risks by one-third. The decision to initiate trastuzumab, however, needs to be prudently deliberated as two to three times more cardiotoxicity risk was shown to be associated with its use. : Administering adjuvant trastuzumab in a weekly cycle concurrently with anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy regimen appears to be a preferable option to optimize its favorable effect in improving DFS and to prevent significantly higher risk for cardiotoxic effects.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Breast Neoplasms; Cardiotoxicity; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Receptor, ErbB-2; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 31287333
DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1637252 -
Medicine Aug 2022This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment in HER2-positive advanced gastric... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (HER2-PAGC).
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed using randomized controlled trials that compared trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone. A comprehensive search was conducted in the following databases from their inception onwards: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, WANGFANG, and CNKI. We also searched other literature sources to avoid missing relevant studies. Two reviewers independently performed all record selection, data collection, and methodological assessments. Any confusion was resolved by discussion or referral to a third reviewer. If there were ample data from eligible studies, we performed a fixed-effects meta-analysis. Whenever this was not possible, we conducted a narrative synthesis.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis results showed that trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy achieved better outcomes on response rate (trastuzumab plus CFC vs CFC: odds ratio [OR] = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.17-2.09], I2 = 0%, P < .003; trastuzumab plus OT vs OT: OR = 2.97, 95% CI [1.74-5.09], I2 = 0%, P < .0001; and trastuzumab plus CC vs CC: OR = 2.62, 95% CI [1.84-3.73], I2 = 0%, P < .0001), and disease control rate (trastuzumab plus CFC vs CFC: OR = 1.61, 95% CI [1.17-2.21], I2 = 0%, P = .004; trastuzumab plus OT vs OT: OR = 4.29, 95% CI [2.33-7.90], I2 = 0%, P < .0001; and trastuzumab plus CC vs CC: OR = 2.99, 95% CI [1.99-4.48], I2 = 0%, P < .0001). However, there were no significant differences in the adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study revealed that the efficacy of trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy was superior to that of chemotherapy alone for the treatment of HER2-PAGC. The 2 modalities showed similar safety profiles.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, ErbB-2; Stomach Neoplasms; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 36042610
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029992 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2022Although dual anti-HER2 therapy, namely, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, has shown promising results in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), it is still unclear...
Pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab compared to trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
Although dual anti-HER2 therapy, namely, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab, has shown promising results in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), it is still unclear whether dual therapy will increase adverse effects (AEs) while ensuring the efficacy compared with trastuzumab monotherapy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of combined therapy with monotherapy.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the administration of dual anti-HER2 therapy [pertuzumab plus trastuzumab or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)] versus monotherapy (trastuzumab or T-DM1). The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS
Fourteen RCTs (8,378 patients) were identified. Compared to monotherapy, dual therapy significantly improved the OS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.59-0.99) and PFS (HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.86) in advanced BC. In neoadjuvant therapy, dual blockade has a higher ORR rate than monotherapy. Grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, and anemia as well as heart failure were more frequently reported in dual therapy compared to monotherapy. No significant difference in serious AEs was observed between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, compared to single-target therapy, dual-target therapy has higher OS and PFS rates in Asian patients with advanced therapy; however, total grade ≥3 AEs and serious AEs were significantly higher in the dual group in Asian patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study confirms that the combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab therapy could substantially improve the outcome of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and was well tolerated compared to trastuzumab monotherapy.
PubMed: 36249045
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.894861 -
ESMO Open Jun 2023Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is a distinct subtype with different prognosis and response... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is a distinct subtype with different prognosis and response to treatment. HER2-targeted therapy is currently recommended for patients with HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer. However, there is debate over which drugs to add on the basis of HER2 blockade yield the optimal efficacy. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to solve the problem.
METHODS
Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different interventions in HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer were included. The outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Pooled hazard ratios or odds ratios with credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated to estimate the predefined outcomes. The optimal therapeutics were identified by comparing the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA).
RESULTS
Totally, 23 literatures of 20 RCTs were included. Regarding PFS, significant differences were detected between single or dual HER2 blockade plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone and dual HER2 blockade plus ET versus physician's choice. Trastuzumab, pertuzumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS than trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% CrI 0.50-0.92). The SUCRA values suggested the relatively better efficacy of dual HER2-targeted therapy plus ET (86%-91%) than chemotherapy (62%-81%) in prolonging PFS and OS. The HER2 blockade-containing regimens showed similar safety profiles in eight documented TRAEs.
CONCLUSIONS
Prominent status of dual-targeted therapy for patients with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer was revealed. Compared with chemotherapy-containing regimens, the ET-containing ones showed better efficacy and similar safety profiles, which could be recommended in clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Female; Network Meta-Analysis; Receptor, ErbB-2; Breast Neoplasms; Trastuzumab; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 37084609
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101216 -
EClinicalMedicine Jan 2023Given the increasing use of HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) worldwide, the summary of toxicity incidence and profiles of these drugs is crucial to provide...
BACKGROUND
Given the increasing use of HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) worldwide, the summary of toxicity incidence and profiles of these drugs is crucial to provide reference for clinical application. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the mean incidences of treatment-related adverse events of HER2-targeted ADCs and to investigate the differences between different drugs and cancer types.
METHODS
We performed a systematic search of literature in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to February 1, 2022 and the last search was updated to August 1, 2022. Published prospective clinical trials on single-agent of the US Food and Drug Administration approved HER2-targeted ADCs with available count data regarding treatment-related adverse events were included. The primary outcomes were pooled incidences of treatment-related adverse events and differences between different drugs and cancer types. The data synthesis was performed using a Bayesian hierarchical modelling method and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022331627).
FINDINGS
A total of 39 studies (37 trials) involving 7688 patients across five cancer types were included in the final analysis. On pooling the data using Bayesian hierarchical modelling, the overall mean incidence of all-grade adverse events, high-grade adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events that resulted in drug discontinuation were 98.29% (95% CrI, 97.33%-99.07%, τ = 1.49), 47.88% (95% CrI, 42.74%-53.17%, τ = 0.37), 19.45% (95% CrI, 15.70%-23.67%, τ = 0.55), and 10.52% (95% CrI, 8.03%-13.21%, τ = 0.56), respectively. The most common all-grade adverse events were nausea (41.57%; 95% CrI, 40.46%-42.64%, τ = 0.81), fatigue (35.86%; 95% CrI, 34.85%-36.96%, τ = 0.65), and decreased appetite (28.84%; 95% CrI, 22.93%-36.87%, τ = 0.76). The most common high-grade adverse events were thrombocytopenia (8.37%; 95% CrI, 7.75%-9.07%, τ = 0.71), anaemia (6.49%; 95% CrI, 5.86%-7.11%, τ = 1.06), and neutropenia (6.42%; 95% CrI, 5.76%-7.04%, τ = 1.21). We found no difference in the mean incidences of adverse events among different cancer types, as well as different dosing regimens. However, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) appeared to have higher mean incidences of adverse events compared with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), especially for the higher dose of T-DXd (6.4 mg/kg Q3W).
INTERPRETATION
The incidences of adverse events between two HER2-targeted ADCs were similar in different cancer types, but different HER2-targeted ADCs appeared to have different mean incidences of adverse events. The comprehensive summary of the adverse events of HER2-targeted ADCs is critical for clinicians caring for patients with cancer receiving HER2-targeted ADCs therapy.
FUNDING
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82073402) and Key R&D Plan of Hubei Province, China (No.2020BCA060) funded this study.
PubMed: 36712893
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101795 -
Cancer Causes & Control : CCC Dec 2021Cardiotoxicity affects 5-16% of cancer patients who receive anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab. Limited research has examined interventions to mitigate cardiotoxicity. We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Cardiotoxicity affects 5-16% of cancer patients who receive anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab. Limited research has examined interventions to mitigate cardiotoxicity. We examined the role of statins in mitigating cardiotoxicity by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central. A random-effect model was used to assess summary relative risks (RR), weighted mean differences (WMD), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Testing for heterogeneity between the studies was performed using Cochran's Q test and the I test.
RESULTS
Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 117 patients and four observational cohort studies with a total of 813 patients contributed to the analysis. Pooled results indicate significant mitigation of cardiotoxicity after anthracycline and/or trastuzumab exposure among statin users in cohort studies [RR = 0.46, 95% CI (0.27-0.78), p = 0.004, [Formula: see text] = 0.0%] and a non-significant decrease in cardiotoxicity risk among statin users in RCTs [RR = 0.49, 95% CI (0.17-1.45), p = 0.20, [Formula: see text] = 5.6%]. Those who used statins were also significantly more likely to maintain left ventricular ejection fraction compared to baseline after anthracycline and/or trastuzumab therapy in both cohort studies [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 6.14%, 95% CI (2.75-9.52), p < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 74.7%] and RCTs [WMD = 6.25%, 95% CI (0.82-11.68, p = 0.024, [Formula: see text] = 80.9%]. We were unable to explore publication bias due to the small number of studies.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis suggests that there is an association between statin use and decreased risk of cardiotoxicity after anthracycline and/or trastuzumab exposure. Larger well-conducted RCTs are needed to determine whether statins decrease risk of cardiotoxicity from anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION
PROSPERO: CRD42020140352 on 7/6/2020.
Topics: Anthracyclines; Cardiotoxicity; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Neoplasms; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 34406595
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01487-1 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2023Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated significant efficacy in treating solid tumors. However, the occurrence of ADC drug-associated pneumonitis can limit the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated significant efficacy in treating solid tumors. However, the occurrence of ADC drug-associated pneumonitis can limit the use of ADCs or have severe consequences, and we know comparatively little about this.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were exhaustively searched for articles and conference abstracts published before September 30, 2022. Two authors independently extracted data from the included studies. A random-effects model was used to conduct a meta-analysis of the relevant outcomes. Forest plots reflected the incidence rates from each study, and binomial methods were used to calculate the 95 % confidence interval.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 7732 patients from 39 studies and evaluated the incidence of ADCs drug-associated pneumonitis which have received market approval for the treatment of solid tumors. The total incidence of solid tumors for all-grade pneumonitis was 5.86 % (95 % CI, 3.54-8.66 %) and for grade ≥3 was 0.68 % (95 % CI, 0.18-1.38 %). The incidence of all-grade pneumonitis was 5.08 % (95 % CI, 2.76-7.96 %) and for grade ≥3 was 0.57 % (95 % CI, 0.10-1.29 %) with ADC monotherapy. The incidence of all-grade and grade ≥3 pneumonitis in trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was 13.58 % (95 % CI, 9.43-18.29 %) and 2.19 % (95 % CI, 0.94-3.81 %), respectively, the highest in ADC therapy. Total incidence of all-grade pneumonitis was 10.58 % (95 % CI, 4.34-18.81 %) and for grade ≥3 pneumonitis was 1.29 % (95 % CI, 0.22-2.92 %) with ADC combination therapy. The incidence of pneumonitis was higher with combination therapy than with monotherapy in both all-grade and grade ≥3 groups, but there was no statistical significance (P = .138 and P = .281, respectively). The incidence of ADC-associated pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was 22.18 % (95 % CI, 2.14-52.61 %), the highest among solid tumors. The 11 included studies reported 21 pneumonitis-related deaths.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings will assist clinicians in choosing the optimal therapeutic options for patients with solid tumors treated with ADCs.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Incidence; Lung Neoplasms; Pneumonia; Immunoconjugates
PubMed: 36907365
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103960 -
Future Oncology (London, England) Nov 2021A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients receiving therapy for HER2+ unresectable/metastatic breast cancer... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients receiving therapy for HER2+ unresectable/metastatic breast cancer after ≥1 HER2-directed therapy was conducted to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and relative differences from fractional polynomials (FPs) for PFS and OS were assessed by Bayesian network meta-analyses. For PFS, surface under the cumulative rankogram (SUCRA) ranked tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine as highest in both HR and FP analyses, followed by T-DM1 monotherapy and neratinib plus capecitabine. For OS, SUCRA ranked tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine as highest in both HR and FP analyses, followed by pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with capecitabine and T-DM1 monotherapy, with similar scores. Tucatinib plus trastuzumab with capecitabine, and T-DM1 monotherapy, consistently showed improved PFS and OS versus lapatinib/trastuzumab plus capecitabine and non-targeted treatments.
Topics: Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Capecitabine; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Oxazoles; Progression-Free Survival; Pyridines; Quinazolines; Quinolines; Receptor, ErbB-2; Trastuzumab
PubMed: 34463120
DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0742