-
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive... 2023Gradually increasing interest in laparoscopic surgeries has led to the advent of various lesser invasive techniques in the form of vaginal natural orifice transluminal... (Review)
Review
Comparison of Outcomes following Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery in Benign Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Gradually increasing interest in laparoscopic surgeries has led to the advent of various lesser invasive techniques in the form of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. Very few studies have analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of vNOTES over LESS surgeries in hysterectomy. After a comprehensive search, full texts of relevant manuscripts were obtained to assess eligibility for recruitment. A comprehensive meta-analysis was subsequently performed to compare the outcomes of vNOTES and LESS in hysterectomy, and forest plots were constructed. Four articles were rendered for review (three retrospective cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial). Three studies showed lesser postoperative pain in vNOTES compared to LESS. In one study, postoperative vaginal pain was higher in vNOTES due to additional suture between uterine artery and vaginal wall. The meta-analysis concluded that vNOTES could be better alternative to LESS hysterectomies. However, further large multicentric randomized trials are required for the standardization of the surgical method.
PubMed: 38034107
DOI: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_88_22 -
Reproductive Sciences (Thousand Oaks,... Dec 2022In the Western world today, urogenital fistula, including vesicovaginal fistula (VVF), is rare. However, while it remains significant in developing parts of the world... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
In the Western world today, urogenital fistula, including vesicovaginal fistula (VVF), is rare. However, while it remains significant in developing parts of the world due to prolonged and obstructed labor, in this study, we systematically reviewed the existing literature, discussing VVF occurrence, its etiology, and outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We used electronic databases to search relevant articles from 2010-2020. The screening was performed with the help of Covidence. Relevant data from included studies were extracted in excel sheets, and final analysis was done using CMA-3 using proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Fifteen studies reported the VVF among the fistula series. The pooled result showed 76.57% cases of VVF (CI, 65.42-84.96), out of which 27.54% were trigonal, 55.70% supra-trigonal, and the rest with a varied description like circumferential, juxta-cervical, juxta-urethral. Obstetric etiology was commonly reported with 19.29% (CI, 13.26-27.21) with cesarean section and 31.14% (CI, 18.23-47.86) with obstructed labor. Hysterectomy was the commonly reported etiology among gynecological etiology (46.52%, CI; 36.17-57.19). Among different surgical treatments employed for fistula closure, 49.50% were by abdominal approach (CI, 37.23-61.82), and 42.31% by vaginal approach (CI, 31.82-53.54). Successful closure of fistula was reported in 87.09% of the surgeries (CI, 84.39-89.38).
CONCLUSION
The vesicovaginal fistula is the most common type of genitourinary fistula. Major causes of fistula are gynecological surgery, obstructed labor, and cesarean section. The vaginal approach and abdominal are common modalities of repair of fistula with favorable outcomes in the majority of the patients.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pregnancy; Vesicovaginal Fistula; Cesarean Section; Retrospective Studies; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Hysterectomy
PubMed: 34981462
DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00832-8 -
Obstetrics and Gynecology May 2024To identify the optimal hysterectomy approach for large uteri in gynecologic surgery for benign indications from a perioperative morbidity standpoint.
OBJECTIVE
To identify the optimal hysterectomy approach for large uteri in gynecologic surgery for benign indications from a perioperative morbidity standpoint.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception through September 19, 2022. Meta-analyses were conducted as feasible.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
This review included studies that compared routes of hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for large uteri (12 weeks or more or 250 g or more) and excluded studies with any concurrent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, incontinence, gynecologic malignancy, or any obstetric indication for hysterectomy.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
The review included 25 studies comprising nine randomized trials, two prospective, and 14 retrospective nonrandomized comparative studies. Studies were at high risk of bias. There was lower operative time for total vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) (mean difference 39 minutes, 95% CI, 18-60) and total vaginal hysterectomy compared with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (mean difference 50 minutes, 95% CI, 29-70). Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with much greater risk of ureteral injury compared with total vaginal hysterectomy (odds ratio 7.54, 95% CI, 2.52-22.58). There were no significant differences in bowel injury rates between groups. There were no differences in length of stay among the laparoscopic approaches. For LAVH compared with total vaginal hysterectomy, randomized controlled trials favored total vaginal hysterectomy for length of stay. When rates of blood transfusion were compared between these abdominal hysterectomy and robotic-assisted total hysterectomy routes, abdominal hysterectomy was associated with a sixfold greater risk of transfusion than robotic-assisted total hysterectomy (6.31, 95% CI, 1.07-37.32). Similarly, single studies comparing robotic-assisted total hysterectomy with LAVH, total laparoscopic hysterectomy, or total vaginal hysterectomy all favored robotic-assisted total hysterectomy for reduced blood loss.
CONCLUSION
Minimally invasive routes are safe and effective and have few complications. Minimally invasive approach (vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic) results in lower blood loss and shorter length of stay, whereas the abdominal route has a shorter operative time.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, CRD42021233300.
PubMed: 38743951
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005607 -
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology Jul 2022To perform a systematic review on consumption, leftover, and disposal of prescribed opioids after surgery in obstetrics and gynecology (The International Prospective... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review on consumption, leftover, and disposal of prescribed opioids after surgery in obstetrics and gynecology (The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews ID 249856).
DATA SOURCES
Electronic database searches on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE and other search methods including all studies published between the years 2000 and 2021 were used.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
We included all randomized trials, cohorts, case-control studies, and clinical trials. The search was limited to studies related to obstetrics and gynecology. Studies that pertained to opioid consumption, leftover, and disposal patterns were selected. We excluded review articles, meeting abstracts, case series and case reports, and abstracts without access to full texts. The search was limited to trials in humans and published in English language. Study population included women who were prescribed opioids after obstetric and/or gynecologic procedures. Information on opioid consumption, leftover, and disposal patterns were extracted and compared among different procedures. Potential risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tool of Controlled Interventional Studies for clinical trial.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
Of 2343 articles, 10 were used in the analysis: 9 cohorts and 1 randomized clinical trial. We found that among patients who underwent obstetric and gynecologic procedures, a considerable number of opioids are unused. The total number of consumed opioids after discharge in patients who underwent cesarean delivery was 21.8 oral morphine equivalent (OME); vaginal hysterectomy, 55.7 OME; abdominal hysterectomy, 105.8 OME; and laparoscopic hysterectomy, 89.0 OME. The number of opioids leftover in the vaginal, abdominal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy groups was 67.6 OME, 115.5 OME, and 95.3 OME, respectively. On average, 77.5% of leftover opioids were not disposed/kept, whereas only 20% discarded their medication through a disposal program. Five studies were deemed to have fair quality, and the rest were rated as good quality.
CONCLUSION
Compared with those after cesarean delivery, patients undergoing gynecologic procedures consumed a large number of opioids, especially after abdominal hysterectomies. Abdominal hysterectomy was also associated with a high number of opioids leftover. Most patients did not use the entire prescribed opioids and were either keeping their unused opioids or unsure about what to do with them. We recommend perioperative opioid-specific counseling and education on opioid consumption, potential hazards of unused medication, and proper disposal for patients. Strategies to reduce opioids prescription by physicians should be considered.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Analgesics, Opioid; Pain Management; Pain, Postoperative; Patient Discharge; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35513302
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.04.017 -
BJUI Compass Nov 2022Pessaries are desirable for its overall safety profiles. Serious complications have been reported; however, there is little summative evidence. This systematic review... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Pessaries are desirable for its overall safety profiles. Serious complications have been reported; however, there is little summative evidence. This systematic review aimed to consolidate all reported serious outcomes from pessaries usage to better identify and counsel patients who might be at higher risk of developing these adverse events.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature review using search terms such as 'prolapse', 'stress urinary incontinence' and 'pessary or pessaries or pessarium' on PubMed, Embase and CINAHL. A total of 36 articles were identified. Patient-level data were extracted from case reports to further describe complications on an individual level.
RESULTS
Overall median age of the patients was 82 years (range 62-98). The most frequent complications were vesicovaginal fistula (25%, = 9/36), rectovaginal fistula (19%, = 7/36), vaginal impaction (11%, = 4/36) and vaginal evisceration of small bowel through vaginal vault (8%, = 3/36). In the vesicovaginal fistula cohort, none of the patients had a history of radiation, and two had histories of total abdominal hysterectomy (22%). In the rectovaginal fistula cohort, one patient had a history of pelvic radiation for rectal squamous cell carcinoma, and another had a history of chronic steroid use for rheumatoid arthritis. No other risk factors were reported in the other groups. Ring and Gellhorn were the most represented pessary types among the studies, 16 (44%) and 12 (33%), respectively. No complications were reported with surgical and non-surgical treatment of the complications.
CONCLUSION
Pessaries are a reasonable and durable treatment for POP with exceedingly rare reports of severe adverse complications. The ideal candidate for pessary should have a good self-care index. Studies to determine causative factors of the more serious adverse events are needed; however, this may be difficult given the long follow-up that is required.
PubMed: 36267197
DOI: 10.1002/bco2.174 -
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology Mar 2021Vaginal cuff dehiscence, a severe and potentially detrimental complication, has significantly increased after the introduction of endoscopic hysterectomy. The aim of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Vaginal cuff dehiscence, a severe and potentially detrimental complication, has significantly increased after the introduction of endoscopic hysterectomy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature was to identify the incidence of, and possible strategies to prevent, this complication after total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total robotic hysterectomy.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically queried to identify all articles reporting either laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomies for benign indications in which vaginal dehiscence was reported as an outcome. Reference lists of the identified studies were manually searched. Only papers written in English were considered.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
The Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework for the review included (1) population of interest: women who underwent conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy; (2) interventions: possible methods to prevent vaginal dehiscence; (3) comparison: experimental strategies vs standard treatment or alternative strategy for each item of intervention; and (4) outcome: rate of vaginal dehiscence. Series of subtotal hysterectomies and radical hysterectomies in addition to reports that combined both benign and malignant cases were excluded. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.4.1 (Cochrane Training, London, United Kingdom). Two independent reviewers identified all reports comparing 2 or more possible strategies to prevent vaginal dehiscence.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
A total of 460 articles were identified. Of these, 20 (6 randomized, 2 prospective, and 12 retrospective) studies were included in this review for a total of 19 392 patients. The incidence of vaginal dehiscence after total laparoscopic hysterectomy ranged between 0.64% and 1.35%. Robotic hysterectomy was associated with a risk of vaginal dehiscence of approximately 1.64%. No study compared early vs delayed resumption of coital activity nor analyzed the role of training in laparoscopic suturing. No study specifically assessed the impact of electrosurgery on the risk of vaginal dehiscence in endoscopic hysterectomies for benign indications. Double-layer and reinforced sutures did not decrease the risk of dehiscence. Barbed sutures reduced the risk of separation compared with nonbarbed closure (0.4% [4/1108] vs 2% [22/1097]; odds ratio [OR] 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.57). However, these data came mainly from retrospective series. Excluding studies on the use of self-anchoring sutures during robotic hysterectomy, there was no significant difference in the risk of dehiscence between barbed and nonbarbed sutures (0.5% [4/890] vs 1.4% [181/776]; OR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.13-1.10). Transvaginal suture of the vault at the end of an endoscopic hysterectomy seemed to increase the risk of dehiscence when compared with laparoscopic closure (2.3% [23/1002] vs 1.16% [11/944]; OR 1.97; 95% CI, 1.00-3.88).
CONCLUSION
There is a paucity of high-quality papers evaluating vaginal dehiscence and possible prevention strategies in the current literature. Only 2 effective strategies have been identified in reducing the risk for this complication: the use of barbed sutures and the adoption of a laparoscopic approach to close the vaginal cuff. When restricting the analysis only to laparoscopic cases, the use of barbed sutures does not protect against vaginal cuff separation.
Topics: Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Incidence; Laparoscopy; Risk Factors; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Surgical Wound Dehiscence; Suture Techniques; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; Vaginal Diseases
PubMed: 33348012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.016 -
Obstetrics and Gynecology Nov 2023To explore how markers of health care disparity are associated with access to care and outcomes among patients seeking and undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications.
OBJECTIVE
To explore how markers of health care disparity are associated with access to care and outcomes among patients seeking and undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through January 23, 2022.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
The population of interest included patients in the United States who sought or underwent hysterectomy by any approach for benign indications. Health care disparity markers included race, ethnicity, geographic location, insurance status, and others. Outcomes included access to surgery, patient level outcomes, and surgical outcomes. Eligible studies reported multivariable regression analyses that described the independent association between at least one health care disparity risk marker and an outcome. We evaluated direction and strengths of association within studies and consistency across studies.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
Of 6,499 abstracts screened, 39 studies with a total of 46 multivariable analyses were included. Having a Black racial identity was consistently associated with decreased access to minimally invasive, laparoscopic, robotic, and vaginal hysterectomy. Being of Hispanic ethnicity and having Asian or Pacific Islander racial identities were associated with decreased access to laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy. Black patients were the only racial or ethnic group with an increased association with hysterectomy complications. Medicare insurance was associated with decreased access to laparoscopic hysterectomy, and both Medicaid and Medicare insurance were associated with increased likelihood of hysterectomy complications. Living in the South or Midwest or having less than a college degree education was associated with likelihood of prior hysterectomy.
CONCLUSION
Studies suggest that various health care disparity markers are associated with poorer access to less invasive hysterectomy procedures and with poorer outcomes for patients who are undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. Further research is needed to understand and identify the causes of these disparities, and immediate changes to our health care system are needed to improve access and opportunities for patients facing health care disparities.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, CRD42021234511.
Topics: Aged; Female; Humans; United States; Healthcare Disparities; Medicare; Hysterectomy; Ethnicity; Hysterectomy, Vaginal; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37826848
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005389 -
AJOG Global Reports May 2024As the second most common surgery performed on women in the United States, hysterectomy techniques are constantly examined for validity and superiority. The vaginal... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
As the second most common surgery performed on women in the United States, hysterectomy techniques are constantly examined for validity and superiority. The vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) has increased in popularity since the first vNOTES hysterectomy was performed in 2012. We sought out to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of hysterectomy by vNOTES compared to conventional vaginal hysterectomy for various benign indications.
DATA SOURCES
We searched Scopus, Medline, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.Gov, and the Cochrane Library. Our search included all studies from each respective database's inception until September 1, 2023.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We included eligible studies that compare vNOTES hysterectomy versus conventional vaginal hysterectomy for various benign indications, and included at least one of our preselected outcomes. The main outcomes were estimated blood loss (mL), operation time (min), length of hospital stay (d), Visual Analogue Scale pain score at Day 1, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
We analyzed data of our continuous outcomes using RevMan 5.4.1. Continuous outcomes were analyzed using mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) under the inverse variance analysis method. We assessed the quality of the studies using the ROBINS-I assessment tool.
RESULTS
We found 4 eligible studies to include in our analysis. Surgeon declared estimated blood loss was found to be similar in both groups (MD=-44.70 [-99.97, 10.57]; =.11). Also, the total length of hospital stay (in days) was found to be comparable in both groups (MD=-0.16 [-1.62, 1.30]; =.83). We also found no other statistically significant difference between hysterectomy by vNOTES and vaginal hysterectomy in other studied outcomes, including the duration of the operation, the Visual Analogue Scale Pain score after 1 day, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION
vNOTES seems to be associated with a nonsignificant lower surgeon declared estimated blood loss. We found no other significant differences in hospital stay, intraoperative, or postoperative outcomes. Further studies may clarify if other differences in safety or efficacy exist.
PubMed: 38883323
DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100355 -
International Journal of Gynaecology... Jan 2023To evaluate the efficacy and safety of five different approaches to cervical cancer surgery. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of five different approaches to cervical cancer surgery.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search for comparative studies on different radical hysterectomy types for cervical cancer in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. All included observational studies used survival analyses to compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing different radical hysterectomy types. All studies were assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale with scores of at least seven points. We extracted the relevant data and conducted a network meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes among five surgical approaches.
RESULTS
Thirty studies (n = 11 353) were included. Robotic surgery had the lowest blood loss volume and hospitalization duration; open surgery had the shortest operative time. Vaginal assisted laparoscopic surgery was associated with the highest number of resected lymph nodes and lowest rate of perioperative complications. Survival outcomes and tumor recurrence outcomes were similar among the approaches.
CONCLUSION
The current approaches to cervical cancer surgery have comparable efficacies.
Topics: Female; Humans; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Hysterectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Laparoscopy; Neoplasm Staging
PubMed: 35373333
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14209 -
Gynecologic Oncology Sep 2022Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy are considered the standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer (ECC). Minimal Invasive approach to this surgery...
BACKGROUND
Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy are considered the standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer (ECC). Minimal Invasive approach to this surgery has been debated after the publication of a recent prospective randomized trial (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer, LACC trial). It demonstrated poorer oncological outcomes for Minimal Invasive Surgery in ECC. However, the reasons are still an open debate. Laparo-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy (LAVRH) seems to be a logical option to Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy (ARH). This meta-analysis has the aim to prove it.
METHODS
Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, the Pubmed database and Scopus database were systematically searched in January 2022 since early first publications. No limitation of the country was made. Only English article were considered. The studies containing data about Disease-free Survival (DFS) and/or Overall Survival (OS) and/or Recurrence Rate (RcR) were included.
RESULTS
18 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. 8 comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning surgical approach (Laparo-Assisted Vaginal Radical Hysterectomy) and compared with ARH Oncological outcomes such as DFS and OS were considered. 3033 patiets were included. Meta-analysis highlighted a non-statistic significant difference between LARVH and ARH (RR 0.82 [95% CI 0.55-1.23] p = 0.34; I = 0%; p = 0.96). OS was feasible only for 3 studies (RR 1.14 [95% CI 0.28-4.67] p = 0.43; I = 0 p = 0.86). Data about the type of recurrences (loco-regional vs distant) were collected.
CONCLUSION
LARVH does not appear to affect DFS and OS in ECC patients. The proposed results seem to be comparable with the open approach group of the LACC trial, which today represents the reference standard for the treatment of this pathology. More studies will be needed to test the safety and efficacy of LARVH in the ECC.
PubMed: 36150915
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.001