-
Journal of Clinical Medicine Oct 2022Metronomic chemotherapy (MC) is the frequent, regular administration of drug doses designed to maintain a low, but active, range of concentrations of chemotherapeutic... (Review)
Review
Metronomic chemotherapy (MC) is the frequent, regular administration of drug doses designed to maintain a low, but active, range of concentrations of chemotherapeutic drugs, during prolonged periods of time without inducing excessive toxicities. To date, more than 400,000 children and adolescents under the age of 20 are diagnosed with cancer, per year, with 80% survival in most high-income countries, but less than 30% in low- and middle-income ones. In this review, we summarized the principal preclinical and clinical studies involving the use of MC in the most common pediatric tumors, with an overview of efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetic profile, and biomarkers. The best advantages of MC are low toxicity, oral administration and, thus, the feasibility of a more comfortable, home-based treatment, therefore improving the quality of life of the children themselves and of their parents and caregivers. Moreover, MC could represent a valid method to reduce the economic burden of anticancer therapy in the pediatric setting.
PubMed: 36362482
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216254 -
Gynecologic Oncology Reports Aug 2022No standard chemotherapy is available after disease progression or anaphylaxis during platinum chemotherapy among patients with recurrent cervical cancer. Here we report...
No standard chemotherapy is available after disease progression or anaphylaxis during platinum chemotherapy among patients with recurrent cervical cancer. Here we report the efficacy and toxicities of metronomic chemotherapy consisting of 50 mg of oral cyclophosphamide (CPA) daily and intravenous 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab (BEV) repeated every 3 weeks (CPA-BEV). Treated patients were retrospectively reviewed. Adverse events and response rates were recorded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ver 5.0 and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors ver 1.1, respectively. Eleven patients had been treated with CPA-BEV between 2016 and 2021.The pathologic types were squamous cell carcinoma in seven patients, adenocarcinoma in three, and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in one. Nine patients had primary concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Five patients received more than one prior chemotherapy (excluding CCRT). Six patients had progressive disease during prior platinum-based chemotherapy, four patients recurred within 6 months of the last platinum administration, and one patient had platinum anaphylaxis. Grade 3 or more hematologic toxicities and grade 2 or more non-hematological toxicities were observed in one with grade 3 neutropenia and in one with grade 2 proteinuria, respectively. The median duration of chemotherapy was 2.8 months (range 0.2-30.6 months). One patient had CR but none had PR. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95 %CI: 2.1-10.7 months), and median overall survival was 13.6 months (95 %CI: 8.4-33.7 months). In conclusion, the CPA-BEV regimen showed favorable antitumor activity with minimal toxicity and is promising candidate for second-line chemotherapy.
PubMed: 36118995
DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101013 -
Veterinary and Comparative Oncology Dec 2021This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of low dose cyclophosphamide chemotherapy plus meloxicam as an adjuvant treatment, compared with high dose...
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of low dose cyclophosphamide chemotherapy plus meloxicam as an adjuvant treatment, compared with high dose doxorubicin or surgery alone in cats with mammary carcinoma. Medical records of 228 female cats treated for mammary carcinoma between 2008 and 2018, were reviewed in eight veterinary institutions. Only cats with complete tumour staging and radical mastectomy were included in the study. One hundred and thirty-seven cats were divided into three treatment groups: group 1 (n = 80) cats treated with surgery, group 2 (n = 34) cats that had surgery and adjuvant treatment with doxorubicin, and group 3 (n = 23) cats with surgery and adjuvant treatment with low dose metronomic cyclophosphamide and meloxicam. The study endpoints were disease free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was evaluated according to the VCOG-CTCAE criteria. The median DFI was 270, 226 and 372 days in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The median OS was 338 (group 1), 421 (group 2) and 430 (group 3) days. The differences between groups were not significant (DFI P = .280 and OS P = .186). Toxicity was observed in 52.9% (n = 18) of cats in group 2 and 39.1% (n = 9) of cats in group 3, with mild to moderate intensity. Differences were not significant (P = .306). In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy treatment did not improve survival and the overall benefit remains unproven. Randomized prospective trials are necessary to clarify the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for feline mammary carcinomas.
Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma; Cat Diseases; Cats; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cyclophosphamide; Doxorubicin; Female; Mammary Neoplasms, Animal; Mastectomy; Meloxicam; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate
PubMed: 33140523
DOI: 10.1111/vco.12660 -
Journal of Neuro-oncology Jan 2021Glioblastoma (GBM) has a survival rate of around 2 years with aggressive current standard of care. While other tumors have responded favorably to trials combining... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Glioblastoma (GBM) has a survival rate of around 2 years with aggressive current standard of care. While other tumors have responded favorably to trials combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy, GBM remains uniformly deadly with minimal increases in overall survival. GBM differ from others due to being isolated behind the blood brain barrier, increased heterogeneity and mutational burden, and immunosuppression from the brain environment and tumor itself.
METHODS
We have reviewed clinical and preclinical studies investigating how different doses (dose intense (DI) and metronomic) and timing of immunotherapy following TMZ treatment can eradicate tumor cells, alter tumor mutational burden, and change immune cells.
RESULTS
Recent clinical trials with standard of care (SoC), DI and metronomic TMZ regimes are no able to completely eradicate GBM. Elevated TMZ levels in DI treatment can overcome MGMT resistance but may result in hypermutation of surviving tumor cells. Higher levels of TMZ will also generate a higher degree of lymphopenia compared to SoC and metronomic regimes in preclinical studies.
CONCLUSION
The different levels of lymphopenia and tumor eradication discussed in this review suggest possible beneficial pairings between immunotherapy and TMZ treatment. Treatments resulting in profound lymphopenia will allow for expansion of vaccine specific T cells or of CAT T cells. Clinical and preclinical studies are currently comparing different combinations of TMZ and immunotherapy timing to treat GBM through a balance between tumor killing and immune cell expansion. More frequent immune monitoring time points in ongoing clinical trials are crucial for further development of these combinations.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Glioblastoma; Humans; Immunotherapy; Lymphopenia; Temozolomide; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32813186
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03598-2 -
Cancer Letters Jul 2023The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical practice for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is currently limited to patients with... (Review)
Review
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical practice for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is currently limited to patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), which comprise less than 5% of all mCRC cases. Combining ICIs with anti-angiogenic inhibitors, which modulate the tumor microenvironment, may reinforce and synergize the anti-tumor immune responses of ICIs. In mCRCs, combinations of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib have shown good efficacy in early phase trials. These results suggest the potential utility of immune modulators as partners in combination treatment with ICIs in immunologically cold microsatellite stable, as well as hot dMMR/MSI-H tumors. Unlike conventional pulsatile maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy, low-dose metronomic (LDM) chemotherapy recruits immune cells and normalizes vascular-immune crosstalk, similar to anti-angiogenic drugs. LDM chemotherapy mostly modulates the tumor stroma rather than directly killing tumor cells. Here, we review the mechanism of LDM chemotherapy in terms of immune modulation and its potential as a combination partner with ICIs for the treatment of patients with mCRC tumors, most of which are immunologically cold.
Topics: Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Colorectal Neoplasms; Colonic Neoplasms; Immunotherapy; DNA Mismatch Repair; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 37209943
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216236 -
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Jul 2020Metronomic chemotherapy exerts its effects via inhibition of angiogenesis, immune modulation of the tumoral stroma, induction of senescence and apoptosis of tumor cells.... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Metronomic chemotherapy exerts its effects via inhibition of angiogenesis, immune modulation of the tumoral stroma, induction of senescence and apoptosis of tumor cells. Due to its favorable toxicity profile and its oral administration, metronomic chemotherapy arises as a promising alternative to be combined with endocrine therapy for the treatment of patients with luminal breast cancer.
AREAS COVERED
The present manuscript reviews the rationale supporting the combination of metronomic chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, discussing the studies that evaluated this regimen in the treatment of early-stage and metastatic breast cancer patients. Finally, we conclude by providing an expert opinion on the current role and perspectives for the combination of metronomic chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in the management of patients with luminal breast cancer.
EXPERT OPINION
Retrospective series and early-phase clinical trials have shown promising signs of activity and a favorable toxicity profile with this regimen, which warrants further investigation as a treatment option for luminal breast cancer patients.
Topics: Administration, Metronomic; Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Neovascularization, Pathologic
PubMed: 32536212
DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1782200 -
Indian Journal of Pharmacology 2020Treatment of cancer is a major challenge even though the pathophysiology is becoming clearer with time. A number of new chemical entities are developed to target cancer... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
Treatment of cancer is a major challenge even though the pathophysiology is becoming clearer with time. A number of new chemical entities are developed to target cancer growth inhibition, but the targeted delivery of these products still needs novel research. This is of utmost importance not only for higher efficacy but also for a reduction in systemic toxicity and cost of treatment. Although multiple novel targets and molecules are being researched, most of them could not pass the regulatory approval process, due to low benefit-risk ratio and lack of target specificity. Failure of a majority of these drugs was in part due to their superiority claimed via surrogate markers. Despite these, currently, more than 100 chemotherapeutic agents are in practice. This review paper discusses in detail the molecular basis, drug discovery, and pros and cons over conventional treatment approaches of three novel approaches in cancer therapy, i.e., (i) antibody-drug conjugates, (ii) cancer immunotherapy, and (iii) metronomic chemotherapy. All the drugs developed using these three novel approaches were compared against the established treatment regimens in clinical trials with clinical end points, such as overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life.
Topics: Administration, Metronomic; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Development; Humans; Immunoconjugates; Immunotherapy; Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival; Quality of Life; Survival Rate
PubMed: 33283772
DOI: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_475_18 -
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Jan 2020: Head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world. Almost 2/3rds of patients have recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC. Treatment... (Review)
Review
: Head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world. Almost 2/3rds of patients have recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC. Treatment options for R/M HNSCC have evolved, with relatively little change in survival. Thus, it is imperative that management decisions must balance efficacy with toxicity and emphasize the importance of maintaining the patient's quality of life (QOL).: We cover the various chemotherapeutic options available for R/M HNSCC including single agent chemotherapy, platinum-based doublets and triplet options. The role of cetuximab, immunotherapy and oral metronomic chemotherapy (OMCT) is also reviewed. We discuss the management of patients with platinum-refractory disease.: In all patients with R/M HNSCC, we recommend assessment of extent of disease, patient symptomatology, performance status, affordability and availability of logistic and social support. In patients with PD-L1 CPS =/> 20, pembrolizumab is an option. In patients with PD-L1 CPS < 20, pembrolizumab/cisplatin/5FU or cisplatin/5FU/cetuximab (EXTREME) may be considered based on affordability and availability. Options available that have a lower toxicity and can help to maintain the patient's QOL include; single agent chemotherapy, carboplatin/paclitaxel combination chemotherapy, sequential combination chemotherapy followed by cetuximab, replacing 5FU with docetaxel (TPEx regime) and OMCT.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Immunotherapy; Palliative Care; Quality of Life; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
PubMed: 31899993
DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1708197 -
Physical Review. E Sep 2023We develop a finite-cell model of tumor natural selection dynamics to investigate the stochastic fluctuations associated with multiple rounds of adaptive chemotherapy....
We develop a finite-cell model of tumor natural selection dynamics to investigate the stochastic fluctuations associated with multiple rounds of adaptive chemotherapy. The adaptive cycles are designed to avoid chemoresistance in the tumor by managing the ecological mechanism of competitive release of a resistant subpopulation. Our model is based on a three-component evolutionary game played among healthy (H), sensitive (S), and resistant (R) populations of N cells, with a chemotherapy control parameter, C(t), which we use to dynamically impose selection pressure on the sensitive subpopulation to slow tumor growth and manage competitive release of the resistant population. The adaptive chemoschedule is designed based on the deterministic (N→∞) adjusted replicator dynamical system, then implemented using the finite-cell stochastic frequency dependent Moran process model (N=10K-50K) to ascertain the cumulative effect of the stochastic fluctuations on the efficacy of the adaptive schedules over multiple rounds. We quantify the stochastic fixation probability regions of the R and S populations in the HSR trilinear phase plane as a function of the control parameter C∈[0,1], showing that the size of the R region increases with increasing C. We then implement an adaptive time-dependent schedule C(t) for the stochastic model and quantify the variances (using principal component coordinates) associated with the evolutionary cycles over multiple rounds of adaptive therapy. The variances increase subquadratically through several rounds before the evolutionary cycle begins to break down. Despite this, we show the stochastic adaptive schedules are more effective at delaying resistance than standard maximum tolerated dose and low-dose metronomic schedules. The simplified low-dimensional model provides some insights on how well multiple rounds of adaptive therapies are likely to perform over a range of tumor sizes (i.e., different values of N) if the goal is to maintain a sustained balance among competing subpopulations of cells to avoid chemoresistance via competitive release in a stochastic environment.
Topics: Humans; Biological Evolution; Neoplasms; Selection, Genetic; Game Theory; Stochastic Processes
PubMed: 37849192
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.108.034407 -
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Jun 2021Although feline mammary carcinomas (FMCs) are highly metastatic, the literature and treatment options pertaining to advanced tumours are scarce. This study aimed to...
OBJECTIVES
Although feline mammary carcinomas (FMCs) are highly metastatic, the literature and treatment options pertaining to advanced tumours are scarce. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcome of metastatic FMC with or without adjuvant treatment.
METHODS
The medical records of 73 cats with metastatic FMC (stage IV) were reviewed and included in this study. Metastatic disease was detected by distinct imaging techniques (radiography, ultrasound and CT) and confirmed by cytology and/or histopathology. Cats with adjuvant chemotherapy treatment (n = 34) were divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 9) cats receiving maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy; group 2 (n = 15) cats receiving metronomic chemotherapy; and group 3 (n = 10) cats treated with toceranib phosphate. The study endpoints were time to progression (TTP) and tumour-specific survival (TSS). Treatment-related toxicity was evaluated according to the Veterinary Co-operative Oncology Group's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 1.1 (VCOG-CTCAE).
RESULTS
Overall mean TTP and TSS were 23 and 44 days, respectively. Cats with clinical signs at the time of diagnosis had a lower TSS (14 days) than asymptomatic cats (128 days; <0.001). Cats with pleural effusion had a lower TSS (16 days) than cats without ( <0.001). Median TSS was 58, 75 and 63 days in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively ( = 0.197). Toxicity was observed in 66.7%, 20% and 30% of cats in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
To the best of our knowledge, this study includes the highest number of patients with metastatic FMC assessed. Despite the overall poor prognosis, some cats survived >6 months, indicating that adjuvant treatment may be an option to consider in metastatic disease. More studies are warranted for better understanding and management of stage IV patients.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Cat Diseases; Cats; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33078692
DOI: 10.1177/1098612X20964416