-
Neurologic Clinics May 2021Seizures are frequently triggered by an inciting event and result from uninhibited excitation and/or decreased inhibition of a pool of neurons. If physiologic seizure... (Review)
Review
Seizures are frequently triggered by an inciting event and result from uninhibited excitation and/or decreased inhibition of a pool of neurons. If physiologic seizure abortive mechanisms fail, the ensuing unrestrained synchronization of neurons-status epilepticus-can be life-threatening and is associated with the potential for marked morbidity in survivors and high medical care costs. Prognosis is intimately related to etiology and its response to therapeutic measures. Timely implementation of pharmacologic therapy while concurrently performing a stepwise workup for etiology are paramount. Neurodiagnostic testing should guide titration of pharmacologic therapies, and help determine if there is a role for immune modulation.
Topics: Humans; Seizures; Status Epilepticus
PubMed: 33896531
DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2021.01.009 -
Current Neurology and Neuroscience... Jan 2022Seizures, including status epilepticus, have been reported in association with acute COVID-19 infection. People with epilepsy (PWE) have suffered from seizure... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Seizures, including status epilepticus, have been reported in association with acute COVID-19 infection. People with epilepsy (PWE) have suffered from seizure exacerbations during the pandemic. This article reviews the data for clinical and electrographic seizures associated with COVID-19, technical EEG considerations for reducing risk of transmission, and factors contributing to seizure exacerbations in PWE as well as strategies to address this issue.
RECENT FINDINGS
An increasing number of studies of larger cohorts, accounting for a variety of variables and often utilizing EEG with standardized terminology, are assessing the prevalence of seizures in hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19 infections, and gaining insight into the prevalence of seizures and their effect on outcomes. Additionally, recent studies are evaluating the effect of the pandemic on PWE, barriers faced, and the usefulness of telehealth. Although there is still much to learn regarding COVID-19, current studies help in assessing the risk of seizures, guiding EEG utilization, and optimizing the use of telehealth during the pandemic.
Topics: COVID-19; Epilepsy; Humans; Pandemics; Seizures; Status Epilepticus
PubMed: 35080752
DOI: 10.1007/s11910-022-01174-x -
Journal of Child Neurology Aug 2022To determine the nature of staring spells and factors distinguishing epileptic from nonepileptic staring spells, we studied the clinical and demographic features of...
OBJECTIVE
To determine the nature of staring spells and factors distinguishing epileptic from nonepileptic staring spells, we studied the clinical and demographic features of children with staring spells referred to a regional new-onset seizure clinic.
STUDY DESIGN
Our retrospective chart review encompassed 2818 consecutive patients evaluated in the new-onset seizure clinic between September 22, 2015, and March 19, 2018. We identified 121 patients with newly presenting staring spells.
RESULTS
Sixty-two of 121 (51%) children were diagnosed with nonepileptic staring spells and 59 (49%) with epileptic seizures (24 with absence epilepsy, 35 with focal epilepsy). Patients with nonepileptic staring spells were younger (4.8 vs 7.1 years, = .001) and more likely to have developmental delay ( = .005) than the seizure group. There was an 8.9-month delay on average from the onset of staring spells to the new-onset seizure clinic visit. The emergency department was a referral source for 80% (28/35) of focal seizures. In children with focal seizures, the staring spells typically lasted >1minute (29/35, 83%), whereas only 19 of 62 (31%) of children with nonepileptic staring spells had events lasting this long ( = .04). All children had a routine electroencephalography (EEG) on the day of new-onset seizure clinic visit. EEG was diagnostic in 100% (24/24) of absence seizures and 51% (18/35) of focal seizures.
CONCLUSIONS
In children presenting with staring spells, the differential diagnosis of epileptic staring spells vs nonepileptic staring spells can be made by history and routine EEG. Staring was as likely to be epileptic as nonepileptic spells. Younger children with developmental delay were more likely to have nonepileptic events. Our simple approach based on event duration, postictal symptoms, and EEG allowed identification of epileptic staring on first visit to new-onset seizure clinic but requires validation in future prospective studies including long-term video EEG monitoring and follow-up.
Topics: Child; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy, Absence; Humans; Mental Disorders; Retrospective Studies; Seizures
PubMed: 35746887
DOI: 10.1177/08830738221103090 -
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Aug 2023
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Humans; Seizures; Electroencephalography
PubMed: 37797323
DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003893 -
Medicina Clinica Mar 2023Idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGI) are an electroclinical syndrome that includes four subsyndromes according to the ILAE 2017 classification. The long-term...
INTRODUCTION
Idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGI) are an electroclinical syndrome that includes four subsyndromes according to the ILAE 2017 classification. The long-term prognosis of these syndromes is uncertain due to the scarcity and heterogeneity of the studies. The objective of this study is to analyze the long-term prognosis of these syndromes, pharmacological treatment and the seizure recurrence.
METHOD
Observational and retrospective study of a serie of patients diagnosed with EGI. Epidemiological variables, pharmacological treatment, freedom of seizures and recurrence after withdrawal of treatment were collected.
RESULTS
We included 101 patients, the majority women (56.4%), with a median evolution of epilepsy of 17 years (interquartile range: 7-31). The most frequent syndrome was juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (46.5%), followed by epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone (25.7%), juvenile absence epilepsy (13.9%) and childhood absence epilepsy (13.9%). The 71.29% were on monotherapy and 20.79% on polytherapy, with significant differences between the different syndromes (P=.001). The most widely used drug was valproic acid. 39.6% presented seizure remission at 5 years, but we did not observe significant differences between the different syndromes (P=.982). The recurrence rate was 71.4% after withdrawal of treatment.
CONCLUSION
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy was the most frequent subtype of IGE. We observed significant differences in terms of polytherapy in the different syndromes, although not in the rates of remission of seizures at one year and at five years. The majority of patients with treatment withdrawal relapsed.
Topics: Humans; Female; Child; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Retrospective Studies; Epilepsy, Generalized; Epilepsy, Absence; Seizures; Syndrome; Anticonvulsants; Electroencephalography
PubMed: 36030098
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2022.06.019 -
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B Mar 2022To assess the occurrence of sleep disorders (SD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children with typical absence seizures (TAS) compared to... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
OBJECTIVE
To assess the occurrence of sleep disorders (SD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children with typical absence seizures (TAS) compared to control children and to evaluate the impact of epilepsy-related factors on sleep and attention in children with TAS.
METHODS
The Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) and the ADHD rating scale were filled in by parents of a cohort composed by 82 children aged from 5 to 15.6 years, 49% of boys (41 with TAS with a syndromic diagnosis of childhood absence epilepsy and 41 controls). For children with TAS, the Pediatric Epilepsy Side Effects Questionnaire was completed. Statistical analyses were conducted in order to compare sleep and attention scores between groups. In children with TAS, a correlation was computed between these scores. Logistics regression models were conducted to identify predictors of excessive diurnal sleepiness and inattention in children with TAS.
RESULTS
Compared to controls, children with TAS had higher total scores for subjective sleep (mean 42.9 vs 38.3, p = 0.05) and attention disorders (mean 16.8 vs 11.6, p = 0.01), especially for excessive diurnal sleepiness (mean 3.9 vs 3.2, p = 0.02) and inattention (mean 9.3 vs 5.6, p = 0.003) components. In children with TAS, sleep problems were significantly under-reported by parents. Sleep disorders symptoms as breathing-related sleep disturbance, excessive diurnal sleepiness or naps at or after 7 years of age were reported. Subjective sleep and attention disorders were significantly correlated (r = 0.43, p = 0.01). Subjective excessive diurnal sleepiness may be the result of a polytherapy (p = 0.05) or a side effect of anti-seizure medication (ASM) (p = 0.03) but children without medication side effects also reported subjective SD. In children with TAS, the risk of inattention symptoms was increased in boys (p = 0.02), with a high BMI (p = 0.05), or with ASM side effects (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates that children with TAS are at risk of sleep and attention disorder symptoms. If attention disorders in a context of epilepsy are now widely assessed and identified, sleep disorders are still under-estimated. An accurate identification and management of sleep disorders could improve academic performances, quality of life, and seizure management in children with TAS.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsy, Absence; Humans; Male; Quality of Life; Seizures; Sleep; Sleep Wake Disorders; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 35085916
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108513 -
Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences Oct 2023Most patients with glioneuronal tumors present with seizures. Although several studies have shown that greater extent of resection improves overall patient survival, few...
BACKGROUND
Most patients with glioneuronal tumors present with seizures. Although several studies have shown that greater extent of resection improves overall patient survival, few studies have focused on postoperative seizure outcome after resection of these tumors. The aim of this study was to characterize seizure control rates in patients undergoing glioneuronal tumor resection and evaluate the association between poor seizure outcome and tumor recurrence or progression.
METHODS
The study population included patients who had undergone resection of glioneuronal tumors between 2014 and 2019 at our institution. Seizure outcome was assessed using Engel grading. Preoperative seizure characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical factors, and postoperative seizure outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS
Twenty-six patients (N.=16, temporal lobe; N.=6, frontal lobe; N.=4, parietal lobe) with mean seizures duration of 56.9-months, were assessed. Histopathologically, N.=15 dysembryoplastic neurepithelial tumor, N.=7 ganglioglioma and N.=4 Diffuse lepto-meningeal neuroepithelial tumor. There were 2 cases of complex DNET and one case of DLMNT had associated cortical dysplasia. At mean follow-up of 49.7 months, N.=20 Engel 1, N.=4 Engel 2 and N.=2 had Engel 3 outcome. N.=20 underwent gross total excision (N.=18 Engel 1 and N.=2 Engel 2) and N.=6 sub-total excision. Among the 4 patients who needed re-surgery, two were in Engel 2 and another two were in Engel 3.
CONCLUSIONS
Good seizure-outcome is likely associated with extent of resection. Younger age of patient, less than one-year of seizure duration and absence of generalization of seizure are good prognostic indicators. The best seizure-control can be achieved by early surgical intervention.
Topics: Humans; Brain Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Epilepsy; Ganglioglioma; Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial; Electroencephalography
PubMed: 33320468
DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.20.05144-9 -
Seizure May 2021To investigate whether the parameters of EEG microstates changed before and after an absence seizure episode.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate whether the parameters of EEG microstates changed before and after an absence seizure episode.
METHODS
AE patients with a current high frequency of seizures were included (n=21). Each included subject underwent a two-hour and 19-channel video EEG examination. Five epochs of 10-second EEG data in interictal, pre-seizure, and post-seizure states were collected from each AE patient. Five 10-second resting-state EEG epochs from sex- and age-matched HCs who reported no history of neurological or psychiatric disorders and visited the hospital for routine physical examinations were collected. Microstate analysis and source localization of microstates were performed using the LORETA KEY tool.
RESULTS
Compared with the resting-state EEGs of HCs, the interictal EEGs of AE patients showed a higher relative transition rate from microstates B to D (p<0.05). From interictal to pre-seizure EEG, the total time ratio of microstate C and the occurrence of microstate B decreased significantly, while the duration of microstate B increased significantly (p<0.05). Compared with pre-seizure EEGs, microstate C in post-seizure EEGs showed a significantly downregulated total time percentage and occurrence (p<0.05). The source localization of each microstate in each condition also varied and showed spatial recovery tends from pre- to post-seizure states.
CONCLUSION
Altered EEG microstate dynamics exist between inter-ictal EEGs of AE patients and resting-state EEGs of HCs and between pre- and post-seizure EEGs in AE patients. The EEG microstates of epileptic patients before and after absence seizures are characterized by a "slowdown" in transitions between microstates. Microstates might be used as an index to evaluate the temporal and spatial recovery process of absence seizures in AE.
Topics: Brain; Brain Mapping; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy, Absence; Humans; Seizures
PubMed: 33799135
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.03.020 -
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology :... Nov 2022Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) refers to coronavirus disease secondary to SARS-CoV2 infection mainly affecting the human respiratory system. The SARS-CoV2 has been...
PURPOSE
Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) refers to coronavirus disease secondary to SARS-CoV2 infection mainly affecting the human respiratory system. The SARS-CoV2 has been reported to have neurotropic and neuroinvasive features and neurological sequalae with wide range of reported neurological manifestations, including cerebrovascular disease, skeletal muscle injury, meningitis, encephalitis, and demyelination, as well as seizures and focal status epilepticus. In this case series, we analyzed the continuous video-EEGs of patients with COVID-19 infection to determine the presence of specific EEG features or epileptogenicity.
METHODS
All continuous video-EEG tracings done on SARS-CoV2-positive patients during a 2-week period from April 5, 2020, to April 19, 2020, were reviewed. The demographics, clinical characteristics, imaging, and EEG features were analyzed and presented.
RESULTS
Of 23 patients undergoing continuous video-EEG, 16 were COVID positive and were included. Continuous video-EEG monitoring was ordered for "altered mental status" in 11 of 16 patients and for "clinical seizure" in 5 of 16 patients. None of the patients had seizures or status epilepticus as a presenting symptom of COVID-19 infection. Instead, witnessed clinical seizures developed as results of COVID-19-related medical illness(es): anoxic brain injury, stroke/hemorrhage, lithium (Li) toxicity (because of kidney failure), hypertension, and renal disease. Three patients required therapeutic burst suppression because of focal nonconvulsive status epilepticus, status epilepticus/myoclonus secondary to anoxic injury from cardiac arrest, and one for sedation (and with concomitant EEG abnormalities secondary to Li toxicity).
CONCLUSIONS
In this observational case series of 16 patients with COVID-19 who were monitored with continuous video-EEG, most patients experienced a nonspecific encephalopathy. Clinical seizures and electrographic status epilepticus were the second most commonly observed neurological problem.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; RNA, Viral; SARS-CoV-2; Status Epilepticus; Seizures; Electroencephalography
PubMed: 33606430
DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000832 -
Pediatric Neurology Dec 2022The primary objective of this study was to investigate the utility of limited-montage electroencephalography (EEG) for seizure detection in children. We also aimed to...
BACKGROUND
The primary objective of this study was to investigate the utility of limited-montage electroencephalography (EEG) for seizure detection in children. We also aimed to determine whether the detection rate differed among different montage patterns.
METHODS
This study was carried out between November 2019 and October 2020 at a tertiary children's hospital in Japan. The subjects were inpatients in the pediatric intensive care unit who had an epileptic seizure during EEG monitoring. Each patient's EEG record, consisting of a 15-minute recording during an epileptic seizure and a 15-minute recording in the absence of an epileptic seizure, was extracted from the medical charts. The EEG data were then analyzed using six, limited-montage coverage patterns: (1) Fp1-C3, Fp2-C4, (2) Fp1-O1, Fp2-O2, (3) Fp1-T3, Fp2-T4, (4) C3-O1, C4-O2, (5) C3-T3, C4-T4, and (6) O1-T3, O2-T4. The sensitivity and specificity of each montage for seizure detection was analyzed.
RESULTS
One hundred thirty-two EEG data points from 11 patients were examined. Sensitivity and specificity were the highest for Fp1-O1 and Fp2-O2 at 73% and 91%, respectively. Overall, the montage covering the frontopolar area had the highest detection rate, followed by the montage covering the occipital, central, and temporal areas.
CONCLUSION
Limited-montage EEG identified seizures in children hospitalized in the intensive care unit, but the detection rate differed by montage coverage. The detection rate was highest in the montage covering the frontopolar area.
Topics: Child; Humans; Electroencephalography; Seizures; Epilepsy; Sensitivity and Specificity; Intensive Care Units
PubMed: 36182696
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.08.011