-
JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques Aug 2021Although fracture of the coracoid process (CF) used to be considered rare, it is now more commonly encountered due to increased awareness and advances in imaging... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Although fracture of the coracoid process (CF) used to be considered rare, it is now more commonly encountered due to increased awareness and advances in imaging methods. This review aimed to analyze reported cases of CF to determine its mechanism and appropriate treatment.
METHODS
PubMed and Scopus were searched using the terms "scapula fracture" and "coracoid fracture." The inclusion criteria were English full-text articles concerning CF that described patient characteristics with appropriate images. The exclusion criteria included cases without appropriate images and those with physeal injury or nonunion. Citation tracking was conducted to find additional articles and notable full-text articles in other languages. Fractures were mainly classified using Ogawa's classification.
RESULTS
Ninety-seven studies were identified, including 197 patients (131 men, 33 women; average age 37.0±16.9 years). CF was classified as type I in 77%, type II in 19%, and avulsion fracture at the angle in 5%. Concurrent shoulder girdle injuries included acromioclavicular injury in 33%, clavicular fracture in 17%, acromion or lateral scapular spine fracture in 15%, and anterior shoulder instability in 11%. Among patients with type I CF, 69% had multiple disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex. Conservative treatment was applied in 71% of isolated type I CF, while surgical treatment was applied in 76% of type I CF with multiple disruptions. Although the evaluation methods varied, 60% of patients were followed up for more than 6 months, and the outcomes were generally satisfactory for both conservative and surgical treatments.
CONCLUSION
CF occurred commonly in the age group with higher social activity. The most common fracture type was type I. The possible mechanism of CF is violent traction of the attached muscles, except for avulsion fracture at the angle. Type I CF with multiple disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex requires surgical treatment, whereas conservative care is recommended for isolated type I and type II CFs.
PubMed: 37588963
DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.04.008 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong... 2022The coracoid process is an important anatomical structure of the scapula, which can be used as a landmark in the diagnosis and treatment of scapula related diseases,...
INTRODUCTION
The coracoid process is an important anatomical structure of the scapula, which can be used as a landmark in the diagnosis and treatment of scapula related diseases, such as acromioclavicular joint dislocation, anterior shoulder instability, and coracoid fractures. The aim of this study was to classify the coracoid process according to morphology and to measure the morphological parameters of the coracoid process.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 377 dry and intact scapulae were collected and classified in terms of the connection between the shape of coracoid process and common things in life. The anatomical morphology and the position related to acromion and glenoid socket of the coracoid process were measured in each type by three independent researchers with a digital caliper. The measurements were averaged and recorded.
RESULTS
Based on obvious morphological features, five specific types of the coracoid process were described: Type I, Vertical 8-shape; Type II, Long stick shape; Type III, Short stick shape; Type IV, Water drop shape, and Type V, Wedge shape. Type I (30%) and Type III (29%) were more prevalent in China. The tip width of the coracoid process of Type IV was the shortest and significantly different compared to the other types ( <.05), contrary to the longest in Type V. The tip thickness of the coracoid process of Type I was the shortest and significantly different from the other types ( <.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The coracoid process was classified into five types based on obvious morphological features. Knowing of morphological classification and anatomical parameters of different types of the coracoid process, to some extent, may be helpful to diagnose and treat the shoulder joint disease, such as acromioclavicular joint dislocation, anterior shoulder instability, and coracoid fractures, and to theoretically reduce postoperative complications.
Topics: Coracoid Process; Humans; Joint Instability; Scapula; Shoulder Dislocation; Shoulder Joint
PubMed: 35041540
DOI: 10.1177/23094990211069694 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Mar 2022The critical shoulder angle (CSA) reflects the lateral extent of the acromion and the inclination of the glenoid. In 2013, CSA was first introduced and its association...
Editorial Commentary: Current Indications for Lateral Acromioplasty Include Patients With Elevated Critical Shoulder Angle Plus Subacromial Impingement With Rotator Cuff Pathology or Previous Rotator Cuff Repair.
The critical shoulder angle (CSA) reflects the lateral extent of the acromion and the inclination of the glenoid. In 2013, CSA was first introduced and its association with rotator cuff (RC) tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) was shown. It was speculated that with a high CSA, there was an increased superior force vector from the deltoid and that this superior force led to RC tears. Conversely, when the CSA was low, there was a greater compressive force from the deltoid and that this compressive force led to GHOA. CSA serves as a further development of 2 previously reported measurements (glenoid inclination and acromial index). A key potential therapeutic aspect of the CSA is the ability to modify it surgically, which theoretically could protect RC repairs or prevent progression. In our current clinical practice, we perform lateral acromioplasty (LA) in patients undergoing treatment of subacromial impingement with an "at-risk" rotator cuff (partial rotator cuff tear and severe tendinopathy on magnetic resonance imaging) with a CSA > 38° or all patients with a CSA >35° after an RC repair to protect the RC repair construct. The relationships of high and low CSA, the anatomic safe zone, and thus clinical applicability of LA are well established and performed in our daily surgical practice. However, we do not yet have widespread clear clinical evidence on potential benefits regarding the clinical outcome after LA. Finally, at this time, the downsides seem minimal, so we continue to use LA as an adjunct in patients with RC tears and RC tendons that are at risk.
Topics: Acromion; Humans; Rotator Cuff; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder; Shoulder Joint
PubMed: 35248226
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.002 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Nov 2023The biomechanical changes and treatment guidelines on acromial fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are still not well understood. The purpose of our study...
BACKGROUND
The biomechanical changes and treatment guidelines on acromial fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are still not well understood. The purpose of our study was to analyze the biomechanical changes with respect to acromial fracture angulation in RSA.
METHODS
RSA was performed on 9 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders. An acromial osteotomy was performed on the plane extending from the glenoid surface to simulate an acromion fracture. Four conditions of acromial fracture inferior angulation were evaluated (0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° angulation). The middle deltoid muscle loading origin position was adjusted based on the position of each acromial fracture. The impingement-free angle and capability of the deltoid to produce movement in the abduction and forward flexion planes were measured. The length of the anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid was also analyzed for each acromial fracture angulation.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in the abduction impingement angle between 0° (61.8° ± 2.9°) and 10° angulation (55.9° ± 2.8°); however, the abduction impingement angle of 20° (49.3° ± 2.9°) significantly decreased from 0° and 30° angulation (44.2° ± 4.6°), and 30° angulation significantly differed from 0° and 10° (P < .01). On forward flexion, 10° (75.6° ± 2.7°), 20° (67.9° ± 3.2°), and 30° angulation (59.8° ± 4.0°) had a significantly decreased impingement-free angle than 0° (84.2° ± 4.3°; P < .01), and 30° angulation had a significantly decreased impingement-free angle than 10°. On analysis of glenohumeral abduction capability, 0° significantly differed (at 12.5, 15.0, 17.5, and 20.0N) from 20° and 30°. For forward flexion capability, 30° angulation showed a significantly smaller value than 0° (15N vs. 20N). As acromial fracture angulation increased, the middle and posterior deltoid muscles of 10°, 20°, and 30° became shorter than those of 0°; however, no significant change was found in the anterior deltoid length.
CONCLUSIONS
In acromial fractures at the plane of glenoid surface, 10° inferior angulation of the acromion did not interfere with abduction and abduction capability. However, 20° and 30° of inferior angulation caused prominent impingement in abduction and forward flexion and reduced abduction capability. In addition, there was a significant difference between 20° and 30°, suggesting that not only the location of the acromion fracture after RSA but also the degree of angulation are important factors for shoulder biomechanics.
PubMed: 37379965
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.026 -
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Dec 2022The aim of this study was to assess whether the anteroposterior coverage of the acromion reflecting acromial morphology affects the rotator cuff tear (RCT) and tear...
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to assess whether the anteroposterior coverage of the acromion reflecting acromial morphology affects the rotator cuff tear (RCT) and tear size, in addition to the lateral coverage.
METHODS
Medical records of 356 patients with RCTs, concentric osteoarthritis, and calcific tendinitis identified using three-dimensional computed tomography between January 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group A (those with RCTs) and group B (those with concentric osteoarthritis or calcific tendinitis). Subsequently, group A was subdivided into three categories according to the size of RCTs: small-to-medium, large, and massive. The lateral coverage was measured through the lateral acromial angle (LAA) and critical shoulder angle (CSA), whereas the anteroposterior coverage was measured via the acromial tilt (AT), acromiohumeral interval (AHI) in the sagittal view, and anteroposterior coverage index (APCI) as a new radiologic parameter.
RESULTS
Between groups A and B, CSA (34.5° ± 3.4° and 30.8° ± 3.4°, respectively), APCI (0.83 ± 0.10 and 0.75 ± 0.08, respectively), and AHI (6.3 ± 2.0 mm and 7.8 ± 1.8 mm, respectively) were significantly different (all < 0.001), whereas LAA and AT did not show a significant difference between the groups ( = 0.089 and = 0.665, respectively). The independent predictive radiologic parameters of the RCT were the CSA, APCI, and AHI ( < 0.001, < 0.001, and = 0.043, respectively); among these, the APCI showed the highest regression coefficient (odds ratio = 2.82). The parameters associated with the size of RCTs were CSA ( = 0.022) and AHI, of which AHI, in particular, had the most significant effect on both small-to-medium and large tears (all < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Large CSA, high APCI, and low AHI were predictors of RCTs, with the APCI showing the strongest correlation. In addition to the large CSA, low AHI also correlated with the size of RCTs and affected the entire size groups. We suggest that both the lateral coverage and anteroposterior coverage of the acromion should be considered essential factors for predicting the presence of RCTs and tear size.
Topics: Humans; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Acromion; Shoulder Joint; Rupture; Osteoarthritis; Tendinopathy
PubMed: 36518929
DOI: 10.4055/cios22073 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2022Proximal humeral migration is common in patients with rotator cuff tears. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relevance between proximal humeral migration and some...
BACKGROUND
Proximal humeral migration is common in patients with rotator cuff tears. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relevance between proximal humeral migration and some rotator cuff tear-related factors.
METHODS
A total of 75 patients with unilateral rotator cuff tears were retrospectively included from August 2016 to January 2018 who underwent magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray examinations before enrollment. We introduced the upward migration index (UMI) to stratify the patients into three groups, Group A: 1 < UMI ≤ 1.3; Group B: 1.3 < UMI ≤ 1.4; and Group C: UMI > 1.4. Pearson correlation analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between UMI and age, sex, body mass index, pain, fatty degeneration grade, tear size, and thickness of ruptured tendon. Then, the test and receiver operator characteristic curve were applied to measure the diagnostic value of UMI.
RESULTS
The average UMI was 1.34 ± 0.07, ranging from 1.16 to 1.48. For the Pearson correlation analysis, there was a negative correlation between UMI and tear size ( = -0.68, < 0.01), and also, there was a negative correlation between UMI and the visual analogue scale score ( = 0.342, < 0.01). What is more, there was a negative correlation between UMI and the fatty degeneration grade ( = -0.373, < 0.01). Ordinal multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that tear size ( = -1.825, < 0.001) was the independent predictor of UMI, which was a risk factor for humeral upward migration. The cutoff points of UMI were 1.38 and 1.3 to determine tears and distinguish large tears from small ones.
CONCLUSIONS
UMI is a good predictor for humeral upward migration, which is related to the tear size of posterosuperior cuff tears. When the UMI is <1.3, a large tear should be alerted. Combining physical examination and X-ray is helpful for evaluating rotator cuff tears.
PubMed: 35599789
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.903538 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Oct 2023The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with stratification based on measurement method and implant design.
METHODS
This systematic review was performed using PRISMA-P guidelines. PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Trials, and Embase were queried for articles evaluating the relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes inclusive of range of motion (ROM), strength, outcome scores, and pertinent complications (acromial and scapular spine fractures, nerve injury) after RSA. The relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes was reported descriptively overall and stratified by measurement method and implant design (globally medialized vs. lateralized). A positive association was defined as increased humeral lengthening being associated with greater ROM, outcome scores, or a greater incidence of complications, whereas a negative association denoted that increased humeral lengthening was associated with poorer ROM, outcome scores, or a lower incidence of complications. Meta-analysis was performed to compare humeral lengthening between patients with and without fractures of the acromion or scapular spine.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were included. Humeral lengthening was assessed as the acromiohumeral distance (AHD), the distance from the acromion to the greater tuberosity (AGT), the acromion to the deltoid tuberosity (ADT), and the acromion to the distal humerus (ADH). Of 11 studies that assessed forward elevation, a positive association with humeral lengthening was found in 6, a negative association was found in 1, and 4 studies reported no association. Of studies assessing internal rotation (n = 9), external rotation (n = 7), and abduction (n = 4), all either identified a positive or lack of association with humeral lengthening. Studies assessing outcome scores (n = 11) found either a positive (n = 5) or no (n = 6) association with humeral lengthening. Of the studies that assessed fractures of the acromion and/or scapular spine (n = 6), 2 identified a positive association with humeral lengthening, 1 identified a negative association, and 3 identified no association. The single study that assessed the incidence of nerve injury identified a positive association with humeral lengthening. Meta-analysis was possible for AGT (n = 2) and AHD (n = 2); greater humeral lengthening was found in patients with fractures for studies using the AGT (mean difference 4.5 mm, 95% CI 0.7-8.3) but not the AHD. Limited study inclusion and heterogeneity prohibited identification of trends based on method of measuring humeral lengthening and implant design.
CONCLUSION
The relationship between humeral lengthening and clinical outcomes after RSA remains unclear and requires future investigation using a standardized assessment method.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Shoulder Joint; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Fractures, Bone; Humerus; Range of Motion, Articular; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Shoulder Prosthesis
PubMed: 37379967
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.024 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jan 2022Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can be devastating complications leading to substantial functional impairments.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can be devastating complications leading to substantial functional impairments. The purpose of this study was to review factors associated with increased acromial and scapular spine strain after RTSA from a biomechanical standpoint.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, OVID Medline, and CENTRAL databases were searched and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Each article was assessed using the modified Downs and Black checklist to appraise the quality of included studies. Study selection, extraction of data, and assessment of methodological quality were carried out independently by two of the authors. Only biomechanical studies were considered.
RESULTS
Six biomechanical studies evaluated factors associated with increased acromial and scapular spine strain and stress. Significant increases in acromial and scapular spine strain were found with increasing lateralization of the glenosphere in four of the included studies. In two studies, glenosphere inferiorization consistently reduced acromial strain. The results concerning humeral lateralization were variable between four studies. Humeral component neck-shaft angle had no significant effect on acromial strain as analysed in one study. One study showed that scapular spine strain was significantly increased with a more posteriorly oriented acromion (55° vs. 43°; < 0.001). Another study showed that the transection of the coracoacromial ligament increased scapular spine strain in all abduction angles ( < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Glenoid lateralization was consistently associated with increased acromial and scapular spine strain, whereas inferiorization of the glenosphere reduced strain in the biomechanical studies analysed in this systematic review. Humeral-sided lateralization may increase or decrease acromial or scapular spine strain. Independent of different design parameters, the transection of the coracoacromial ligament resulted in significantly increased strains and scapular spine strains were also increased when the acromion was more posteriorly oriented. The results found in this systematic review of biomechanical in-silico and in-vitro studies may help in the surgical planning of RTSA to mitigate complications associated with acromion and scapular spine fracture.
PubMed: 35054057
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020361 -
Anatomy & Cell Biology Dec 2020Acromion is a major associated structure of subacromial impingement syndrome, one of the most common diagnoses in chronic shoulder pain world-wide. The aims of this...
Acromion is a major associated structure of subacromial impingement syndrome, one of the most common diagnoses in chronic shoulder pain world-wide. The aims of this study are to study morphometry of acromion and to find risk group using acromial morphometry. Total samples were 392 scapulae. The samples were of both sexes, ranging from the age of 31 to 90. Acromion type and osteophytes were observed. Acromial parameters were measured. The relationships were analyzed among acromion type, acromial osteophyte, acromial parameters, age group, sex and side. Curved acromion had the highest prevalence in all age groups. Hooked acromion had the second highest prevalence since the age of 41. Hooked acromion prevalence was higher in male than in female. The highest prevalence of acromial osteophytes was on anteroinferior surface in all age group. The prevalence of acromial osteophytes on anteroinferior surface and acromial facet increased with age. In addition, acromion type was associated with only osteophytes on anteroinferior surface of acromion. Anterior one-third acromial thickness in the age of 31 to 50 was different from those of 51 to 90. There are differences between all parameters and sexes, but not side. General population with age above 50 and concerned male group with age above 40 who have chronic shoulder pain should be investigated for subacromial impingement syndrome. Surgical treatment is recommended because hooked acromion and osteophytes are mostly the root of problem.
PubMed: 32963132
DOI: 10.5115/acb.20.166 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Nov 2021Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an established treatment for elderly patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears, complex proximal humerus fractures, and... (Review)
Review
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an established treatment for elderly patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears, complex proximal humerus fractures, and revision arthroplasty; however, with the increasing indications for RTSA over the last decade and younger implant recipients, post-operative complications have become more frequent, which has driven advances in computational modeling and simulation of reverse shoulder biomechanics. The objective of this study was to provide a review of previously published studies that employed computational modeling to investigate complications associated with RTSA. Models and applications were reviewed and categorized into four possible complications that included scapular notching, component loosening, glenohumeral joint instability, and acromial and scapular spine fracture, all of which remain a common cause of significant functional impairment and revision surgery. The computational shoulder modeling studies reviewed were primarily used to investigate the effects of implant design, intraoperative component placement, and surgical technique on postoperative shoulder biomechanics after RTSA, with the findings ultimately used to elucidate and mitigate complications. The most significant challenge associated with the development of computational models is in the encapsulation of patient-specific anatomy and surgical planning. The findings of this review provide a basis for future direction in computational modeling of the reverse shoulder.
PubMed: 34830616
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225336