-
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice :... Sep 2020Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent the standard of care in patients with mutation-positive (m+) non-small cell lung cancer... (Review)
Review
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent the standard of care in patients with mutation-positive (m+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The availability of several EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for use in the first-line or later settings in NSCLC warrants an in-depth understanding of the pharmacological properties of, and clinical data supporting, these agents. The second-generation, irreversible ErbB-family blocker, afatinib, has been extensively studied in the context of m+ NSCLC. Results from the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 studies showed that afatinib was more active and better tolerated than chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring mutations. Subanalysis of these trials, along with real-world data, indicates that afatinib is active in patients with certain uncommon mutations (S768I/G719X/L861Q) as well as common mutations (Del19/L858R), and in patients with active brain metastases. In LUX-Lung 7, a head-to-head phase IIb trial, afatinib improved progression-free survival and time-to-treatment failure versus the first-generation reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib, albeit with a higher incidence of serious treatment-related adverse events. Nevertheless, afatinib is generally well tolerated, and adverse events are manageable through supportive care and a well-defined tolerability-guided dose adjustment scheme. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of afatinib, discuss treatment sequencing strategies following emergence of different resistance mechanisms, and shed light on the economic impact of afatinib. We also provide a comparison of afatinib with the available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and discuss its position within treatment strategies for patients with m+ NSCLC.
Topics: Afatinib; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; ErbB Receptors; Gefitinib; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Progression-Free Survival; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 32567494
DOI: 10.1177/1078155220931926 -
Anticancer Research Apr 2022Afatinib is a standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Osimertinib...
BACKGROUND/AIM
Afatinib is a standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Osimertinib can overcome the treatment resistance-associated EGFR T790M mutation, and the sequence of afatinib followed by osimertinib is an effective therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients. This study comprehensively evaluated the outcomes of sequential therapy following frontline afatinib and identified predictive factors for T790M mutation acquisition.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Data from patients with advanced NSCLC treated with frontline afatinib at a Taiwanese hospital group from June 2014 to March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The EGFR T790M mutation was detected by tissue sequencing or liquid biopsy. The patients' clinicopathological features were collected, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential predictive and prognostic factors.
RESULTS
A total of 635 patients treated with afatinib were enrolled in this study. Until August 2021, 553 patients experienced progression, and 225 patients underwent T790M mutation testing. The T790M positive rate was 54.2%. Both exon 19 deletion and progression-free survival were associated with T790M positivity. Osimertinib was found to be effective in T790M-positive but not T790M-negative NSCLC. The median overall survival (OS) was 61.8 months for patients with T790M mutation undergoing later-line osimertinib compared with 30.1 months for patients without T790M mutation undergoing chemotherapy only. Osimertinib independently prolonged OS after afatinib progression.
CONCLUSION
This study confirmed the efficacy of sequential afatinib and osimertinib treatment. T790M mutation detection and osimertinib availability are important for prolonging survival in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.
Topics: Afatinib; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; ErbB Receptors; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35347039
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15697 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Dec 2021Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard of care for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However,...
BACKGROUND
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard of care for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, optimal sequence of treatment has yet to be defined. Overall survival (OS) is influenced by the availability/use of subsequent therapy after first-line treatment. Emergence of T790M is the main mechanism of resistance to afatinib and second-line osimertinib could be a treatment option in this instance.
METHODS
In this non-interventional, global study (NCT04179890), existing medical/electronic records were identified for consecutive EGFR TKI-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (Del19 or L858R) treated with first-line afatinib and second-line osimertinib in regular clinical practice (n = 191; all T790M-positive). The primary objective was time to treatment failure (TTF). Key secondary objectives were OS and objective response rate (ORR).
RESULTS
At the start of afatinib treatment, median age (range) was 62 years (34-88). Fifty-five percent of patients were female and 67% were Asian. ECOG PS (0/1/≥2) was 31%/57%/12%. Fourteen percent of patients had brain metastases. At the start of osimertinib treatment, ECOG PS (0/1/≥2) was 25%/61%/14% and 14% had brain metastases (rising to 29% at the end of osimertinib treatment). The source of biopsy material (solid/liquid) was 86%/3% at the start of afatinib and 54%/33% at start of osimertinib. Mutations were mainly detected with PCR methods. Overall, median TTF was 27.7 months (95% CI: 24.0-30.2) and median OS was 36.5 months (95% CI: 32.9-41.8). ORR with afatinib and osimertinib was 74% and 45%. TTF, OS and ORR were generally consistent across subgroups.
CONCLUSION
Sequential afatinib and osimertinib demonstrated encouraging activity in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and acquired T790M. Activity was observed across all subgroups, including patients with poor ECOG PS or brain metastases. ECOG PS and incidence of brain metastases remained stable prior to, and after, afatinib treatment.
Topics: Acrylamides; Afatinib; Aniline Compounds; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; ErbB Receptors; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Mutation; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 34649106
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.009 -
Integrative Cancer Therapies 2022In epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) leads to disease...
In epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) leads to disease progression. Strategies to overcome the resistance are required in treatment for advanced lung cancer. In this study, we investigated the therapeutic effect of afatinib and HangAmDan-B1 (HAD-B1) co-administration in gefitinib-resistant NSCLC using HCC827-GR, NSCLC cell line with gefitinib resistance, and the HCC827-GR cell implanted mouse model. HAD-B1 consists of 4 herbs, Radix, , C. A. Mey, and Birdwood, and has been reported to be effective in patients with advanced lung cancer in clinical practice. Our findings demonstrated that HAD-B1 combined with afatinib markedly inhibited cell proliferation and induced apoptosis compared to afatinib monotherapy and HAD-B1 monotherapy. Inhibition of HCC827-GR cell proliferation by HAD-B1 occurred through MET amplification and reduced phosphorylation, and the synergistic effect of afatinib and HAD-B1 induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HCC827-GR cells via the downregulation of ERK and mTOR signaling pathways. In hematology and biochemistry tests, HAD-B1 alleviated the toxicity of tumor. In conclusion, HAD-B1 combined with afatinib would be a promising therapeutic strategy for NSCLC with EGFR-TKI resistance.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Afatinib; Gefitinib; Lung Neoplasms; Quinazolines; ErbB Receptors; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Mutation
PubMed: 36565160
DOI: 10.1177/15347354221144311 -
Cancer Treatment and Research... 2022After the development of acquired resistance to osimertinib, the standard-of-care treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC is chemotherapy. Whether afatinib, a pan-ErbB...
INTRODUCTION
After the development of acquired resistance to osimertinib, the standard-of-care treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC is chemotherapy. Whether afatinib, a pan-ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active after progression on osimertinib is unknown.
METHODS
We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received afatinib-containing therapy after progression on osimertinib. Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initiation of afatinib.
RESULTS
After progression on first (N=3) or second-line plus (N=12) osimertinib, 15 patients received afatinib monotherapy (N=3), afatinib and cetuximab (N=10), or afatinib and bevacizumab (N=2). The objective response rate was 6.7% and disease control rate was 53.3%. Median PFS was 2.5 months and median OS was 7.7 months. Median PFS of ≥ 6 months versus < 6 months on osimertinib was associated with a significantly greater median PFS on afatinib (4.0 versus 1.4 months; P=0.003), although there was no significant difference in median OS (9.3 versus 6.6 months; P=0.123). Best response of stable disease/partial response versus progressive disease on osimertinib was associated with a significantly greater median PFS on afatinib (3.4 versus 1.6 months; P=0.036) and a significantly greater median OS (8.7 versus 4.6 months; P=0.017).
CONCLUSION
Afatinib-containing therapy had limited activity in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after progression on osimertinib in this cohort of mostly second-line plus osimertinib. Response and longer PFS to prior osimertinib may be predictive of response to afatinib. Strategies based on osimertinib resistance mechanisms may further define the role of subsequent afatinib.
PubMed: 34920242
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100497 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Oct 2023Adding bevacizumab to first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS), but... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Adding bevacizumab to first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS), but limited data are available for second-generation EGFR-TKIs. AfaBev-CS is a randomized, phase II trial comparing afatinib plus bevacizumab and afatinib alone as first-line treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Untreated patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations (Del19 or L858R) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either afatinib (30 mg) plus bevacizumab (AfaBev group) or afatinib (40 mg) monotherapy (Afa group). The primary endpoint was PFS. The power was >50% under the assumptions of a median PFS of 12 months for the Afa group and hazard ratio (HR) of 0.6 for the AfaBev group.
RESULTS
Between August 2017 and September 2019, 100 patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference in PFS between the groups. The median PFS was 16.3 and 16.1 months for the AfaBev and Afa groups, respectively, with an HR of 0.865 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.539 to 1.388; p = 0.55). In terms of overall survival, there was no significant difference between the groups (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.83; p = 0.67). The overall response rate was 82.6% and 76.6% in the AfaBev and Afa groups, respectively (p = 0.61). Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, hypertension, acneiform rash, paronychia, and stomatitis were frequently observed in the AfaBev group.
CONCLUSIONS
This study failed to show efficacy of AfaBev over Afa for improving PFS in untreated patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Afatinib; Bevacizumab; Lung Neoplasms; ErbB Receptors; Mutation
PubMed: 37651927
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107349 -
Oncogene Jan 2021Pancreatic cancer (PC) is difficult to defeat due to mechanism (s) driving metastasis and drug resistance. Cancer stemness is a major challenging phenomenon associated...
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is difficult to defeat due to mechanism (s) driving metastasis and drug resistance. Cancer stemness is a major challenging phenomenon associated with PC metastasis and limiting therapy efficacy. In this study, we evaluated the pre-clinical and clinical significance of eradicating pancreatic cancer stem cells (PCSC) and its components using a pan-EGFR inhibitor afatinib in combination with gemcitabine. Afatinib in combination with gemcitabine significantly reduced Kras; Pdx-1 Cre (KC) (P < 0.01) and Kras; p53; Pdx-1 Cre (KPC) (P < 0.05) derived mouse tumoroids and KPC-derived murine syngeneic cell line growth compared to gemcitabine/afatinib alone treatment. The drug combination also reduced PC xenograft tumor burden (P < 0.05) and the incidence of metastasis by affecting key stemness markers, as confirmed by co-localization studies. Moreover, the drug combination significantly decreases the growth of various PC patient-derived organoids (P < 0.001). We found that SOX9 is significantly overexpressed in high-grade PC tumors (P < 0.05) and in chemotherapy-treated patients compared to chemo-naïve patients (P < 0.05). These results were further validated using publicly available datasets. Moreover, afatinib alone or in combination with gemcitabine decreased stemness and tumorspheres by reducing phosphorylation of EGFR family proteins, ERK, FAK, and CSC markers. Mechanistically, afatinib treatment decreased CSC markers by downregulating SOX9 via FOXA2. Indeed, EGFR and FOXA2 depletion reduced SOX9 expression in PCSCs. Taken together, pan-EGFR inhibition by afatinib impedes PCSCs growth and metastasis via the EGFR/ERK/FOXA2/SOX9 axis. This novel mechanism of pan-EGFR inhibitor and its ability to eradicate CSC may serve as a tailor-made approach to enhance chemotherapeutic benefits in other cancer types.
Topics: Afatinib; Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Deoxycytidine; ErbB Receptors; Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-beta; Humans; Mice; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Pancreatic Neoplasms; SOX9 Transcription Factor; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 33288882
DOI: 10.1038/s41388-020-01564-w -
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology Mar 2022The therapeutic efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on solid tumors is limited by drug resistance and side effects. Currently, the combination therapy...
The therapeutic efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on solid tumors is limited by drug resistance and side effects. Currently, the combination therapy comprises of TKIs and angiogenesis inhibitors have been corroborated as an effective approach in cancer therapy. Ethoxy-erianin phosphate (EBTP) is an anti-angiogenic compound with low toxicity obtained by structural modification of the natural product erianin. Here, we aimed to evaluate whether EBTP can cooperate with TKIs to inhibit the proliferation and angiogenesis of tumor cells and reduce toxic effects. First, CCK-8 results showed that EBTP can effectively inhibit the proliferation of liver cancer cell line HepG2. We combined EBTP with four TKIs (Bosutinib, Apatinib, Afatinib and Erlotinib) to treat HepG2 cells and CompuSyn software analysis suggested that EBTP/Afatinib(Afa)shows the best synergistic inhibitory effect. Meanwhile, EBTP/Afa can significantly suppress the proliferation, invasion, migration and angiogenesis of HepG2 and HUVECs. ELISA results revealed that EBTP/Afa inhibits the secretion of VEGF in HepG2. EBTP/Afa down-regulates the expression of VEGF, p-VEGFR1, p-VEGFR2 and p-EGFR in both HepG2 and HUVECs. Further, the supernatant of HepG2 cells treated with EBTP/Afa blocks the intracellular downstream signal transduction shared by VEGF and EGFR in HUVECs. Finally, EBTP/Afa significantly inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo. To conclude, EBTP/Afa targets VEGF and EGFR signaling pathways in liver cancer cells and tumor vasculature, thereby inhibiting the proliferation, motion and angiogenesis of liver cancer cells. Overall, this study provides a new combined strategy for the clinical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Topics: Afatinib; Animals; Bibenzyls; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; ErbB Receptors; HCT116 Cells; Hep G2 Cells; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Mice, Nude; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Phenol; Phosphates; Signal Transduction; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
PubMed: 35143806
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2022.115911 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2023Afatinib is mainly used to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but its therapeutic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma is still unclear.
BACKGROUND
Afatinib is mainly used to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but its therapeutic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma is still unclear.
METHODS
Over 800 drugs were screened by CCK8 technology and afatinib was found to have a significant inhibitory effect on liver cancer cells. The expression of PDL1 in tumor cells treated with drugs were detected by qRT-PCR and Weston Blot experiments. The effects of afatinib on the growth, migration and invasion of HCC cells were evaluated using wound healing, Transwell, and cell cloning assays. The in vivo effects of afatinib in combination with anti-PD1 were evaluated in C57/BL6J mice with subcutaneous tumorigenesis. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to explore the specific mechanism of afatinib's inhibition of ERBB2 in improving the expression level of PD-L1, which was subsequently verified through experiments.
RESULTS
Afatinib was found to have a significant inhibitory effect on liver cancer cells, as confirmed by in vitro experiments, which demonstrated that it could significantly suppress the growth, invasion and migration of HCC cells. qRT PCR and Weston Blot experiments also showed that Afatinib can enhance the expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells. In addition, in vitro experiments confirmed that afatinib can significantly enhance the immunotherapeutic effect of hepatocellular carcinoma. Afatinib's ability to increase PD-L1 expression is mediated by STAT3 activation following its action on HCC cells.
CONCLUSION
Afatinib enhances PD-L1 expression in tumor cells through the STAT3/PD-L1 pathway. The combination of afatinib and anti-PD1 treatment significantly increases the immunotherapeutic effect of HCC.
PubMed: 37324014
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1198118 -
Scientific Reports Dec 2023There is no strong and reliable predictive biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) for EGFR inhibitors. We aimed to identify predictive and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
There is no strong and reliable predictive biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) for EGFR inhibitors. We aimed to identify predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarkers of efficacy of afatinib, a pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in a window-of-opportunity trial (NCT01415674). Multi-omics analyses were carried out on pre-treatment biopsy and surgical specimen for biological assessment of afatinib activity. Sixty-one treatment-naïve and operable HNSCC patients were randomised to afatinib 40 mg/day for 21-28 days versus no treatment. Afatinib produced a high rate of metabolic response. Responders had a higher expression of pERK1/2 (P = 0.02) and lower expressions of pHER4 (P = 0.03) and pRB1 (P = 0.002) in pre-treatment biopsy compared to non-responders. At the cellular level, responders displayed an enrichment of tumor-infiltrating B cells under afatinib (P = 0.02). At the molecular level, NF-kappa B signaling was over-represented among upregulated genes in non-responders (P < 0.001; FDR = 0.01). Although exploratory, phosphoproteomics-based biomarkers deserve further investigations as predictors of afatinib efficacy.
Topics: Humans; Afatinib; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Quinazolines; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Biomarkers; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 38110561
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49887-4