-
Bone Aug 2020Herein we review the discovery, development, commercial history and legacy of risedronate or NE-58095, a potent N-containing bisphosphonate developed by scientists at... (Review)
Review
Herein we review the discovery, development, commercial history and legacy of risedronate or NE-58095, a potent N-containing bisphosphonate developed by scientists at the Cincinnati Miami Valley Laboratories and the Norwich Eaton Laboratories of Procter and Gamble. It is characterized by a hydroxyl substituent (R) and a pyridyl-methylene substituent (R) at the carbon bridging two phosphonate moieties. It was shown to have greater potency than alendronate in cell-based systems while binding affinity to bone matrix was lower than alendronate, accounting for the relatively rapid offset of bone turnover inhibition when therapy is discontinued. Risedronate was shown to significantly reduce serum alkaline phosphatase and clinical features in patients with Paget's disease and was approved for this indication, at a dose of 30 mg daily for 2 months, in 1998. Formal dose response testing for treatment of osteoporosis was not performed. In large Phase 3 studies, 5 mg risedronate daily increased bone mineral density more than did the 2.5 mg dose. As a result, the 2.5 mg dose was dropped from most of the Phase 3 studies after 12 months. The 5 mg daily dose was approved for treating and preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in 2000. The drug was subsequently approved for treating men with osteoporosis. Following the leads of other companies, weekly and monthly preparations were developed and approved, based on non-inferiority BMD studies vs the 5 mg daily oral dose as was a unique dosing regimen of 75 mg given on 2 consecutive days each month. Finally, to overcome the effect of food on limiting the already poor gastrointestinal absorption of the drug, a once-weekly oral preparation containing the chelating agent EDTA and with an enteric coating delaying dissolution until the tablet was in the small intestine was approved in 2010 to be administered after breakfast. The Alliance for Better Bone Health, a collaboration between Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and sanofi-aventis U.S. was formed to market risedronate as Actonel® and, subsequently, Actonel-EC® or Atelvia®. These drugs are still marketed by sanofi-aventis in some countries. The sale of the pharmaceutical division of Procter & Gamble to Warner Chilcott (US) was based, in large part, on the perceived value and marketability of the risedronate drugs. When marketing targets of Warner-Chilcott were not met, the rights of risedronate were sold to Allergan USA, Inc. which never actively promoted the drug. Generic forms of risedronate were introduced into the United States in 2015 but are rarely used, although several generic forms are actively marketed in other countries.
Topics: Alendronate; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Diphosphonates; Etidronic Acid; Female; Humans; Male; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Risedronic Acid
PubMed: 32387834
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115407 -
Orthopaedic Surgery Jun 2020To evaluate the effects of two fall-prevention and anti-osteoporotic protocols in elderly patients with osteopenia (OPA). (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
UNLABELLED
To evaluate the effects of two fall-prevention and anti-osteoporotic protocols in elderly patients with osteopenia (OPA).
METHODS
The present randomized controlled study included patients with OPA (n =123). The age of these patients was ≥80 years old, with the mean age of 83.54 ± 2.99 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 2.97:1.00. Fall-prevention guidance was given to all patients. Patients in the experiment group (n = 62) orally received 600 mg/d of calcium carbonate, 0.5 μg/d of alfacalcidol, and 70 mg/week of alendronate, while patients in the control group (n = 61) orally received 600 mg/d of calcium carbonate and 0.5 μg/d of alfacalcidol for 18 months. The grip strength, gait speed, bone turnover markers, serum calcium, serum phosphorus, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and bone mineral density were measured, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and the chair rising test (CRT) were performed. Falls, fragility fractures, medication compliance, and side effects of the drugs were recorded.
RESULTS
The serum levels of bone turnover markers (type I procollagen amino-terminal peptide [P1NP], type I collagen carboxyl terminal peptide [β-CTx], and osteocalcin [OC]) decreased, while the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and bilateral femoral neck increased after treatment in the experiment group (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). The rate of change in bone mineral density of the bilateral femoral neck was higher in the experiment group than the control group (3.43% vs 0.03%, P < 0.05; 2.86% vs -0.02%, P < 0.01). After treatment, the proportion of patients with increased hip T scores in the experiment group (66.1%, 41/62) was significantly higher than the proportion (35.0%, 21/60) in the control group (P = 0.001). The incidence of fall decreased in both groups after treatment compared to that before treatment (54.8% vs 33.9% and 54.1% vs 36.7%, respectively; P < 0.05). The incidence of fragility fractures was lower in the experiment group than the control group (8.1% vs 20.0%, P = 0.057). During the intervention period, the incidence of fragility fractures in patients who did not fall (3.8%, 3/79) was significantly lower than that in patients who fell (32.6%, 14/43) (P = 0.000). The risk of fragility fractures was significantly lower in patients who did not fall compared to patients who fell (relative risk: 0.117, 95% confidence interval: 0.035-0.384).
CONCLUSION
The combination of alendronate sodium with alfacalcidol and calcium can significantly improve the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. For older patients with OPA, subjectively paying attention to avoiding falls can significantly reduce the risk of fragility fractures.
Topics: Accidental Falls; Aged, 80 and over; Alendronate; Biomarkers; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Calcium Carbonate; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gait; Hand Strength; Humans; Hydroxycholecalciferols; Male; Osteoporosis
PubMed: 32495521
DOI: 10.1111/os.12701 -
Clinics in Geriatric Medicine Nov 2022In older adults, polypharmacy and osteoporosis frequently occur contemporaneously. Polypharmacy is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for hip and fall-related... (Review)
Review
In older adults, polypharmacy and osteoporosis frequently occur contemporaneously. Polypharmacy is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for hip and fall-related fractures. Treatments for osteoporosis include antiresorptive (alendronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid, ibandronate, denosumab) and osteoanabolic (teriparatide, abaloparatide, romosozumab) agents. Polypharmacy is associated with worse adherence to pharmacologic therapy. Thus, the selection of osteoporosis treatment should be individualized and based on a variety of factors, including underlying fracture risk (high vs very high risk), medical comorbidities, medication burden, as well as fracture risk reduction profiles, modes of administration, and side effects of treatment options.
Topics: Aged; Alendronate; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Denosumab; Diphosphonates; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Ibandronic Acid; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Polypharmacy; Risedronic Acid; Teriparatide; Zoledronic Acid
PubMed: 36210087
DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2022.05.011 -
Drugs & Aging Nov 2020Romosozumab (Evenity), a humanized monoclonal antibody, promotes bone formation and inhibits bone resorption by inhibiting sclerostin, a protein involved in the... (Review)
Review
Romosozumab (Evenity), a humanized monoclonal antibody, promotes bone formation and inhibits bone resorption by inhibiting sclerostin, a protein involved in the regulation of bone formation. Subcutaneous romosozumab is approved in several countries, including those of the EU for treating severe osteoporosis as well as in the USA for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture. In pivotal phase III trials (FRAME and ARCH), 12 months' once-monthly romosozumab 210 mg significantly reduced vertebral and clinical fracture risk versus placebo and oral alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. After patients transitioned from romosozumab to 12-24 months of subcutaneous denosumab or oral alendronate, fracture risks were significantly improved versus placebo-to-denosumab and alendronate-only treatment. In these trials and a phase IIIb trial, romosozumab significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) relative to placebo, alendronate and subcutaneous teriparatide at 12 months, with these benefits maintained 12-24 months after patients transitioned from romosozumab to alendronate or denosumab in pivotal trials. Romosozumab had a generally manageable tolerability profile. While further clinical experience is needed to more definitively establish its efficacy and safety, including its CV safety, romosozumab extends the treatment options in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who have a high risk of fracture and in those who have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis therapy.
Topics: Alendronate; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Osteogenesis; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Teriparatide; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32909197
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-020-00793-8 -
Journal of Women's Health (2002) Mar 2020
Topics: Alendronate; Anorexia Nervosa; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone and Bones; Contraceptives, Oral; Disease Management; Humans; Osteoporosis; Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein
PubMed: 31834855
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8195 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023With adequate blood transfusion and iron chelation, thalassemia patients have a longer life expectancy and experience long-term metabolic complications, including... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
With adequate blood transfusion and iron chelation, thalassemia patients have a longer life expectancy and experience long-term metabolic complications, including osteoporosis, fractures, and bone pain. Alendronate, an oral bisphosphonate, is currently used to treat various types of osteoporosis. However, the efficacy for the treatment of thalassemia-associated osteoporosis remains unclear.
METHODS
We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in thalassemia patients. Patients were included if they were males (18-50 years) or premenopausal females with low bone mineral density (BMD) (Z-score < -2.0 SD) or positive vertebral deformities from vertebral fracture analysis (VFA). Stratified randomization was performed according to sex and transfusion status. Patients were 1:1 allocated to receive once weekly alendronate 70 mg orally or placebo for a total duration of 12 months. BMD and VFA were re-evaluated at 12 months. Markers of bone resorption (C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen; CTX) and bone formation (Procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide; P1NP), and pain scores were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary outcome was the change of BMD. The secondary endpoints were changes in bone turnover markers (BTM) and pain scores.
RESULTS
A total of 51 patients received the study drug, 28 patients were assigned to receive alendronate and 23 patients to receive placebo. At 12 months, patients in the alendronate group had significant improvement of BMD at L1-L4 compared to their baseline (0.72 ± 0.11 vs 0.69 ± 0.11 g/cm, p = 0.004), while there was no change in the placebo group (0.69 ± 0.09 vs 0.70 ± 0.06 g/cm, p = 0.814). There was no significant change of BMD at femoral neck in both groups. Serum BTMs were significantly decreased among patients receiving alendronate at 6 and 12 months. The mean back pain score was significantly reduced compared to the baseline in both groups (p = 0.003). Side effects were rarely found and led to a discontinuation of the study drug in 1 patient (grade 3 fatigue).
CONCLUSION
Alendronate 70 mg orally once weekly for 12 months effectively improves BMD at L-spine, reduces serum BTMs, and alleviates back pain in thalassemia patients with osteoporosis. The treatment was well tolerated and had a good safety profile.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Alendronate; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Density; Osteoporosis; Thalassemia; Spinal Fractures; Pain
PubMed: 37251676
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1178761 -
Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and... 2023In rare cases, bisphosphonates are well established to cause ocular inflammation, presenting as uveitis, episcleritis, scleritis, orbital inflammation, and/or... (Review)
Review
In rare cases, bisphosphonates are well established to cause ocular inflammation, presenting as uveitis, episcleritis, scleritis, orbital inflammation, and/or conjunctivitis. Some reports of bisphosphonate-associated neuro-ophthalmic complications also exist. We identified 101 reports in the literature relating to bisphosphonate-associated ocular complications. In a great majority of cases, symptoms resolve after discontinuation of the drug and anti-inflammatory treatment. Many cases recur if rechallenged with the same bisphosphonate. First-generation nonamino bisphosphonates, including clodronate and etidronate, are not associated with ocular inflammation. Only 2nd- and 3rd-generation amino bisphosphonates, including pamidronate, alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate are associated with these complications. The mechanism of bisphosphonate-induced ocular inflammation may be related to activation of γ/δ T cells or M1 macrophages. Intravenous forms, such as pamidronate and zoledronate, tend to have higher rates and faster onset of ocular inflammation, generally presenting within days of infusion. In oral bisphosphonates, such as alendronate and risedronate, these complications present with more sporadic timing. Rates of complications are also higher when bisphosphonates are used for malignancy, as doses tend to be higher compared with doses for osteoporosis.
Topics: Humans; Diphosphonates; Pamidronate; Zoledronic Acid; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Alendronate; Risedronic Acid; Inflammation; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Scleritis
PubMed: 36409537
DOI: 10.1089/jop.2022.0094 -
Small (Weinheim An Der Bergstrasse,... Nov 2023The pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) is mainly determined by the adhesion of osteoclasts to the bone matrix and the involvement of various molecules in...
The pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) is mainly determined by the adhesion of osteoclasts to the bone matrix and the involvement of various molecules in bone resorption. The dual regulation strategy of the physical barriers of bone matrix and intracellular gene regulation generated by advanced biomaterials is a decent alternative for the treatment of PMOP. Herein, for the first time, it is identified that hsa-miR-378i/mmu-miR-378a-3p are closely associated with PMOP. Then, an osteophilic and dual-regulated alendronate-gene lipoplex (antagomir@Aln-Lipo), composed of medicative alendronate-functionalized liposomal vehicle and encapsulated specific microRNAs is engineered, for bone-targeting delivery of genes to achieve combined mitigation of bone loss. Alendronate targets hydroxyapatite in the bone matrix and occupies the adhesion site of osteoclasts, thus providing the "physical barriers". Antagomir is coupled precisely to specific endogenous microRNAs, thus providing the "genetic signals". These functionalized lipoplexes exhibited long-term stability and good transfection efficiency. It is proven that antagomir@Aln-Lipo could synergistically regulate osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, intravenous injection of antagomir@Aln-Lipo efficiently reverses bone loss through a dual mechanism driven by alendronate and antagomir-378a-3p. In conclusion, the osteophilic and dual-regulated antagomir@Aln-Lipo offers a brand-new bifunctional strategy for the precise treatment of PMOP.
Topics: Humans; Alendronate; Antagomirs; Bone and Bones; Bone Resorption; MicroRNAs
PubMed: 37438648
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202303456 -
Archives of Osteoporosis Jul 2022The efficacy of generic teriparatide in improving BMD at lumbar spine in patients with osteoporosis was similar to that of alendronate. It provided a new choice for... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
UNLABELLED
The efficacy of generic teriparatide in improving BMD at lumbar spine in patients with osteoporosis was similar to that of alendronate. It provided a new choice for osteoporosis treatment in Chinese population.
INTRODUCTION
To determine whether the efficacy of generic teriparatide is noninferior to alendronate for Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
METHODS
Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) in a 48-week, open-label design to receive 20 µg sc daily teriparatide or 70 mg oral weekly alendronate. Primary outcome was percentage change in BMD at the lumbar spine from baseline to 48 weeks and was assessed for non-inferiority. The same outcome was further assessed for superiority as a secondary endpoint.
RESULTS
Three hundred ninety-one and 196 participants were randomly assigned to the teriparatide or alendronate group, of whom 379 and 194 receiving at least one dose of teriparatide and alendronate treatment were eligible for the efficacy analysis. Teriparatide was non-inferior to alendronate for BMD change at lumbar spine (treatment difference: 0.7%, 95% CI: - 0.3 to 1.7%), which excluded the predefined non-inferiority margin of - 1.5%. However, teriparatide was not statistically superior to alendronate in improving BMD at lumbar spine (P = 0.169). At 48 weeks, changes in BMD at total hip were - 1.0% and 2.2% in teriparatide and alendronate group, respectively (P < 0.001). The incidence of new fracture showed no statistical difference between groups (P = 0.128). Serum P1NP and β-CTX levels significantly increased in the teriparatide group and markedly decreased in alendronate group (all P < 0.001 vs baseline). The adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were more common in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group, which were mainly teriparatide-related hypercalcemia, elevated alkaline phosphatase or parathyroid hormone, dizziness, and arthralgia.
CONCLUSIONS
Teriparatide was not inferior to alendronate in increasing BMD at lumbar spine in Chinese postmenopausal women, and they achieved these effects through different mechanisms.
Topics: Alendronate; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; China; Female; Humans; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Postmenopause; Prospective Studies; Teriparatide
PubMed: 35900607
DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01131-8 -
Bone Mar 2023Cardiovascular effects of osteoporosis medications have recently been highlighted. Although oral and intravenous bisphosphonates are assumed to have similar...
BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular effects of osteoporosis medications have recently been highlighted. Although oral and intravenous bisphosphonates are assumed to have similar cardiovascular safety, few head-to-head comparisons exist. The cardiovascular safety of teriparatide is unknown. Aim We conducted a pharmacovigilance safety study of cardiac events using real-life adverse event reports from alendronate, zoledronic acid and teriparatide users.
METHODS
Adverse drug reactions were obtained from Vigibase, a WHO database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from 130 countries (1967-2020). ISCRs for atrial fibrillation (AF), angina pectoris, arteriosclerosis coronary artery (ACA), cardiac arrhythmias, coronary artery disease (CAD), thromboembolic events (TE), ischaemic heart disease (IHD), torsade de pointes/QT prolongation (TDP) associated with alendronate, zoledronic acid and teriparatide use were extracted. Data were included in a disproportionality analysis where the lower end of the 95 % credibility interval for the information component (IC), showing a statistical association when >0. Head-to-head comparisons of ISCRs were estimated by age-adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals.
RESULTS
465 episodes of angina, 287 ACA, 13,385 arrhythmias, 792 CAD, 6743 TE, 3264 IHD, 1037 myocardial infarcts, and 3714 TDP events were recorded across 50,365 alendronate, 52,436 zoledronic acid and 137,629 teriparatide users. There was a significant association between alendronate and zoledronate with all outcomes except MI. Teriparatide use was associated with AF, arrythmias and angina only. In head-to-head comparisons, teriparatide use was associated with fewer ACA and CAD events than alendronate and fewer ACA than zoledronic acid.
DISCUSSION
Osteoporosis medication use is associated with adverse cardiac events, except for MI, and these appear to be more common with oral and intravenous bisphosphonates than teriparatide. Our data do not support differential effects of oral and intravenous bisphosphonates on cardiac events. Mechanisms whereby teriparatide may be cardio-protective warrant further investigation.
Topics: Humans; Diphosphonates; Teriparatide; Alendronate; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Zoledronic Acid; Pharmacovigilance; Osteoporosis; Coronary Artery Disease; DNA-Binding Proteins
PubMed: 36543300
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116647