-
The British Journal of Dermatology Feb 2024
Topics: Humans; Alopecia Areata; Comorbidity; Germany
PubMed: 38366836
DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljae027 -
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Apr 2022Emerging literature evidence shows that the manifestations of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, encompass alterations... (Review)
Review
Emerging literature evidence shows that the manifestations of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, encompass alterations of the pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neurological system. Moreover, hematologic and dermatologic manifestations have been documented. The aim of this review is to summarize the dermatologic manifestations of COVID-19 involving the hair and nails in a narrative way. A total of 1136 patients have been reported to have de novo hair loss following COVID-19. Notably, 958 patients experienced telogen effluvium (TE) (female/male ratio = 3,86:1), two female patients experienced anagen effluvium, and 176 people had alopecia areata (female/male ratio of 19:3). Ten patients were reported to have ungual changes following the infection with the novel coronavirus: The individuals affected were 6 women and 4 men. COVID-19 can be associated with hair and ungual manifestations. This review summarizes the evidence regarding the hair and ungual manifestations of COVID-19, which could be harnessed to better understand the clinical implications and pathophysiology of this disease that has been burdening society globally since December 2019.
Topics: Alopecia; Alopecia Areata; COVID-19; Female; Hair; Humans; Male; Nails; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 35032337
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14774 -
Experimental Dermatology Mar 2020A 3500-year-old papyrus from ancient Egypt provides a list of treatments for many diseases including "bite hair loss," most likely alopecia areata (AA). The treatment of... (Review)
Review
A 3500-year-old papyrus from ancient Egypt provides a list of treatments for many diseases including "bite hair loss," most likely alopecia areata (AA). The treatment of AA remained largely unchanged for over 1500 years. In 30 CE, Celsus described AA presenting as scalp alopecia in spots or the "windings of a snake" and suggested treatment with caustic compounds and scarification. The first "modern" description of AA came in 1813, though treatment still largely employed caustic agents. From the mid-19th century onwards, various hypotheses of AA development were put forward including infectious microbes (1843), nerve defects (1858), physical trauma and psychological stress (1881), focal inflammation (1891), diseased teeth (1902), toxins (1912) and endocrine disorders (1913). The 1950s brought new treatment developments with the first use of corticosteroid compounds (1952), and the first suggestion that AA was an autoimmune disease (1958). Research progressively shifted towards identifying hair follicle-specific autoantibodies (1995). The potential role of lymphocytes in AA was made implicit with immunohistological studies (1980s). However, studies confirming their functional role were not published until the development of rodent models (1990s). Genetic studies, particularly genome-wide association studies, have now come to the forefront and open up a new era of AA investigation (2000s). Today, AA research is actively focused on genetics, the microbiome, dietary modulators, the role of atopy, immune cell types in AA pathogenesis, primary antigenic targets, mechanisms by which immune cells influence hair growth, and of course the development of new treatments based on these discoveries.
Topics: Alopecia Areata; Animals; Autoimmune Diseases; Dermatology; Disease Models, Animal; Egypt; Hair; Hair Follicle; History, 19th Century; History, 20th Century; History, Ancient; Humans; Lymphocytes; Models, Biological
PubMed: 31960494
DOI: 10.1111/exd.14073 -
JAMA Dermatology Nov 2023Alopecia areata (AA) is characterized by hair loss ranging from patches of hair loss to more extensive forms, including alopecia totalis (AT) and alopecia universalis...
IMPORTANCE
Alopecia areata (AA) is characterized by hair loss ranging from patches of hair loss to more extensive forms, including alopecia totalis (AT) and alopecia universalis (AU). There is a lack of consensus for treatment. Understanding current practice patterns could help the identification of treatment needs and development of standards of care.
OBJECTIVE
To review treatment patterns for adults with AA in the US between 2015 and 2020.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This retrospective cohort study used medicine and pharmacy claims for commercially insured individuals from the IBM MarketScan Research Database to assess adults (≥18 years) newly treated for AA between October 15, 2015, and February 28, 2020. Alopecia areata was identified based on having at least 1 diagnosis of International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code L63.x. Patients were required to have at least 365 days of continuous health plan enrollment before and after the cohort entry date. Patients were required to be free of AA diagnosis codes 365 days before the cohort entry date. Statistical analyses were conducted between 2019 and 2023.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Main outcomes were treatment patterns for all patients with AA and subgroups of (1) patients with AT or AU and (2) those cared for by a dermatologist on the cohort entry date. Longitudinal therapy course during the first year after the diagnosis was also examined.
RESULTS
The study cohort consisted of 45 483 individuals (mean [SD] age, 43.8 [14.2] years; 29 903 [65.7%] female). During the year of follow-up, 30 217 patients (66.4%) received at least 1 AA treatment. The most common treatments were intralesional (19 014 [41.8%]), topical (18 604 [40.9%]), intramuscular (17 328 [38.1%]), and oral (9378 [20.6%]) corticosteroids. Compared with patients without AT or AU, patients with AT or AU a lower frequency of intralesional steroid (359 [11.1%] vs 18 655 [44.1%], P < .001) and higher frequency of topical corticosteroid (817 [25.4%] vs 17 787 [42.1%], P < .001) use. Almost half of patients (21 489 [47.2%]) received no treatment on the day of diagnosis. By 12 months, 32 659 (71.8%) were not receiving any treatment, making no treatment the largest study group.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this large cohort study of commercially insured individuals, corticosteroids were the most commonly used treatment for adults with AA between 2015 and 2020. At 365 days after diagnosis, more than two-thirds of patients were no longer receiving any AA treatment. Further studies are needed to understand the reasons for the absence of treatment.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Male; Alopecia Areata; Retrospective Studies; Cohort Studies; Alopecia; Adrenal Cortex Hormones
PubMed: 37728940
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3109 -
JAMA Dermatology Feb 2024
Topics: Humans; Alopecia Areata; COVID-19; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38198177
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.5559 -
Paediatric Drugs May 2024Alopecia areata (AA) lifetime incidence is around 2%, with many patients first experiencing symptoms during childhood. However, ritlecitinib is the only FDA-approved... (Review)
Review
Alopecia areata (AA) lifetime incidence is around 2%, with many patients first experiencing symptoms during childhood. However, ritlecitinib is the only FDA-approved treatment for pediatric patients 12 years and older. This review outlines reported topical, injectable, and oral treatment options for pediatric patients with AA. Clinical studies were obtained via a PubMed search using the following search terms: alopecia areata, areata, universalis, or totalis and medication, therapy, treatment, drug, or management. Only studies with pediatric patients were included in this review. Commonly used therapies, including corticosteroids, methotrexate, and minoxidil, newer promising medications, such as Janus kinase inhibitors, and less frequently used topical and systemic treatments are included. A summary of the drug development pipeline and ongoing interventional clinical trials with pediatric patients is provided. Treatments demonstrate variable efficacy, and many patients require combination therapy for maximal response. More robust clinical data is needed for many of the medications reviewed in order to provide better care for these patients.
Topics: Humans; Alopecia Areata; Child; Adolescent; Minoxidil; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Janus Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 38466519
DOI: 10.1007/s40272-024-00620-2 -
International Journal of Molecular... May 2024Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune-mediated disorder in which the proximal hair follicle (HF) attack results in non-scarring partial to total scalp or body hair loss.... (Review)
Review
Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune-mediated disorder in which the proximal hair follicle (HF) attack results in non-scarring partial to total scalp or body hair loss. Despite the growing knowledge about AA, its exact cause still needs to be understood. However, immunity and genetic factors are affirmed to be critical in AA development. While the genome-wide association studies proved the innate and acquired immunity involvement, AA mouse models implicated the IFN-γ- and cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell-mediated immune response as the main drivers of disease pathogenesis. The AA hair loss is caused by T-cell-mediated inflammation in the HF area, disturbing its function and disrupting the hair growth cycle without destroying the follicle. Thus, the loss of HF immune privilege, autoimmune HF destruction mediated by cytotoxic mechanisms, and the upregulation of inflammatory pathways play a crucial role. AA is associated with concurrent systemic and autoimmune disorders such as atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, psoriasis, and thyroiditis. Likewise, the patient's quality of life (QoL) is significantly impaired by morphologic disfigurement caused by the illness. The patients experience a negative impact on psychological well-being and self-esteem and may be more likely to suffer from psychiatric comorbidities. This manuscript aims to present the latest knowledge on the pathogenesis of AA, which involves genetic, epigenetic, immunological, and environmental factors, with a particular emphasis on immunopathogenesis.
Topics: Alopecia Areata; Humans; Animals; Hair Follicle
PubMed: 38891839
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115652 -
International Immunopharmacology Nov 2023Although there have been indications that periodontitis (PD) may be susceptible to alopecia areata (AA), the underlying mechanism of its pathogenesis remains poorly...
BACKGROUND
Although there have been indications that periodontitis (PD) may be susceptible to alopecia areata (AA), the underlying mechanism of its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. The objective of our study is to conduct further research into the occurrence of this complication.
METHODS
The gene expression omnibus (GEO) database was the source of acquisition for both PD and AA datasets. Various methods, including the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis, functional enrichment analysis, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction, Cytohubba algorithms, and RandomForest algorithms, were utilized to identify candidate hub immuno-related genes (IRGs) for diagnosing AA with PD. The diagnostic efficacy was assessed by constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. To further deepen our understanding, immune cell infiltration, flow cytometry assay, and immunofluorescence techniques were employed to uncover immune cell dysregulation in PD and AA.
RESULTS
899 and 803 DEGs were detected in AA and PD, respectively, with an intersection of 150 common DEGs enriched in immune regulation. Further analysis of the junction of shared DEGs and IRGs was analyzed using the PPI network, Mcode, and Cytohubba algorithms. Three hub genes (CTSS, IL2RG, and ITGAL) were subsequently selected by Cytohubba and RandomForest algorithms and were found to be promising candidate hub genes with high diagnostic values (AUC ranging from 0.776 to 0.909) for diagnosing AA with PD. Additionally, various dysregulated immune cells were observed, with mast cells potentially serving as markers for AA and plasma for PD.
CONCLUSION
Three candidate hub IRGs (CTSS, IL2RG, and ITGAL) were identified with considerable diagnostic values. Besides, mast cells could serve as markers for AA, while plasma may indicate PD. Our research has the potential to identify shared diagnostic candidate genes and immune cells for AA and PD patients.
Topics: Humans; Alopecia Areata; Algorithms; Biological Assay; Databases, Factual; Computational Biology
PubMed: 37717318
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110880 -
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Nov 2022There may be an association between increased intestinal permeability and the progression of alopecia areata (AA).
BACKGROUND
There may be an association between increased intestinal permeability and the progression of alopecia areata (AA).
OBJECTIVE
The present study aimed to investigate the role of intestinal permeability in the etiopathogenesis of AA and its association with the severity of the disease.
METHODS
Serum zonulin levels of 70 patients with AA who were not receiving any systemic treatment and of 70 healthy control subjects were measured.
RESULTS
The median serum zonulin level in the patient group (46.38 ng/mL) did not differ significantly from that in the control group (50.34 ng/mL) (p = 0.828). Moreover, there was no significant relationship between serum zonulin levels and the severity of the disease (p = 0.549).
LIMITATIONS
The present study had a cross-sectional design, and it did not include patients with alopecia totalis (AT) or alopecia universalis (AU).
CONCLUSION
We did not observe an increase in intestinal permeability secondary to zonulin expression in patients with AA. However, in order to generalize this result to all patients with AA, serum zonulin levels need to be evaluated in studies including more patients with severe disease, AT, and AU.
Topics: Humans; Alopecia Areata; Cross-Sectional Studies; Permeability
PubMed: 35579378
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.15095 -
Journal of the American Academy of... Jan 2024
Topics: Humans; Alopecia Areata
PubMed: 37207950
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.05.022