-
Brain and Behavior Nov 2020Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a degenerative brain disease that progresses over time, heavily burdening patients, families, and aging societies worldwide. Memantine and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a degenerative brain disease that progresses over time, heavily burdening patients, families, and aging societies worldwide. Memantine and donepezil are frequently used in its treatment, both as monotherapy and in combination. This multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of these regimens and placebo in the management of AD.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Wanfang Med Online and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for English and Chinese publications from the first records to 17 April 2020. Two investigators scanned articles for placebo-controlled trials of memantine and donepezil alone and in combination. We extracted data on the following outcomes: cognition, global assessment, daily activities, neuropsychiatric symptoms, adverse events, and the acceptability and cost of these treatment regimens.
RESULTS
Of 936 records screened, we included 54 trials in this analysis. The combination therapy was more effective in improving cognition (mean difference (MD)-5.01, 95% credible interval (95% Crl) -10.73 to 0.86 in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; MD 9.61, 95% Crl 2.29 to 16.97 in the Severe Impairment Battery), global assessment (MD -2.88, 95% Crl -6.04 to 0.40), daily activities (MD 13.06, 95% Crl -34.04 to 58.92), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (MD -6.84, 95% Crl -10.62 to -2.82) compared with placebo. Memantine was more acceptable than placebo (MD 0.93, 95% Crl 0.69 to 1.22).
CONCLUSIONS
Memantine plus donepezil showed superior outcomes for cognition, global assessment, daily activities, and neuropsychiatric symptoms, but lower acceptability than monotherapy and placebo. Combination therapy may be more cost-effective, because memantine slows the progression of AD.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; China; Donepezil; Humans; Memantine; Network Meta-Analysis
PubMed: 32914577
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1831 -
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Jul 2020We conducted an updated systematic review on the safety and efficacy of amantadine in cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI), in order to determine if the...
We conducted an updated systematic review on the safety and efficacy of amantadine in cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI), in order to determine if the current literature justifies its use in this clinical condition. A comprehensive search strategy was applied to three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane). Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of amantadine and placebo in adults within 3 months of TBI were included in the review. Study characteristics, outcomes, and methodological quality were synthesized. This systematic review was conducted and presented in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis) was not feasible due to the large heterogeneity of studies identified. Three parallel RCTs and one cross-over RCT, with a total of 325 patients were included. All of the studies evaluated only severe TBI in adults. Amantadine was found to be well tolerated across the studies. Two RCTs reported improvement in the intermediate-term cognitive recovery (four to six weeks after end of treatment), using DRS (in both studies) and MMSE, GOS, and FIM-Cog (in one study). The effect of amantadine on the short-term (seven days to discharge) and long-term (six months from the injury) cognitive outcome was found not superior to placebo in two RCTs. The rate of severe adverse events was found to be consistently very low across the studies (the incidence of seizures, elevation in liver enzymes and cardiac death was 0.7 %, 1.9 %, and 0.3 %, respectively). In conclusion, amantadine seems to be well tolerated and might hasten the rate of cognitive recovery in the intermediate-term outcome. However, the long-term effect of amantadine in cognitive recovery is not well defined and further large randomized clinical trials in refined subgroups of patients are needed to better define its application.
Topics: Amantadine; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Nootropic Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recovery of Function
PubMed: 32244036
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105815 -
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy Feb 2023Masitinib is an orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets activated cells of the neuroimmune system (mast cells and microglia). Study AB09004 evaluated... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Masitinib is an orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets activated cells of the neuroimmune system (mast cells and microglia). Study AB09004 evaluated masitinib as an adjunct to cholinesterase inhibitor and/or memantine in patients with mild-to-moderate dementia due to probable Alzheimer's disease (AD).
METHODS
Study AB09004 was a randomized, double-blind, two parallel-group (four-arm), placebo-controlled trial. Patients aged ≥50 years, with clinical diagnosis of mild-to-moderate probable AD and a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 12-25 were randomized (1:1) to receive masitinib 4.5 mg/kg/day (administered orally as two intakes) or placebo. A second, independent parallel group (distinct for statistical analysis and control arm), randomized patients (2:1) to masitinib at an initial dose of 4.5 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks that was then titrated to 6.0 mg/kg/day, or equivalent placebo. Multiple primary outcomes (each tested at a significance level of 2.5%) were least-squares mean change from baseline to week 24 in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), or the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory scale (ADCS-ADL). Safety for each masitinib dose level was compared against a pooled placebo population.
RESULTS
Masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/day) (n=182) showed significant benefit over placebo (n=176) according to the primary endpoint of ADAS-cog, -1.46 (95% CI [-2.46, -0.45]) (representing an overall improvement in cognition) versus 0.69 (95% CI [-0.36, 1.75]) (representing increased cognitive deterioration), respectively, with a significant between-group difference of -2.15 (97.5% CI [-3.48, -0.81]); p<0.001. For the ADCS-ADL primary endpoint, the between-group difference was 1.82 (97.5% CI [-0.15, 3.79]); p=0.038 (i.e., 1.01 (95% CI [-0.48, 2.50]) (representing an overall functional improvement) versus -0.81 (95% CI [-2.36, 0.74]) (representing increased functional deterioration), respectively). Safety was consistent with masitinib's known profile (maculo-papular rash, neutropenia, hypoalbuminemia). Efficacy results from the independent parallel group of titrated masitinib 6.0 mg/kg/day versus placebo (n=186 and 91 patients, respectively) were inconclusive and no new safety signal was observed.
CONCLUSIONS
Masitinib (4.5 mg/kg/day) may benefit people with mild-to-moderate AD. A confirmatory study has been initiated to substantiate these data.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
EudraCT: 2010-021218-50.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov : NCT01872598.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Activities of Daily Living; Memantine; Thiazoles
PubMed: 36849969
DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01169-x -
Proceedings of the National Academy of... Nov 2023Neurotransmitter receptors are increasingly recognized to play important roles in anti-tumor immunity. The expression of the ion channel N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor...
Neurotransmitter receptors are increasingly recognized to play important roles in anti-tumor immunity. The expression of the ion channel N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) on macrophages was reported, but the role of NMDAR on macrophages in the tumor microenvironment (TME) remains unknown. Here, we show that the activation of NMDAR triggered calcium influx and reactive oxygen species production, which fueled immunosuppressive activities in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the hepatocellular sarcoma and fibrosarcoma tumor settings. NMDAR antagonists, MK-801, memantine, and magnesium, effectively suppressed these processes in TAMs. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed that blocking NMDAR functionally and metabolically altered TAM phenotypes, such that they could better promote T cell- and Natural killer (NK) cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity. Treatment with NMDAR antagonists in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody led to the elimination of the majority of established preclinical liver tumors. Thus, our study uncovered an unknown role for NMDAR in regulating macrophages in the TME of hepatocellular sarcoma and provided a rationale for targeting NMDAR for tumor immunotherapy.
Topics: Humans; Tumor-Associated Macrophages; Neoplastic Processes; Memantine; Liver Neoplasms; Sarcoma; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 37967215
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2302126120 -
European Archives of Psychiatry and... Oct 2023This review article presents select recent studies that form the basis for the development of esmethadone into a potential new drug. Esmethadone is a promising member of... (Review)
Review
This review article presents select recent studies that form the basis for the development of esmethadone into a potential new drug. Esmethadone is a promising member of the pharmacological class of uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonists that have shown efficacy for major depressive disorder (MDD) and other diseases and disorders, such as Alzheimer's dementia and pseudobulbar affect. The other drugs in the novel class of NMDAR antagonists with therapeutic uses that are discussed for comparative purposes in this review are esketamine, ketamine, dextromethorphan, and memantine. We present in silico, in vitro, in vivo, and clinical data for esmethadone and other uncompetitive NMDAR antagonists that may advance our understanding of the role of these receptors in neural plasticity in health and disease. The efficacy of NMDAR antagonists as rapid antidepressants may advance our understanding of the neurobiology of MDD and other neuropsychiatric diseases and disorders.
Topics: Humans; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Depressive Disorder, Major; Memantine; Antidepressive Agents; Alzheimer Disease
PubMed: 36890259
DOI: 10.1007/s00406-023-01571-4 -
Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii Imeni... 2023Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a delayed, often irreversible iatrogenic movement disorder caused by long-term use of that dopamine receptors blocking drugs. Prevention of TD...
Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a delayed, often irreversible iatrogenic movement disorder caused by long-term use of that dopamine receptors blocking drugs. Prevention of TD is paramount, and clinicians should follow best practice recommendations for prescribing antipsychotics, as well as reduction the using of dopamine receptor blocking drugs for non-psychiatric prescriptions. Replacement of antipsychotics with lower affinity for D2 receptors drugs, addition of VMAT2 (tetrabenazine), botulinum therapy, amantadine may be effective. In detection and incurable cases, the possibility of neuromodulation of brain structures should be considered. Most methods for testing TD currently have an insufficient level of evidence, although they include recommendations from professional communities. There is a great need for new clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Tardive Dyskinesia; Antipsychotic Agents; Tetrabenazine; Amantadine
PubMed: 37490662
DOI: 10.17116/jnevro202312307125 -
Asian Journal of Psychiatry Jan 2023To integrate all evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological augmentation interventions for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Pharmacological and nonpharmacological augmentation treatments for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis with normalized entropy assessment.
OBJECTIVE
To integrate all evidence derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological augmentation interventions for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS).
METHODS
Six major electronic databases were systematically searched for RCTs published until July 10, 2021. The primary outcome was change in overall symptoms, and the secondary outcomes were positive and negative symptoms and acceptability. We performed random-effects network meta-analysis. Normalized entropy was calculated to examine the uncertainty of treatment ranking.
RESULTS
We identified 35 RCTs (1472 patients with 23 active augmentation treatments) with a mean daily clozapine dose of 440.80 (91.27) mg for 1168.22 (710.28) days. Network meta-analysis of overall symptoms (reported as standardized mean difference; 95 % confidence interval) with consistent results indicated that mirtazapine (-4.41; -5.61, -3.21), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (-4.32; -5.43, -3.21), and memantine (-2.02; -3.14, -0.91) were ranked as the best three treatments. For positive symptoms, ECT (-5.18; -5.86, -4.49) was ranked the best with less uncertainty. For negative symptoms, memantine (-3.38; -4.50, -2.26), duloxetine (-3.27; -4.25, -2.29), and mirtazapine (-1.73; -2.71, -0.74) were ranked the best three treatments with less uncertainty. All antipsychotics, N-methyl d-aspartate receptor agonists, and antiepileptics were not associated with more efficacy than placebo. Compared to placebo, only amisulpride had statistically significant lower discontinuation rate (risk ratio: 0.21; 95 % CI: 0.05, 0.93).
CONCLUSION
Add-on mirtazapine, ECT, and memantine were the most efficacious augmentation options for CRS. Data on other important outcomes such as cognitive functioning or quality of life were rarely reported, making further large-scale, well-designed RCTs necessary. (PROSPERO number, CRD42021262197.).
Topics: Humans; Clozapine; Network Meta-Analysis; Entropy; Memantine; Mirtazapine; Antipsychotic Agents; Schizophrenia
PubMed: 36470132
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103375 -
Psychopharmacology Bulletin Jul 2023Introduction The purpose of this guide is to provide convenient and useful information on about Alzheimer's disease and dementias of late life. The information includes...
Introduction The purpose of this guide is to provide convenient and useful information on about Alzheimer's disease and dementias of late life. The information includes selected facts, diagnostic criteria tables, descriptions of selected tests and screens, guidelines, clinical pharmacological data and references. This guide is divided into several sections: Background factsDiagnostic aids and criteria for dementia diagnosesMedications used for Alzheimer's disease and dementia Basic information on marketed treatments is provided although the treatment may not be FDA approved for this use. Approved cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, and monoclonal antibodies are listed. No treatment is recommended or endorsed, however. This guide does not address the evidence base for the efficacy of the treatments listed. : Except for treatments above, discussions of medications for people with dementia nearly always involve off label use. For example, antidepressants and antipsychotics are indicated in the FDA-approved prescribing information for major depression and schizophrenia, and not for depressive symptoms or the delusions or hallucinations occurring within the context of dementia with two exceptions. In these instances, the doses listed are for reference only and should not be considered as recommendations or appropriate use. Physicians should consult the product package labeling for any drug mentioned.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Antipsychotic Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Hallucinations; Memantine
PubMed: 37489152
DOI: No ID Found -
Brain and Nerve = Shinkei Kenkyu No... May 2023Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatment includes both non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches. Current pharmacological approaches include symptomatic and... (Review)
Review
Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatment includes both non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches. Current pharmacological approaches include symptomatic and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). In Japan, DMTs have not yet been approved for treating AD; however, four drugs are currently available for symptomatic therapies, including cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) such as donepezil for mild-to-severe dementia, galantamine and rivastigmine for mild-to-moderate dementia, and memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, for moderate-to-severe dementia. In this review, we describe the use of four symptomatic anti-AD drugs in clinical practice for AD.
Topics: Humans; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Alzheimer Disease; Donepezil; Rivastigmine; Galantamine; Memantine; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
PubMed: 37194514
DOI: 10.11477/mf.1416202360 -
Neurodegenerative Disease Management Feb 2022Amantadine is an old, antiviral compound, which moderately improves motor behavior in Parkinson's disease. Its current resurgence results from an innovative, delayed... (Review)
Review
Amantadine is an old, antiviral compound, which moderately improves motor behavior in Parkinson's disease. Its current resurgence results from an innovative, delayed uptake and extended release amantadine hydrochloride capsule, given at bedtime once daily. It is the only approved compound for reduction of involuntary movements, so called dyskinesia, in fluctuating orally levodopa treated patients. It additionally ameliorates 'OFF' intervals characterized by impaired motor behavior. These beneficial effects result from higher and more continuous brain delivery of amantadine. Future clinical research is warranted on preventive effects of this amantadine capsule combined with enzyme blockers of central monoamine oxidase B and peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase on motor complications in orally levodopa treated patients, as all these pharmacological principles support the concept of continuous dopamine substitution.
Topics: Amantadine; Antiparkinson Agents; Catechol O-Methyltransferase; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced; Humans; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease
PubMed: 34918543
DOI: 10.2217/nmt-2021-0028