-
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a formidable public health problem with limited curable treatment options. Axitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a... (Review)
Review
Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a formidable public health problem with limited curable treatment options. Axitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a potent and selective second-generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 1, 2, and 3. This anti-angiogenic drug was found to have promising activity in various solid tumors, including advanced HCC. At present, however, there is no relevant review article that summarizes the exact roles of axitinib in advanced HCC. In this review, 24 eligible studies (seven studies in the ClinicalTrials, eight experimental studies, and nine clinical trials) were included for further evaluation. The included randomized or single-arm phase II trials indicated that axitinib could not prolong the overall survival compared to the placebo for the treatment of advanced HCC, but improvements in progression free survival and time to tumor progression were observed. Experimental studies showed that the biochemical effects of axitinib in HCC might be regulated by its associated genes and affected signaling cascades (e.g. VEGFR2/PAK1, CYP1A2, CaMKII/ERK, Akt/mTor, and miR-509-3p/PDGFRA). FDA approved sorafenib combined with nivolumab (an inhibitor of PD-1/PD-L1) as the first line regimen for the treatment of advanced HCC. Since both axitinib and sorafenib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as the VEGFR inhibitors, axitinib combined with anti-PDL-1/PD-1 antibodies may also exhibit tremendous potential in anti-tumoral effects for advanced HCC. The present review highlights the current clinical applications and the molecular mechanisms of axitinib in advanced HCC. To move toward clinical applications by combining axitinib and other treatments in advanced HCC, more studies are still warranted in the near future.
Topics: Humans; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Sorafenib; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Indazoles; Liver Neoplasms; Imidazoles
PubMed: 37325670
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1163967 -
Hematology/oncology and Stem Cell... Apr 2023Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer in adults (approximately 90%), and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is the most frequent histologic subtype... (Review)
Review
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer in adults (approximately 90%), and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is the most frequent histologic subtype (approximately 75%). We reviewed the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in ccRCC, identifying 5927 articles in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Ten randomized control (N = 7765) and 10 non-randomized (N = 572) studies were included. Overall, 4819 patients treated with CPI combinations were compared with everolimus, sunitinib, or placebo. Overall response rates (ORR) were 9-25% with nivolumab (niv), 42% with niv + ipilimumab (ipi), 55.7% with niv + cabozantinib, 56% with niv + tivozanib vs. 5% with everolimus. ORR was 51.5-58% with avelumab + axitinib vs. 25.5% with sunitinib. ORR was 59.3-73% with pembrolizumab + tyrosine kinase inhibitor vs. 25.7% with sunitinib. ORR was 32-36% with atezolizumab + bevacizumab vs. 29-33% with sunitinib. In patients with PD-L1+ve and -ve ccRCC, niv, atezolizumab, ipi, and pembrolizumab were safe and effective alone and when combined with cabozantinib, tivozanib, axitinib, levantinib, and pegilodecakin. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab was safe and effective in ccRCC with high PD-L1 expression. Pembrolizumab was safe and effective in preventing recurrence in ccRCC patients with nephrectomy. Additional randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Sunitinib; Axitinib; Everolimus; B7-H1 Antigen; Bevacizumab; Kidney Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37023219
DOI: 10.56875/2589-0646.1027 -
Cancers Apr 2021Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous family of neoplasms of increasing incidence and high prevalence due to their relatively indolent nature. Their wide... (Review)
Review
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous family of neoplasms of increasing incidence and high prevalence due to their relatively indolent nature. Their wide anatomic distribution and their characteristic ability to secrete hormonally active substances pose unique challenges for clinical management. They are also characterized by the common expression of somatostatin receptors, a target that has been extremely useful for diagnosis and treatment (i.e., somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)). Chemotherapy is of limited use for NETs of non-pancreatic origin, and the only approved targeted agents for advanced progressive NETs are sunitinib for those of pancreatic origin, and everolimus for lung, gastrointestinal and pancreatic primaries. Despite recent therapeutic achievements, thus, systemic treatment options remain limited. In this review we will discuss the state-of-the-art targeted therapies in the field of NETs, and also future perspectives of novel therapeutic drugs or strategies in clinical development, including recently presented results from randomized trials of yet unapproved antiangiogenic agents (i.e., pazopanib, surufatinib and axitinib), PRRT including both approved radiopharmaceuticals (177Lu-Oxodotreotide) and others in development (177Lu-Edotreotide, 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan), immunotherapy and other innovative targeted strategies (antibody-drug conjugates, bites,…) that shall soon improve the landscape of personalized treatment options in NET patients.
PubMed: 33916707
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071701 -
Scientific Reports Jul 2021Medulloblastoma is the most common high-grade brain tumor in childhood. Medulloblastomas with c-myc amplification, classified as group 3, are the most aggressive among...
Medulloblastoma is the most common high-grade brain tumor in childhood. Medulloblastomas with c-myc amplification, classified as group 3, are the most aggressive among the four disease subtypes resulting in a 5-year overall survival of just above 50%. Despite current intensive therapy regimens, patients suffering from group 3 medulloblastoma urgently require new therapeutic options. Using a recently established c-myc amplified human medulloblastoma cell line, we performed an in-vitro-drug screen with single and combinatorial drugs that are either already clinically approved or agents in the advanced stage of clinical development. Candidate drugs were identified in vitro and then evaluated in vivo. Tumor growth was closely monitored by BLI. Vessel development was assessed by 3D light-sheet-fluorescence-microscopy. We identified the combination of gemcitabine and axitinib to be highly cytotoxic, requiring only low picomolar concentrations when used in combination. In the orthotopic model, gemcitabine and axitinib showed efficacy in terms of tumor control and survival. In both models, gemcitabine and axitinib were better tolerated than the standard regimen comprising of cisplatin and etoposide phosphate. 3D light-sheet-fluorescence-microscopy of intact tumors revealed thinning and rarefication of tumor vessels, providing one explanation for reduced tumor growth. Thus, the combination of the two drugs gemcitabine and axitinib has favorable effects on preventing tumor progression in an orthotopic group 3 medulloblastoma xenograft model while exhibiting a favorable toxicity profile. The combination merits further exploration as a new approach to treat high-risk group 3 medulloblastoma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Deoxycytidine; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Gene Amplification; Gene Expression; Humans; Medulloblastoma; Mice; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays; Gemcitabine
PubMed: 34234256
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93586-x -
European Urology Oncology Dec 2023Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a mainstay of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management with five current Food and Drug Administration-approved...
BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now a mainstay of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management with five current Food and Drug Administration-approved regimens. However, data regarding nephrectomy outcomes following an ICI are limited.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the safety and outcomes of nephrectomy following an ICI.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A retrospective review was performed of patients with primary locally advanced or metastatic RCC undergoing nephrectomy following an ICI in five US academic centers between January 2011 and September 2021.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Clinical data, perioperative outcomes, and 90-d complications/readmissions were recorded and evaluated by univariate and logistic regression models. Recurrence-free and overall survival probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
A total of 113 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 63 (56-69) yr were included. The main ICI regimens were nivolumab ± ipilimumab (n = 85) and pembrolizumab ± axitinib (n = 24). Risk groups included 95% intermediate- and 5% poor-risk patients. Surgical procedures were 109 radical and four partial nephrectomies, including 60 open, 38 robotic, and 14 laparoscopic with five (10%) conversions. Two intraoperative complications were reported (bowel and pancreatic injury). The median operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay were 3 h, 250 ml, and 3 d, respectively. A complete pathologic response (ypT0N0) was noted in six (5%) patients. The 90-d complication rate was 24%, with 12 (11%) patients requiring readmission. On a multivariable analysis, two or more risk factors (odds ratio [OR] 2.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09, 7.42) and pathologic T stage ≥T3 (OR 4.21, 95% CI: 1.13-15.8) were independently associated with a higher 90-d complication rate. The 3-yr estimated overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 82% and 47%, respectively. Limitations include the retrospective nature and heterogeneous cohort in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics and ICI regimens received.
CONCLUSIONS
Nephrectomy following ICI therapy is feasible and a potential consolidative therapy option in select patients. Further research in the neoadjuvant setting is also warranted.
PATIENT SUMMARY
This study evaluates the outcomes of kidney surgery following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (mainly nivolumab and ipilimumab or pembrolizumab and axitinib) for patients with advanced kidney cancer. We utilized data from five academic centers across the USA and found that surgery in this setting did not have more complications or returns to the hospital than similar surgeries, indicating that it is a safe and feasible procedure at this time.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Kidney Neoplasms; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Nivolumab; Ipilimumab; Axitinib; Retrospective Studies; Nephrectomy
PubMed: 37005212
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.03.003 -
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Sep 2021The acquisition of resistance to VEGF-inhibiting therapies has prompted research toward immunotherapy for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Among... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The acquisition of resistance to VEGF-inhibiting therapies has prompted research toward immunotherapy for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Among several, checkpoint inhibitors including PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are the most promising approach.
AREAS COVERED
This review addresses the clinical efficacy of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab in first- and second-line treatment for mRCC regarding the most recent and significant published and ongoing studies. Attention is also given to its pharmacological characteristics as well as adverse events and its impact on patients' quality of life.
EXPERT OPINION
Immunotherapy has become the backbone for the treatment of advanced RCC. With the approval of several therapeutic options, research needs now to focus on defining the appropriate therapy for each patient. Axitinib plus pembrolizumab belongs to the combinations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors for the first-line treatment of metastatic RCC. New combinations of pembrolizumab plus TKI for the evaluation in first- and second-line treatment of mRCC available. However, studies directly comparing the various treatment regimens using predictive biomarkers and long-term endpoints, including treatment-free survival, are lacking.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Quality of Life
PubMed: 34042015
DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1935856 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Dec 2021Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) have been treated with immunotherapy for decades; the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors represents the most recent advance. In this review,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) have been treated with immunotherapy for decades; the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors represents the most recent advance. In this review, we compare these new RCC immunotherapies, with a focus on achieving durable complete responses (CR).
REVIEW
Sorafenib and sunitinib were the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved targeted agents for RCC, with sunitinib eventually becoming the standard-of-care agent against which novel therapies are compared. In the last five years, many combination therapies based on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including ipilimumab/nivolumab, nivolumab/cabozantinib, avelumab/axitinib, pembrolizumab/axitinib, and pembrolizumab/lenvatinib, have demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to sunitinib. Ongoing clinical trials of hypoxia-induced factor-2 alpha (HIF-2a) inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy targeting CD70, and other new combination therapies have also shown promise and are currently under investigation.
CONCLUSIONS
Many new combination therapies are approved for RCC treatment, and CR rates suggest that, in the era of immunotherapy, it may be possible to achieve durable responses and survival benefit in patients with metastatic RCC.
PubMed: 35054417
DOI: 10.3390/life12010024 -
Journal of Controlled Release :... Jul 2022The unique physiological makeup of the eye limits the use of small-molecule drugs for treating the posterior segment of the eye. Nevertheless,...
The unique physiological makeup of the eye limits the use of small-molecule drugs for treating the posterior segment of the eye. Nevertheless, transmembrane-peptide-mediated non-invasive drug delivery can serve as an ideal treatment strategy, as it is capable of delivering small-molecule drugs across the membrane in the form of eye drops, thereby achieving the effective treatment of neovascularisation in the posterior cavity. In this study, we screened and compared the posterior segment distribution of two poly(ethylene glycol)-distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine carriers modified using targeting-peptides. Thereafter, a transmembrane peptide (i.e., PENE) with a greater ability of transmembrane delivery was selected for delivering the anti-vascular drug (i.e., Axitinib) to the posterior segment of the eye. Using two different mouse models with fundus neovascular diseases, the complete non-invasive delivery of Axitinib to the posterior segment of the eye was confirmed using the targeted system; the designed eye drops (i.e., PENE-nanoparticles) could achieve drug distribution to the retina and veins of the eye as well as good drug permeability for renewal. Moreover, using the eye-drop treatment, neovascularisation was substantially reduced, demonstrating the high efficacy of this drug delivery system. This study, which combines nanodrug-loading technology and the transmembrane delivery of penetrating-peptides to achieve the goal of the non-invasive delivery of small-molecule drugs through the dense blood vessels of the sclera, shows wide applicability and considerably expands the use of ocular drugs. Thus, this study is expected to help develop a more acceptable drug administration strategy for the drug treatment of the posterior segment of the eye.
Topics: Animals; Axitinib; Drug Delivery Systems; Mice; Neovascularization, Pathologic; Ophthalmic Solutions; Peptides; Retina
PubMed: 35537538
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.009 -
Cancers Aug 2019The practising clinician treating a patient with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) faces a difficult task of choosing the most appropriate therapeutic... (Review)
Review
The practising clinician treating a patient with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) faces a difficult task of choosing the most appropriate therapeutic regimen in a rapidly developing field with recommendations derived from clinical trials. NCCN guidelines for kidney cancer initiated a major shift in risk categorization and now include emerging treatments in the neoadjuvant setting. Updates of European Association of Urology clinical guidelines also include immune checkpoint inhibition as the first-line treatment. Randomized trials have demonstrated a survival benefit for ipilimumab and nivolumab combination in the intermediate and poor-risk group, while pembrolizumab plus axitinib combination is recommended not only for unfavorable disease but also for patients who fit the favorable risk category. Currently vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), sunitinib and pazopanib is the alternative regimen for patients who cannot tolerate immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Cabozantinib remains a valid alternative option for the intermediate and high-risk group. For previously treated patients with TKI with progression, nivolumab, cabozantinib, axitinib, or the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab appear the most plausible alternatives. For patients previously treated with ICI, any VEGF-targeted therapy, not previously used in combination with ICI therapy, seems to be a valid option, although the strength of this recommendation is weak. The indication for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is also changing. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not add perioperative morbidity and can help identify non-responders, avoiding unnecessary surgery. However, the role of CN should be investigated under the light of new immunotherapeutic interventions. Also, markers of response to ICI need to be identified before the optimal selection of therapy could be determined for a particular patient.
PubMed: 31443471
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091227 -
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Apr 2022Axitinib is one of the most potent inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor and shows strong antitumor activity toward various malignant...
Axitinib is one of the most potent inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor and shows strong antitumor activity toward various malignant tumors. However, its severe side effects affect the quality of life and prognosis of patients. Losartan, which functions as a typical angiotensin receptor blocker, controls the average arterial pressure of patients with essential hypertension and protects against hypertension-related secondary diseases, including proteinuria and cardiovascular injury. To explore the effects of losartan on side effects caused by axitinib and its antitumor activity, several animal experiments were conducted. This study first analyzed and explored the effect of losartan on the amelioration of side effects in Wistar rats caused by axitinib. The results showed that the systolic blood pressure of Wistar rats was significantly increased by about 30 mmHg in 7 days of axitinib treatment, while the combination of losartan significantly reduced the blood pressure rise caused by axitinib. The Miles experimental model and mouse xenograft tumor model were further used to evaluate the effect of losartan on the antitumor effect of axitinib. The result clearly demonstrated that losartan has no significant influence on axitinib-related low vascular permeability and antitumor activity. In summary, our results showed that the combination of axitinib and losartan significantly reduced the side effects and maintained the antitumor effects of axitinib. This study provides information for overcoming VEGF receptor inhibitor-related side effects.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Axitinib; Blood Pressure; Humans; Hypertension; Losartan; Mice; Quality of Life; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
PubMed: 35566115
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092764