-
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2023The cementation of indirect restoration is one of the most important steps in prosthetic and restorative dentistry. Cementation aims to bond the prosthetic restoration... (Review)
Review
The cementation of indirect restoration is one of the most important steps in prosthetic and restorative dentistry. Cementation aims to bond the prosthetic restoration to the prepared enamel or enamel and dentine. Successful cementation protocols prevent biofilm formation at the margin between tooth and restoration and minimize mechanical and biological complications. With the advancements in dental cements, they have been modified to be versatile in terms of handling, curing, and bond strengths. This review presents updates on dental cements, focusing on the composition, properties, advantages, limitations, and indications of the various cements available. Currently, dental restorations are made from various biomaterials, and depending on each clinical case, an appropriate luting material will be selected. There is no luting material that can be universally used. Therefore, it is important to distinguish the physical, mechanical, and biological properties of luting materials in order to identify the best options for each case. Nowadays, the most commonly used dental cements are glass-ionomer and resin cement. The type, shade, thickness of resin cement and the shade of the ceramic, all together, have a tangible influence on the final restoration color. Surface treatments of the restoration increase the microtensile bond strength. Hence, the proper surface treatment protocol of both the substrate and restoration surfaces is needed before cementation. Additionally, the manufacturer's instructions for the thin cement-layer thickness are important for the long-term success of the restoration.
Topics: Materials Testing; Resin Cements; Biocompatible Materials; Glass Ionomer Cements; Cementation; Dental Cements; Surface Properties; Composite Resins
PubMed: 36838607
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28041619 -
Journal of the American Dental... Aug 2022Grossman described the ideal properties of root canal sealers. The International Organization for Standardization and American National Standards Institute and American... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Grossman described the ideal properties of root canal sealers. The International Organization for Standardization and American National Standards Institute and American Dental Association have codified some of his requirements in ISO 6876 and ANSI/ADA 57, respectively. In this narrative review, the authors combined the ideal Grossman properties and requirements of these standards, emphasizing the newer tricalcium silicate cement sealers. This chemical matrix for such sealers was developed on the basis of the success of bioactive mineral trioxide aggregate-type (tricalcium silicate cement) materials for enhanced sealing and bioactivity.
METHODS
The authors searched the internet and databases using Medical Subject Heading terms and then conducted a narrative review of those articles involving the tricalcium silicate cement endodontic sealers.
RESULTS
Ninety-four articles were identified that discussed tricalcium silicate cement sealers. Tricalcium silicate cement sealers are partially antimicrobial and have bioactivity, which may presage improved biological sealing of the root canal system. Most other properties of tricalcium silicate cement sealers are comparable with traditional root canal sealers.
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitations of this review, tricalcium silicate cement endodontic sealers met many of the criteria for ideal properties, such as placement, antimicrobial properties, and bioactivity, but limitations were noted in solubility, dimensional stability (shrinkage and expansion), and retrievability.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
Tricalcium silicate-based cements have been commercialized as bioactive, bioceramic endodontic sealers. Warm, cold, and single-cone obturation techniques are usable, depending on the commercial product. Some sealers can cause discoloration and are not easily retrievable, particularly when used to completely obturate a canal.
Topics: Calcium Compounds; Dental Cements; Glass Ionomer Cements; Humans; Materials Testing; Root Canal Filling Materials; Silicates
PubMed: 35260235
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2022.01.004 -
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative... Oct 2023Currently, a classification of resin cements that includes relatively recently formulated ("universal") cements is lacking. Furthermore, the terminology used to define... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Currently, a classification of resin cements that includes relatively recently formulated ("universal") cements is lacking. Furthermore, the terminology used to define different resin cements in the scientific reports is inconsistent. Accordingly, this work aims to: (i) propose a novel classification of resin composite cements; (ii) disambiguate the term "universal cements" and (iii) present an overview of the properties of these cements.
METHODS
An analysis of peer-reviewed literature (PubMed search), as well as market research on definitive resin composite cements were performed.
RESULTS
A tendency toward simplified and versatile luting materials was observed both in the scientific literature and on the dental market with the advent of self-adhesive/one-step resin cements. However, additional priming procedures were necessary to improve their bonding performance in certain clinical situations. Hence, several cements that can be applied both in adhesive and self-adhesive mode were introduced. These cements are associated with a universal adhesive resin, that can be used as a tooth and/or restorative material primer, without the need for other priming systems, regardless of the substrate. These systems should be considered truly universal. Therefore, we hereby suggested a new classification of resin-based cements: (1) adhesive/multi-step; (2) self-adhesive/one-step; (3) universal cements (one- or multi-step). Despite promising in vitro results, clinical trials and long-track laboratory studies are necessary to confirm the reliability of the universal cements.
CONCLUSIONS
This review presented the current advances in the field of resin-based cements, which are reflected in the proposed classification. The term "universal cement" was disambiguated, which will help standardize the terminology used in published research.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
The classification of resin-based cements and a better understanding of the proper terminology will help standardize the terminology in published research, as well as improve the understanding of the clinical practitioners of the different indications and possible modalities of use of the available cements.
Topics: Resin Cements; Reproducibility of Results; Dental Bonding; Materials Testing; Composite Resins; Dental Cements; Surface Properties
PubMed: 36924395
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13036 -
The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2020This literature-based OPINION PAPER reflects in an introductory historical perspective on the rapid advancement of dental adhesive technology. Past and current...
This literature-based OPINION PAPER reflects in an introductory historical perspective on the rapid advancement of dental adhesive technology. Past and current techniques to bond to tooth tissue, in particular to dentin as the most challenging bonding substrate, are critically appraised. Including the historical perspective in (1), this paper focuses on fourteen items thought to be of primary importance with regard to the current status of dental adhesive technology. In (2) the primary mechanisms involved in adhesion to enamel and especially dentin are dealt with having (3) also revisited the previously introduced adhesion-decalcification concept (AD concept) as basis of biomaterial-hard tissue interaction; the worldwide accepted classification of today's adhesives into etch&rinse (E&R) and self-etch (SE) adhesives are presented in (4), along with presentation of their respective PLUS-MINUS balances in (5) and (6); nomination of the GOLD-STANDARD E&R (7) and SE (8) adhesives is based on evidence of successful laboratory and long-term clinical performance, resulting in a recommended 3-step full E&R bonding route in (9) and the preferred 3-step combined selective enamel E&R with 2-SE bonding route in (10); (11) description of the main bond-degradation pathways and eight strategies to preserve bond stability; (12) coverage of the PROS and CONS of the newest generation of UNIVERSAL adhesives. Looking into the future, some expected future developments in dental adhesive technology have been suggested in (13), along with (14) a first status determination of the latest research-and-development towards self-adhesive restorative materials that no longer require any pre-treatment.
Topics: Dental Bonding; Dental Cements; Dentin; Dentin-Bonding Agents; Materials Testing; Resin Cements
PubMed: 32030373
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a43994 -
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative... Jun 2022This study aims to evaluate and compare the film thickness obtained with a resin cement and two composite resins, preheated and/or ultrasonically vibrated, as luting...
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to evaluate and compare the film thickness obtained with a resin cement and two composite resins, preheated and/or ultrasonically vibrated, as luting agents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
One hundred and twenty-six (126) pairs of resin discs were randomly assigned to six experimental groups (n = 21) according to luting agent (Variolink Esthetic LC, IPS Empress Direct or Estelite Omega) and cementation technique (preheating at 68°C and/or ultrasonic vibration). Specimens were luted by applying a controlled force. Following sectioning and film thickness measurement through field emission gun scanning electron microscopy, statistical analysis was carried out considering a 5% significance level.
RESULTS
Statistically significant lower film thickness was observed in Variolink Esthetic LC group when compared to all composite resin groups (p < 0.001), except IPS Empress Direct preheated and ultrasonically vibrated group (p = 0.073). IPS Empress Direct with ultrasonic vibration yielded statistically lower film thickness values than Estelite Omega groups, regardless of luting technique (p < 0.05). Ultrasonically vibrated Estelite Omega groups showed statistically lower film thickness values than solely preheated groups (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Both Variolink Esthetic LC and IPS Empress Direct preheated and ultrasonically vibrated provided the lowest film thickness. The addition of ultrasonic vibration during cementation proved to be effective in reducing film thickness of both tested composite resins.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
The cementation technique will have variable results depending on the luting material. Adhesive cementation protocols with composite resins should mainly consider ultrasonic vibration, but also preheating, as strategies for reducing film thickness. The tested resin cement, alongside with IPS Empress Direct composite resin preheated and ultrasonically vibrated, provided the lowest film thickness among the tested materials and techniques.
Topics: Cementation; Composite Resins; Dental Bonding; Dental Cements; Dental Porcelain; Materials Testing; Resin Cements; Surface Properties; Random Allocation
PubMed: 34897958
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12851 -
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Jul 2023Screwmentable prostheses were developed to combine the benefits of screw retention and cement retention. However, data are limited on the clinical performance of this... (Review)
Review
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Screwmentable prostheses were developed to combine the benefits of screw retention and cement retention. However, data are limited on the clinical performance of this type of prosthesis.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this systematic review was to collect scientific evidence on screwmentable prostheses and evaluate their long-term clinical behavior.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
An electronic search was conducted by 2 independent reviewers for articles published in scientific dental journals in English from 2004 to April 2020. The search strategy followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were scientific studies concerning the screwmentable type of prosthesis.
RESULTS
The search provided 494 records. Of these, 24 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The included articles presented significant heterogeneity concerning the manufacturing process and the materials used. One randomized clinical trial, 2 prospective clinical studies, 14 in vitro studies, 3 protocol descriptions, 1 case series, and 3 case reports were included.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the systematic search of the literature, it is concluded that the screwmentable prosthesis combines advantages of both cement-retained and screw-retained restorations, including passive fit, retrievability, excess cement control, tissue-friendly emergence profile, and improved esthetics. Nevertheless, data from well-designed clinical trials are limited, and further research is required to provide evidence on their long-term clinical behavior.
Topics: Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis Retention; Prospective Studies; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Esthetics, Dental; Dental Cements; Glass Ionomer Cements; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34740460
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.027 -
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of... Dec 2021Biodentine is a calcium silicate/calcium carbonate/zirconium dioxide/water-based dental replacement biomaterial, significantly outperforming the stiffness and hardness...
Biodentine is a calcium silicate/calcium carbonate/zirconium dioxide/water-based dental replacement biomaterial, significantly outperforming the stiffness and hardness properties of chemically similar construction cement pastes. We here report the first systematic micromechanical investigation of Biodentine, combining grid nanoindentation with ultrasonic testing and micromechanical modeling. Histograms of nanoindentation-probed hardness and elastic modulus, comprising more than 5700 values each, are very well represented by the superposition of three log-normal distributions (LNDs). Most of the data (74%) belong to the intermediate LND, representing highly dense calcite-reinforced hydration products with on-average more than 60GPa elastic modulus and 3GPa hardness. The remaining data refer, on the one hand, to lower density hydration products, and on the other hand, to single-micron-sized unhydrated clinker and zirconium-dioxide inclusions. Micromechanical homogenization of these three material phases delivers elastic properties of the overall cement paste material, which significantly exceed those probed by more than 300 ultrasonic tests performed in the kHz and MHz regime. This indicates the presence of micro-defects, which slightly weaken the otherwise highly optimized biomaterial system.
Topics: Calcium Carbonate; Construction Materials; Glass Ionomer Cements; Hardness; Water
PubMed: 34634693
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104863 -
Dental Materials : Official Publication... Nov 2022A low-shrinkage-stress resin-based cement with antibacterial properties could be beneficial to create a cement with lower stress at the tooth-restoration interface,...
OBJECTIVE
A low-shrinkage-stress resin-based cement with antibacterial properties could be beneficial to create a cement with lower stress at the tooth-restoration interface, which could help to enhance the longevity of the fixed dental restoration by reducing microleakage and recurrent caries. To date, there has been no report on the development of a low-shrinkage-stress and bio-interactive cement. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to develop a novel low-shrinkage-stress resin-based cement containing dimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylate (DMAHDM) and investigate the mechanical and antibacterial properties for the first time.
METHODS
The monomers urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) and triethylene glycol divinylbenzyl ether (TEG-DVBE) were combined and denoted as UV resin. Three cements were fabricated: (1) UV+ 0%DMAHDM (experimental control); (2) UV+ 3%DMAHDM, (3) UV+ %5DMAHDM. RelyX Ultimate cement was used as commercial control. Mechanical properties and Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) biofilms growth on cement were evaluated.
RESULTS
The novel bio-interactive cement demonstrated excellent antibacterial and mechanical properties. Compared to commercial and experimental controls, adding DMAHDM into the UV cement significantly reduced colony forming unit (CFU) counts by approximately 7 orders of magnitude, metabolic activities from 0.29 ± 0.03 A/cm to 0.01 ± 0.01 A/cm, and lactic acid production from 22.3 ± 0.74 mmol/L to 1.2 ± 0.27 mmol/L (n = 6) (p < 0.05). The low-shrinkage-stress cement demonstrated a high degree of conversion of around 70 %, while reducing the shrinkage stress by approximately 60%, compared to a commercial control (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The new antibacterial low-shrinkage-stress resin-based cement provides strong antibacterial action and maintains excellent mechanical properties with reduced polymerization shrinkage stress.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
A low-shrinkage-stress resin-based cement containing DMAHDM was developed with potent antibacterial effects and promising mechanical properties. This cement may potentially enhance the longevity of fixed dental restoration such as a dental crown, inlay, onlay, and veneers through its excellent mechanical properties, low shrinkage stress, and strong antibacterial properties.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biofilms; Dental Cements; Dental Materials; Ethers; Lactic Acid; Methacrylates; Methylamines; Resin Cements
PubMed: 36115699
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.08.005 -
Clinical and Experimental Dental... Dec 2023The aim of this study was to review the selection criteria of resin cements for different types of partial coverage restorations (PCRs) and investigate if the type of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to review the selection criteria of resin cements for different types of partial coverage restorations (PCRs) and investigate if the type of restorations or restorative materials affect the type of selected resin cement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An electronic search (1991-2023) was performed in PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases by combinations of related keywords.
RESULTS
A total of 68 articles were included to review the selection criteria based on the advantages, disadvantages, indications, and performance of resin cements for different types of PCRs.
CONCLUSIONS
The survival and success of PCRs are largely affected by appropriate cement selection. Self-curing and dual-curing resin cements have been recommended for the cementation of metallic PCRs. The PCRs fabricated from thin, translucent, and low-strength ceramics could be adhesively bonded by light-cure conventional resin cements. Self-etching and self-adhesive cements, especially dual-cure types, are not generally indicated for laminate veneers.
Topics: Resin Cements; Ceramics; Dental Cements; Cementation
PubMed: 37427500
DOI: 10.1002/cre2.761 -
Australian Endodontic Journal : the... Dec 2023The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of resin cement material types on tooth with endocrown and onlay restorations. The first molar was scanned using...
The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of resin cement material types on tooth with endocrown and onlay restorations. The first molar was scanned using Micro-CT and underwent a modelling process to obtain the 3D model for computational simulation. Eight models were simulated in the current study with two loading conditions (720N vertical load and 200N oblique load), two types of restoration (onlay and endocrown restorations), and two resin cement variants (dual-cure resin cement and light-cure resin cement). The tooth with onlay restoration showed a significant stress reduction (up to 70%) when using light-cure resin cement compared to dual-cure resin cement. In contrast, types of cement did not affect stress distribution in the tooth with endocrown restoration. The current study found that dual-cure resin cement was preferable in Endocrown and Onlay restorations, due to dual-cure resin cement provided better bond strength compared to light-cure resin cement.
Topics: Crowns; Resin Cements; Finite Element Analysis; Dental Stress Analysis; Inlays; Materials Testing; Composite Resins
PubMed: 37789568
DOI: 10.1111/aej.12800